On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:50:21PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
I've seen this cause a boot take hours. The system looks like it's
mostly idle, but everything which uses syslog is excruciatingly slow.
It is possible that this is the same which is mentioned in bug 273269,
as both systems I've
Hi Marcelo,
Since you Andreas' patch looks good, do you plan to upload a fixed
gtkglextmm soon? Although this bug does not affect the version of
gtkglextmm in testing, the version that is in testing is also RC-buggy
because it's built for the old C++ ABI and does not build-depend on g++-3.3;
and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 328608 important
Bug#328608: xfce4-weather: It makes the xfce4-panel crashes on if you try to
query your location
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
forwarded 334292 lftp@uniyar.ac.ru
tags 334292 + confirmed upstream
severity 334292 normal
merge 334059 334292
thanks
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Filippo Giunchedi:
Hello,
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
consider this sample output
[EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 334292 lftp@uniyar.ac.ru
Bug#334292: lftp: illegal instruction/double free detected
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 334292 + confirmed upstream
Bug#334292: lftp: illegal instruction/double free
Package: ruby-v4l
Version: 0.1.2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of ruby-v4l_0.1.2-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), ruby1.8-dev
[...]
Package: bazaar
Version: 1.4.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on 4 architectures.
It failed to build from source on hppa, arm, ia64 and sparc; arm fails
thusly:
Test 73: archive_mirror url name
Test 73: FAILED: did not mirror to the local mirror
while sparc, ia64 and hppa fail:
Package: bsdtar
Version: 1.02.034-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of bsdtar_1.02.034-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libarchive-doc,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 333940
Bug#333940: Unsatisfiable build-dep on libsnmp5-dev
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
close 331303
Bug#331303: cacti-cactid:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 186882 1:1.18-2.1
Bug#186882: Crashes immediately on Alpha
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.18-2.1.
found 188448 1:0.7.0-1
Bug#188448: abuse-sdl: Nothing happens
Bug marked as found in version 1:0.7.0-1.
tags 213571 + patch
Bug#213571:
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:38:19 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#325564
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 01:47:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334138: fixed in dnprogs 2.31
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 325551 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#325551: Two disjunct aleph projects cause filename clash in Debian
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
tag 327129 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#327129: tetex-bin: missing links and formats
hi
I have (hopefully) fixed the bug 334055 that is a security alert.
This is the proposed update for sarge :
http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mennucc1/zope/debian/sarge-security/zope2.7_2.7.5-2sec1_source.changes
This is the proposed update for etch :
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:12:40 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-8 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: clamav
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
apt-get install clamav
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
reopen 329759
thanks
Sorry, but depending on gconf2 does not fix this. The prerm script needs to
not fail if gconf2 is unavailable.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: apache
Severity: serious
Version: 1.3.33-8
From my build log:
...
=== src/modules/ssl
gcc -c -I../../os/unix -I../../include -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DLINUX=22
-DTARGET=\apache\ -DHAVE_SET_DUMPABLE -DDB_DBM_HSEARCH=1
-DDEV_RANDOM=/dev/random -DUSE_HSREGEX -DAPACHE_SSL -O1 -g
Package: rhapsody
Version: 0.26b-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
the first time I joined in a channel it worked fine but the users list
showed only the ops of the channel. So I closed the program. Now when I
just join in a channel the program is closed with a
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:02:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334332: clamav: Broken package: fails to install due to
unmet dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Tommi Vainikainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does missing paperwork create a problem?
Strictly speaking, yes.
And what would be good license for Debians web pages?
MIT/Expat or GNU GPL.
Because copyright is currently claimed by SPI Inc, and SPI's board
meeting is coming rather soon, I brought this
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005, Ryan Murray wrote:
Sorry, but depending on gconf2 does not fix this. The prerm script needs to
not fail if gconf2 is unavailable.
Can you -vv your remark? You want the dh_gconf to be more robust?
Policy seems to grant explicitely this usage:
The Depends field
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: kcheckgmail
Version: 0.5.4-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Thank you, Lamont.
Incorporating changes as soon as possible.
Is there anything that upstream can do to help with this? i would
forward the information
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 304019 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#304019: nautilus: crash when accesing Properties
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
tag 309653 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#309653: nautilus: Icons for an open folder don't revert to closed
Package:r-cran-gtkdevice
Version:1.9.3-1
Severity: grave
To reproduce: start R, library(gtkDevice), gtk(), then click the X
on the window that pops up.
Package versions: r-base 2.1.1-1; libgtk1.2: 1.2.10-17; any
questions, please ask!
Cheers
David
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:02:17 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#331627: fixed in python-visual 3.2.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:17:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#333941: fixed in mbrowse 0.3.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:02:14 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#333633: fixed in gdis 0.86-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:02:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#332850: fixed in deskbar-applet 0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: ia32-libs
Version: 1.4
Severity: serious
Unpacking lib32z1 (from .../lib32z1_1%3a1.2.3-4_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lib32z1_1%3a1.2.3-4_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libz.so.1', which is also in
package ia32-libs
tags 317882 - moreinfo
tags 317882 - unreproducible
thanks
install xorg-driver-fglrx (but I cannot find this package in Ubuntu),
then ia32-libs to reproduce the installation failure.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 317882 - moreinfo
Bug#317882: ia32-libs: package fails to install
Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible
Tags removed: moreinfo
tags 317882 - unreproducible
Bug#317882: ia32-libs: package fails to install
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed:
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 06:52:39 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the Debian Bug report #334344,
regarding r-cran-gtkdevice causes R to segfault on window destruction
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Martyn Plummer [EMAIL
Package: flexbackup
Severity: grave
Tags: security
ZATAZ Audits has published an advisory concerning flexbackup. Based
on a cursory investigation of the source package, Debian is affected
as well.
From: ZATAZ Audits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Full-disclosure] flexbackup default config insecure
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:10:14 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line new release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:10:14 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line new release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: netplan
Version: 1.9-3
Severity: grave
With the new upgrade, the netplan daemon ate up all the memory on the
system and caused the xserver and its associated tty to fail. This
required a reboot.
Going to plan B, I tried apt-get source and compiling my own. It now
yields this error
Package: krb4
Severity: serious
Version: 1.2.2-11.3
From my build log:
...
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -I../../lib/roken
-I../../lib/roken -DROKEN_RENAME -I/usr/include/et -I/usr/include/et -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast
severity 313316 important
tags 313316 + unreproducible
thanks
On dim, jun 12, 2005, Nick Lewycky wrote:
I go to Tools - Web Development - JavaScript Debugger ... and
nothing happens. Nothing at all. The JavaScript Console shows no
errors, and neither does the text console Mozilla is run from.
On jeu, aoû 04, 2005, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
This package has been unusable for its purpose in certain
architectures for over six months now (including the versions in
unstable).
Is this a regression over version 2:1.7.8-1sarge2 in testing?
If yes, please provide a backtrace of the crash as
severity 321243 important
tags 321243 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On jeu, aoû 04, 2005, Torsten Zirzlaff wrote:
The browser does not start up, but still exsist as a process. It gives
the following warning:
Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_property_get(): length value has wrapped in calculation
[Dan Griswold]
With the new upgrade, the netplan daemon ate up all the memory on the
system and caused the xserver and its associated tty to fail. This
required a reboot.
Hm. I'm not aware of any changes which could give this result. What
was the version number you used before this problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 313316 important
Bug#313316: mozilla-js-debugger: menu option doesn't do anything at all.
Severity set to `important'.
tags 313316 + unreproducible
Bug#313316: mozilla-js-debugger: menu option doesn't do anything at all.
