Package: checkstyle
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'checkstyle' in a clean chroot,
I get the following error:
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is amd64
debian/rules clean
debian/rules:9: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk: No such file or
directory
debian/rules:10:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 299947 unreproducible
Bug#299947: ifplugd: Long networking interruption when updating
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
severity 299947 normal
Bug#299947: ifplugd: Long networking interruption when updating
Severity set to
On Saturday 26 March 2005 09:15, Ben Burton wrote:
Hi again,
At this stage it seems that everyone is happy to go with a dual
QPL/GPL license for cervisia. My question now is how to go forward
with the change.
I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this
shouldn't be
On Saturday 26 March 2005 10:15, Ben Burton wrote:
I'm not sure if Bernd Gehrmann still uses his CVS account. Andras,
would it be in any way possible to find out if Bernd wishes to make
these changes himself, and if not to obtain some form of
authorisation? I'm not sure how formal the KDE
Hi again,
At this stage it seems that everyone is happy to go with a dual QPL/GPL
license for cervisia. My question now is how to go forward with the change.
Thiago has written with the following instructions:
If you people are ok with a dual license, then please place notices in
all your
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 08:46:03AM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Package: checkstyle
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Particularly when filing release-critical bugs against a package, please
include the package version that it's known to apply against.
For FTBFS reports, it is also
Hi,
On mer, mar 16, 2005, David I. Lehn wrote:
* debian/patches/cpuid.patch:
* Patch from upstream to check for cpuid support (Closes: #289362)
Upstream said the initial patch was crap (see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166696), could you backport
a newer patch
I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this
shouldn't be a problem, right?
I don't see why not; from Bernd's reply (courtsey of Andras), he seems
happy with this also.
Ben.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Saturday 26 March 2005 10:36, Ben Burton wrote:
I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this
shouldn't be a problem, right?
I don't see why not; from Bernd's reply (courtsey of Andras), he
seems happy with this also.
Yes, he wrote that if the licensing of the
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: grave
Hello,
when I kill all mozilla-firefox and mozilla instanzes and wipe out the
.mozilla and .firefox directories, mozilla-firefox fails to start with
following message:
Xlib: connection to :0.0 refused by server
Xlib: XDM authorization
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 300787 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#300787: impossible to upgrade makedev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
severity 300787 important
Bug#300787:
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 04:47:09 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#282292: fixed in libgd-perl 1.41-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
I used to use phpWiki on Debian, and I'm wondering exactly what minor
bugs make it unreleasable.
Could you detail, or better, submit bugreports?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 05:02:09 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#282293: fixed in libgd-noxpm-perl 1.41-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-64-smp
Version: 2.6.8-6
Severity: grave
Seen on an A500 SMP system, it works fine with an A500 kernel found
at ftp.parisc-linux.org.
http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/download/linux-2.6/autobuild/a500_defconfig/palinux-a500-defconfig-2.6.8.1-pa11_0-2_all.deb
Just
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 301479 normal
Bug#301479: fails to start w/o config with bogus Xlib error messages
Severity set to `normal'.
forwarded 301479 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246313
Bug#301479: fails to start w/o config with bogus Xlib error
severity 301479 normal
forwarded 301479 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246313
merge 301479 259215
Downgrading to normal, this is workaroundable and doesn't occur for
everybody at anytime.
See upstream bug for a workaround.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 300278 - patch
Bug#300278: defoma: debhelper files fail if defoma is removed before package
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Package: linphone
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
linphone and linphonec segfault on startup
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-ck5
Locale:
Package: dbconfig-common
Version: 1.5
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
I've builded a new package (mydms) with dbconfig-common dependence in a
debootstrap chroot and fails executing ucf, I've seen dbconfig-common uses it
and it's not on dependences.
Another dependence: mysql-client |
tags 300522 sid
thanks
This bug only shows up in sid, where gettext has been upgraded to version
0.14.2-1. The AM_LC_MESSAGES macro has been renamed to gt_LC_MESSAGES in
this version, and gal expects this macro to be available from an external
source.
Currently, the best fix for this is to
Hi Bastian,
Has anything been done with Horms' suggestion to work around this in the
s390 kernel-headers package for sarge? Should this bug be reassigned to
kernel-image-2.6.8-s390?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Do I need to add a copyright since I did the kparts port?
Rich.
