Bug#346116: xemacs21-basesupport: gnus fails because of gnus-splash-face

2006-01-13 Thread OHURA Makoto
Hi. From: kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#346116: xemacs21-basesupport: gnus fails because of gnus-splash-face Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:55:43 -0800 gnus is now unusable. When I start gnus, I receive the following message: No such face: gnus-splash-face I think that this is fixed

Bug#347493: ccrypt_1.7-8(ia64/unstable): FBTFS: unaligned references

2006-01-13 Thread Chris Vanden Berghe
Thanks for the patch! Contacted upstream who will fix the bug in the next release... in the meantime I've uploaded a new version that applies this patch! Cheers, Chris. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: ccrypt Version: 1.7-8 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to

Bug#347730: beagle: Both of them

2006-01-13 Thread M Jared Finder
Package: beagle Followup-For: Bug #347730 Both of the packages libgalago1 and libevolution-cil can not be installed, as they refer to old packages: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libevolution-cil: Depends: libebook1.2-3 (= 1.2.3) but it is not installable

Bug#346641: marked as done (coin: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:02:14 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346641: fixed in coin 1.0.4-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#347876: fam: FTBFS: Compiler errors in DNotify.c++

2006-01-13 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: fam Version: 2.7.0-8 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -DFAM_CONF=\/etc/fam.conf\ -g -Wall -O2 -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-deprecated -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -MT DNotify.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/DNotify.Tpo

Bug#339873: marked as done (FTBFS (alpha): hard-coded use of gcc-3.3 without build dependency)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:40:18 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FTBFS (alpha): hard-coded use of gcc-3.3 without build dependency has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#337436: please remove passivetex from testing (was: passivetex: destroys local configuration)

2006-01-13 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Frank, hi Steve! On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote: source package or anywhere in Debian (main). Thus it seems the package is not even functional. On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: However, gstreamer0.8 has a build-dependency on it, and I think we might miss that. Do

Bug#345563: No help topics are displayed in yelp

2006-01-13 Thread Daniel Rodriguez Garcia
Loïc Minier wrote: Hi, This is a followup for Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/345563. yelp no longer displays any help topics in the browser window. Do you still get this bug with yelp 2.12? Thanks, yelp 2.12 not available yet for debian testing (etch) -- To

Bug#347730: beagle: Both of them

2006-01-13 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 347730 libgalago1 retitle 347730 libgalago1: uninstallable in unstable, needs rebuilt against libdbus-glib-1-dev thanks On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:17:07AM -0800, M Jared Finder wrote: Package: beagle Followup-For: Bug #347730 Both of the packages libgalago1 and libevolution-cil can

Processed: Re: Bug#347730: beagle: Both of them

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 347730 libgalago1 Bug#347730: beagle: build dependencies cannot be satisfied (libevolution-cil and libgalago-cil) Bug reassigned from package `beagle' to `libgalago1'. retitle 347730 libgalago1: uninstallable in unstable, needs rebuilt

Bug#346632: ITNMU

2006-01-13 Thread Amaya
Anand Kumria wrote: Hmm -- it compiled before, so you seem to have a interesting version of libpango Isn't it cool to realize pbuilder was pointing to testing for some wicked reason? I am full of joy. Unless you are a masochist, you don't want to be touching a new upstream. I slightly tried

Processed: Re: Bug#347868: aide segfaults without reason from yesterday to today on amd64

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity #347868 important Bug#347868: aide segfaults without reason from yesterday to today on amd64 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#343989: tcl8.* and tk8.* NMUs for configure errors

2006-01-13 Thread Daniel Schepler
Le Samedi 07 Janvier 2006 00:18, vous avez écrit : On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: I intend to prepare NMUs for tcl8.[034] and tk8.[34] to fix this bug over the weekend, and upload Monday morning, unless you object or do your own uploads before then. I'll

Bug#343182: lilypond-data installation/removal is broken

2006-01-13 Thread Ian Bruce
Package: lilypond-data Bug #: 343182 I don't understand why this bug was closed. The explanation given makes no sense. Both installation and removal of this package require the file /usr/bin/kpsewhich, which seems to come from either package tetex-bin or package libkpathsea-perl. So either one of