There were no tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 321243 important
Bug#321243: mozilla-browser: mozilla does not startup, but still exsist as a
process
Severity set to `important'.
tags 321243 + unreproducible
Bug#321243: mozilla-browser: mozilla does not startup, but still exsist as a
severity 321644 important
tags 321644 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005, Ian Campbell wrote:
I've just tested 1.7.12-1 on my amd64 system and it still crashes in the
same way 1.7.10 did. The patch in this bug still fixes the problem for
me.
Did you install the other
severity 323200 important
tags 323200 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On lun, aoû 15, 2005, Luke Schierer wrote:
according to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311035#c7,
which a bug I submitted was marked duplicate of, gcc4 generates bad
code in the libimglib2.so module, and this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 323200 important
Bug#323200: mozilla-browser: gcc4 problem in the libimglib2.so module
Severity set to `important'.
tags 323200 + unreproducible
Bug#323200: mozilla-browser: gcc4 problem in the libimglib2.so module
Tags were: patch
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 327550 + confirmed
Bug#327550: [CAN-2005-2414] Race condition in the XPCOM library
Tags were: security
Tags added: confirmed
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 321644 important
Bug#321644: mozilla-browser: mozilla 1.7.10 version crashes almost immediately
and all other browsers that use the mozilla core crash with similar frequency
Severity set to `important'.
tags 321644 + unreproducible
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Dan Griswold]
With the new upgrade, the netplan daemon ate up all the memory on the
system and caused the xserver and its associated tty to fail. This
required a reboot.
Hm. I'm not aware of any changes which could give this result. What
was
Package: php4-curl
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
libcurl3-dev disappeared from unstable on or about October 10th (based
on the upload date in the changelog) and the last PHP4 upload got caught
in the transition.
Some architectures' autobuilders could still get
Package: rdesktop
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
after invoking rdesktop with parameters -u, -d, -p, -g, -B, -z, -a, -x
my desktop freezes (kde). this also happended when invoking rdesktop with
'krdc'.
this bug was introduces in the last 10 days or so,
Re: Ryan Murray in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The correct 'configure' script will have output that looks like this:
linux*)
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
;;
Hi,
I've just compiled xmms-oggre with a modified configure script that
uses the above mentioned paragraph. It throws no further
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* corrected snmp build-dep, Salut Luk
Hi Noèl ;-)
I suppose it was a quick and easy fix :-)
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
Can't locate stddef.ph in @INC (did you run h2ph?) (@INC contains: /etc/perl
/usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5
/usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8
/usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/bits/types.ph line 10.
Compilation
Package: python2.4-psyco
Version: 1.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
python2.4-psyco fail to import, here's a transcript:
$ python2.4 -c 'import psyco'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File string, line 1, in ?
File
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Wrong email address?On 17 Oct 2005 23:54:46 +0900, Atsushi KAMOSHIDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't locate stddef.ph in @INC (did you run h2ph?) (@INC contains:
/etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7
/usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8
reopen 334228
thanks
As discussed on IRC, -mtune didn't do it. I've tested and can confirm that
the following cflags (suggested by Aurelien) work:
-pipe -O -march=
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 334228
Bug#334228: renders network unusable
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:47:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#333510: fixed in perl 5.8.7-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
[Dan Griswold]
That's what I thought when I looked in the changelog. I upgrade very
frequently, so my replaced version must be the immediately previous
one, 1.9-2.
Can you try to verify this by installing the old binary package and
see if it get rid of the problem?
Package: liballegro4.1-dbg
Version: 2:4.1.15-5.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get install liballegro4.1-dbg
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:28:52PM +0200, Loic Minier wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005, Ryan Murray wrote:
Sorry, but depending on gconf2 does not fix this. The prerm script needs to
not fail if gconf2 is unavailable.
Can you -vv your remark? You want the dh_gconf to be more robust?
Setting
I found that this bug cannot be reproduced consistently.
1. Sometimes inkscape behaves as previously reported
2. Sometimes, the font size will decrease (opposite of what was reported)
3. Sometimes, inkscapes behaves correctly (no corruption of font size).
Right now I don't have any idea what
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
I uploaded a new version over the weekend (to anonymous-ftp-master) that
was rejected. It
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
tags 329759 - fixed
Bug#329759: libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0: prerm failure: gconftool-2: command not
found
Tags were: fixed
Tags removed: fixed
End of message, stopping processing here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to make sure you're aware of this bug report as the NMU'er of
the last version of libgphoto2 -- with this version, libgphoto2-2 fails to
install without udev also being installed, which is a serious problem, since
Well, you're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
+++ Luk Claes [17/10/05 18:29 +0200]:
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Hi Luk,
I haven't had time to properly maintain DCTC
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:49:52 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334387: liballegro4.1-dbg: not installable in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
the thing i changed recently was the 'composite' extension. i disabled it, and
now rdesktop works great again.
I'm using nvidias accelerated X driver, an a self-compiled debian 2.6.12-10
kernel.
juergen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 333678 + fixed
Bug#333678: libgphoto2-2: Fails to install in chroot without udev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: fwbuilder-linux
Version: 2.0.7-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
fwbuilder can't build a firewall script for linux. Here's the message
written when compiling:
Unrecognized host OS linux24 (family linux24)
Here are some fwbuilder related packages installed on my
Package: gbib
Version: 0.1.2-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
after upgrading from version 0.1.2-6 gbib segfaults on program startup
and dumps a core file. The command:
gdb -c core `which gbib`
tells me:
#0 0x0f77bfa0 in __gnu_cxx::__pooltrue::_M_reclaim_block
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
+++ Luk Claes [17/10/05 18:29 +0200]:
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached
unmerge 333295 334146
reassign 334146 rpm
severity 334146 important
retitle 334146 rpm should declare Conflicts: Replaces: manpages-pl (
20051017-1 )
thanks
Hi,
I'm just uploading new version of the manpages-pl package, which has the
conflicting files removed. But for the smooth sarge
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:32:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330867: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:32:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330867: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
,manpages-pl' to `rpm'.
severity 334146 important
Bug#334146: rpm and manpages-pl contain the same files
Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl
Severity set to `important'.
retitle 334146 rpm should declare Conflicts: Replaces: manpages-pl (
20051017-1 )
Bug
Hi Frank,
Thanks very much for taking care of this.
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hi.
Openal currently fails to build on mips and mipsel again since you
again missed to include the NMU patches in subsequent uploads.
Please consider the following updated patch. If you don't raise any
objections I
Hi.
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:11:14 +0100 Simon Richard Clarkstone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I checked in /usr/share/, and found that /usr/share/slibcat did not
exist,
and permissions (0755) ensured that only root would be able to create
this file. Upon reading the documentation, I found that SLIB
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you try to verify this by installing the old binary package and
see if it get rid of the problem?
URL:ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/plan/netplan_1.9-2_i386.deb
Verified. 1.9-2 runs, and I can access my served calendars from plan.
+++ Luk Claes [17/10/05 19:38 +0200]:
Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
I haven't had time to properly maintain DCTC since a while and will be
orphaning it shortly (along with a few other packages).
Please go ahead,
Shall I orphan it properly with Maintainer set to Debian QA Group and
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 23:07 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Any comments?
Martin Wilck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0. the module loading tool runs during boot with PID 1.
I do not understand how this can happen. request_module() cannot occur
until usermodehelper_init() is called. This is only done
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unmerge 334146
Bug#334146: rpm should declare Conflicts: Replaces: manpages-pl (
20051017-1 )
Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl
Disconnected #334146 from all other report(s).
severity 333295 serious
Bug#333295
[Dan Griswold]
Can you try with ltrace?
Yields nothing obviously of value.
Well, please send the last 50 lines anyway, to let me know what is
going on when it fails. And send the last 50 strace lines as well,
though I do not expect them to tell me much.
So, I guess I need to gpg --import
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
