Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 319336 grave
Bug#319336: mozilla-firefox: firefox crash when I click on refresh button
Severity set to `grave'.
forwarded 319381 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293307
Bug#319381: 1.0.6 on amd64: where is the gui?
Noted your
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#312145: fixed in libspf2 1.2.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
inux/SDL_sysjoystick.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/SDL_sysjoystick.o
In file included
from
../../../../SDL-1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007/src/joystick/linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c:41:
/usr/include/linux/joystick.h:142:2: error: #error Unexpected BITS_PER_LONG
make[4]: *** [SDL_sysjoystick.lo] Error 1
Package: nsis
Version: 2.08-2
Followup-For: Bug #319929
InstallOptions.dll is not usable on Windows. The dialog is not coming up.
filefunc.exe, logiclib.exe, textfunc.exe and textfunctest.exe produces
gpf's when compiled with linux-compiled zlib-stub. Windows stub works.
-- System Information:
Package: ecamegapedal
Version: 0.4.4
Severity: serious
Please add a build-depends on libxinerama-dev.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 4.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
gcj-4.0 requires the file /usr/lib/libgcj.spec from libgcj6-dev. Either
this file should be repackaged into libgcj6 or gcj-4.0 should depend on
libgcj6-dev. (I suggest the former.)
Without this file, gcj errors
Hello Lucas,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 05:22:17PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
Helge Kreutzmann wrote, On 29/07/05 13:30:
Well, I don't think so. I read in your changelog:
- new upstream patch because of security issue CAN-2005-2335
There is no mention of a bug in the BTS here (no
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:14:20 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320555: gcc-defaults: gcj-4.0 requires
/usr/lib/libgcj.spec from non-dependent libgcj6-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
reopen 319929
found 319929 2.08-2
thanks
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 01:23 +0200, bholliger wrote:
InstallOptions.dll is not usable on Windows. The dialog is not coming up.
Hmm, I'll investigate this tomorrow.
filefunc.exe, logiclib.exe, textfunc.exe and textfunctest.exe produces
gpf's when
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:47:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#319336: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:47:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#319336: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:47:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#308252: fixed in libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:47:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#315676: fixed in libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: ocamlnet
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
From my build log:
...
Installed
/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/debian/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring/netaccel_link.mli
Installed
Package: screem
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
From my build log:
...
Checking correctness of source dependencies...
Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_=*=PROVIDED=*= gcc-4.0_4.0.1-2
g++-4.0_4.0.1-2 binutils_2.16.1-2+kbsd libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.1-2
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 09:01:18PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
So, the only one that's not the same is evolution, and the bug was
reported for etch's version...
So the bug must be still present in etch. And I have no intention to
corrupt my system again by trying to test (mix) the
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:58:13 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320504: liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev: liblablgtk2-ocaml
dependency problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: hsftp
Version: 1.15-1
Severity: serious
It seems as though hsftp doesn't really work:
'''[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ hsftp -v -p [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Username matti, remote host [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Command: ssh -p -x -l matti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'pwd'
... hangs indefinitely until ^C ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 320567 0.14.2-2
Bug#320567: FTBFS: missing build-dep on cdbs
Bug marked as found in version 0.14.2-2.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:32:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#319907: fixed in slang 1.4.9dbs-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 320357 fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in unstable, stable and
possibly oldstable
Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in stable and possibly oldstable
Changed Bug title.
tags 320357 + patch
Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335
Hi,
this isn't fixed in sid either, because debian/rules is fucked up and
only applies the patch after the build. I just noticed this by chance
because I suddenly got bitten by the old fetchsizelimit bug again (for
APOP) and started to investigate... And why is there an old random
unrelated
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Please close once woody and sarge are dealt with.
Sorry, my fault... I forgot to reopen it.
Anyway, there will be no official update from the security team, so
I'm going to upload a fixed package to stable-proposed-updates (and
maybe
Package: kdelibs4
Version: 4:3.3.2-6.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Updating kdelibs to 3.3.2-7 breaks kmail on 3 different Linux Systems
with Debian/unstable installed and Kernel 2.6.11-mm1:
Standard kernel 2.6.11 with patch from
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 08:20:17PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:39:58AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
And, what *does* config.log have to say about this? The build log on
buildd.debian.org certainly shows that libx11-6 and libx11-dev were
installed, so -lX11 should
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 286964 + fixed
Bug#286964: guppi: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:18:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320017: fixed in vim 1:6.3-071+1sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 287924 + fixed
Bug#287924: ppxp: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function
'SigQuit'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hi,
thanks for reporting this
This will be fixed in -18.
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 320017
Bug#320017: vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
reopen 320017
thanks
* Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
vim (1:6.3-071+1sarge1) stable; urgency=high
.
* New upstream patches (081 and 082), see README.gz for details.
+ 6.3.081, 6.3.082: Fix arbitrary shell commands execution by wrapping
them in glob() or expand() function
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:48:23 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#319433: FTBFS: Unable to find libmlgdome2-xslt
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: xchat
Version: 2.4.3-0.2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
when i use /unloadall xchat close/quit
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture:
That's why I sent you the previous mail. I
will gladly prepare a package of elmo which fixes this bug and 3 minor
issues that have been reported. The question is: who is going to
upload it because my previous sponsor is not replying to my emails.
If your sponsor is not responding, it is
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:32:20 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#319431: fixed in dvr 3.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
Have a look at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkgdata=devtodoarchive=noversion=dist=unstable
This is what the form at
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/
came up with when I selected
search for:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
tags 320361 + sid
Bug#320361: rt2500-source: can't installed compiles package with
linux-image-2.6.12
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing
Package: vpopmail-bin
Severity: grave
Tags: security
vpopmail has a couple of security holes:
CAN-2004-2239 a buffer overflow in vsybase.c
Originally reported here:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-08/0226.html
Confirmed by author as fixed in cvs here:
Hi,
Apparently, the bug with the libccscript disappeared with the transition
to g++ 4.0, so it should be ok to close this bug when the gcc-4.0 build
package will be uploaded.
However, bayonne FTBFS with g++ 4.0. If you didn't already have them,
patches are attached :
- Fix 1 is for friend
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320568: fixed in ocamlnet 1.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:02:31 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320523: fixed in gtkdialog 1:0.58.11-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
severity 320582 grave
Bug#320582: libdjvulibre1: soname of library changed
Severity set to `grave'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
directory `/build/buildd/ggcov-0.6/build-tree/ggcov-0.6'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ggcov-0.6/build-tree/ggcov-0.6'
make: *** [build] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20050730-1726
FAILED
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:47:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300102: fixed in goo 0.155-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Want to learn how to build your own website?
http://vamo.8funbpq15i8x5r8.hjendozoacl.com
All movements go too far.
Subdue your appetites, my dears, and you've conquered human nature.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:52 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#269152: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: libdjvulibre1
Version: 3.5.14-6
Severity: serious
Any number of packages that link to /usr/lib/libdjvulibre.so.14
(I hit evince 0.3.0-2 first) break horribly when libdjvulibre.so.15 is
installed ahead.
I'm not sure how this should be handled, but neither the changelog
nor the version
Package: ocalm
Version: 3.08.3-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
if [ -x ./ocamlopt ]; then \
/usr/bin/make -C ocaml-md5sums/ opt;\
else
Package: pcre-ocaml
Version: 5.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/pcre-ocaml-5.10.0/lib'
ocamlc -c -cc cc -ccopt -g -Wall -O2 \
-DPIC \
On Jul 30, 11:22am, Joey Hess wrote:
Finally, the reason this bug is grave, vpopmail's author says that
version 5.4.6 contains fixed for SQL injection vulnerabilities which
This one doesn't apply to current Debian package.
Pawel
--
(___) | Pawel Wiecek - Coven /
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:53:16 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed with a bin NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 319771 +pending
Bug#319771: sfs-common: can't install SFS in sid
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
tags 319771 +pending
thanks
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Francois Gurin wrote:
Package: sfs-common
Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20041016.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
SFS packages have a dependency on libgmp3 which is not available on sid.
It has been replaced with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 320587 important
Bug#320587: xchat: Xchat close when i use /unloadall
Severity set to `important'.
tag 320587 moreinfo
Bug#320587: xchat: Xchat close when i use /unloadall
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
tag 320587
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 320508 grave
Bug#320508: libopenal0 depends on libsmpeg0 (replaced)
Severity set to `grave'.
tags 320508 + sid
Bug#320508: libopenal0 depends on libsmpeg0 (replaced)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 319319 normal
Bug#319319: xscreensaver: does not start: 'couldn't setgroups ... not permitted'
Severity set to `normal'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:30:38PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
The bug is still present in testing for me.
Upgrade-crash
downgrade-working.
Thank you for testing. I anticipated this.
Strictly speaking, this is probably not a bug in evolution, but I don't
know where exactly the problem
The bug is still present in testing for me.
Upgrade-crash
downgrade-working.
Here was the upgrade:
Inst libgnomecanvas2-0 [2.8.0-1] (2.10.2-2 Debian:testing) []
Inst libgnomecanvas2-common [2.8.0-1] (2.10.2-2 Debian:testing)
Strictly speaking, this is probably not a bug in evolution, but I don't
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:41:20 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing. Not an Xorg bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
package a2ps
severity 280370 grave
merge 267527 280370
thanks
I'm not completely sure that this bug should be grave, but I can see the
justification since right now a2ps can't print on any system that uses
lpr. Anyway, since one of these bugs was already marked grave, I'll
change the severity on
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 10:38:41PM +0200, Holger Leskien wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:30:38PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
The bug is still present in testing for me.
Upgrade-crash
downgrade-working.
Thank you for testing. I anticipated this.
Strictly speaking, this is probably not
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:48:52PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
reopen 320017
thanks
* Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
vim (1:6.3-071+1sarge1) stable; urgency=high
.
* New upstream patches (081 and 082), see README.gz for details.
+ 6.3.081, 6.3.082: Fix arbitrary shell
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package a2ps
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: a2ps
severity 280370 grave
Bug#280370: a2ps using lp broken
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 267527 280370
Bug#267527: a2ps option -P does not work
Bug#280370: a2ps using lp broken
Merged 267527 280370.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
reassign 320622 ocaml
Bug#320622: ocalm: FTBFS: ../ocamlopt: Command not found
Warning: Unknown package 'ocalm'
Bug reassigned from package `ocalm' to `ocaml'.
End of message,
Package: libmysqlclient14,mysql-client-4.1,mysql-server-4.1
Version: 4.1.13-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
in the latest mysql-dfsg-4.1, the dependencies from the above three
packages have been changed to include Depends: mysql-common-4.1 (=
4.1.12-1). This makes the packages uninstallable,
Status report
I am almost done with solving all the problems for libcrypto++ with
respect to the GCC4 transition. My plan is as follows. I will upload
to experimental and/or test the build on other architectures than i386.
If everything works smoothly, I will upload to sid.
--
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 07:57:36PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: pcre-ocaml
Version: 5.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/pcre-ocaml-5.10.0/lib'
ocamlc -c -cc cc -ccopt -g -Wall -O2
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Dear mentors,
the last version of ocaml I uploaded FTBFS on all autobuilders but
build properly on my unstable and in a pbuilder chroot.
According to the build logs (e.g. [1]) the FTFBS happened at this point:
if [
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 07:57:36PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
On which architecture the package FTBFS?
On buildd.debian.org all attempted built have been completed
successfully ...
Before forwarding the patch upstream I would like to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 300699 - patch
Bug#300699: alex: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): lexical error in string/character
literal
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
severity 320621 grave
Bug#320621: libdjvulibre1 3.5.14-6 changes soname without warning
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 320621 320682
Bug#320621: libdjvulibre1 3.5.14-6 changes soname
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 320622 ocaml
Bug#320622: ocalm: FTBFS: ../ocamlopt: Command not found
Bug reassigned from package `ocaml' to `ocaml'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Right, the request server doesn't read past a line starting with two
# hyphens, so it can't read past MIME boundaries. Redo the bug changes
# that were done in messages that also contained patches.
package a2ps
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: a2ps
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:32:16 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#318364: fixed in aatv 0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
77 matches
Mail list logo
