Processed: Re: Bug#307429: ..post-installation of util-vserver_0.30.207-2 dies:lstat(): No such file or directory

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307429 + unreproducible moreinfo help sid Bug#307429: ..post-installation of util-vserver_0.30.207-2 dies:lstat(): No such file or directory Tags were: sid Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo, help, sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#297980: marked as done (gnat-gps: causes the X server to crash when compiling)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 03 May 2005 01:47:21 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297980: fixed in gnat-gps 2.1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#307429: ..post-installation of util-vserver_0.30.207-2 dies:lstat(): No such file or directory

2005-05-03 Thread Ola Lundqvist
tags 307429 + unreproducible moreinfo help sid thanks Hello On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:57:34AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.207-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable ...note that this dist-upgrade was done immediately after a

Bug#306499: state of investigations

2005-05-03 Thread Yann Dirson
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:14:48PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: I'll have to add a Replaces line on the -4 packages to allow for a smooth upgrade. Uhm... sorry? Since everything ended into the mesag3 package, people will have problems to upgrade. I had done: Replaces: libgl1,

Bug#307211: saxon-catalog: FTBFS (testing): Semantic Error: The abstract method java.lang.String getRawName(int $1);, inherited from type org.xml.sax.Attributes, is not implemented in the non-abstract class cz.kosek.CatalogXMLReader.

2005-05-03 Thread Michael Koch
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:04:10PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: (I'm resending this cuz I forgot to CC: everyone...) Hi All, IMO, this package should be dropped, as the wrapper script probably needs to be rewritten, and the package depends on stuff that is superceded by the

Processed: a missing dependency is RC

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306015 grave Bug#306015: php4-mysql: Should depend on php4 Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#306838: jargon-text: FTBFS: ERROR at cmdline.c:96: Unknown option -no-references

2005-05-03 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 05-May-03 01:27, Paul Martin wrote: This FTBFS will go away when elinks 0.10.4-3 reaches testing... but your patch means that there's going to be a bug raised because it will then FTBFS into a nice-looking text file. Filing an FTBFS on an architecture: all package that contains only a

Bug#307290: addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot find protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol'

2005-05-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:23:14AM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote: With the attached patch, 'addresses-for-gnustep' can be compiled on i386/testing. There is a new version of addresses-for-gnustep in sid which already has this patch applied, but which will probably not enter sarge because of

Bug#307290: addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot find protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol'

2005-05-03 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Steve Langasek a écrit : On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 08:03:55PM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote: Package: addresses-for-gnustep Version: 0.4.6-3 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'addresses-for-gnustep' on i386/testing, I get the following error: gcc VCFViewer.m -c \ -MMD -MP -DGNUSTEP

Processed: This is not a missing dependency, feh

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306015 important Bug#306015: php4-mysql: Should depend on php4 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Patch for building on both sarge and sid

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307211 patch Bug#307211: saxon-catalog: FTBFS (testing): Semantic Error: The abstract method java.lang.String getRawName(int $1);, inherited from type org.xml.sax.Attributes, is not implemented in the non-abstract class

Bug#307211: Patch for building on both sarge and sid

2005-05-03 Thread Wolfgang Baer
tags 307211 patch stop Hi, with jikes-kaffe instead of jikes-classpath this package builts on both sarge and sid systems. Wolfgang --- debian/control.orig 2005-05-03 08:48:35.0 + +++ debian/control 2005-05-03 08:49:50.0 + @@ -2,12 +2,12 @@ Section: contrib/text

Bug#307338: ncurses-ruby: FTBFS: `ncurses_bin.so': No such file or directory

2005-05-03 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi Kurt, On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 05:49:20PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Your package is failing to build with the following error: install -p -m 0755 ncurses_bin.so /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-linux install: cannot stat `ncurses_bin.so': No such file or directory It builds the 3 .c files, but then

Bug#306838: jargon-text: FTBFS: ERROR at cmdline.c:96: Unknown option -no-references

2005-05-03 Thread Lars Wirzenius
ti, 2005-05-03 kello 01:27 +0100, Paul Martin kirjoitti: This FTBFS will go away when elinks 0.10.4-3 reaches testing... but your patch means that there's going to be a bug raised because it will then FTBFS into a nice-looking text file. Filing an FTBFS on an architecture: all package that

Bug#304968: marked as done (gnustep-base should not enter in sarge now)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 03 May 2005 11:14:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307290: addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot find protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: Bug#307338: ncurses-ruby: FTBFS: `ncurses_bin.so': No such file or directory