Bug#347816: gcolor2: Segfault on startup

2006-01-13 Thread Carlos C Soto
Joakim Lundborg wrote: Package: gcolor2 Version: 0.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Gcolor2 segfaults on startup on my computer. After this bug report I have check the home page for gcolor2 and the only bug report corresponds(1) to violation segment on amd64. I

Bug#337436: please remove passivetex from testing

2006-01-13 Thread Frank Küster
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, gstreamer0.8 has a build-dependency on it, and I think we might miss that. Do you have a solution for gstreamer0.8? I'll look into it during the weekend. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer

Bug#347493: marked as done (ccrypt_1.7-8(ia64/unstable): FBTFS: unaligned references)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:32:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347493: fixed in ccrypt 1.7-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#347881: gnome-applets not installable because gnome-panel is still at 2.10.2-1

2006-01-13 Thread Martin Schuster
Package: gnome-applets Version: 2.12.2-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable gnome-applets 2.12.2-4 depends on gnome-panel (= 2.12.1-1) which is still at version 2.10.2-1, thus making it un-installable: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gnome-applets: Depends:

Bug#337436: please remove passivetex from testing

2006-01-13 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: However, gstreamer0.8 has a build-dependency on it, and I think we might miss that. Do you have a solution for gstreamer0.8? I could do the following: Take the sources from texlive (where passivetex was

Bug#347190: Bug #347190 fix in unstable

2006-01-13 Thread Johannes Rohr
Hi, the latest version of f-prot-installer 0.5.21 has been uploaded to unstable today and is currently in the incoming queue (http://incoming.debian.org). Please report back whether or not it works for you. Thanks, Johannes -- http://www.infoe.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#337436: please remove passivetex from testing (was: passivetex: destroys local configuration)

2006-01-13 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 12.01.06 Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:41:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Hi *, I was about to create a patch for the package, but I discovered more issues. Most notably, the Makefile in the example directory fails because it cannot find a file

Bug#346346: marked as done (netatalk_2.0.3-3 (mips*/unstable): FTBFS: checking for gss_acquire_cred... no)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:47:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346346: fixed in heimdal 0.7.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#346680: marked as done (heimdal: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:47:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346680: fixed in heimdal 0.7.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#347190: Bug #347190 fix in unstable

2006-01-13 Thread Elmar Haneke
the latest version of f-prot-installer 0.5.21 has been uploaded to unstable today and is currently in the incoming queue (http://incoming.debian.org). Please report back whether or not it works for you. It does work after invoking update-f-prot -fi only. Elmar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#347891: lsh-utils - uses DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL

2006-01-13 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: lsh-utils Version: 2.0.1cdbs-2 Severity: serious lsh-utils uses DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL which modifies the build dependencies on the fly, this is not allowed. Bastian -- Captain's Log, star date 21:34.5... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#347547: Orphaning spip

2006-01-13 Thread Thomas Huriaux
reassign 347547 wnpp retitle 347547 O: spip -- User Friendly and powerful Publishing System (CMS) built in php severity 347547 normal thanks Nutella.virtual-net.Fr [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13/01/2006): Thomas Huriaux a écrit : Package: spip Version: 1.7.0-1 Severity: serious It seems that

Processed: Orphaning spip

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 347547 wnpp Bug#347547: spip: Neglected package with RC-bugs, should this be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `spip' to `wnpp'. retitle 347547 O: spip -- User Friendly and powerful Publishing System (CMS) built in php Bug#347547: spip:

Bug#337436: please remove passivetex from testing (was: passivetex: destroys local configuration)

2006-01-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:51:35AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: Hi Frank, hi Steve! On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote: source package or anywhere in Debian (main). Thus it seems the package is not even functional. On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: However,

Bug#337436: please remove passivetex from testing

2006-01-13 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fre, 13 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote: I could do the following: Take the sources from texlive (where passivetex was excluded due to its existence in debian) and try to fix the passivetex packages. It shouldn't be too complicated, but probably would be a complete rewrite of the

Bug#347894: php5: Two security problems in PHP5

2006-01-13 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: php5 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Two security problems have been found in PHP5. For details please see http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_012006.112.html http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_022006.113.html PHP 4 is not affected, so this only

Bug#337436: please remove passivetex from testing

2006-01-13 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could build the docs of gstreamer0.8 without having passivetex installed. I could not test the full build as it gave an FTBFS at another place, which was definitely not caused by missing passivetex. I didn't get a FTBFS in a sid chroot (i386).

