Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 330865 normal
Bug#330865: webmin wont show cron's from other users, also adding new for root
wont work...
Severity set to `normal'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:02:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329779: fixed in sipsak 0.9.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: libgtkimreg-dev
Version: 0.1.3-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
libgtkimreg-dev needs to be rebuilt with gdk-imlib11-dev:
# apt-get install libgtkimreg-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed.
Package: python-soappy
Version: 0.11.3-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'python-soappy' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
if [ -z ]; then \
if ! test -f debian/compat; then echo 4 debian/compat; fi; \
fi
cd . python setup.py build --build-base=./build
Package: mono-tools
Version: 1.1.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'mono-tools' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
debian/rules clean
debian/rules:5: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target
Package: dokuwiki
Version: 0.0.20050922-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
The content provided in the data directory--one png image and three
text files--are licensed with a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License Version 2.0 [1] which is
non-free (as a result
Package: galago-sharp
Version: 0.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'galago-sharp' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
debian/rules clean
debian/rules:14: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:32:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#328350: fixed in gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Adobe Creative Suite for MAC - $59.95
http://maintains.okmac.com/
It's not the voting that's democracy, it's the counting.
Popularity is neither fame nor greatness.
Nothing emboldens sin so much as mercy.
If little else, the brain is an educational toy.
Et tu, Brute!
Downloadable software
http://Galilee.okmac.com/
May no portent of evil be attached to the words I say.
Opinions founded on prejudice are always sustained with the greatest of
violence.
It's not practice that makes perfectbut perfect practice that makes
perfect.
It's innocence when
Package: scim-chinese
Version: 0.4.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Scim-chinese is not installable since early October. Would someone
out there be kind enough to provide a fix for this? This bug has
already been reported but it seems like a fix is a recompile to
Package: uim
Severity: serious
Tags: security
All uim releases before 0.4.9.1 have a security bug, which causes
privilege escalation if applications linked to libuim is set
setuid/setgid.
For more detail, please see:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/uim/2005-September/001346.html
Best
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:02:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#317185: fixed in brutefir 1.0f-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:02:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320270: fixed in brutefir 1.0f-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 331050 + patch
thanks
hi,
attached patch fixes this issue, i dont know if its a clean solution, it
seems to work:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# ruby -ryaml -e 'puts YAML.load(YAML.dump(1234567890))'
1234567890
bye,
- michael
--- ruby1.8-1.8.3/ruby-1.8.3/lib/yaml/rubytypes.rb 2005-09-20
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 331050 + patch
Bug#331050: libruby 1.8.3 yaml bignum issues
Tags were: sid upstream
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Package: python-visual
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get install python-visual
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an
hi again,
please note that the patch does still not prevent raggle from crashing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# raggle
Raggle: Loading config...
Raggle: Loading feed list...
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/yaml.rb:133:in `transfer': allocator undefined for
Bignum (TypeError)
from
severity 331540 normal
tags 331540 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:14:18AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 04:53:38PM -0500, Carter Wiggins wrote:
[...]
gives only:
DOCUMENT_ROOT=/var/www
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 331540 normal
Bug#331540: eperl: fails to work in nph mode
Severity set to `normal'.
tags 331540 unreproducible
Bug#331540: eperl: fails to work in nph mode
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
thanks
Stopping processing here.
tags 331620 patch
thanks
I made the patch from uim-0.4.9 and uim-0.4.9.1. With this patch,
update-uim-config prints some warning messages(Broken Pipe), but this
will fix the security problem.
In Debian, mlterm is installed with setgid, and I'm afraid mlterm is
affected with this bug.
Best
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 331620 patch
Bug#331620: uim: privilege escalation before 0.4.9.1
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Package: libsilc-1.0.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Jeesh, the libraries are missing. I rebuilt from source, still
no libraries in the built package. Same with libsilc-1.0.2-dev.
---snip---
$ dpkg -L libsilc-1.0-2
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
Package: libpt-dev
Severity: serious
S'està desempaquetant el reemplaçament de libpt-dev ...
dpkg: s'ha produït un error en processar
/net/mirror/debian/pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-dev_1.8.7-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
s'està intentant sobreescriure «/usr/lib/libpt.so.1», que també està en el
paquet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 331630 libsilc-1.0-2
Bug#331630: libsilc-1.0.2: Libraries missing
Warning: Unknown package 'libsilc-1.0.2'
Bug reassigned from package `libsilc-1.0.2' to `libsilc-1.0-2'.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 03:17:51 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#331565: fixed in openclipart 0.17+dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi,
I just installed the Debian unstable packages:
ii fwbuilder 2.0.7-2Firewall
administration tool GUI
ii fwbuilder-common 2.0.7-2Firewall
administration tool GUI (common fil
ii fwbuilder-linux 2.0.7-2
On 3 October 2005 at 21:59, Matt Kraai wrote:
| | I disabled a few of these tests on other packages formerly provided by
| | r-recommended, and I guess I need to disable it here too.
| |
| | This was on i386.
|
| Odd, so how does that square with my pbuilder logs showing that it built
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 331601 + fixed
Bug#331601: python-soappy: python 2.4 is not the default in debian's
python-defaults yet. please do not depend on python = 2.4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
tag 331607 + fixed
Bug#331607: python-soappy: FTBFS: Missing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 04:32:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330603: fixed in gbatnav 1.0.4cvs20051004-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:02:17 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#263209: fixed in xwit 3.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:32:13 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#294392: fixed in xmcpustate 3-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:32:13 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260846: fixed in xmcpustate 3-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package mysql-dfsg
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mysql-dfsg
reopen 319042
Bug#319042: linux-kernel-headers: #include asm/atomic.h fails from C++ due to
function parameter called new
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
severity 319042 serious
Hello
On 2005-10-04 Daniel Schepler wrote:
According to the bug log, you thought you'd fixed the FTBFS in
mysql-dfsg, but I can still reproduce it in version 4.0.24-10 using a
pbuilder chroot created just today:
Please report the exact version you tried and on which architecture
Package: docbook-xsl
Version: 1.68.1
Severity: serious
The extensions contains many jar files, without having the sources in
the source package, the problematic files seem to be:
saxon644.jar
saxon65.jar
saxon651.jar
saxon652.jar
saxon653.jar
It looks like the source for saxon643.jar
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:29:38AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
i just uploaded a NMU to fix that bug into the DELAYED-5 queue on gluck.
the patch is attached.
I doubt it was DELAYED-5 since it's now available in archive.
Anyway thanks for fixing it, cause I'm rather busy now.
regards
fEnIo
--
On 04/10/2005 Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:29:38AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
i just uploaded a NMU to fix that bug into the DELAYED-5 queue on gluck.
the patch is attached.
I doubt it was DELAYED-5 since it's now available in archive.
Anyway thanks for
Package: streamripper
Severity: serious
versions of streamripper, greater than 1.61.11 contain new buffering
code and therefore may be too buggy for testing. Lets keep them out
until the bugs are fixed.
bye,
- michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does this mean that the twiki (20040902-3) in Debian is not vulnerable
and this bug report can be closed?
Micah
Sven Dowideit wrote:
while I think its very reasonable for you to send along these
advisories, and even doing so as a BTS bug wothout
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, defiantly
I have not found any way to exploit the debian package using any thus
far found methods. Florians patch get in the way every time :)
Sven
micah wrote:
Does this mean that the twiki (20040902-3) in Debian is not vulnerable
and
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:20:23PM -0700, Joshua Rodman wrote:
What was done before was the line was scanned for anything which
resembles an IP address. What I am suggesting is a regex which
specifies where in the line the IP address should be.
how would you specify where? if you are
Hi Michael,
Just wanted to warn you of a new bug in the latest
streamripper (1.61.14). The symptom is that they
will get an error of SR_ERROR_BUFFER_EMPTY, and then
streamripper will exit. This only happens with certain
streams, and/or with certain splitpoint settings.
The only known fix
--- Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Greg,
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:22:01AM -0700, Gregory Sharp wrote:
Just wanted to warn you of a new bug in the latest
streamripper (1.61.14). The symptom is that they
will get an error of SR_ERROR_BUFFER_EMPTY, and then
found 293667 4.41.3-2
found 293667 4.46.2-1
thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed
Uhm, how does adding a Depends on debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0
resolve the problem of simply not sourcing the debconf library before
using a debconf function?
(Ref.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 293667 4.41.3-2
Bug#293667: Mailscanner Wont Upgrade Or Install After Removing Old Version
Bug marked as found in version 4.41.3-2.
found 293667 4.46.2-1
Bug#293667: Mailscanner Wont Upgrade Or Install After Removing Old Version
Bug marked as
merge 324268 331618
tags 324268 pending
tags 331618 pending
tags 297975 pending
thanks
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 01:08:45AM -0700, Wilmer Lau wrote:
Scim-chinese is not installable since early October. Would someone
out there be kind enough to provide a fix for this? This bug has
already
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 323350 + fixed
Bug#323350: egroupware: Another XMLRPC vulnerability
Tags were: sid etch sarge security
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 324268 331618
Bug#324268: Uninstallable scim-chinese package
Bug#331618: scim-chinese still not installable
Merged 324268 331618.
tags 324268 pending
Bug#324268: Uninstallable scim-chinese package
There were no tags set.
Bug#331618: scim-chinese
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Forgot 324808
tags 324808 pending
Bug#324808: scim-chinese: sicm-chinese uninstallable with scim 1.4.1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Your message dated Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:59:20 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
This problem is actually caused by a problem with libfwbuilder
2.0.7-4 which is already corrected in 2.0.7-5 which was uploaded last
night as part of the fix for Bug#331575.
Regards,
Jeremy
Michael Setzer wrote:
Hi,
I just installed the Debian unstable packages:
ii fwbuilder
Package: qtorrent
Version: 2.9.1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
The same bugs as in 330563 is also in line 138 of the same file. It doesn't do
anything with respect to asking about where to save, and is therefore quite
unusable.
You can replace
Package: dar
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: serious
[...]
strip: debian/dar-static/usr/bin/dar_static: File format not recognized
dh_strip: command returned error code 256
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
dar's configure script detects upx is installed and uses it to generate
compressed (but broken)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 331396 libmysqlclient15: contains libcdbclient.so.* shared library
also in libmysqlclient14-dev
Bug#331396: mysql-query-browser: package dependencies conflict with
mysql-server-5.0
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#316584: fixed in libmusicbrainz-2.1 2.1.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#319411: fixed in libmusicbrainz-2.1 2.1.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: lasso
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-'
lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: syntax error before ')' token
[...]
lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: invalid type argument of '-'
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-'
lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: syntax error before ')' token
[...]
lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: invalid type argument of '-'
lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: syntax
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-'
lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: syntax error before ')' token
[...]
lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: invalid type argument of '-'
lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: syntax error before ')' token
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:41:09PM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
It's also giving _alot_ of warning of this type:
warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
You can probably use -fno-strict-aliasing as a workaround for
this.
Those are from SWIG
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
It's not only a cleaner log, but it also changes the generated
code. This can be the difference between something that works or
not.
Thanks for the information; I didn't know this.
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Tue, 4 Oct 2005 16:16:57 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:17:13 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#331699: fixed in lasso 0.6.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:17:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#328420: fixed in gtksourceview 1.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: php4-lasso
Severity: grave
Depends: phpapi-20020918
phpapi-20020918 isn't provided by anything.
phpapi-20050606 is, however.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327327: fixed in tcpick 0.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:02:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258460: fixed in asmem 1.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326927: fixed in tcpick 0.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:17:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#331710: fixed in lasso 0.6.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:17:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258640: fixed in elvis-tiny 1.4-19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Some more info on the issue:
If trying to execute the failing command by hand one gets the following
error message:
/tmp/chroottest$ sudo chroot /tmp/chroottest/woody dpkg --force-depends
--install var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_3.0.2_i386.deb
If I had known the proper 'process', I would have done so. Thanks for
informing me now. I won't do so in the future.
However, you don't sound very 'welcoming' to a newbie like me to
participate in the Debian process in the future. I've heard problems
with Debian's community being somewhat
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 15:32:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#286478: fixed in isic 0.05-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
These bug reports are very confusing, I am performing my own tests to
help clarify.
Andrew Lee wrote:
The VCI shouldn't be none if you have setup /dev/loop4 correctly, I
did same thing and got same errors when I forgot to setup the /dev/
loop4
Hello,
Thank you very much for your message, Andree - you really deserved your
vacation ;-)
I had seen the bug on mindi, but I had not paid enough attention to it. So, I
looked at it again and tried the patch, on both a Sarge system (on which it
worked before) and a recent one (on which it
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:02:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298714: fixed in nsmon 2.3e-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:33:36PM -0700, Wilmer Lau wrote:
However, you don't sound very 'welcoming' to a newbie like me to
participate in the Debian process in the future. I've heard problems
with Debian's community being somewhat exclusive, not friendly, and
welcoming. If you were me, and
Fair enough. Case closed. Looking forward to the update.
2005/10/4, Ming Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:33:36PM -0700, Wilmer Lau wrote:
However, you don't sound very 'welcoming' to a newbie like me to
participate in the Debian process in the future. I've heard problems
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: docbook-xsl
Version: 1.68.1
Severity: serious
The extensions contains many jar files, without having the sources in
the source package, the problematic files seem to be:
saxon644.jar
saxon65.jar
saxon651.jar
saxon652.jar
saxon653.jar
I don't change
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:17:27AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 3 October 2005 at 21:59, Matt Kraai wrote:
| | I disabled a few of these tests on other packages formerly provided by
| | r-recommended, and I guess I need to disable it here too.
| |
| | This was on i386.
|
|
On 4 October 2005 at 08:23, Matt Kraai wrote:
| On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:17:27AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 3 October 2005 at 21:59, Matt Kraai wrote:
| | | I disabled a few of these tests on other packages formerly provided
by
| | | r-recommended, and I guess I need to
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:32:14 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#312058: fixed in ttf-larabie 1:20011216-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:32:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#331694: fixed in qtorrent 2.9.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 23:13:58 -0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Has been fixed for ages, but I forgot to close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 285025 imlib11
Bug#285025: imlib1: CAN-2004-0817 is not fixed.
Bug reassigned from package `imlib1' to `imlib11'.
reassign 154690 gdk-imlib11
Bug#154690: gdk-imlib1: does not support PPMs with maxval = 1
Bug reassigned from package
Package: apt-move
Version: 4.2.24-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
As of today, apt-move fails to build the packages file. It worked
yesterday. There are two packages starting with xfce4-syst but none
named that, so it appears something is trunkating a package name.
89 matches
Mail list logo