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:02:25 +0200, Andras Mantia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 26 March 2005 10:36, Ben Burton wrote:
I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this
shouldn't be a problem,
Hi,
Could you please attach a test case to this bug because I can't
reproduce it using the testsuite (after converting the .jpg file
to .png and changing the relevant reference).
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark Hymers, University of Newcastle Medical School
Intercalating Medical Student (MBBS / PhD)
I can't reproduce a segfault here when building this package; what I *do*
get appears to be an error identical to bug #301267.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: bcel, ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious
Hi,
The bcel_5.1.orig.tar.gz seems to be missing from the archive.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
tags 282873 pending
Bug#282873: nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc
Tags were: sarge
Bug#289150: nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc
Tags added: pending
End of message,
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 07:17:14 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301038: fixed in imagefs 1.03-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: mdadm
Version: 1.9.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #294404
Hello,
I've been trying to setup md-raid on a system using udev and ran
across the problem described in this bug. AFAICS udev won't
create device nodes as long as there is no device initialized in
the kernel. OTOH mdadm insists on having
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 301508 + sid
Bug#301508: cantlr: Depends on libgcc1 from experimental.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: sysklogd
Version: 1.4.1-16
Severity: grave
Justification: breaks the whole system
References:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/26/37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103392
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/21/208
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/2/17
Syslogd can hang if
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:29:20 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the Debian Bug report #298930,
regarding tulip: contains non-free fonts
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) David Auber [EMAIL PROTECTED].
(NB: If you are a system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 301511 patch
Bug#301511: sysklogd: hangs the whole system
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.12
tags 247192 + patch
Bug#247192: gnome-pim: uninstallable due to conflict with gnome-pim-conduits
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hi,
Dino Puller wrote:
Package: linphone
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
linphone and linphonec segfault on startup
Argl. Could you please send me a stack trace to see where the problem
is? You can do that by:
% gdb linphone
(gdb) r
Package: gnome-pim
Followup-For: Bug #247192
Hello.
Because seems that gnome-pim include now old gnome-pim-conduits
(disappeared from archive), here is a little patch to fix the RC bug.
--- debian/control.orig 2005-03-26 14:10:35.178294248 +0100
+++ debian/control 2005-03-26
Package: clamsmtp
Version: 1.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Installing clamsmtp on sarge throws up error as /var/lib/ucf/cache isn't
there and there is nobody to create it. That renders package
uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 301213 ipop3: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails (grep)
Bug#301213: ipopd: Upgrading to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails You already have
/etc/ssl/certs/ipop3d.pem
Changed Bug title.
reassign 301213 uw-imapd,ipopd
Bug#301213: ipop3: upgrade to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 301494 sid
Bug#301494: linphone and linphonec segfault on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: giftui
Verison: 0.4.1-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
if i386-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DXTHREADS
-I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 285046 serious
Bug#285046: wmkbd: FTBFS: g++ internal compiler error
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:04:38 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#223188: NMU Patch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 301333 pending
Bug#301333: php4-rrdtool: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:32:38 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300928: fixed in socketapi 1.3.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 2 drives.
I'm not really sure what to say. None of that code has been modified in
any of the hppa patches.
Are you sure the device labels are correct? mdadm shows /dev/md0
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:32:37 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#295902: fixed in socketapi 1.3.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
severity 301489 normal
thanks
Kyle McMartin writes:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 2 drives.
I'm not really sure what to say. None of that code has been modified in
any of the hppa patches.
Are
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 301494 + upstream
Bug#301494: linphone and linphonec segfault on startup
Tags were: sid
Tags added: upstream
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Arturas Slajus wrote:
Installing clamsmtp on sarge throws up error as /var/lib/ucf/cache
isn't there and there is nobody to create it. That renders package
uninstallable.
I am unable to reproduce this error. This is very strange, indeed. I
cannot
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Dimitri Chausson wrote:
Package: xscreensaver
Version: 4.16-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Until now, I could reproduce this bug on kernel 2.6.8 and 2.6.11. It
seems independant from the desktop/window manager (tried
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:26:41AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
I'm not convinced that this is actually a bug in defoma; the trouble is that
the failure happens in the fontconfig *pre*rm script, and fontconfig depends
on defoma -- so how is it possible that defoma's files have been removed
---BeginMessage---
Hi Tomas,
You contacted me a while back about the roleplaying package, which I
have set to ITA. Your last comment on bug 246486 was that fixing it
and bringing it up to date would be the be difficult, and perhaps the
package should just be removed.