Processed: Re: please remove passivetex from testing

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 347884 serious Bug#347884: gstreamer0.8: Unnecessary build-depends: xmltex, passivetex Severity set to `serious'. # passivetex will be removed from testing thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#337436: please remove passivetex from testing

2006-01-13 Thread Frank Küster
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, gstreamer0.8 has a build-dependency on it, and I think we might miss that. Do you have a solution for gstreamer0.8? Yes: I tried to find out which problems would occur, and it turned out that the build-dependency can simply be dropped:

Bug#337436: please remove passivetex from testing

2006-01-13 Thread Frank Küster
severity 347884 serious # passivetex will be removed from testing thanks Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could build the docs of gstreamer0.8 without having passivetex installed. I could not test the full build as it gave an FTBFS at another place, which was definitely not caused by

Processed: Blocking bugs

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Hi, # # The lists on http://pkg-tetex.alioth.debian.org/foreign_bugs.html have # grown substantially smaller, therefore I'm adding some blocks to # document the rest # block 334722 by 339060 Bug#334722: tetex-base: Dummy bug: Should not migrate

Bug#347758: dh_python and current python policy doesn't match

2006-01-13 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 12 janvier 2006 à 14:58 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit : Package: python,debhelper Severity: serious dh_python currently doesn't honor current python policy (but says so in the manual page). the version should not yet enter testing until one of the two is updated. I don't think

Bug#347898: tagtool: Must depend on libid3-3.8.3c2a

2006-01-13 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Subject: tagtool: Must depend on libid3-3.8.3c2a Package: tagtool Version: 0.12.1-1 Severity: grave *** Please type your report below this line *** Since libid3-3.8.3c2 does not exist anymore, the package must be changed to depend of libid3-3.8.3c2a so that it can be installed. -- System

Bug#321202: grip: Name of package changed again

2006-01-13 Thread Eduardo M Kalinowski
Package: grip Version: 3.2.0-5 Followup-For: Bug #321202 The name of the package has changed again to libid3-3.8.3c2a, and libid3-3.8.3c2 does not exist anymore, so grip cannot be installed. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500,

Bug#347758: dh_python and current python policy doesn't match

2006-01-13 Thread Matthias Klose
Josselin Mouette writes: Le jeudi 12 janvier 2006 à 14:58 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit : Package: python,debhelper Severity: serious dh_python currently doesn't honor current python policy (but says so in the manual page). the version should not yet enter testing until one of the

Processed: reopen 321202 !

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 321202 ! Bug#321202: Uninstallable in sid due to C++ transition of libid3 Bug reopened, originator set to Eduardo M KALINOWSKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#336645: [php-maint] Bug#336645: Bug 336645: PHP 4.4.1 Security Fixes

2006-01-13 Thread Adam Conrad
Nick Jenkins wrote: According to http://lwn.net/Articles/159103/ , it's looking like Debian is the last major distro without a fix for this. Could perhaps the recent Ubuntu updates ( http://lwn.net/Alerts/165505/ ), which were for PHP 4.3.8, be of use to Sarge? Yes, I'm preparing updates for

Bug#321202: grip: Name of package changed again

2006-01-13 Thread Steve Langasek
close 321202 3.3.1-3 quit On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:16:31AM -0200, Eduardo M Kalinowski wrote: The name of the package has changed again to libid3-3.8.3c2a, and libid3-3.8.3c2 does not exist anymore, so grip cannot be installed. No, the current version of grip depends on libid3-3.8.3c2a on

Bug#346677: xlibs-dev

2006-01-13 Thread Bjoern Boschman
Hi, this bug can easily be solved by just removing the build-dependency xlibs-dev ( 4.1.0) from debian/control file This package doesn't seem to build depend on this. -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards Bjoern Boschman pgpX15INqfdep.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: Bug#321202: grip: Name of package changed again

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 321202 3.3.1-3 Bug#321202: Uninstallable in sid due to C++ transition of libid3 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 3.3.1-3, send any further explanations to Eduardo M KALINOWSKI

Bug#346399: marked as done (atp: FTBFS: Build dependency on libpaperg-dev)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:25:11 +1100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 1.2-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#347898: marked as done (tagtool: Must depend on libid3-3.8.3c2a)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:23:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347898: tagtool: Must depend on libid3-3.8.3c2a has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#347730: beagle: build dependencies cannot be satisfied (libevolution-cil and libgalago-cil)

2006-01-13 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
The following packages have unmet dependencies: beagle: Depends: libevolution-cil (= 0.10.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgalago-cil (= 0.3.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgalago1 but it is not going to be installed E:

Bug#346689: marked as done (ihu: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:32:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346689: fixed in ihu 0.5.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#344762: marked as done (libpisock-dev: Should depend on newer version of libpisync0.)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:55:03 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344762: libpisock-dev: Should depend on newer version of libpisync0. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#347760: libaudio-cd-perl: not installable in sid because of libcdaudio

2006-01-13 Thread Jereme Corrado
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:00:34PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: Package: libaudio-cd-perl Version: 0.05-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install libaudio-cd-perl Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree...

Bug#347748: audio-cd - FTBFS: Not available build dependency

2006-01-13 Thread Jereme Corrado
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:49:44PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: audio-cd Version: 0.05-4+b1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Thanks for reporting this, I will have a look at it tomorrow morning. -- Jereme Corrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Bug#347730: beagle: build dependencies cannot be satisfied (libevolution-cil and libgalago-cil)

2006-01-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 02:42:44PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: beagle: Depends: libevolution-cil (= 0.10.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgalago-cil (= 0.3.2) but it is not going to be installed

Bug#347730: beagle: build dependencies cannot be satisfied (libevolution-cil and libgalago-cil)

2006-01-13 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Hrm, libgalago1's build-deps should *not* be satisfiable; dbus-glib-1-dev has been renamed to libdbus-glib-1-dev, which requires a source update. However, it works for me: # apt-get build-dep libgalago1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following NEW packages

Processed: djvulibre conflict in Etch

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 347218 4:3.4.3-2 Bug#347218: kdelibs-data: file confilict with libdjvulibre1 Bug marked as found in version 4:3.4.3-2. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#346981: marked as done (wmnut: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:32:20 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346981: fixed in wmnut 0.62-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#330495: marked as done (php3: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends: libsnmp5-dev)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:19:29 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line php3 removed from unstable/testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#341153: marked as done (xbase-clients experimental can't install: conflict with xprint (xdpr))

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:38:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#346985: correct xlibs-dev replacement

2006-01-13 Thread Mike O'Connor
replacing xlibs-dev with libx11-dev, libxt-dev makes this package buildable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308200: blackbox-themes: Copyright status still not resolved

2006-01-13 Thread Andrew Moise
Has there been any more progress on this? 250 days is a long time for Debian to be (apparently) distributing someone else's copyrighted works without a license. Again, if you want me to do any of the work associated with fixing this bug, say the word; I appreciate the work you've done for

Bug#347730: beagle: build dependencies cannot be satisfied (libevolution-cil and libgalago-cil)

2006-01-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:00:28PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: Hrm, libgalago1's build-deps should *not* be satisfiable; dbus-glib-1-dev has been renamed to libdbus-glib-1-dev, which requires a source update. However, it works for me: # apt-get build-dep libgalago1 Reading package

Bug#347730: beagle: build dependencies cannot be satisfied (libevolution-cil and libgalago-cil)

2006-01-13 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Then apparently you're picking up the build-dependencies for the experimental version of libgalago? Yes, you're right. I thought that apt-get needed the -t experimental option to consider experimental packages. Apparently it's true for apt-get install, but not for apt-get build-dep and for

Bug#347730: marked as done (libgalago1: uninstallable in unstable, needs rebuilt against libdbus-glib-1-dev)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:32:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347730: fixed in libgalago 0.3.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#347936: (no subject)

2006-01-13 Thread Juergen Pfennig
Subject: tar truncates file 4GB to zero size when having large sparse region Package: tar Version: 1.14-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** When a tar archive contains a large sparse file (8 GByte file containing 6 GByte of

Bug#347937: tar truncates file 4GB to zero size when having large sparse region

2006-01-13 Thread Juergen Pfennig
Subject: tar truncates file 4GB to zero size when having large sparse region Package: tar Version: 1.14-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** When a tar archive contains a large sparse file (8 GByte file containing 6 GByte of

Processed: set tags

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 336527 + wontfix Bug#336527: bootchart-view: requires j2re1.4, but doesn't depend on it There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix tags 330102 + moreinfo Bug#330102: Cannot boot with bootchart There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo stop

Processed: Reassigning

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 211765 xserver-xorg Bug#211765: xfree86: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Software License B is not DFSG-free Bug reassigned from package `xfree86' to `xserver-xorg'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#347940: pstngw_1.3.1-5(alpha/unstable): FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -rsudo

2006-01-13 Thread Ryan Murray
Package: pstngw Version: 1.3.1-5 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of pstngw_1.3.1-5 on goedel by sbuild/alpha 85 Build started at 20060112-1617 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper

Bug#346809: marked as done (xdu: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:18:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346809: fixed in xdu 3.0-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#347937: tar truncates file 4GB to zero size when having large sparse region

2006-01-13 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 17:55 +0100, Juergen Pfennig wrote: Subject: tar truncates file 4GB to zero size when having large sparse region I understand conceptually what you're describing, but it would be very helpful to me if you could provide an example of how to reproduce the problem? Bdale

Bug#347936: marked as done ((no subject))

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:41:46 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347936: (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: block 346974 with 347158

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 block 346974 with 347158 Bug#346974: wmusic: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 347158 End of message, stopping processing

Bug#337425: marked as done (zope-zpatterns: Uninstallabe due to zope transition)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:12:11 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Processed: tagging

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 341444 important Bug#341444: quagga (0.98-3-7) ospfd segfault on interface with vlans Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#340696: marked as done (wvstreams - FTBFS: build depends against unavailable package libxplc0.3.13-dev)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:31:24 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line XPLC is in Debian now. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#347881: marked as done (gnome-applets not installable because gnome-panel is still at 2.10.2-1)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:02:27 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347881: fixed in gnome-panel 2.12.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#319713: Broken build, needs gtk+ 2.6 AND libglade 2.5

2006-01-13 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Steve, On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:32:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Hello Steve, On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:07:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Does this bug actually apply to unstable or testing, where we do have

Processed: your mail

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags #347158 patch Bug#347158: libdockapp-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#343710: marked as done (wvstreams: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: wvhash.cc:33: error: cast from 'const void*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:32:16 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343710: fixed in wvstreams 4.2.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#347957: Login using pam-p11-opensc.so fails: Authentication method blocked

2006-01-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: libpam-p11 Version: 0.1.2-2 Severity: grave frodo login: rene Password: iso7816.c:98:iso7816_check_sw: Authentication method blocked sec.c:204:sc_pin_cmd: returning with: Authentication method blocked pam_p11[3732]: PKCS11_login failed pam_p11[3732]: (pam_unix) session opened for user

Bug#308200: blackbox-themes: Copyright status still not resolved

2006-01-13 Thread Bruno Barrera C.
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 11:14 -0500, Andrew Moise wrote: Has there been any more progress on this? 250 days is a long time for Debian to be (apparently) distributing someone else's copyrighted works without a license. Again, if you want me to do any of the work associated with fixing this

Bug#346795: patches for some xlibs-dev bugs

2006-01-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
tag 347041 patch tag 347096 patch tag 347109 patch tag 346795 patch tag 346796 patch tag 346801 patch tag 347042 patch tag 347090 patch tag 347074 patch tag 346965 patch tag 346943 patch thanks The following packages can be trivially fixed by replacing their build dep on xlibs-dev with the

Processed: patches for some xlibs-dev bugs

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 347041 patch Bug#347041: quark: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch tag 347096 patch Bug#347096: rigel: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch tag

Processed: cloning 346801, retitle -1 to xconvers: nonpristine packjage, severity of -1 is important ...

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 clone 346801 -1 Bug#346801: xconvers: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug 346801 cloned as bug 347959. retitle -1 xconvers: nonpristine packjage Bug#347959: xconvers:

Bug#346851: marked as done (xmms-bumpscope: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:02:18 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346851: fixed in xmms-bumpscope 0.0.3.release-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: cloning 346796, retitle -1 to xconvers: nonpristine packjage, severity of -1 is important ...

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 clone 346796 -1 Bug#346796: xcall: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug 346796 cloned as bug 347961. retitle -1 xconvers: nonpristine packjage Bug#347961: xcall: FTBFS:

Bug#346041: marked as done (Cons dependency scanning broken)

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:17:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346041: fixed in cons 2.3.0.1+2.2.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#346490: bittornado-gui: btdownloadgui.bittornado causes Gdk-ERROR

2006-01-13 Thread Micah Anderson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tag 346490 +unreproducable severity 346490 important thanks Hi, Thanks for your report, but I cannot reproduce this. When I run btdownloadgui I get the GUI, when I run it on a .torrent file it starts up the torrent. Since I cannot reproduce this I

Processed: Re: Bug#346490: bittornado-gui: btdownloadgui.bittornado causes Gdk-ERROR

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 346490 +unreproducable Unknown tag/s: unreproducable. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental

Processed: cloning 346808, retitle -1 to xdx: nonpristine package, severity of -1 is important, submitter -1

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 clone 346808 -1 Bug#346808: xdx: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug 346808 cloned as bug 347964. retitle -1 xdx: nonpristine package Bug#347964: xdx: FTBFS: build-depends

Bug#343182: lilypond-data installation/removal is broken

2006-01-13 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
reopen 343182 thanks I don't understand why this bug was closed. The explanation given makes no sense. Both installation and removal of this package require the file /usr/bin/kpsewhich, which seems to come from either package tetex-bin or package libkpathsea-perl. So either one of these

Bug#346949: wmnetselect: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

2006-01-13 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, just uploaded an NMU to fix this bug. Diff is attached. Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlüssel `. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E `-

Bug#346886: wmcalc: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

2006-01-13 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I just uploaded a NMU to fix this bug. Attached is the diff. Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlüssel `. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E `-

Processed: Re: lilypond-data installation/removal is broken

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 343182 Bug#343182: lilypond-data: libkpathsea-perl is missing from Depends Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: tagging

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 347876 + patch Bug#347876: fam: FTBFS: Compiler errors in DNotify.c++ There were no tags set. Tags added: patch -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#346969: wmcube: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

2006-01-13 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I just uploaded an NMU to fix this bug. Attached is the diff. Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlüssel `. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E `-

Bug#342212: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' token

2006-01-13 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, this error looks like a forgotte include on python.h. Please test if the attached patch fixes the compile problem. Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlüssel `. `'gpg

Processed: cloning 346644, retitle -1 to bzflag: nonpristine package, severity of -1 is important, submitter -1

2006-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 clone 346644 -1 Bug#346644: bzflag: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug 346644 cloned as bug 347986. retitle -1 bzflag: nonpristine package Bug#347986: bzflag: FTBFS:

Bug#345876: imagemagick: New format string vulnerability in SetImageInfo().

2006-01-13 Thread Daniel Kobras
retitle 345876 [CVE-2006-0082] imagemagick: New format string vulnerability in SetImageInfo(). thanks On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:05:20AM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote: As this is really is a new vulnerability, I assume CAN-2005-0397 should not be reused. Security team, can you please confirm and

Bug#346613: patches for some xlibs-dev bugs

2006-01-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
tag 346760 patch tag 346970 patch tag 346827 patch tag 346773 patch tag 346808 patch tag 346613 patch tag 346622 patch tag 346624 patch tag 346626 patch tag 346631 patch tag 346634 patch thanks The following packages can be trivially fixed by replacing their build dep on xlibs-dev with the

Bug#346644: just needs to drop dependencies

2006-01-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
tag 346644 patch thanks This package builds if you drop the dependency on xlibs-dev and s/| libcurl-dev//. -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   >