Bug#104394: Grab this quick triple at its low

1 hey 130523-done 1 B 1 check out paris, and many other celebs at http://www.midnightlaundries.com/40079730/index.html b -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: #302680

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package zeroconf Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zeroconf severity 302680 minor Bug#302680: Inadequate copyright information Severity set to `minor'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#302680: #302680

package zeroconf severity 302680 minor thanks Setting the severity from serious to minor since the upstream page (http://www.progsoc.org/~wildfire/zeroconf/) works fine, and the comment about the copyright file isn't true. See explainations of the copyright file at

Bug#266370: Should we release lukemftpd with sarge?

I'm wondering whether lukemftpd should be released with sarge or not. Noah Meyerhans filed a critical security bug in August 2004 (#266370). This has been fixed in an NMU but Noah also raised this point: | It seems that lukemftpd no longer exists, at least not by that name. | In the NetBSD

Bug#306840: quagga: I_WANT_SSL does not --enable-snmp

Hello Christoph On 2005-06-01 Christoph Kluenter wrote: debian/rules does only insert an extra backslash when I_WANT_SSL=yes is set. Maybe this is due to wrong syntax ? Yes, thanks, has been fixed. bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processed: Re: libgtkmm-2.4-1: delivers wrong shlibs control file

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 310403 serious Bug#310403: libgtkmm-2.4-1: delivers wrong shlibs control file Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#310757: davfs2: doesn't enforce permissions

Hello, I have done a quick and brutal fix to this. Patch file is attached. The fix: - terminate, if run setuid. So only root can mount. Reason: davfs2 does not enforce mount control by fstab. So if run setuid, any user could mount with the uid of any other user. - set uid and gid according to

Bug#311958: kdebase: FTBFS: error making docs.

Package: kdebase Verison: 4:3.4.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, When building your package for experimental, I'm getting the following error: make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kdebase-3.4.1/obj-i386-linux/doc/userguide' /usr/bin/meinproc --check --cache index.cache.bz2

Bug#311062: marked as done (liblscp: FTBFS: ./configure: Permission denied)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:08:59 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#311062: liblscp: FTBFS: ./configure: Permission denied has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Processed: tagging 310757

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 310757 + patch Bug#310757: davfs2: doesn't enforce permissions Tags were: help upstream confirmed security Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Processed: muine: wrong libdbus-cil build-dep

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 311364 serious Bug#311364: muine: wrong libdbus-cil build-dep Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#311966: proguard doesn't work although the dependencies are fulfilled

Package: proguard Version: 3.2-1 Severity: grave $ proguardgui /usr/bin/proguardgui: line 3: exec: kaffe: not found $ proguard /usr/bin/proguard: line 3: exec: gij: not found $ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500,

Bug#311976: courier-authlib: FTBFS: Missing build dependency on procps

Package: courier-authlib Version: 0.56-0.4 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, Your package is failing to build on some arches because it doesn't have a build dependency on procps. It fails with the following error: configure: error: Cannot find pathname to ps configure: error: /bin/sh

Bug#311983: libflash-mozplugin: a couple of segfaults

Package: libflash-mozplugin Version: 0.4.11-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable URL: http://www.bredbandsbolaget.se/. Segfaults occured in this order: First attempt - no backtrace :( Second attempt: , | Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. |

Processed: still present in sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 306990 Bug#306990: lvm2: Strange error when attempting to install Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 306990 +sarge Bug#306990: lvm2: Strange error when attempting to install Tags were: patch Tags added: sarge thanks Stopping

Bug#311991: md5 mismatch

Package: evolution Version: 2.0.4-2 Severity: serious Failed to fetch http://ftp.ie.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/evolution/evolution_2.0.4-2_i386.deb MD5Sum mismatch broken mirror (only that file, not any others that I have yet obtained) or someone has been playing where they shouldnt be.