I think that's a good
* Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Until now, I could reproduce this bug on kernel 2.6.8 and 2.6.11. It
seems independant from the desktop/window manager (tried under
Gnome, XFce)
Step 1: Start xscreensaver-demo
Step 2: choose Hyperball, click on preview
After a while, the system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 301531 normal
Bug#301531: xscreensaver: Hyperball causes system crash
Severity set to `normal'.
severity normal 301531
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:17:41 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299455: fixed in svn-workbench 1.1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi
Could you confirm that the ucf pacakge is not installed on your
box.
$ dpkg -l ucf
A workaround would be to install it before retrying to
install/upgrade clamsmtp. Please test ucf before.
Maye clamsmtp use ucf but miss a dependency on it.
Cheers
Alban
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: sgcontrol
Version: 0.3cvs-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to build 'sgcontrol', I get the following error:
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 ./configure --host=x86_64-linux --build=x86_64-linux
--prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:3.4.0-0pre2
Severity: critical
Tags: experimental
Justification: breaks the whole system
I have been using kde 3.4 for a couple of weeks now. I have just done an
aptitude
update today, although I am not 100% sure whether this package got updated in
this
update
This one time, at band camp, Chad Walstrom said:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Arturas Slajus wrote:
Installing clamsmtp on sarge throws up error as /var/lib/ucf/cache
isn't there and there is nobody to create it. That renders package
uninstallable.
I am unable to reproduce
Hi
do you think such a configuration layer should depends on every
database interface ?
Wouldn't it be cleaner to have the package using dbconfig depends
on the database it can work with and have test in dbconfig to
only show option regarding installed databases (or databases
detectable via the
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:32:46 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301550: fixed in sgcontrol 0.3cvs-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi
|
| do you think such a configuration layer should depends on every
| database interface ?
|
| Wouldn't it be cleaner to have the package using dbconfig depends
| on the database it can work with and have test in dbconfig
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 301560 mdadm
Bug#301560: mounts original /dev under udev /dev: breaks raid systems (others?)
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `mdadm'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
reassign 301560 mdadm
thanks
On Mar 26, Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fix to #294968 moves the original /dev directory from a safe spot
outside of the udev /dev tree to a .static dir inside the udev tree,
only accessable to root. Unfortunately, many programs (such as mdadm)
that
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:51:31 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300874: fixed in lsh-utils 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: python-4suite
Version: 0.99cvs20041008-5
Severity: grave
The output pretty much says it all:
Setting up python-4suite-doc (0.99cvs20041008-5) ...
cannot create dhelp file '/usr/share/doc/python-4suite-doc/html/.dhelp': No
such file or directory
dpkg: error processing python-4suite-doc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-03-2005 14:37, Darren Salt wrote:
I'm seeing exactly the same problem here. The you already have... message
isn't the problem - it's the previous line about the pre-installation script.
This is caused by there being no imap line in
Package: libwxgtk2.4-python
Version: 2.4.2.6
Severity: serious
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libwxgtk2.4-python_2.4.2.6_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/helpviewer', which is also in package
wxpython2.5.3
either wx2.4 needs to conflict with wx2.5, vice
Package: python-4suite
Version: 0.99cvs20041008-5
Severity: grave
The output pretty much says it all:
Setting up python-4suite-doc (0.99cvs20041008-5) ...
cannot create dhelp file '/usr/share/doc/python-4suite-doc/html/.dhelp': No
such file or directory
dpkg: error processing python-4suite-doc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-03-2005 14:37, Darren Salt wrote:
--- uw-imap-2002edebian1.orig/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
+++ uw-imap-2002edebian1/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
#!/bin/sh
-set -e
-
PROGRAM=uw-imapd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301576 sid
Bug#301576: needs to conflict with wx2.5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 300278 important
Bug#300278: defoma: debhelper files fail if defoma is removed before package
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
severity 300278 important
thanks
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 09:34:13AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:26:41AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
I'm not convinced that this is actually a bug in defoma; the trouble is that
the failure happens in the fontconfig *pre*rm script,
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:31:00PM +0100, Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) wrote:
Package: gnome-pim
Followup-For: Bug #247192
Because seems that gnome-pim include now old gnome-pim-conduits
(disappeared from archive), here is a little patch to fix the RC bug.
--- debian/control.orig 2005-03-26
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-03-2005 00:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:43:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 26-03-2005 14:37, Darren Salt wrote:
--- uw-imap-2002edebian1.orig/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
+++
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:16:34 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299168: fixed in python-mysqldb 1.2.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:55 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:55 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
* sabato 26 marzo 2005, alle 15:21, Steve Langasek scrive:
I think you really want a Replaces here, not a Conflicts.
Sorry, my bad.
I've correct my control file with
Replaces: gnome-pim-conduits
Eventually NMU will be correct.
Thank you.
--
Maurizio - Tannoiser -
Package: libgcj-dev
Severity: grave
Version: 4:3.3.5-2
Tags: patch
The libgcj-dev package added in today's gcc-defaults upload is
uninstallable since it Depends on `libgcj4-dev (= 4:3.3.5-2)', but
the actual current version of libgcj4-dev is 1:3.3.5-12. I've
attached a patch which fixes the
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 12:30:19AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 27-03-2005 00:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:43:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
To keep the code compact I'd just append this to the grep lines:
|| true if [ $? \ 2 ]
Do you see a problem
I demand that Jonas Smedegaard may or may not have written...
On 26-03-2005 23:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[snip patch]
I really don't like diabling the set -e completely. Is the problem not
with the grep lines only?
To keep the code compact I'd just append this to the grep lines:
||
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-03-2005 00:34, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 12:30:19AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 27-03-2005 00:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:43:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
To keep the code compact
Package: liblircclient-dev
Version: 0.7.1pre2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is a strange conflict (it is the library itself ...)
Unpacking replacement liblircclient-dev ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/liblircclient-dev_0.7.1pre2-3_i386.deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
severity 299605 important
Bug#299605: libapache-mod-php4 crashes in __kernel_vsyscall
Severity set to `important'.
tags 299605 moreinfo
Bug#299605: libapache-mod-php4 crashes in
Package: lirc-modules-source
Version: 0.7.1pre2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
the packages does not automaticly build with linux 2.6.11
I have the source of my current kernel in /usr/src/linux, but after
configuring lirc-modules-source, he complains
Well i cannot help much about the bug , else the posix standard
online spec is there :
http://www.posix.com/posix.html (faq and permanent link)
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/toc.htm (current
version)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301589 sid
Bug#301589: liblircclient-dev: conflict with libirclient (library)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 301513 serious
Bug#301513: sslwrap: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues: WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is
needed
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
This is caused by the Makefile.in in the package being out-of-date relative
to the configure.in and aclocal.m4 files that are patched in the Debian
diff. This package needs to be repacked with freshly-generated aclocal.m4
and Makefile.in files, to get them in sync and prevent this problem in the
Thank you for reporting bug. I've posted bug report to gcc bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18922
-- Additional Comment #3 From Andrew Pinski 2004-12-10 13:27
[reply] ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18384 ***
tags 301589 pending
thanks
OMG, thanks for reporting this... upload is on the way!
--
.''`. sleep: command not found
: :' :
`. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.10 Ext3)
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
--
To
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
tags 301513 sid
Bug#301513: sslwrap: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues: WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is
needed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301584 sid
Bug#301584: libgcj-dev: Uninstallable: Bad dependency
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 301590 sid pending
Bug#301590: lirc-modules-source: does not accept kernel source
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid, pending
priority 301590 important
Bug#301590: lirc-modules-source: does not accept kernel source
Severity set to
Package: gnome-spell
Version: N/A; reported 2005-03-27
Followup-For: Bug #231483
Sorry but, this reporting seems completely wrong.
aspell package is regolary in woody (and, also in sarge and sid):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy aspell
aspell:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 0.33.7.1.1-9
tags 301590 sid pending
priority 301590 important
thanks
I am downloading priority because the package builds fine with other
kernels Debian ships. See #294174 for the release manager explaining how
this kind of bug is not Release Critical.
--
.''`. sleep: command not found
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:02:23 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301584: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:19:21 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301589: fixed in lirc 0.7.1pre2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: bootcd
Version: 2.47
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Note that I have previously successfully created working
CDs using bootcd on this installation; the following started
happening after an apt-get upgrade a couple of weeks ago.
When the created ISO is booted,
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo