Package: archzoom
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The 1.3.3 version of tla from unstable seems incompatible with
archzoom. Any attempt to get a page drives to :
[2005-Jul-14 08:38:25] executing: 'tla' '--version'
[2005-Jul-14 08:38:25] Unexpected 'tla --ve
At Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:44:11 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> GOTO Masanori writes:
> > At Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:09:59 -0700,
> > Ryan Murray wrote:
> > > libc6-s390x is missing a depends on lib64gcc1 that causes gcc to fail to
> > > link
> > > when -m64 is used on an s390 system.
> > >
> > > I'm fill
Your message dated Thu, 14 Jul 2005 01:55:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317225: fixed in supercollider 20050624-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 14 Jul 2005 02:02:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318054: fixed in gnome-spell 1.0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # packages providing plugin interfaces are held to the same standards as
> libraries
> severity 318189 serious
Bug#318189: asterisk-oh323: chan_oh323.so cannot find symbol and Aster
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # This bug doesn't break all of asterisk only asterisk users with
> # asterisk-oh323, thus severity important
> severity 318189 important
Bug#318189: asterisk-oh323: chan_oh323.so cannot find symbol and Asterisk
crashes
Severity set to `important'.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 318189 -1
Bug#318189: asterisk-oh323: chan_oh323.so cannot find symbol and Asterisk
crashes
Bug 318189 cloned as bug 318216.
> reassign 318189 asterisk-oh323
Bug#318189: asterisk-oh323: chan_oh323.so cannot find symbol and Asterisk
crashes
Bug
Your message dated Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:17:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#208198: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers 1.0.7667-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Thu, 14 Jul 2005 05:54:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#284905: severity 284905 serious
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 14 Jul 2005 04:52:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306302: NMU for libgcrypt11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On 7/13/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NMUs for these issues are encouraged, but there are complications to
> uploading right now because xorg-x11 isn't built on all architectures.
> Waiting a couple of days for that to be sorted out may be a good idea
> anyway.
For some reason, i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 318199 sid
Bug#318199: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on python2.2-numeric
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 01:53:00AM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> I would suspect that asterisk is changing symbol names without telling
> anyone :-( That's not good of asterisk.
> A rebuild of the asterisk-oh323 package should rectify things against the
> newer asterisk.
But that's an insufficie
Isn't this problem, just because kdelibs4 hasn't yet been rebuild with GCC4?
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Juan,
I would suspect that asterisk is changing symbol names without telling
anyone :-( That's not good of asterisk.
A rebuild of the asterisk-oh323 package should rectify things against the
newer asterisk.
Mark
On Thursday 14 July 2005 00:08, Juan Jose Comellas wrote:
> Package: aster
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 318176 normal
Bug#318176: imagemagick in combination with transcode fails (amd64)
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Package: mailutils
Version: 0.6.90-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
This package fails to build from source:
if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../lib
-I../include/mailutils/gnu -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\" -g -Wall -O2 -MT
common.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/common.Tpo" -c -o common.o common.c
Package: rpy
Version: 0.4.2.1-1
Severity: serious
rpy build-depends on python2.2-numeric, but this package does not
exist in sid, so rpy cannot be built.
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: regex
Version: 0.12-15.1
Severity: serious
The package fails to build from source because it is incompatible with
recent versions of dpkg-dev:
> debian/rules build
> dpkg: unknown option --print-gnu-build-architecture
>
> Type dpkg --help for help about installing and deinstalling pack
reassign 318189 asterisk
tags 318189 sid
thanks
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 08:08:33PM -0300, Juan Jose Comellas wrote:
> Package: asterisk-oh323
> Version: 0.6.6pre3-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> The asterisk-oh323 package version 0.6.6pre3-3 was linked expecting th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 318189 asterisk
Bug#318189: asterisk-oh323: chan_oh323.so cannot find symbol and Asterisk
crashes
Bug reassigned from package `asterisk-oh323' to `asterisk'.
> tags 318189 sid
Bug#318189: asterisk-oh323: chan_oh323.so cannot find symbol and A
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 318180 kwifimanager
Bug#318180: kde: Dependance problems since introducing of xserver-xorg (3.4.1 -
SID)
Bug reassigned from package `kde' to `kwifimanager'.
> tags 318180
tag 315561 +patch
tag 317578 +patch
tag 304998 +patch
tag 308590 +patch
tag 314866 +patch
thanks
Here is the patch for the 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.1 NMU that fixed
this bug.
Regards,
--
Sam.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 14:21, Robert Jordens wrote:
> Package: cheesetracker
> A new release of jack-audio-connection-kit (0.100.0-2) has been uploaded
> to Debian unstable. The old library libjack0.80.0-0 (and
> libjack0.80.0-dev) have been removed and replaced with libjack0.100.0-0
> and libj
Here is really the patch. Sorry.
Regards,
--
Sam.
diff -puriN libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007.orig/debian/changelog
libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-x/debian/changelog
--- libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007.orig/debian/changelog 2005-07-14
01:17:37.0 +0200
+++ libsdl1.2-1.2.7+1.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 315561 +patch
Bug#315561: libsdl1.2: please apply this patch for libslang2
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: patch
> tag 317578 +patch
Bug#317578: libsdl1.2-dev: Broken build dependencies and dependencies on
libaa1-dev
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: patc
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:13:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316725: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 10:16:30PM +0300, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> Package: libxosd-dev
> Severity: grave
> It seems that with the new Xorg in sid, Xinerama_pic.a got lost
> somewhere. It doesn't seem to be neither in xlibs-static-pic nor in
> libxinerama* packages. As a consequence, linker does no
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 02:59:03PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 01:47:43PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > Package: r-cran-rgl
> > Version: 0.64.13-3
> > Severity: serious
> > Subject says it all, really... the upload of X.org to sid makes this
> > package not install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 318142 sid
Bug#318142: r-cran-rgl: needs to be rebuilt for libglu1-xorg (libglu1c2)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 318139 sid
Bug#318139: CXX 4.0 transition
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Package: asterisk-oh323
Version: 0.6.6pre3-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The asterisk-oh323 package version 0.6.6pre3-3 was linked expecting the
ast_smoother_feed symbol to be in the /usr/sbin/asterisk executable. The
problem is that the symbol is present as __ast_smoot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 318118 sid
Bug#318118: xfree86-driver-synaptics: broken dependency whidth xserver-xorg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have made a non-maintainer upload (NMU) to fix this bug; it is in
the DELAYED/3-day upload queue. It will be ignored if you make a new
maintainer upload within 3 days. The changes are detailed in the
attached diff. Please apply the diff and acknow
Package: libgmime2.1-cil
Severity: serious
I installed libgnime2.1-cil for beagle and found it doesn't install the
required native libgmime2.1-0 library, because it doesn't depend on it.
Not sure why dh_clideps didn't catch it, it's not perfect yet... but you
should check if dh_makeclilibs is call
Oops... I forget to say that "kde, kde-core, kdebase, etc." packages
aren't installable on a new SID installation because of dependancies of
course.
KnuX
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 304998 + fixed
Bug#304998: can not compile UTF-8
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 308590 + fixed
Bug#308590: libsdl1.2: FTBFS with gcc-4.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 314866 + fixed
Bug#314866: libsdl1.2debian: D
Package: kde
Severity: serious
Justification: 4
Since xserver-xorg is in Debian unstable, some dependance issues appear.
I hope this log above log will be explicit, I don't know how to explain the
problem in an other way ;)
# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependenc
Package: imagemagick
Version: 6:6.2.3.1-1
Severity: grave
Afer the update of imagemagic to version 6.2.3.1-1 transcode fails to
load images (logo-modules) with transcode. The reason is that the
filename of a specific file is shrunked by imagemagick:
/home/ocordes/movies/convert/logo.png -> vies/c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 287397 + fixed
Bug#287397: libgii: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of
'linux_joy_devinfo' follows non-static declaration
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 307418 + fixed
Bug#307418: New upstream version (0.9) available
There were
Hello!
patch for the NMU
Robert.
diff -u hdf5-1.6.4/debian/control hdf5-1.6.4/debian/control
--- hdf5-1.6.4/debian/control
+++ hdf5-1.6.4/debian/control
@@ -5,12 +5,13 @@
Build-Depends: libmpich1.0-dev (>= 1.2.5.3-2), zlib1g-dev, lam4-dev,
libjpeg62-dev, debhelper (>> 4)
Standards-Ver
On 7/13/05, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 01:47:43PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > Package: r-cran-rgl
> > Version: 0.64.13-3
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Subject says it all, really... the upload of X.org to sid makes this
> > package not installable wi
Package: hdf5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
I plan on NMUing hdf5 for the CXX transition today. See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html
The idea is from here:
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11748
I will attach a patch as soon as I have this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 314896 + fixed
Bug#314896: libdvdread3: FTBFS: Missing 'Depends' on 'debconf'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 287397 serious
Bug#287397: libgii: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of
'linux_joy_devinfo' follows non-static declaration
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 01:47:43PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> Package: r-cran-rgl
> Version: 0.64.13-3
> Severity: serious
>
> Subject says it all, really... the upload of X.org to sid makes this
> package not installable with the upgraded xutils and x-window-system-core.
Do all X11 packages
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 06:11 am, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The most likely explanation for this is that aptitude is trying to satisfy
> a Recommends: for some package already installed on the system, and
> believes that installing exim4 is the only way to do this. You might also
> try running aptit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # gcc 4 is now default in sid, verified FTBS on iX86.
> severity 307760 serious
Bug#307760: snacc: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 'EOC' was not declared in this scope
Severity set to `serious'.
> tags 307760 sid
Bug#307760: snacc: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 'EOC'
Package: libxosd-dev
Severity: grave
It seems that with the new Xorg in sid, Xinerama_pic.a got lost
somewhere. It doesn't seem to be neither in xlibs-static-pic nor in
libxinerama* packages. As a consequence, linker does not work with what
xosd-cofig --libs produces, rendering the package unusabl
Package: r-cran-rgl
Version: 0.64.13-3
Severity: serious
Subject says it all, really... the upload of X.org to sid makes this
package not installable with the upgraded xutils and x-window-system-core.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (50
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 317985 + pending
Bug#317985: ctn: Incorrect/missing/hardcoded depenencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Patch for the nmu
--
Eat as much as you like -- just don't swallow it.
-- Harry Secombe's diet
diff -u boost-1.32.0/debian/control boost-1.32.0/debian/control
--- boost-1.32.0/debian/control
+++ boost-1.32.0/debian/control
@@ -58,10 +58,12 @@
.
Homepage: http://www.boost.org/
Package: mailscanner
Version: 4.41.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: unknow
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30.20050518
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages mailscanner depends on:
ii debc
Package: boost
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
I plan on NMUing boost for the CXX transition today. See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html
The idea is from here:
https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10768
I will attach a patch as soon as I have t
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:32:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314374: fixed in squirrelmail 2:1.4.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:32:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317094: fixed in squirrelmail 2:1.4.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 01:54:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 10:28:20AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
# After succesfull `apt-get dist-upgrade` knows apt-get that the dist
# upgrade was done, but aptitude still wants to install exim
# and some other packages.
>
> > N
sean finney wrote:
> another update,
>
> the security release for cacti has been delayed due to complications
> backporting the security fix into the version in woody, which is a major
> release (and rewrite) behind the versions in sarge and sid.
>
> joey from the security team provided an init
Rebuilding the kdepim source package, and installing the resulting lib*.deb
fixed the problem for me.
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 317739 [CAN-2005-2161] XSS in bbcode
Bug#317739: XSS in phpbb2 (MS IE only?)
Changed Bug title.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Package: xfree86-driver-synaptics
Version: 0.14.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xfree86-driver-synaptics is a driver for the Synaptics TouchPad for X.Org and
XFree86 4.x. (cf http://web.telia.com/~u89404340/touchpad/index.html)
It depends on xserver-xfree86 (>4.1.0)
For the benifit of non-experts (like myself), some specifics on a way
to downgrade:
Add stable to /etc/apt/sources.list (lines marked with a '+'):
deb http://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian testing main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib
non-free
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 316401 -sarge -sid
Unknown tag/s: -sid.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n e
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:32:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306279: fixed in netatalk 2.0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:32:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306279: fixed in netatalk 2.0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
severity 316963 normal
tags 316963 +unreproducible
tags 316963 +moreinfo
thanks
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said:
> You clearly have something wrong with your network arrangement. The
> first error message says that freshclam is unable to do a DNS query (odd
> in and of itself) and t
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:32:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306279: fixed in netatalk 2.0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310439 serious
Bug#310439: gperf FTBFS using gcc-4.0 4.0.0-8 from experimental
Severity set to `serious'.
> retitle 310439 gperf: FTBFS with gcc-4.0: 'PositionIterator' does not name a
> type
Bug#310439: gperf FTBFS using gcc-4.0 4.0.0-8 from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 316963 normal
Bug#316963: clamav-freshclam - fails to upgrade with timeout
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 316963 +unreproducible
Bug#316963: clamav-freshclam - fails to upgrade with timeout
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 288189 serious
Bug#288189: xine-lib: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in increment
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
M.H. ten Berge wrote:
Package: mysql-query-browser
Version: 1.1.12-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
mysql-query-browser depends on libsigc++-1.2-5c102, which is no longer
available in testing. This makes that the dependencies for
mysql-query-browser cannot be fu
Package: desktop-file-utils
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hey ho,
On a newly installed Debian system, when I try to apt-get gnome-core, it
ends in a series of uninstallable packages, all of which seem to be
related to desktop-file-utils not properly being
Package: xmms
Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050209-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xmms
Message: device: default
Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
serial 468 error_code 8 request_code 2 minor_code 0
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 318085 sid
Bug#318085: mysql-query-browser: package depends on unavailable
libsigc++-1.2-5c102
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Hi Markus
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 06:50 -0400, Markus Waldeck wrote:
> Dear Andree
>
> > I don't believe this is comparable: mondo works fine without the
> > ...
>
> snort works fine without database support, too!!!
> But I have the possibility to choose a package WITH database support!
But mond
Package: mysql-query-browser
Version: 1.1.12-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
mysql-query-browser depends on libsigc++-1.2-5c102, which is no longer
available in testing. This makes that the dependencies for
mysql-query-browser cannot be fulfilled.
-- System Info
On 2005-07-13 09:11:14 +0100, Silas S. Brown wrote:
> Why not simply backport 1.0.5? I can't see any major difference
> between 1.0.4 and 1.0.5 except for these security problems.
In addition to these security problems, an important performance
regression concerning form inputs seems to have been
Dear Markus
Thanks a lot for your swift response!
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 09:38 -0400, Markus Waldeck wrote:
> Dear Andree
>
> > I am writing to you, because you have filed two bugs against the mondo
> > package, #314782 and #315733.
>
> > I am awaiting feedback from you on #314782 since 19 Jun 2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 318038 serious
Bug#318038: libxine1 uninstallable because of xorg transition
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 318038 318019
Bug#318019: libxine1: uninstallable due to g++ 4.0 transition
Bug#318038: libxine1 uninstallable because of xorg tran
* Adam Conrad:
>> These bugs will likely be addressed for stable by a change in the
>> security bug policy for stable. Discussions with the security team are
>> ongoing; a detailed statement should be published soon.
>
> We need a new security policy for something that *may* fix security
> bugs?
Florian Weimer wrote:
Version 4.4.0 address some memory corruption bugs, apparently resulting
from fairly wide-spread errors in the implementation of reference
counting. These bugs probably can be exploited by malicious PHP scripts
only, and not by specially crafted input to correctly written P
On Jul 13, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then I guess you are deliberately breaking all up-to-date unstable
> boxes? In this case udev installs, but doesn't start at boot time
> anymore, while with 0.060-1 it starts.
I decided that this would have been the less painful choice, havi
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 10:28:20AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:11:20AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > After succesfull `apt-get dist-upgrade` knows apt-get that the dist
> > > upgrade was done, bu
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:11:20AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> > After succesfull `apt-get dist-upgrade` knows apt-get that the dist
> > upgrade was done, but aptitude still wants to install exim
> > and some other packages.
>
> # aptitude --without-recommends dist-upgrade
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>at exim4 exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light mdetect read-edid
I have seen the packages 'mdetect' and 'read-edid' also seen pulled in
by debian-installer on other systems.
I'm not sure
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.4-2
Followup-For: Bug #318061
It seems that a little more information has appeared on that
page now. "Code execution through shared function objects"
sounds scary.
Why not simply backport 1.0.5? I can't see any major
difference between 1.0.4 and 1.0.5 exce
severity 318020 important
thanks
Am Mittwoch, den 13.07.2005, 14:08 +0900 schrieb OHURA Makoto:
First of all, I finally found the place to which vm had moved all my
mail: It was all in $HOME/INBOX. So, after all, no data has been lost,
meaning this bug probably no longer qualifies for severity "g
> And in debian rules:
> # dh_shlibdeps -A
>
> Please don't do this. You have incorrect/missing dependencies because
> of this.
Thank you for your report. I will look into this tonight.
regards,
Thijs Kinkhorst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 318020 important
Bug#318020: xemacs21-basesupport: vm corrupts my complete mail directory
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 318017 serious
Bug#318017: kdelibs4-dev: gcc4 issues causes build failures
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 00:44 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> On Jul 13, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > udev 0.062-4 still installs without a warning on my unstable box.
> You could at least have taken the time to read the changelog entry
> that closes this bug: "This will
Package: php4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Version 4.4.0 address some memory corruption bugs, apparently resulting
from fairly wide-spread errors in the implementation of reference
counting. These bugs probably can be exploited by malicious PHP scripts
only, an
Package: mozilla-browser
Version: 2:1.7.8-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Mozilla 1.7.9 fixes several security bugs, one of them rated critical.
Unfortunately, details for this bug are embargoed until at least July
20, 2005. 8-(
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/s
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.4-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Firefox 1.0.5 fixes several security bugs, two of them rated critical.
Unfortunately, details for these bugs are embargoed until at least July
20, 2005, so no details so far.
http://www.mozi
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 03:17:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318037: fixed in librep 0.17-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
95 matches
Mail list logo
