Bug#338675: glabels - not bin-nmu save

2005-11-13 Thread Josselin Mouette
severity 338675 wishlist thanks Le samedi 12 novembre 2005 à 00:57 +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit : glabels is not bin-nmu save. glabels is an arch-any package which depends against glabels-data, an arch-all package, with the same version. Don't play the reopen game with us. You have opened a

Bug#338823: guile-1.6-slib: catch 22 on installation? circular dependency conflict

2005-11-13 Thread Rob Browning
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: guile-1.6-slib Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Below is a script of my attempt to install this package. This follows my attempt to install gnucash via aptitude, which failed, naturally. Is there a way to resolve

Bug#336083: marked as done (apt-src: Fails to install a package)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 00:02:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335211: fixed in libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#335211: marked as done (apt-src install segfaults)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 00:02:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335211: fixed in libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#337172: marked as done (Upgrade segfaults)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 00:02:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335211: fixed in libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#338813: Very little error checking

2005-11-13 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
tags 338813 + patch thanks bts control programm mp32ogg does very little error checking, indeed, and assumes that any file *.mp? (where ? is any digit) is an mp3 file and converts it unconditiconally. The attached patch adds very basic error checking. I tried it on all my mp4-files (which are not

Processed: severity of 338675 is wishlist

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 severity 338675 wishlist Bug#338675: glabels - not bin-nmu save Severity set to `wishlist'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: Very little error checking

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 338813 + patch Bug#338813: mp32ogg: Destroys MP4 movies! There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks bts control programm Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#338715: xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx

2005-11-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:31:27AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:21:06AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:52:45PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: Obviously, this is nvidia-glx's problem, not xorg's. The nvidia-glx package exists, and was here

Bug#338715: xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx

2005-11-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:21:32PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: This one time, at band camp, Daniel Stone said: On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:03:12PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: This has been an ongoing thing, I thought, and could be solved with a dpkg-divert, rather than a conflicts line.

Bug#338113: marked as done (fwbuilder: FTBFS: needs new version of libfwbuilder)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 01:17:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338113: fixed in fwbuilder 2.0.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338293: marked as done (Failed to load /usr/share/fwbuilder/objects_init.xml)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 01:17:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338293: fixed in fwbuilder 2.0.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338831: Not installable in sid

2005-11-13 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Package: abiword-plugins Version: 2.4.1-2 Severity: grave Tags: patch abiword-plugins is not installable in a pure sid environment anymore: # apt-get --dry-run install abiword-plugins Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages

Bug#338832: Not installable in sid

2005-11-13 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Package: kword Version: 1:1.4.2-2 Severity: grave Tags: patch kword is not installable in a pure sid environment anymore # apt-get install kword Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that

Bug#338833: bison - contains no binaries

2005-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: bison Version: 1:2.1-0.1 Severity: grave The bison package contains no binaries. Something changed the debhelper compat level to 4 but uses debian/tmp. Bastian -- Beam me up, Scotty! It ate my phaser! signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eric Valette wrote: Joey Hess wrote: On Fre, 11 Nov 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Setting up tex-common (0.10) ... debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog. I imagine that a strace -f of a run of dpkg-reconfigure or any other debconf command

Bug#188448: acknowledged by developer (Bug#188448: fixed in abuse-sdl 1:0.7.0-2)

2005-11-13 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
found 188448 1:0.7.0-2 severity 188448 minor thanks bts control programm Hello, On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:18:14PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Version: 1:0.7.0-2 Closes: 185301 188448 Changes: abuse-sdl (1:0.7.0-2) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. *

Processed: Re: Bug#188448 acknowledged by developer (Bug#188448: fixed in abuse-sdl 1:0.7.0-2)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 188448 1:0.7.0-2 Bug#188448: abuse-sdl: Nothing happens Bug marked as found in version 1:0.7.0-2. severity 188448 minor Bug#188448: abuse-sdl: Nothing happens Severity set to `minor'. thanks bts control programm Stopping processing here.

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, anyway, the following changes will be applied to Debian whizzytex default configuration to work around the problem. ... and cause a new one sooner or later. -FMT=efmt +FMT=fmt As I said previously, and as it is documented in the Debian TeX

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess a much better idea is to use the interface provide by fmtutil if you need additional formats. In the Debian TeX policy (from tex-common) we mention that. In the Version as of 18th of July it is not written clearly how to use it. This needs

Bug#337259: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: debian-reference Severity: serious Version: 1.08-4 From my pbuilder build log: ... ln -sf fix.txt.ent fix.ent debiandoc2text -l $(echo ja | bin/getlocale) quick-reference.ja.sgml bin/fixtxt ja quick-reference.ja.txt

Processed: Fixed in NMU of bison 1:2.1-0.2

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 338833 + fixed Bug#338833: bison - contains no binaries There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#338638: [Help] How to fix a buggy prerm script in sarge? (was: Bug#338638: tetex-base: dies when /usr/local/ read-only)

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
tags 338638 help thanks Hi all, we just received a bug report that is caused by a buggy prerm script in the package in sarge (it fails because it doesn't handle read-only /usr/local properly). Is there any way to fix this, except documenting it in the release notes? And on a related thought,

Bug#338638: [Help] How to fix a buggy prerm script in sarge? (was: Bug#338638: tetex-base: dies when /usr/local/ read-only)

2005-11-13 Thread sean finney
hi frank, On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:25:01PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: we just received a bug report that is caused by a buggy prerm script in the package in sarge (it fails because it doesn't handle read-only /usr/local properly). Is there any way to fix this, except documenting it in the

Processed: [Help] How to fix a buggy prerm script in sarge? (was: Bug#338638: tetex-base: dies when /usr/local/ read-only)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 338638 help Bug#338638: tetex-base: dies when /usr/local/ read-only There were no tags set. Tags added: help thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#338855: fails to bootstrap

2005-11-13 Thread Robert Millan
Package: crosshurd Version: 1.7.22 Severity: grave Tags: patch For some reason, this didn't happen before, but the problem appears clear now: when makehurddir.sh attempts to extract packages, it fails when changing cwd to $TARGET. This is because the TARGET variable contains a relative path, but

Bug#338046: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions. Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:30:43 +0900 Well, it was a news, which could have been included in 3.0-2 NEWS.Debian. To be more precise, removeal of

Bug#332683: marked as done ([PR 23711] [4.1 regression] [s390] bootstrap error in libjava (ICE in fixup_eh_region_note))

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 12:54:26 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-snapshot-20051112 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#334823: marked as done (php4-maxdb: broken php4 dependency)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 04:02:28 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334823: fixed in php4-maxdb 7.5.00.30-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#336278: marked as done (FTBFS: No match for operator)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 04:02:25 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#336278: fixed in maxdb-7.5.00 7.5.00.31-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:51:35PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:30:44AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Now in the future, *never* edit texmf.cnf again, but instead just edit the files

Bug#338046: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Atsuhito Kohda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where is that texk mailing list and texlive list archives that keeps on popping up? URL? I'm not so familiar with texlive but perhaps http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/ (or you can start from http://www.tug.org/texlive/) I tried to find information

Bug#338739: RFC: allow usage of mknod in postinst

2005-11-13 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Eduard Bloch [Sun, Nov 13 2005, 10:17:55AM]: Further, I expect from you as a carefull maintainer to write at least a simple HOWTO for your fellows about how (exactly) to deal with changes/transition to udev. You simply throw people into cold water. Feel free to tell me that

Bug#338739: RFC: allow usage of mknod in postinst

2005-11-13 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 13, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suggest changing the policy to reflect the reality. Using a wrapper like MAKEDEV to maintain device nodes which use arbitrary choosen major/minor numbers is just not very useful. Sure, just close the bug if appropriate. (Please remember

Bug#274705: marked as done (mv: --reply doesn't work)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 07:29:02 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line mv --reply doesn't work has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#325271: tinycdb doesn't provide cdbmake

2005-11-13 Thread Matej Vela
Charles Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tinycdb is not currently a fit replacement for freecdb in skkdic, which depends on the cdbmake command, which is not currenlty included in tinycdb. It seems that cdbmake should either be released as a seperate package, or moved into tinycdb (although if

Bug#336047: marked as done (Tries to use non-essential package on purge)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 04:47:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#336047: fixed in epos 1:2.5.36-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338038: marked as done (skkdic requires cdbmake to complete migration from freecdb)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:54:50 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line tinycdb doesn't provide cdbmake has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#308125: marked as done (bash dependence)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 05:02:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308125: fixed in skkdic 20040323-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#325271: marked as done (freecdb is dead, please migrate to tinycdb)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 05:02:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#325271: fixed in skkdic 20040323-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338868: fuser doesn't work anymore.

2005-11-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: psmisc Version: 21.8-1 Severity: serious Hi, It seems that fuser doesn't work anymore. While 21.6-1 returned all the processes, 21.8-1 doesn't return anything anymore. Downgrading fixes it. Note that this is tested in a chroot, I can't testing it outside the chroot since that is

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, anyway, the following changes will be applied to Debian whizzytex default configuration to work around the problem. ... and cause a new one sooner or later. -FMT=efmt +FMT=fmt As I said previously, and as it is documented in the Debian TeX Policy Draft, the format should not

Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install

2005-11-13 Thread Eric Valette
Frank Küster wrote: Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eric Valette wrote: Joey Hess wrote: On Fre, 11 Nov 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Setting up tex-common (0.10) ... debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog. I imagine that a strace -f of a run of dpkg-reconfigure or any

Bug#338879: cdbs: FTBFS: DVI file can't be opened

2005-11-13 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.32 Severity: serious Hi, building the package cdbs in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] proc (from libxslt \OML/cmm/m/it/10 [][]$\OT1/pcr/m/n/10 http : / /

Bug#329231: [Kst] debian unstable X errors (WAS: kst-1.1.0 and svn HEAD X Errors)

2005-11-13 Thread Mark Hymers
reassign 329231 libqt3-mt found 329231 3.3.5-1 tags 329231 + patch retitle 329231 X errors in kst due to qt change in 3.3.5 thanks CC'd to interested parties and also the KST mailing list for the record. OK, I've finally tracked down exactly where this bug comes from. There was a change between

Processed: Re: Bug#329231: [Kst] debian unstable X errors (WAS: kst-1.1.0 and svn HEAD X Errors)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 329231 libqt3-mt Bug#329231: kst: KST can't show any plots Bug reassigned from package `kst' to `libqt3-mt'. found 329231 3.3.5-1 Bug#329231: kst: KST can't show any plots Bug marked as found in version 3.3.5-1. tags 329231 + patch

Processed: change severity

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329231 important Bug#329231: X errors in kst due to qt change in 3.3.5 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#338886: leafnode security bug SA-2005:02 (CVE-2005-1911)

2005-11-13 Thread Matthias Andree
Package: leafnode Version: 1.11.2.rel-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream confirmed fixed-upstream Leafnode 1.11.2 contains a denial of service bug, fixed in subsequent versions. Find below the full security announcement. Please fix. Thank you, -- Matthias

Bug#338888: cl-screen-sbcl: FTBFS: texi2pdf not found

2005-11-13 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: cl-screen-sbcl Version: 1.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, building the package cl-screen-sbcl in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] make[1]: Nothing to be done for

Bug#338891: pnet-assemblies: FTBFS: relocation error: /usr/bin/csant: symbol __libc_stack_end

2005-11-13 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: pnet-assemblies Version: 0.6.12-2 Severity: serious Hi, building the package pnet-assemblies in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] if test -e

Bug#337259: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt

2005-11-13 Thread Jens Seidel
Hi, first of all sorry for this late reply. On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:49:24AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: debian-reference Severity: serious Version: 1.08-4 From my pbuilder build log: ... ln -sf fix.txt.ent fix.ent

Bug#338659: pngcrush: fails to start with relocation error

2005-11-13 Thread Roland Stigge
libpng12 doesn't provide the respective symbol anymore. For the same reason, pngcrush doesn't even build anymore. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I (of course!) took the postinst of the failing packages aka tex-common. (Do not assume I'm stupid please). Sorry, I didn't want to offend; I just had a problem understanding your sentence, and that might well be due to my english being not good enough,

Bug#282815: marked as done (cscope: Vulnerable to CAN-2004-0996)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 07:02:03 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#282815: fixed in cscope 15.5+cvs20050816-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: your mail

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 338886 1.11.3-1 Bug#338886: leafnode security bug SA-2005:02 (CVE-2005-1911) 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.11.3-1, send any further explanations to Matthias Andree [EMAIL

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists

2005-11-13 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 01:20:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:51:35PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:30:44AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Now in the

Bug#338823: guile-1.6-slib: catch 22 on installation? circular dependency conflict

2005-11-13 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:56:10PM -0800, Rob Browning wrote: Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: guile-1.6-slib Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Below is a script of my attempt to install this package. This follows my attempt to install

Bug#337369: marked as done (Please update scim-tables-zh for scim 1.41)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:10:26 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323831: fixed in scim-tables 0.5.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#327315: marked as done (FTBFS: Unable to find scim-make-table)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:10:26 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327315: fixed in scim-tables 0.5.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#323831: marked as done (scim-tables-additional: cannot be installed with scim in unstable)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:10:26 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323831: fixed in scim-tables 0.5.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#337062: marked as done (IM provided by scim-tables-zh no longer available in scim 1.4.1)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:10:26 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323831: fixed in scim-tables 0.5.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, how would I find out that /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt is in fact not generated from tex, but pdfetex? You can do that by parsing /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf (or rather `kpsewhich --format='web2c files' fmtutil.cnf`) if you need to. I have

Bug#338899: ghemical: ppc ghemical 1.90-2 segmentaion fault

2005-11-13 Thread Giovanni Ridolfi
Package: ghemical Version: 1.90-2 Severity: grave Ghemical 1.90-2 When I run ghemical from a gnometerm and try to draw a molecule the program seg-faults. This is the output I pasted from the gnometerm: $ ghemical OpenGL extension version - 1.2 WARNING : SetCurrent() called before widget was

Bug#338886: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#338886: leafnode security bug SA-2005:02 (CVE-2005-1911)]

2005-11-13 Thread Mark Brown
The enclosed bug was filed by Leafnode upstream. I believe this patch contains the relevant fix: diff -urN leafnode-1.11.2.rel/artutil.c leafnode-1.11.3.rel/artutil.c --- leafnode-1.11.2.rel/artutil.c 2004-03-16 02:54:43.0 + +++ leafnode-1.11.3.rel/artutil.c 2005-06-08

Bug#335150: marked as done (xdebconfigurator: incompatible debconf values for xserver-xorg)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335150: fixed in xdebconfigurator 1.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#338715: xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx

2005-11-13 Thread David Nusinow
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 08:07:12PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:03:13AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: libglx is an xorg module. It is originally provided by the XFree86 DDX. Some drivers feel the need to provide an alternate version, and that's great. But nvidia's

Bug#337008: marked as done (gtklookat: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libgcj-dev')

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:32:05 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337008: fixed in gtklookat 0.13.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#332563: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on texinfo)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:53:51 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332563: fixed in libtasn1-2 0.2.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338901: kdenetwork: FTBFS: ambiguous overload for operator+

2005-11-13 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: kdenetwork Version: 4:3.4.2-3 Severity: serious Hi, building the package kdenetwork in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] /usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:287:

Processed: Fixed in upload of eventlog 0.2.3+20051105 to experimental

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 333202 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#333202: binary packages are empty Tags were: patch experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 337654 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#337654: ITP: libevt0 -- Syslog event logger library There were no tags set.

Processed: Fixed in upload of evolution-data-server 1.4.1.1-1 to experimental

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 291469 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#291469: libedataserver3: Typo in synopsis: s/Utily/Utility Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 305611 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#305611: Subsection is wrong There were no tags set. Tags added:

Bug#298414: marked as done (smtpfeed: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 'newmx')

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:17:14 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298414: fixed in smtpfeed 1.19-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338313: marked as done (zlib wanted when building against openssl)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:17:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338313: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#337873: marked as done (hula - FTBFS: missing build dependency)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:17:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338313: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#327732: Mailman bugs tags galore

2005-11-13 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
tags 327732 +pending security tags 326024 +pending tags 310451 +pending thanks A patch hopefully fixing this bug has been committed to the SVN repository of the package. If it survives some yet-to-be-made testing, it will be part of the next upload. Yours truly, -- Lionel Mamane -- To

Processed: Mailman bugs tags galore

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 327732 +pending security Bug#327732: Dos attack to a list in mailman using sarge due to impropper handling of exception of utf8 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending, security tags 326024 +pending Bug#326024: mailman: Unhandled exception

Bug#333142: marked as done (libcamel1.2-0: soversion bump with no package name change)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:33:52 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in upload of evolution-data-server 1.4.1.1-1 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#338906: bidwatcher: Bidwatcher doens neither show my current bids, nor am i abble to enter a item number, cause it will tell me, that item number is not correct

2005-11-13 Thread Jens Suelwald
Package: bidwatcher Version: 1.3.17-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to

Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14

2005-11-13 Thread Uwe Schindler
Package: udev Version: 0.074-2 Severity: grave Since today I have a linux-2.6.12 (with mkinitrd) and linux-2.6.14 (with yaird) running in parallel on an alpha machine (Alphastation 500/500). With udev-0.071-1 the system starts without any problems with both kernels. When then switching to

Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14

2005-11-13 Thread Marco d'Itri
severity 338911 important tag 338911 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Nov 13, Uwe Schindler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since today I have a linux-2.6.12 (with mkinitrd) and linux-2.6.14 (with yaird) running in parallel on an alpha machine (Alphastation 500/500). Did you build your own kernel?

Processed: Re: Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 338911 important Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14 Severity set to `important'. tag 338911 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14 There were no tags set. Tags added:

Processed: your mail

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 338886 - confirmed Bug#338886: leafnode security bug SA-2005:02 (CVE-2005-1911) Tags were: confirmed fixed-upstream security upstream Tags removed: confirmed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#338420: marked as done (dcgui_0.80-3_m68k: FTBFS: undefined reference to `db_env_create_4002')

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:47:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338420: fixed in dcgui 0.80-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#338920: migrationtools: Insecure handling of temporary files

2005-11-13 Thread Jason Hoover
Package: migrationtools Version: 46-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole Migrationtools leaves insecure temporary files containing information from /etc/shadow. When it fails to add information, it creates files like nis.bunchofnumbers.ldif which are world

Bug#338739: RFC: allow usage of mknod in postinst

2005-11-13 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Sunday 13 November 2005 09:17, Eduard Bloch wrote: * Marco d'Itri [Sat, Nov 12 2005, 12:42:07PM]: Package: sl-modem-source Version: 2.9.9d-7 Severity: serious See policy 10.6: packages must use MAKEDEV instead of calling mknod. I must agree with Mr. d'Itri in this case. I suggest

Bug#328534: Adaptec 2005S Hangs with current experiemental 2.6.13-686-smp kernel

2005-11-13 Thread Wolftales
Jurij Smakov wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, wolftales wrote: End of screen ouput: Begin: Running /scripts/local-top ... Done. ALERT! /dev/sda1 does not exist. Dropping to a shell! Oh, that might be not your controller's bug, but initramfs-tools bug. You can either use yaird to generate your

Processed: Fixed in NMU of boo 0.7.0.1921-0.1

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 329454 + fixed Bug#329454: broken symlinks /usr/bin/boo* There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 331086 + fixed Bug#331086: FTBFS: Syntax errors There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#322452: marked as done (python-cherrypy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:02:43 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#322452: fixed in python-cherrypy 2.0.0f-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#337445: marked as done (pointless: FTBFS with tetex 3.0: \pdfinfo used while \pdfoutput is not set)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:02:41 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337445: fixed in pointless 0.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338929: amule: relocation error

2005-11-13 Thread Piotr Zielinski
Package: amule Version: 2.0.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [23:18 ~]%amule amule: Symbol `_ZTV11wxSpinEvent' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking amule: Symbol `_ZTV14wxTextCtrlBase' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking

Bug#338930: gambas - FTBFS: creating symbolic link: Permission denied

2005-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gambas-1.0.12' make: *** [install] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051113-1256 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian

Bug#338931: tess - FTBFS

2005-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
-impl] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051113-1153 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338932: postgresql-ocaml - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

2005-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/postgresql-ocaml-1.4.6/lib' make: *** [common-install-impl] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051113-0949 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#338934: parrot - FTBFS: Segmentation fault

2005-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051113-1928 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

2005-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
-0.3.1/src' make[1]: *** [install] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocaml-ssl-0.3.1' make: *** [install] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051113-2151 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian

Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install

2005-11-13 Thread Eric Valette
Frank Küster wrote: which means that all lines with calls to db_* end with || true except for db_version and db_go. This seems to indicate to me that *if* we made an error with debconf, it wouldn't reveal itself as a failing maintainer script. The full error message is included in the

Bug#338929: amule: relocation error

2005-11-13 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Piotr Zielinski [Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:20:51 +0100]: Package: amule Version: 2.0.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [23:18 ~]%amule I can't reproduce this. Can you send the output of the following commands?: % ldd /usr/bin/amule % ldd /usr/bin/amule |

Bug#338929: amule: relocation error

2005-11-13 Thread Piotr Zielinski
Adeodato Simó: Package: amule Version: 2.0.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [23:18 ~]%amule I can't reproduce this. Can you send the output of the following commands?: % ldd /usr/bin/amule % ldd /usr/bin/amule | awk '{print $3}' | xargs md5sum

Bug#338942: FTBFS: missing libz dependency

2005-11-13 Thread Falk Hueffner
Package: hula Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source hula 0.1.0+svn379-2.1 fails to build on all autobuilders: [...] gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../../include -Wall -g -O2 -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs

Bug#338929: amule: relocation error

2005-11-13 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Piotr Zielinski [Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:58 +0100]: Hi again, Wow, *really* fast response. :-) And yes, of course. Here it is: [23:48 ~]%ldd /usr/bin/amule libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0 = /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0 (0xb7e98000) libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6.so.0 =

  1   2   >