Bug#311436: fp-compiler: Error installing package

On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 01:21:24PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: Regarding the alternative removal from preinst, I would keep it for some time, until the -1 - -2+ mess is mostly addressed by users (say, at most 1-2 months), and then remove it. It is a bug that might cause manual mode be lost,

Bug#308587: 308587: reopening and tagging woody

Florian Ernst wrote: On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 07:57:06PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: I've looked at the patch you've provided and I must say that I believe that it is utterly broken with regards to the integer overflow. I don't think that I've discovered a single integer overflow that's

Processed: version in sarge is seriously broken

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 228793 Bug#228793: coldsync: ColdSYnc.pm not included Bug reopened, originator not changed. severity 228793 grave Bug#228793: coldsync: ColdSYnc.pm not included Severity set to `grave'. tags 228793 +sarge Bug#228793: coldsync: ColdSYnc.pm not

Bug#266370: Should we release lukemftpd with sarge?

* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050604 13:56]: I'm wondering whether lukemftpd should be released with sarge or not. Noah Meyerhans filed a critical security bug in August 2004 (#266370). This has been fixed in an NMU but Noah also raised this point: | It seems that lukemftpd no

Processed: really a blocker, duplicate of archived #234787

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 296609 serious Bug#296609: fam: can not unmount floppy Severity set to `serious'. tags 296609 +sarge Bug#296609: fam: can not unmount floppy There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#310170: /usr/share/aclocal/lib-link.m4: Use of AC_PREREQ(2.50) breaks existing sources

Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: retitle 310170 openduke FTBFS, requires autoconf 2.50 severity 310170 serious reassign 310170 openduke thanks On Sun, 22 May 2005, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Package: gettext Version: 0.14.4-2 Severity: important File: /usr/share/aclocal/lib-link.m4

Bug#310170: /usr/share/aclocal/lib-link.m4: Use of AC_PREREQ(2.50) breaks existing sources

Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 22 May 2005, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Package: gettext Version: 0.14.4-2 Severity: important File: /usr/share/aclocal/lib-link.m4 Hi, Updating gettext from 0.14.1-10 to 0.14.4-2 introduces AC_PREREQ(2.50) in lib-link.m4 and requires

Processed: this bug doesn't belong here

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 311991 ftp.debian.org Bug#311991: md5 mismatch Bug reassigned from package `evolution' to `ftp.debian.org'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#311991: Not a bug in evolution

Package: evolution Version: 2.0.4-2 Followup-For: Bug #311991 This is not a bug in evolution, but a broken mirror. This bug should be closed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ wget http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/ Packages.gz --19:51:37--

Bug#311991: this bug doesn't belong here

reassign 311991 ftp.debian.org thanks Hello, Yes, perhaps the mirror might have been compromised, more likely it's just a storage/mirroring hiccup. But the bug is not with the evolution package, so I'm reassigning this to the ftp.debian.org virtual package where it belongs. Thanks, -- Joshua

Processed: blah

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 311991 important Bug#311991: md5 mismatch Severity set to `important'. reassign 311991 mirrors Bug#311991: md5 mismatch Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `mirrors'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#300574: marked as done (ldapdns misses requirements of RFC2308)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:42:35 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Package now in sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#312008: mailman: upgrading from woody fails

Package: mailman Version: 2.1.5-8 Severity: serious Justification: hangs in postinst (You already know about this bug, just keeping it in the BTS to make sure it's not getting lost :-) ) Upgrading mailman from woody fails for two reasons: - the postinst script does a read foo in multiple places

Bug#311769: marked as done (sendmail: upgrade with queued mail from woody 8.12 to sarge 8.13: readqf: messageid bad line G0)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:44:26 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed version in sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#296609: really a blocker, duplicate of archived #234787

severity 296609 serious tags 296609 +sarge thanks This bug (fam: can not unmount floppy) seems to be a duplicate of the archived bug #234787. David, can you confirm that the fam package in unstable fixes this issue? cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked

Bug#311263: marked as done (woody to sarge upgrade trigger 34 useless dpkg conffiles handling)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:46:15 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Updated snort-package in sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#311257: marked as done (snort: Files conflict with woody snort-common)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:46:15 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Updated snort-package in sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#304258: yate: patch to fix the problem

Hello Kilian, Zaphfc patch dosen't work with sangoma drivers from the new yate lib. It's an incompatibility added by Klauss patches. We didn't find yet a solution for that, but we will try more. Diana Hi Lior, Since there has been almost two months since you said you'll check the

Processed: severity of 312008 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6 severity 312008 normal Bug#312008: mailman: upgrading from woody fails Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#312014: fop missing dependencies.

Package: fop Severity: grave apt-get install fop Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not

Bug#312017: gtk-doc: Incorrect build dependencies

Package: gtk-doc Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: no longer builds from source Hi, The build dependency order prevents the build conflicts being satisfied, which prevents autobuilding. The patch reorders the jade dependency, so docbook-dsssl can't drag openjade back in as a

Processed: still present in sarge, Steve agreed this might go into sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 308391 Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386 Bug reopened, originator not changed. severity 308391 serious Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386

Processed: This should go into sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 308710 Bug#308710: acs: Dummy package still needed? Bug reopened, originator not changed. severity 308710 serious Bug#308710: acs: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. tags 308710 +sarge Bug#308710: acs: Dummy package still

Bug#312014: marked as done (fop missing dependencies.)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:50:21 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#312014: fop missing dependencies. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: this is RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 309594 serious Bug#309594: zoo: directory traversal security bug Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: severity of 228793 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 228793 important Bug#228793: coldsync: ColdSYnc.pm not included Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: Don't fix in sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 312017 + sarge-ignore Bug#312017: gtk-doc: Incorrect build dependencies Tags were: patch Tags added: sarge-ignore thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#312021: tinyhoneypot lacks a dependency on adduser

Package: tinyhoneypot Version: 0.4.6-6 Severity: serious Tags: sarge Although adduser is used in the postinst, a dependency is missing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#305027: f-spot: Generates SIGILL on startup on PowerPC

Is the strace for the crashing and the non-crashing run of f-spot different? Perhaps you can use strace or ltrace to pinpoint where it fails? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312025: adplug: ftbfs [sparc] No rule to make target `binary-arch'

Package: adplug Version: 1.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source adplug fails to build from source on sparc and all other buildds, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. touch build-stamp debian/rules binary-arch make: *** No rule to make target `binary-arch'. Stop.

Bug#312024: proguard: ftbfs [sparc] cannot stat `./lib/proguard.jar': No such file or directory

Package: proguard Version: 3.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source proguard fails to build from source on sparc and all other buildds, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. dh_install -pproguard cp: cannot stat `./lib/proguard.jar': No such file or directory

Bug#312025: adplug: ftbfs [sparc] No rule to make target `binary-arch'

Blars Blarson wrote: adplug fails to build from source on sparc and all other buildds, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. my sponsor did upload the wrong package without fixed rules (similar to libbinio, but there it was my fault) :/ -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562

Processed: tagging 308170, closing 308710, severity of 308710 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 308170 - sarge Bug#308170: synaptic: statusbar should show total download size There were no tags set. Tags removed: sarge close 308710 Bug#308710: acs: Dummy package still

Processed: tagging 312017

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 # use of tag w/o release team input tags 312017 - sarge-ignore Bug#312017: gtk-doc: Incorrect build dependencies Tags were: sarge-ignore patch Tags removed: sarge-ignore End of

Bug#311526: marked as done (nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from another package)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Jun 2005 16:53:17 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from another package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#303860: Celestia is removed from Debian Sarge :( Please fix it ASAP

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:50:53PM +0300, Mantas Kriau??i??nas wrote: It seems you don't know, that there are no celestia package, maintained by QA team in Debian Sarge :( Please, don't leave users of next Debian stable version without wonderful Celestia software. Hi I know there is no