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307338 + pending Bug#307338: ncurses-ruby: FTBFS: `ncurses_bin.so': No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#307338: ncurses-ruby: FTBFS: `ncurses_bin.so': No such file or directory

2005-05-03 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
tags 307338 + pending thanks hi again, On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:50:19AM +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: hi Kurt, On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 05:49:20PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Your package is failing to build with the following error: install -p -m 0755 ncurses_bin.so

Processed: Re: php4: CAN-2005-1042 and CAN-2005-1043

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 306003 -sarge Bug#306003: php4: CAN-2005-1042 and CAN-2005-1043 Tags were: sarge security woody Tags removed: sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306015 grave Bug#306015: php4-mysql: Should depend on php4 Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#307433: marked as done (gr-usrp: Unusable with GNU Radio 2.5)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 3 May 2005 12:22:30 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307433: gr-usrp: Unusable with GNU Radio 2.5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#306003: php4: CAN-2005-1042 and CAN-2005-1043

2005-05-03 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 306003 -sarge thanks php4 4:4.3.10-13, which includes the backported security fixes, has been accepted into testing; therefore I believe this bug no longer applies to sarge, and can be closed when it has been addressed for woody. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc

Bug#307468: ppp does not start: rp-pppoe.so has newer version

2005-05-03 Thread fresh corpse
Package: ppp Version: 2.4.3-20050321+1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system # pppd call dsl-provider pppd: /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.2/rp-pppoe.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory pppd: Couldn't load plugin rp-pppoe.so # ls /usr/lib/pppd/ 2.4.3 pppd and

Bug#307466: unison: fails to upgrade

2005-05-03 Thread Marco Presi (Zufus)
Package: unison Version: 2.10.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, after an upgrade, I've got the following message: Setting up unison (2.10.2-1) ... /usr/share/doc-base/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@-manual: cannot open control file for reading : No such file or

Processed: severity of 306261 is grave, tagging 306261, severity of 306820 is important, tagging 301148

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 306261 grave Bug#306261: pppd persist eats up all cpu after reconnect Severity set to `grave'. tags 306261 sarge sid patch Bug#306261: pppd persist eats up all cpu after

Bug#295010: marked as done (aspell-fi: Support for pending Aspell 0.60)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 03 May 2005 07:32:31 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295010: fixed in ispell-fi 0.7-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#307473: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1

2005-05-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: mysql-server, mysql-server-4.1 Version: 4.0.24-7 Severity: critical apt-get install mysql-server apt-get remove mysql-server apt-get install mysql-server-4.1 dpkg --purge mysql-server ***boom*** Depending on your answer to postrm_remove_databases, this has deleted all your data or

Bug#307468: marked as done (ppp does not start: rp-pppoe.so has newer version)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 3 May 2005 13:34:02 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307468: ppp does not start: rp-pppoe.so has newer version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#307481: aspell: symbol size mismatch in shared library

2005-05-03 Thread James Aspnes
Package: aspell Version: 0.60.2+20050121-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When running aspell, I get complaints about symbol _ZTVN7acommon6StringE, e.g. $ aspell filter aspell: Symbol `_ZTVN7acommon6StringE' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking

Bug#307481: Acknowledgement (aspell: symbol size mismatch in shared library)

2005-05-03 Thread James Aspnes
Upgrading to the most recent version of aspell-bin fixed the problem. So there may be a missing dependency issue but otherwise this doesn't seem to be a bug. --James Aspnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 06:18:07AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for the problem

Bug#306838: marked as done (jargon-text: FTBFS: ERROR at cmdline.c:96: Unknown option -no-references)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 03 May 2005 09:47:21 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306838: fixed in jargon-text 4.4.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#307214: Patch - TDB.h

2005-05-03 Thread Dan Weber
This should fix it as tdb.h doesn't have the needed include files for the build thus causing the problem. Dan --- tdb.old.h 2005-05-03 10:09:08.0 -0400 +++ tdb.h 2005-05-03 10:10:08.0 -0400 @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ #ifndef __TDB_H__ #define __TDB_H__ - +#include sys/types.h

Processed: your mail

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 307214 tdb Bug#307214: ctrlproxy: FTBFS: /usr/include/tdb.h:150: error: parse error before '*' token Bug reassigned from package `ctrlproxy' to `tdb'. tags 307214 +patch Bug#307214: ctrlproxy: FTBFS: /usr/include/tdb.h:150: error: parse

Processed: Dups

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 307466 serious Bug#307466: unison: fails to upgrade Severity set to `serious'. merge 307466 307411 Bug#307411: unison: fails to install Bug#307466: unison: fails to upgrade Merged 307411 307466. thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#300938: marked as done (siproxd: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): too few arguments to function 'osip_message_parse')

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 3 May 2005 11:13:55 -0400 (EDT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line siproxd has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#300684: marked as done (siproxd_1:0.5.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 3 May 2005 11:13:55 -0400 (EDT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line siproxd has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Processed: tagging 306381

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306381 + experimental Bug#306381: python-cherrypy/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: missing b-dep on python There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental End of message, stopping

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: severity 306015 grave thanks Hi Steve, first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded it, it would be nice if you would: - Cc me - send a better explanation than This is not a missing dependency, feh Looking at the bug log,

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

2005-05-03 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: illuminator Version: 0.9.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: Policy 3.3 illuminator fails to build from source ons parc, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. dh_installdeb -a dh_shlibdeps -a dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6 dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:

Bug#306261: ppp: More info

2005-05-03 Thread Reuben Thomas
Package: ppp Version: 2.4.3-20050321+1 Followup-For: Bug #306261 The CPU problem seems to be associated for me with getting a lot of errors like this: May 3 17:51:42 localhost pppoa[2744]: Packet not from driver (mac: 00:60:4C:71:8C:D2) Not sure what's causing it, but restarting the PPP

Bug#306261: ppp: Similar problem with eagle-usb

2005-05-03 Thread Reuben Thomas
Package: ppp Version: 2.4.3-20050321+1 Followup-For: Bug #306261 I'm having similar near-100% CPU consumption with ppp run by eagle-usb utils. It's using pppoa, so I don't think the problem is specifically with the rp-pppoe plugin (unless my CPU problem is different). In fact, I'm not even sure

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:30:22AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: severity 306015 grave thanks Hi Steve, first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded it, it would be nice if you would: - Cc me - send a better

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You seem to confuse this with bug closing. It's common practice to adjust the severity of a bug to a RC one if a RC issue was mistakenly reported as non-RC, and neither your Developers Reference nor your release team have ever disagreed with this

Bug#307504: bbkeys: Missing build dependency.

2005-05-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: bbkeys Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package's is failing to build with the following error: checking for pkg-config... no *** The pkg-config script could not be found. Make sure it is *** in your path, or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable *** to the full

Processed: Re: Bug#307481: aspell: symbol size mismatch in shared library

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 307481 normal Bug#307481: aspell: symbol size mismatch in shared library Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

2005-05-03 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 08:59 -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: Package: illuminator Version: 0.9.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: Policy 3.3 illuminator fails to build from source ons parc, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. dh_installdeb -a dh_shlibdeps -a dpkg-shlibdeps:

Bug#307481: aspell: symbol size mismatch in shared library

2005-05-03 Thread Brian Nelson
severity 307481 normal thanks On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:43:09AM -0400, James Aspnes wrote: Upgrading to the most recent version of aspell-bin fixed the problem. So there may be a missing dependency issue but otherwise this doesn't seem to be a bug. Ugh. The soname of libaspell15 did not

Processed: This is grave, package fails to install.

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 307411 grave Bug#307411: unison: fails to install Bug#307466: unison: fails to upgrade Severity set to `grave'. severity 307466 grave Bug#307466: unison: fails to upgrade Bug#307411: unison: fails to install Severity set to `grave'. thanks

Bug#307466: unison: fails to upgrade

2005-05-03 Thread Sylvain LE GALL
Hi On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 02:43:07PM +0200, Marco Presi (Zufus) wrote: Package: unison Version: 2.10.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, after an upgrade, I've got the following message: Setting up unison (2.10.2-1) ...

Bug#307516: cycle: can't install: Depends: libwxgtk2.5.3-python but it is not installable

2005-05-03 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
Package: cycle Version: 0.3.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ LANG=C sudo apt-get install cycle Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you

Bug#305122: ia32-libs-dev: Fix for the linker script and more

2005-05-03 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Package: ia32-libs-dev Version: 1.2 Followup-For: Bug #305122 Hi, attached the patch for to actually fix the linker script and to create the /usr/lib32 link needed by gcc-3.4. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux

Processed: tagging 307466

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 307466 sid Bug#307466: unison: fails to upgrade Tags were: sid Bug#307411: unison: fails to install Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#306261: pppd persist eats up all cpu after reconnect

2005-05-03 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 12:34:52PM +0200, Joerg Dorchain wrote: exspected. After the the first dis- and reconnect (i.e. after 24h) pppd eats up all cpu time. The reconnect itself works as expected, but the systems becomes notably slow with pppd playing cpu-hog. ... with fd 13 and 14 being

Bug#307429: marked as done (..post-installation of util-vserver_0.30.207-2 dies:lstat(): No such file or directory)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 03 May 2005 14:47:30 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307429: fixed in util-vserver 0.30.207-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#241935: marked as done (sarge version claims system is woody and 3.0)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 03 May 2005 14:47:14 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#241935: fixed in lsb-release 1.4-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#307500: choose-mirror: ftbfs [sparc] build fails ./get-iso-codes

2005-05-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:54:28AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: Package: choose-mirror Version: 1.08 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source choose-mirror fails to build from source on sparc and other buildds, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. # C. Perrier

Processed: Re: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306015 important Bug#306015: php4-mysql: Should depend on php4 Severity set to `important'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 306015 important quit On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded it, it would be nice if you would: - Cc me - send a better explanation than This is not a missing dependency, feh If you are

Bug#303764: marked as done (Not Ready for Sarge)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 3 May 2005 15:05:26 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Sarge frozen has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#304167: xml-soap: FTBFS: 'activation.jar' missing

2005-05-03 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:24:31PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: tags 304167 +patch retitle 304167 xml-soap: FTBFS: 'activation.jar' missing thanks I finally found a patch which allows to build the package with dpkg-buildpackage. I just removed one of the build-dependencies (libservlet2.2,

Processed: Re: Scilab in testing

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 302741 normal Bug#302741: scilab: Scilab starts with a very small window and an unreadable small font Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Re: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 300681 Bug#300681: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#303870: Dependency

2005-05-03 Thread Xavier Grandmougin
I'm confused what you're asking. If you compile your own, it should be the same process as the old way. The only difference is that you now need to keep the binary modules package in synch w/ the ndiswrapper-utils package. The 'ndiswrapper-modules-1.1' dependency was satisfied once I

Bug#300681: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

2005-05-03 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
reopen 300681 thanks On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 04:33:39PM +0200, gnter geiger wrote: Closing, as this bug applied only to the binary packages, which are not built anymore. But all those binary packages like realtime-lsm-module-2.6.8-1-386 are now in testing. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar

Bug#307548: postfix-mysql: local delivery broken with proxymaps

2005-05-03 Thread The Anarcat
Package: postfix-mysql Version: 2.1.5-9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When you configure a chrooted smtpd server and have mysql lookup maps, behind the proxymap service, you end up having problems with either local delivery or access to the maps in smtpd. *** Problem

Processed: Quagga+Openssl, not that easy...

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 306840 Bug#306840: quagga: Depends on OpenSSL Bug reopened, originator not changed. severity 306840 serious Bug#306840: quagga: Depends on OpenSSL Severity set to `serious'. tags 306840 + needhelp Unknown tag/s: needhelp. Recognized are:

Bug#306840: Quagga+Openssl, not that easy...

2005-05-03 Thread Christian Hammers
reopen 306840 severity 306840 serious tags 306840 + needhelp thanks Ok, linking against libsnmp5 reintroduces dynamic linking against OpenSSL regardless on whether or not I deactivate it in Quagga itself. As Quagga is GPL this is, to my understanding even in this indirect way, an incompatible

Processed: Re: Processed: Quagga+Openssl, not that easy...

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 306840 + help Bug#306840: quagga: Depends on OpenSSL Tags were: confirmed Tags added: help thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#307567: apache2-common: Apache2 consumes 100% CPU after a few requests

2005-05-03 Thread Emmanuel Blot
Package: apache2-common Version: 2.0.54-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable It seems that the problem is related to LDAP authentication. The problem started showing up after the last 'aptitude upgrade' which has upgraded both the Apache2 server from 2.0.53 to 2.0.54, and

Processed: Re: Bug#307473: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307473 + pending Bug#307473: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#307473: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1

2005-05-03 Thread Christian Hammers
tags 307473 + pending thanks Hello Adrian On 2005-05-03 Adrian Bunk wrote: BTW2: This is a nice example for the class of data loss bugs testing cannot catch because it might take some time until the first usre falls into this trap. Indeed. Thanks for spotting this. I will try to

Bug#307567: apache2-common: Apache2 consumes 100% CPU after a few requests

2005-05-03 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:08:37AM +0200, Emmanuel Blot wrote: Package: apache2-common Version: 2.0.54-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable It seems that the problem is related to LDAP authentication. The problem started showing up after the last 'aptitude upgrade'

Processed: Upping priority

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 276103 grave Bug#276103: kcdlabel: crash on save Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#307567: apache2-common: Apache2 consumes 100% CPU after a few requests

2005-05-03 Thread Emmanuel Blot
Maybe also a gdb backtrace? (LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug gdb -p pid); you should first install the package libc6-dbg, if possible. If not, then don't set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. It will at least tell us if the stack is still sane, or if there has been memory corruption. Here is the GDB trace. I

Bug#307567: [Fwd: Re: Bug#307567: apache2-common: Apache2 consumes 100% CPU after a few requests]

2005-05-03 Thread Emmanuel Blot
Original Message Subject: Re: Bug#307567: apache2-common: Apache2 consumes 100% CPU after a few requests Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 02:01:38 +0200 From: Emmanuel Blot [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: ANIENIB To: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Bug#307567: [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: Bug#307567: apache2-common: Apache2 consumes 100% CPU after a few requests]]

2005-05-03 Thread Emmanuel Blot
[Sorry, I posted with the wrong email account] I'm not familiar with apache internals, nor LDAP, but I can try to help begin diagnosis. Thanks. Could you provide a strace of the process when it is in that state? (strace -p pid)? Maybe also a strace of the process beginning before it is in

Processed: fixed in unstable

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307574 +sarge Bug#307574: Built with wrong OCaml version There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge thanks. Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#300681: marked as done (Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 May 2005 02:25:01 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

2005-05-03 Thread Blars Blarson
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/illuminator-demo/usr/bin/tsview-ng' gave error exit status 1 dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 256 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 Actually, since it built successfully on ten other arches, I'd conclude

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

2005-05-03 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Blars Blarson wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/illuminator-demo/usr/bin/tsview-ng' gave error exit status 1 dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 256 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 [..] A few packages get an ldd error,

Bug#307429: ..really? ;o) : Bug#307429: fixed in util-vserver 0.30.207-3

2005-05-03 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 03 May 2005 12:03:44 -0700, Debian wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #307429: ..post-installation of util-vserver_0.30.207-2 dies:lstat(): #No such file or directory, which was filed against the util-vserver package. It

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

2005-05-03 Thread Blars Blarson
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:00:19PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: This looks identical to the 268450, which is a kernel bug, fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27-7. I'll try a build with the kernel-image-2.4.27-9 which is currently in sid and should contain this fix. I duplicated it on

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

2005-05-03 Thread Blars Blarson
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:35:00PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: This bug was also fixed in 2.6.8 series (#287287), in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-11. According to changelog [0], the first kernel-image for sparc built from this k-s version is 2.6.8-6. It is very unfortunate that it did not make

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

2005-05-03 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Blars Blarson wrote: On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:00:19PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: This looks identical to the 268450, which is a kernel bug, fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27-7. I'll try a build with the kernel-image-2.4.27-9 which is currently in sid and should contain this fix.

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

2005-05-03 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Blars Blarson wrote: 2.6.8-6 is in sarge, my kernel is/was out of date on that box. (I just installed 2.6.8-6, it will be active next reboot.) Good to know. I've just tested the build with kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 (version 2.4.27-9) from sid and even though the warnings

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

2005-05-03 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 01:00 +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: Am Dienstag, 3. Mai 2005 18:46 schrieb Adam C Powell IV: On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 08:59 -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: Package: illuminator dh_makeshlibs -a [...] dh_shlibdeps -a dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for

Bug#307502: marked as done (illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 03 May 2005 23:42:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: tagging 306770

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306770 sid Bug#306770: aegis: creates ~/integrate.log while building There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#304852: marked as done (cause openimager and python-imaging to FTBFS in testing)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 3 May 2005 20:53:45 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303896: openscenegraph: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#307500: marked as done (choose-mirror: ftbfs [sparc] build fails ./get-iso-codes)

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2005 00:17:16 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307500: fixed in choose-mirror 1.09 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#307591: libapache2-mod-php4 can't be installed; no /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/php.ini

2005-05-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
Package: libapache2-mod-php4 Version: 4.3.10-13 Tags: sarge Severity: serious Justification: renders package unusable jeffindy:~# apt-get install apache2-mpm-prefork libapache2-mod-php4 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: