Matt Kraai wrote:
Package: jmock
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
jmock fails to build:
Needs a build-dep on ant-optional after ant reorganization.
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh yeah the third approach of course is switching defaulting
APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated on by default during the whole initial
install process (and possibly thereafter).
I don't know which I dislike more, that option, or the option of not
shipping CDs until this is properly fixed..
--
see
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
reassign 333522 module-init-tools
Bug#333522: udev: modules randomly aren't loaded at startup - Unknown symbol
Bug#333052: race in the modules loader?
Bug reassigned from package
Package: sword
Version: 1.5.8-5
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
sword failed to build on a sparc buildd. It did build on my sparc
pbuilder, where libidn11-dev was pulled in indirectly. Since the
build process uses this library, it should be in the build-depends.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
severity 334664 minor
Bug#334664: add linux-image-2.6 to list of suggests
Severity set to `minor'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Alexander Sack wrote:
true, but only for pgp/mime encrypted messages. If you inline, it
should work.
Ok, this is a viable workaround for you and me, but is it OK for
everybody? I have enough difficulties to have others sign their
messages at all...
- narrowing view via Subject or
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:39:01 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334603: Linking problem with amd64 port (not able to run
32bit SW, not finding /lib/ld-linux.so.2)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: qalculate-gtk
Version: 0.8.2.1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of qalculate-gtk_0.8.2.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), cdbs,
Package: qalculate-kde
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of qalculate-kde_0.8.2-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), cdbs,
Package: wsola
Version: 4.9-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of wsola_4.9-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
g++ -ffast-math -O4 -lsndfile -lfft -lfftw3 -L/home/flatmax/lib
WSOLATest.v4.C -o wsola.v4
WSOLATest.v4.C: In
The yiff server, by default, will run as the root user, even though it
only requires privileges to access the audio devices (/dev/dsp and
/dev/mixer), no effort is make by the package to create an specific user
and run the server as such.
[...]
I agree that this is badly broken. Thanks for
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#308709: fixed in lilypond 2.6.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323526: fixed in lilypond 2.6.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 12:53:38AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.41
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Thanks for your bugreport.
[..]
As I understand it, there is basically no way we can build official
Debian CDs that are signed with our archive signing key. There is also
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 334626 binutils
Bug#334626: FTBFS: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `binutils'.
reassign 334627 binutils
Bug#334627: FTBFS: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Bug
Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) :
chroot works fine so far with busybox-static.
but no love while booting it, lots of strange error messages.
Better to give samples of those strange error messages. ;-)
You might have a look to busybox-static's Bug #334672
--
R : Tu
Package: synce-serial
Version: 0.9.1-2
Severity: grave
Please follow udev/hotplug transition. The package depends currently
on hotplug, but current udev conflicts with hotplug and hotplug
is considered obsolete. Therefore it is not installable on a
up-to-date system.
-- System Information:
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 01:32:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334667: fixed in sword 1.5.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:48:49AM +0100, Phil Brooke wrote:
The yiff server, by default, will run as the root user, even though it
only requires privileges to access the audio devices (/dev/dsp and
/dev/mixer), no effort is make by the package to create an specific user
and run the server
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 06:20:26PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Hello,
you are right, this part of the patch does not seem to be necessary
any longer to make the package compile.
I've just uploaded a new version of syslinux (3.11-1) with a lot of
changes... could you please try to compile
Package: webmin-bandwidth
Version: 1.200-1
Severity: grave
Don't work at all. /usr/share/webmin/bandwidth looked very strange. IMHO
mistake in packaging.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:28:50AM +0200, Jean Charles Delepine wrote:
Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) :
chroot works fine so far with busybox-static.
but no love while booting it, lots of strange error messages.
Better to give samples of those strange error
Matt == Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matt Package: heimdal Version: 0.6.3-13 Severity: serious
Matt heimdal fails to build:
checking for crypto library... included libdes configure:
error: the crypto library used by krb4 lacks features required
by Kerberos 5; to
severity 334001 grave
severity 334668 grave
merge 334001 334668
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005, Timur Izhbulatov wrote:
I got the following error:
python -c 'import vte'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File string, line 1, in ?
ImportError:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 334001 grave
Bug#334001: Importing vte in python doesn't work
Severity set to `grave'.
severity 334668 grave
Bug#334668: ImportError while trying to import the vte module
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 334001 334668
Bug#334001: Importing
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 02:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#332564: fixed in commons-io 1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 02:32:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334630: fixed in jsch 0.1.19-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: vpnc
Version: 0.3.3+svn20050909-4
Severity: critical
Upgrade to this version fails to establish a working connection. Had
to fall back to 0.3.2+SVN20050326-2 which works properly
Debug level 2 (enable-1des required)
computer:/home/user# vpnc-connect --enable-1des --debug 2
vpnc version
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-31
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I can't install tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 (from testing) due to the following
error:
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_2.0.2-31_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 11:21:39PM +, Stephan Helma said
Hi Matt!
Thanks for your bugreport. I'll look into this, as soon as I come back
home from England (end of September) and after I have cought up with
all my other work (probably middle of October).
It this takes too long and if
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:09:45PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas said
Package: zaptel
Severity: serious
Justification: Fails to build from source
Version: 1:1.2.0-0beta1-1
Tags: experimental
dh_installdocs -a
dh_installman -a doc/ztmonitor.8.gz doc/ztcfg.8.gz doc/zttool.8.gz \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Follow op for my previous comment to this bug:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ kpsewhich -progname=pdfetex pdfetex.pool
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdfetex.pool
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ kpsewhich jadetex.in
- --
GnuPG: 0x77A975AD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 03:47:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#331050: fixed in ruby1.8 1.8.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:39:56 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line happy: Happy depends on package no longer in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:25:20 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#332742: ruby1.8: [CAN-2005-2337] safe mode bypass
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 02:47:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334495: fixed in pdp 1:0.12.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: dvgrab
Version: 1.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I try to use dvgrab on my amd64-system, I get the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](577):~$ dvgrab
Speicherzugriffsfehler
(means Segfault)
with dmesg; I see the following:
ieee1394: Current remote IRM is
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-31
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I can't install tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 (from testing) due to the following
error:
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_2.0.2-31_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 08:36:21AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh said
* Alexis Sukrieh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
I have sent a mail to upstream author, forwarding him the patch and
asking for a new upstream release when possible.
Upstream author just confirmed that he will apply your patch in
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, you can configure a single vty to only allow logins from admins.
Then you avoid the fake login problem, but not the loadkeys problem
(since that affects all vtys)
Just a guess... Can you use loadkeys to change keys used for switching VTs?
I
On Oct 19, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, can someone remind me what is calling modprobe?
The seems certain to be there.
In this case udevd does.
I have reassigned the bug to m-i-t.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Rudolf Polzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, pool computers like in this case are neither servers nor terminals.
If they were terminals, we would need about 30 servers to handle the load of
100 active students. So they are workstation installations that do most of
the
work locally.
Ok.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:43:53AM +0200, Caspar Bothmer wrote:
Alexander Sack wrote:
true, but only for pgp/mime encrypted messages. If you inline, it
should work.
Ok, this is a viable workaround for you and me, but is it OK for
everybody? I have enough difficulties to have others sign
On 2005-10-19 11:19:54 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
So the problem seems to be jadetex, but I could install jadetex from
unstable just fine. Assuming that libkpathsea4 is in fact installed,
can you send us the output of the following commands:
kpsewhich -progname=pdfetex pdfetex.pool
severity 334621 important
thanks
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:42:06AM +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote:
Package: mozilla-thunderbird
Version: 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.6
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Thunderbird reverts to plain authentication for SMTP, in order to
provide more
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:02:13 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#333887: fixed in terraform 0.9.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 334621 important
Bug#334621: mozilla-thunderbird: SMTP down negotiation weakness
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:42:00AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld a écrit :
Package: pdftk
Version: 1.12-6
Severity: serious
pdftk fails on arm with:
g++ pdftk.cc -I../java_libs -O3 -DPATH_DELIM=0x2f
-DASK_ABOUT_WARNINGS=false -DPDFTK_VER=\1.12\ -c
In file included from
On 2005-10-19 13:18:15 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
As a quick fix for you, you can uninstall texinfo, then install
tetex-bin, and install texinfo again afterwards.
I've just tried, but I get the same error as for the unstable version
(bug 334613). So I think that a downgrade to testing won't
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:47:52PM -0700, Mike Markley said
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:19:01PM +0100, Qingning Huo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please find attached patch file to build spfmilter with libspf instead
of libspf2. This should fix both bug#307086[0] and bug#306071[1].
Last time
After trying to dowgrade and upgrade again, I now get the following
error:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-9) ...
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
Error: `tex -ini -jobname=xmltex -progname=xmltex latex xmltex.ini' failed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 334707 important
Bug#334707: dvgrab segfaults on amd64
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-7
Severity: serious
The build of libc6 on i386 in a fresh sid chroot fails.
I build the packages with nice -19 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us
The build fails with the following error:
configure_build=i486-linux-gnu; \
if [ x86_64-linux = $configure_build ];
Hello,
I will upload a new release to correct the 'minor' and 'normal' bugs
soon.
Since the maintainer indicated he is working on the package and it is
still relevant, is it still necessary to keep this bug release critical
or can the severity be lowered?
Thijs
signature.asc
Description:
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:41:15PM +0200, Héctor García Álvarez said
If you read the bug report the patch you send it is already applied, but
unfortunally there is another bug reported (I should split the bug and
close the first one, I guess) which can lead to a root exploit.
About your
Package spampd
found 332259 2.20-16
found 332259 2.20-9
Tags +confirmed +upstream
Thanks
Sven Mueller wrote on 05/10/2005 22:25:
Richard Wohlstadter wrote on 05/10/2005 16:56:
Package: spampd
Version: 2.20-9
When processing an email with the following message id:
Message-ID: [EMAIL
found 332815 3.72
thanks
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:25:39PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
In the experimental versions of adduser, the options --disabled-login
and --disabled-passwd have been inadvertently renamed to
--disabled_login and --disabled_password. This is a bug.
They will be renamed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 332815 3.72
Bug#332815: adduser: --disabled-passwd and --disabled-login non-functional
Bug marked as found in version 3.72.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Javier [UTF-8] Fern??ndez-Sanguino [UTF-8] Pe??a wrote:
I don't have a patch available, but I could write one that:
a) modifies the postinst/postrm to create a 'yiff' user (might need to belong
to the 'audio' group too)
b) modifies the init script to run yiff-server as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package spampd
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: spampd
found 332259 2.20-16
Bug#332259: spampd fails with 'Error in process_request': Modification of
read-only variable in Syslog.pm
Bug marked as found in version 2.20-16.
found 332259 2.20-9
On Mit, 19 Okt 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
I can't install tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 (from testing) due to the following
error:
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_2.0.2-31_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-bin_2.0.2-31_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:10:20 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-10-19 13:18:15 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
As a quick fix for you, you can uninstall texinfo, then install
tetex-bin, and install texinfo again afterwards.
I've just tried, but I get the same error as for the unstable version
(bug 334613).
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:49:53PM +0100, Andreas Jochens said
When building 'roy' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../tests -I../roy -I.. -I../.. -Wall -g
-O2 -MT testrbucket.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/testrbucket.Tpo -c -o testrbucket.o
Hello,
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mantis 1.0.0-rc2 fixed these security problems, that seem to be missing in
the latest DSA upload that fixed several others:
- 0006097: [security] user ID is cached indefinately (thraxisp)
- 0006189: [security] List of
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-10-19 11:19:54 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
So the problem seems to be jadetex, but I could install jadetex from
unstable just fine. Assuming that libkpathsea4 is in fact installed,
can you send us the output of the following commands:
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After trying to dowgrade and upgrade again, I now get the following
error:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-9) ...
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
Error: `tex -ini -jobname=xmltex -progname=xmltex latex xmltex.ini' failed
[...]
i.e. only
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:30:46PM +0200, Mohammed Adnene TROJETTE said
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: sbm
Severity: serious
Version: 3.7.1-7
tag 324575 patch
thanks
/tmp/buildd/sbm-3.7.1/installer/sbminst.c:283: undefined reference to
`MAJOR'
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will upload a new release to correct the 'minor' and 'normal' bugs
soon.
Since the maintainer indicated he is working on the package and it is
still relevant, is it still necessary to keep this bug release critical
or can the severity be lowered?
I
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:41:49PM +0100, Andreas Jochens said
Package: scrollz
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'scrollz' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
gcc -I../include -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c rijndael-alg-ref.c
rijndael-alg-ref.c:39: error: array type
severity 334699 normal
tags 334699 + moreinfo
thanks
#include hallo.h
* Waqar Malik [Wed, Oct 19 2005, 05:47:30AM]:
Package: vpnc
Version: 0.3.3+svn20050909-4
Severity: critical
Please read the definition of critical.
IPSEC SA selected des-md5
S7.7
S7.8
Error: an inet prefix is expected
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 01:55:14PM +0200, Henry Jensen wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-7
Severity: serious
The build of libc6 on i386 in a fresh sid chroot fails.
I build the packages with nice -19 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us
The build fails with the following error:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
severity 334709 important
Bug#334709: libc6 2.3.5-7: FTBFS on i386 - forced unwind support is required
Severity set to `important'.
merge 334709 334673
Bug#334673: libc6-dev-amd64:
Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:30:46PM +0200, Mohammed Adnene TROJETTE said
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: sbm
Severity: serious
Version: 3.7.1-7
tag 324575 patch
thanks
/tmp/buildd/sbm-3.7.1/installer/sbminst.c:283: undefined
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 07:41:48PM +0200, Andreas Jochens said
When building 'schism' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
x86_64-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -o bin2h bin2h.o util.o
rm -f ./default-font.h
echo '/* this file should only be included by draw-char.c */'
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 10:16:57PM +0200, David N. Welton said
dann frazier wrote:
Package: rivet
Version: 0.5.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
At least two .o's fail to build w/ gcc 4:
Yep, fixed in CVS. We're going to do another release soon,
Hello Marcello, ...
Well, it is now over a month since you last commented on this bug, and altough
i understand you don't want people to go trigger happy and do some botched
upload, it would be nice to get something to happen, or some kind of plan.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 328192 fixed-upstream
Bug#328192: FTBFS: Missing sentinel in function call
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed-upstream
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:00:00 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 322602 important
Bug#322602: postfix: trivial-rewrite crashes with signal 11
Severity set to `important'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags #332815 confirmed pending
Bug#332815: adduser: --disabled-passwd and --disabled-login non-functional
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental
Tags added: confirmed, pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:17:13 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#333981: fixed in ace 5.4.7-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Oct. 19th, Rob Weir wrote:
The package is failing to build with the following error:
ld: cannot find -lXinerama
This is caused by the x.org transition, and you'll need to add a
build dependency on libxinerama-dev.
Preferably, you would re-libtoolize this package using
Scripsis, quam aut quem »Krzysztof Halasa« appellare soleo:
Rudolf Polzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, pool computers like in this case are neither servers nor
terminals. If they were terminals, we would need about 30 servers to
handle the load of 100 active students. So they are
On 2005-10-19 15:20:29 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2005-10-19 15:10:07 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
As of yesterday evening, 2.0.2-31 is only available in testing, and only
there bug #334701 exists; for testing the quick fix will work.
It doesn't.
And with apt-get -f install:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package spampd
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: spampd
Tags 332259 +confirmed +upstream
Unknown tag/s: +upstream.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005, Barry Tennison wrote:
...This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux.../usr/bin/mozilla-suite:
not in executable format: File format not recognized
(presumably because it's a shell script)
It's a shell script indeed, add set -x at the beginning and find the
I'm trying to help with getting a backtrace on the bug to which your
helpful email below refers. I'd love to see this bug cleared!
I've followed http://wiki.debian.org/?HowToGetABacktrace
building and installing mozilla-calendar and its build-deps. Whew!
I'm no gdb expert. The gnome menu
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: serious
The teTeX-3.0 package should not migrate to testing too soon, even if
they are free of RC bugs for a couple of days. I'd like to have more
packages recompiled with them before they're let in.
Bye, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie
**
Build finished at 20051019-0353
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
Build finished at 20051019-0520
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: visualboyadvance
Version: 1.7.2-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of visualboyadvance_1.7.2-4 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
if s390-linux-gnu-g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\\
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\\
Package: ipsec-tools
Version: 1:0.6.2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of ipsec-tools_1:0.6.2-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
s390-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I./../libipsec
-D_GNU_SOURCE -include
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:21:13PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
This can be fixed by adding 'libc6-dev-i386 [amd64] | ia32-libs-dev [amd64]'
to the Build-Depends in debian/control (see the patch below).
Patch applied; this bug will be closed when it hits the archive.
Thanks for your support!
Hi,
Rob Weir wrote:
draw-char.c:63: error: static declaration of 'charcache' follows non-static
declaration
./include/it.h:163: error: previous declaration of 'charcache' was here
with gcc 4.0 as the default compiler in sarge, this bug is now
release-critical; do you think you'll have time
Re: To [EMAIL PROTECTED] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've just compiled xmms-oggre with a modified configure script that
uses the above mentioned paragraph. It throws no further libtool
warnings on mipsel. (Re-autoconfing with autoconf 2.59 and 2.50 was
unsuccessful and broke the dependencies on the
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setting up tetex-extra (2.0.2c-9) ...
[...]
Isn't this bug 334613?
No, it isn't, since 334613 is against 3.0-9, and has only been
introduced by this upload. I don't know what is happening with 2.0.2,
and honestly I won't try to find out, since this
Package: guile-1.6-slib
Version: 1.6.7-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
aiken:/# apt-get install guile-1.6-slib
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
guile-1.6-slib
0 upgraded, 1 newly
Package: xmltex
Version: 1.9-10
Severity: serious
From the bug log of #334613, while upgrading sid to tetex-bin_3.0-9 with
xmltex installed:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-9) ...
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
Error: `tex -ini -jobname=xmltex -progname=xmltex latex xmltex.ini'
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:59:34 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334019: grace: fails immediately with error Broken or
incomplete installation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
