Bug#298964: marked as done (atris: contains non-free fonts)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Mar 2005 03:22:52 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in NMU of atris 1.0.7.dfsg1-0.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Not patched

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 295415 - patch Bug#295415: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#299282: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Package: gjdoc Version: 0.7.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable Hi! There is a typo in gjdoc.sh.in: The jars are installed to /usr/share/java/, not /usr/share/java/ext/. Due to this gjdoc fails to run reproducably. The (trivial) patch is attached. Regards,

Processed: retitle 299282 to gjdoc.sh.in: wrong classpath

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 retitle 299282 gjdoc.sh.in: wrong classpath Bug#299282: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Processed: See gjdoc#299282: gjdoc.sh.in: wrong classpath

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package junit Ignoring bugs not assigned to: junit tag 297664 + patch Bug#297664: junit: FTBFS: gjdoc errors There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#297664: See gjdoc#299282: gjdoc.sh.in: wrong classpath

package junit tag 297664 + patch thanks Currently, this bug depends on resolving gjdoc#299282, which is the (current) cause for not building the documentation in junit. Regards, David -- - hallo... wie gehts heute? - *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch* - gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein

Bug#298955: gnurobbo: contains non-free font

Dnia 13-03-2005, nie o godzinie 00:23 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld napisa(a): I've prepared an example patch for this (attached). The patch is not fully tested with regard to time-skew issues due to the Makefile.* changes. The fact that you also need to prepare a orig.tar.gz without the font

Processed: Re: Bug#298967: NMU to fix non-free font RC bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 298967 - fixed Bug#298967: bglibs-doc: contains non-free font Tags were: fixed Tags removed: fixed tags 298967 + sid Bug#298967: bglibs-doc: contains non-free font There were no tags set. Tags added: sid quit Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#298967: NMU to fix non-free font RC bug

tags 298967 - fixed tags 298967 + sid quit On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 06:22:42PM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote: I am uploading a revised version of this package that removes the non-free font to close this RC bug, the only difference is to remove the font, as it doesn't seem to be used at all. Hi

Bug#284925: ??????????????????????

=?GB2312?B?SA==?= To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain;charset=EUC Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:09:25 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: FoxMail 4.0 beta 2 [cn] ƒTƒCƒt‚È‚­‚µ‚¿‚á‚Á‚½‚èA”ޏ—‚â”ÞŽ‚ƃPƒ“ƒJ‚µ‚¿‚á‚Á‚½‚è D‚«‚Ȑl‚ɍ”’‚µ‚½‚̂Ƀtƒ‰‚ê‚¿‚á‚Á‚½‚è‚»‚ñ‚È‚Æ‚« ‚ 

Bug#299291: gnome-games: depends on libhowl-dev

Subject: gnome-games: depends on libhowl-dev Package: gnome-games Version: 1:2.8.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source *** Please type your report below this line *** libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libhowl.la' make[4]: *** [gnect] Error 1 make[4]:

Bug#298615: will solve by itself

This bug will just get solved with the next kdelibs upload, which will happen soon. -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Listening to: Astrud - Vamos al amor (¿Cómo voy a saberlo?) As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

Bug#299291: gnome-games: depends on libhowl-dev

Le dimanche 13 mars 2005 12:36 +0100, Daniel van Eeden a crit : Subject: gnome-games: depends on libhowl-dev Package: gnome-games Version: 1:2.8.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source *** Please type your report below this line *** libtool: link: cannot find

Processed: tagging 297771

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 297771 patch Bug#297771: files missing in directory listing from smbclient 'dir' command with windows xp server There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message,

Processed: tagging 297771

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 297771 fixed-upstream Bug#297771: files missing in directory listing from smbclient 'dir' command with windows xp server Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-upstream End of

Processed: bug 297771 is forwarded to https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2271

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 forwarded 297771 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2271 Bug#297771: files missing in directory listing from smbclient 'dir' command with windows xp server Noted your

Bug#299291: gnome-games: depends on libhowl-dev

On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 13:04 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: What if you try to build it with the latest versions of libgnomeui-dev and libgnomevfs2-dev installed? That didn't help. Installing libhowl-dev did solve the problem. So libhowl-dev should be added to the build depends. -- Daniel van

Bug#299291: gnome-games: depends on libhowl-dev

Le dimanche 13 mars 2005 13:30 +0100, Daniel van Eeden a crit : On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 13:04 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: What if you try to build it with the latest versions of libgnomeui-dev and libgnomevfs2-dev installed? That didn't help. Installing libhowl-dev did solve the problem.

Bug#299299: smart: FTBFS: python not found due to new default python

Package: smart Version: 0.28-7 Severity: serious Hi, building the package smart in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] ii sysv-rc2.86.ds1-1 Standard boot mechanism using

Bug#299300: rebuild without libhowl0 dep

Package: gdm Version: 2.6.0.6-1 Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free Please rebuild gdm withouth the libhowl0 dependency as howl is moving to non-free. Sjoerd -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture:

Bug#299308: Depends on libhowl0

Package: vino Version: 2.8.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free Hi, As discussed on irc, vino on at least ppc depends on libhowl0. Which is unfortunately non-free. For now it seems the best solution is to add --as-needed to you LDFLAGS. Sjoerd -- System

Processed: tagging 299273

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 299273 sid Bug#299273: lineakd: package overlap with dvb-utils There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: tagging 299018

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 299018 sid Bug#299018: antlr: No rule to make target `/skole/tjener/home0/pere/src/debian/java/antlr-2.7.5/scripts/../lib/cpp/Makefile.in' There were no tags set. Tags added: sid

Bug#297771: patch

Attaching a patch which is the result of the two upstream svn commits, applied cleanly to Debian's clilist.c, and reran diff. Justin --- clilist.c 2005-03-13 09:29:52.541928856 -0500 +++ old/clilist.c 2005-03-13 09:30:02.151467984 -0500 @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ setup =

Bug#298965: afterstep: contains non-free font

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi, If 2.0.4 will include other significant changes besides the removal of the fonts, this is really not the time in the release cycle to be packaging new upstream releases to fix RC bugs that can easily be fixed in other ways. And what is the time

Processed: tagging 296243

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 296243 patch Bug#296243: autofs: init script fails if entry in nsswitch.conf contains tabs Tags were: sarge Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#299316: rsnapshot: FTBFS: aclocal-1.4 missing

Package: rsnapshot Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package rsnapshot in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] checking for rsync... /usr/bin/rsync checking for cp...

Bug#298731: what am i missing?

The webdefault.xml references: http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd Which in turn references a few other schema documents ... including http://www.ibm.com/webservices/xsd/j2ee_web_services_client_1_1.xsd Unfortunately our friends at IBM appear to have removed this document. I do

Bug#296029: Current status?

Hi all. What is the current status of this bug? It was forwarded to the GNOME bugzilla, but marked NOTABUG there. The last comment from the bugzilla is three weeks old already. Will this bug be fixed in the Debian packages never-the-less or will the upstream opinion be accepted that this is a bug

Bug#298731: unreproducable

I am not able to reproduce this bug. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#298731: can you still reproduce this?

Are you still getting this bug, I looked at http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd and I don't see a reference to ibm.com anywhere. I tried to reproduce it here and failed. stew signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#299223: webmin-firewall bug

Hi, You recently reported a bug [0] against Debian's pacakge of webmin-firewall. Could you report which version of iptables you have installed? Thanks, Justin References [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=278916 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#299223: webmin-firewall bug

Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2005, 11:01 -0500 schrieb Justin Pryzby: Hi, You recently reported a bug [0] against Debian's pacakge of webmin-firewall. Could you report which version of iptables you have installed? I am using version 1.2.11-8 (Debian sarge system) --

Processed: Re: Bug#299223: webmin-firewall bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 299223 iptables Bug#299223: webmin-firewall: not functional module Bug reassigned from package `webmin-firewall' to `iptables'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#299223: webmin-firewall bug

reassign 299223 iptables thanks On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 05:43:11PM +0100, Thilo Pfennig wrote: Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2005, 11:01 -0500 schrieb Justin Pryzby: Hi, You recently reported a bug [0] against Debian's pacakge of webmin-firewall. Could you report which version of iptables you

Bug#299248: cddb lookup buffer overflow (CAN-2005-0706)

Thanks Joey. I will prepare new packages immediately. (B (BJoey Hess wrote: (B Package: grip (B Severity: grave (B Tags: security patch (B (B Buffer overflow in discdb.c for grip 3.1.2 allows attackers to cause a (B denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code by

Bug#296029: Current status?

severity 296029 important thanks Le dimanche 13 mars 2005 16:40 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld a crit : Hi all. What is the current status of this bug? It was forwarded to the GNOME bugzilla, but marked NOTABUG there. The last comment from the bugzilla is three weeks old already. Will this bug

Processed: severity of 296029 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 296029 important Bug#296029: GtkIconCache doesn't notice that new icons were installed Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#298967: NMU to fix non-free font RC bug

Hi Micah, while I appreciate your efforts, this NMU unfortunately was unnecessary, the current bglibs packages in sarge are fine. Hi Gerrit, I should've noted in the NMU that I did this because of the BSP this weekend, we are trying to resolve as many RC bugs as possible. I suspected that

Processed: reassign 299223 to webmin-firewall

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 reassign 299223 webmin-firewall Bug#299223: webmin-firewall: not functional module Bug reassigned from package `iptables' to `webmin-firewall'. End of message, stopping processing

Bug#299291: gnome-games: depends on libhowl-dev

On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 13:42 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: What is the output of grep howl /usr/lib/*.la ? $ grep howl /usr/lib/*.la /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.la:dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.la /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.la

Bug#299233: conffile

It should not be a conffile, since it is created/modified by postinst. But also, I don't really follow what the postinst is doing. # This writes to $CONFIG if [ ! -e $CONFIG ]; then echo templatedir= $CONFIG fi # But this later overwrites it, unconditionally, so I don't see the # point

Bug#299223: webmin-firewall bug

On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:51:48AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: reassign 299223 iptables why? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#298731: can you still reproduce this?

Hi Stew, This is what my guys tell me: ---snip--- The problem was (and it still is) in the web.xml files that must have as validation a dtd file from http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd   If you look there you'll find that includes other files and one of the is j2ee_1_4.xsd; If you

Processed: phpBB bugs fixed in revision r186

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Fixed in r186 by jeroen tag 298690 + pending Bug#298690: CAN-2005-0673: cross-site scripting attack (in usercp_register.php) Tags were: security Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Processed: severity of 295131 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 # upgrading severity until maintainer has commented on it severity 295131 grave Bug#295131: scorched3d: Does not run:Segmentation Fault Severity set to `grave'. End of message,

Bug#299291: marked as done (gnome-games: depends on libhowl-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:02:54 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299291: gnome-games: depends on libhowl-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#278282: marked as done (multiple insecure temporary file vulnerabilities)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:02:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#278282: fixed in gs-common 0.3.7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#298690: phpBB bugs fixed in revision r186

# Fixed in r186 by jeroen tag 298690 + pending thanks These bugs are fixed in revision 186 by jeroen Log message: * [CAN-2005-0673] Fix cross-side-scripting in private message signatures and in normal posts when users has enabled HTML despite board prohibition, based on anonymous patch on

Processed: Re: Bug#299313: henplus: FTBFS: assertion failed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 299313 normal Bug#299313: henplus: FTBFS: assertion failed Severity set to `normal'. tags 299313 unreproducible Bug#299313: henplus: FTBFS: assertion failed There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#264283: marked as done (vertex: FTBFS: compile errors)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:17:14 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#264283: fixed in vertex 0.1.14-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#299313: henplus: FTBFS: assertion failed

severity 299313 normal tags 299313 unreproducible thanks On Sunday 13 of March 2005 15:01, Roland Stigge wrote: kaffe-bin: /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/kaffe/kaff evm/kaffe-gc/gc-incremental.c:1305: gcFree: Assertion `!!!Attempt to explicitly free nonfixed

Bug#299338: policycoreutils: FTBFS due to undeclared functions

Package: policycoreutils Version: 1.22-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Automatic build of policycoreutils_1.22-1 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libselinux1-dev (= 1.14-1), libpam0g-dev, libsepol1-dev, file, gettext

Bug#299248: marked as done (cddb lookup buffer overflow (CAN-2005-0706))

Your message dated Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:32:07 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299248: fixed in grip 3.2.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#299339: fusermount -u can set arbitrary permissions on /etc/mtab

Package: fuse-utils Version: 2.2-3 Severity: critical Tags: security On unmount, fusermount doesn't reset the permissions on the new /etc/mtab. It ends up having the permissions given in the user's umask, and belonging to the user's group. This is fixed in upstream CVS. [mount ~/mnt with any

Processed: tagging 299337

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 299337 sid Bug#299337: checkpolicy: FTBFS due to undeclared functions Tags were: sid Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#299308: Depends on libhowl0

On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 02:29:39PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: Package: vino Version: 2.8.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free As discussed on irc, vino on at least ppc depends on libhowl0. Which is unfortunately non-free. For now it seems the best solution

Bug#299223: webmin-firewall bug

On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 06:55:30PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:51:48AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: reassign 299223 iptables why? Because I originally thought it looked like the grave iptables bug (tagged woody), but when I reread it with the reporter's iptables

Bug#289646: On-the-Fly spell checking causing kbabel to crash

Hello Stanislav, we received in Debian a bug report claiming that KBabel crashed with a certain .po file, and that it seemed to be related to on-the-fly spell checking. You can read the full discussion at [1]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/289646 The crash is reproducible for me when

Bug#299370: xlibs: the keyboard is useless in X on Ultra 1 Creator

Package: xlibs Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software I have installed X on a Sun Ultra 1 with Creator graphics. The keyboard works fine in framebuffer, but fails in X: it prints different characters. This problem makes X and any other gui software

Processed: severity of 299370 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 299370 important Bug#299370: xlibs: the keyboard is useless in X on Ultra 1 Creator Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#299372: wordpress: Update shows blank front page

Package: wordpress Version: 1.5.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Apparently letting it install the index.php that came with the upgrade I now found on the server makes it only show an empty front page. Looks like index.php is stripped of most of its contents. Was

Bug#299378: wordpress: Updated package doesn't update database

Package: wordpress Version: 1.5.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After updating wordpress to a newer version, the database format seems to have changed. However, the package doesn't upgrade the database, and after a wordpress upgrade, it's impossible to post new

Bug#299316: The Log.

See Attachment. -- I: using fakeroot in build. pbuilder-buildpackage/i386 $Id: pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs,v 1.15 2005/01/04 01:47:18 dancer Exp $ $Id: pbuilder-buildpackage,v 1.110 2005/01/04 01:47:18 dancer Exp $ Current time: Sun Mar 13 14:03:45 CET 2005 pbuilder-time-stamp: 1110719025

Bug#299381: rails: FTBFS: missing Build-Depends: rdoc

Package: rails Version: 0.10.1-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, building the package rails in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] chmod 755

Bug#298731: can you still reproduce this?

Stew, My programmer tells me: The real problem is something else. The web.xml files have to be validated only for 2.4 servlet specification not for 2.3 the version used in debian package. They should change either the webdefaults.xml not to be validated, change the jetty parameter to avoid

Bug#296433: umbrello bug news

Hi, Is there any news on this bug [0]? Its not clear from the bug log that its even present in a version distributed by Debian. (Most importantly: is it present in testing?) Ben, were you using a debian version of the package when you experienced the bug, or one from CVS? Thanks, Justin

Processed: Re: Bug#299378: wordpress: Updated package doesn't update database

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 299378 important Bug#299378: wordpress: Updated package doesn't update database Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#299378: wordpress: Updated package doesn't update database

severity 299378 important thanks Only affects upgrades from versions that were not in sarge; not RC. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:27:40PM +0200, Toni Heinonen wrote: After updating wordpress to a newer version, the database format seems to have changed.

Bug#299316: rsnapshot: FTBFS: aclocal-1.4 missing

On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 08:24:57PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: My experience with similar bugs is that reproduction results can be improved by actually fetching the package (apt-get source ...) from a standard Debian mirror since on the machine of the maintainer in the development directory,

Bug#299381: rails: FTBFS: missing Build-Depends: rdoc

Roland Stigge wrote: rdoc -o doc/app --line-numbers --inline-source --title 'Rails Application Documentation' -T 'html' doc/README_FOR_APP app/helpers/application_helper.rb app/controllers/application.rb (in /tmp/buildd/rails-0.10.1/build) sh: rdoc: command not found Right. I forgot about

Bug#298615: marked as done (kdelibs/mipsel built with a broken g++ (3.3_3.3.5-9) compiler)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Mar 2005 18:17:51 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298615: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.3.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: severity of 298397 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 298397 grave Bug#298397: udevsend breaks firmware downloading Bug#297481: hotplug: Fails to load firmware for ipw2200 after upgrade Bug#297686: udev 0.054-1 fails to load

Bug#299273: marked as done (lineakd: package overlap with dvb-utils)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:32:32 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299273: fixed in lineakd 1:0.8.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#298964: Fixed in NMU of atris 1.0.7.dfsg1-0.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Micah Anderson wrote: | No problem, just working with the Bug Squashing Party trying to close | as many Grave RC bugs as possible this weekend. :) | I would suggest that you contact upstream about this font, because | they probably should not be

Bug#240150: marked as done (eco5000_0.9.8-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: outdated config.guess/config.sub)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:02:37 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#240150: fixed in eco5000 0.9.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#299424: kernel-patch-grsecurity2: apply script only claims version 2.1.3, it applies however version 2.1.2 (on kernel 2.6.11)

Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2 Version: 2.1.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The package includes 3 patches for kernel 2.6.11: - grsecurity-2.1.2-2.6.11 - grsecurity-2.1.3-2.6.11 - pax-linux-2.6.11-200503071330 The last one is included in the middle one, however the

Processed: (no subject)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 299328 serious Bug#299328: streamtuner: segmentation fault during plugin load. Severity set to `serious'. merge 299183 299328 Bug#299183: streamtuner: does not start Bug#299328: streamtuner: segmentation fault during plugin load. Mismatch -

Processed: (no subject)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 299328 streamtuner python2.3-gtk2 Bug#299328: streamtuner: segmentation fault during plugin load. Bug reassigned from package `streamtuner' to `streamtuner python2.3-gtk2'. merge 299328 299183 Bug#299183: streamtuner: does not start

Bug#299441: screen artifacts / widgets not rendering

Package: blender Version: 2.36-1 Severity: grave Bugs 239184 and 291888 seem to refer to an abhorrent behaviour which I also witness - namely that none of the widgets render correctly or at all. I'm setting the severity high as it does render the thing unusable. I am running an X.org server

Processed: severity of 299441 is important, merging 299441 239184

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 299441 important Bug#299441: screen artifacts / widgets not rendering Severity set to `important'. merge 299441 239184 Bug#239184: blender: Blender's interface becoming

Bug#299445: logcheck: invalid regulart expression

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.35 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Command /usr/sbin/logcheck dies with following error message: grep: invalid regular expression -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable')