Bug#345604: [Fontinst] License of the fontinst documentation

2006-02-25 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Frank Küster wrote: But there's also files in the talks subdirectory for which no source is currently available. Do you know about the license situation for them, or should I try to contact Ulrik or Taco? And, for that matter, I guess roadmap.eps has been created with MetaPost - do you happen

Processed: Damn me. Let's close the right bug

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 354217 Bug#354217: DEVPTS_FS not present at linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to marlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] reopen 344217 Bug#344217:

Bug#354323: openoffice.org: [oowriter] Freezes when trying to export *.rtf as XHTML

2006-02-25 Thread Jari Aalto
Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: serious The Writer completely freezes and the program must be separately killed from terminal when it is exporting an *.rtf document in XHTML format. The *.rtf (written in Windows Word) document that was used it at

Processed: tagging 336437

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 tags 336437 pending Bug#336437: libxine1: use of internal libmad makes other apps crash in amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#280370: marked as done (a2ps using lp broken)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:02:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#267527: fixed in a2ps 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#267527: marked as done (a2ps option -P does not work )

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:02:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#267527: fixed in a2ps 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#340044: marked as done (a2ps: source file tests/tstfiles/Converter.java fails DFSG #1)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:02:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#340044: fixed in a2ps 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#266112: marked as done (ggz-gnome-client: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'ggz_table_left')

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:23:05 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line ggz-gnome-client: #266112 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#299665: marked as done (boson-data: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): Can't find X libraries. Please check your installation and add the correct paths!)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:22:05 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line boson-data: #299665 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#294452: marked as done (hptalx: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:27:12 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line hptalx: #294452 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#287846: marked as done (oftc-hybrid: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'yy_aconf' follows non-static declaration)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:24:24 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line oftc-hybrid: #287846 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#345100: Not fixed in 1.1.1-1

2006-02-25 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Just wanted to not that libxine version 1.1.1 does not fix this bug. pornview still segfaults somewhere in libxine.so. pornview spawns 8 additional threads, each of them doing different tasks in xine like loading alsa module, loading config and so on. I suspect there is a race condition

Processed: retitle 345100 to libxine1 makes pornview segfault on startup

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 retitle 345100 libxine1 makes pornview segfault on startup Bug#345100: segfaults on startup Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#300885: marked as done (cursel: FTBFS: cursel Build-Depends on objc-poc which has been removed from the archive)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:40:25 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line cursel: #300885 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#304180: marked as done (aspectj-anttasks: FTBFS: package org.aspectj.tools.ajdoc does not exist)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:42:01 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line aspectj-anttasks: #304180 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#326862: marked as done (ggz-docs: FTBFS: cannot stat `./ggz-game-development-guide_toc.html': No such file or directory)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:41:08 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line ggz-docs: #326862 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#326940: marked as done (redboot: FTBFS (i386): cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -finit-priority)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:43:01 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line redboot: #326940 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#350480: marked as done (xvnc4viewer: FTBFS on amd64)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#350480: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#350405: marked as done (FTBFS: cast from 'void*' to 'CARD32' loses precision)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#350480: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#352520: marked as done (vnc4 - FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `/build/buildd/vnc4-4.1.1+X4.3.0/debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/vnc.so': No such file or directory)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#350480: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#353563: marked as done (Do not build on alpha)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#353563: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#353711: marked as done (FTBFS on amd64: needs -fPIC)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#353711: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#353577: marked as done (Do not build on ia64)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#353577: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#327068: marked as done (saxon-catalog: FTBFS: The import com/icl/saxon/aelfred/SAXDriver is not valid, since it does not name a type in a package.)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:39:15 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line saxon-catalog: #327068 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#354339: Always tries to retrieve a preseed file even for not preseeded installs

2006-02-25 Thread Christian Perrier
Package: preseed Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file...even for not preseeded installs. I found this while running a standard install with the sid_d-i netinst of 20060224. -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#331649: nice: libant1.6-java to ant transition

2006-02-25 Thread Daniel Bonniot
Salut Arnaud, Sorry to bother you again, but it's been a very long time. Should I look for another sponsor? Daniel Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Yes, busy, your mail is in red in my inbox ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#347376: bricolage: dont run with standard instalation

2006-02-25 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi, bricolage does run just fine for me in default configuration, I cannot reproduce this bug. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To

Processed: your mail

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 347376 +moreinfo +unreproducable Unknown tag/s: +unreproducable. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs

Processed: this is serious

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 354342 serious Bug#354342: FTBFS: can't find res_mkquery Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#354339: Always tries to retrieve a preseed file even for not preseeded installs

2006-02-25 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:14:18PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file... even for not preseeded installs. From which location does it try to fetch a preseed file? (file: ? http: ?) GSt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#354351: fail to install

2006-02-25 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
Package: texinfo Version: 4.8-5 Severity: grave When installing it, it fails like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get -f install S'està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet S'està construint l'arbre de dependències... Fet 0 actualitzats, 0 nous a instal·lar, 0 a eliminar i 356 no

Bug#354353: php-net-checkip: FTBFS: no available versions of package php-pear can satisfy version requirements

2006-02-25 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: php-net-checkip Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'php-net-checkip' on unstable, I get the following error: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Build-Depends-Indep dependency for php-net-checkip cannot be satisfied because no available

Bug#354240: This really is a symlink problem

2006-02-25 Thread Kilian Krause
John, Am Freitag, den 24.02.2006, 11:14 -0600 schrieb John Goerzen: merge 354240 354132 thanks I had this symlink: /var/lib/asterisk - /asterisk/lib It turns out that one of the asterisk maintainer scripts must be blowing away that symlink and then creating a directory at

Bug#354351: fail to install

2006-02-25 Thread Norbert Preining
On Sam, 25 Feb 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote: Package: texinfo Version: 4.8-5 Severity: grave kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-var-value' Please tell me the output of which kpsewhich and kpsewhich --version I tested kpsewhich -var-value TEXMFSYSVAR on current

Processed: reassign 351495 to festival

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 reassign 351495 festival Bug#351495: The package is unusable without the patch #335845 Bug reassigned from package `festlex-ifd' to `festival'. End of message, stopping processing

Processed: severity of 354323 is important

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 354323 important Bug#354323: openoffice.org: [oowriter] Freezes when trying to export *.rtf as XHTML Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#354356: python-htmltmpl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

2006-02-25 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: python-htmltmpl Version: 1.22-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'python-htmltmpl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: cd . python setup.py build --build-base=./build /bin/sh: python: command not found make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127 Please add

Bug#354358: libswt-gtk-3.1-java: Unusable on amd64 (ia32-specific sources used)

2006-02-25 Thread Lauri Alanko
Package: libswt-gtk-3.1-java Version: 3.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Azureus hasn't been working on AMD64 Debian out of the box ever, I think. This seems to be why. From a Sun Hotspot 1.5.0_05 error log after a sigsegv when starting Azureus: Stack:

Bug#354206: steghide: FTBFS: invalid conversion

2006-02-25 Thread Ola Lundqvist
tags 354206 + unreproducible moreinfo severity 354206 important thanks Hello On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:43:50AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: Package: steghide Version: 0.5.1-7 Severity: serious I can not reproduce this problem (on latest etch). For what architecture do you build it and with

Processed: Re: Bug#354206: steghide: FTBFS: invalid conversion

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 354206 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug#354206: steghide: FTBFS: invalid conversion There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo severity 354206 important Bug#354206: steghide: FTBFS: invalid conversion Severity set to `important'.

Bug#354361: cdbs: FTBFS: FAIL: hdparm.sh

2006-02-25 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.34 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'cdbs' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error: PASS: recursive.sh PASS: udeb-1.sh FAIL: hdparm.sh PASS: distutils-1.sh make[5]: Entering directory `/cdbs-0.4.34/test' make[5]: Nothing to be done for `tarballs'.

Bug#354339: Always tries to retrieve a preseed file even for not preseeded installs

2006-02-25 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:14:18PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file... even for not preseeded installs. From which location does it try to fetch a preseed file? (file: ? http: ?)

Bug#348706: Possible patch

2006-02-25 Thread Amaya
I am preparing an upload with your patches. If 9.3 is ready like you intended to, please send it over. -- .''`. I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think : :' : I have ended up where I needed to be -- Douglas Adams `. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux

Bug#354204: loop-aes-source: FTBFS: Cannot find debian/patches

2006-02-25 Thread Max Vozeler
tags 354204 + confirmed pending thanks On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:25:12AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: Package: loop-aes-source Version: 3.1c-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... dh_installdocs dh_install cp: cannot stat `./debian/patches': No such file or directory

Processed: Re: Bug#354204: loop-aes-source: FTBFS: Cannot find debian/patches

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 354204 + confirmed pending Bug#354204: loop-aes-source: FTBFS: Cannot find debian/patches There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#354370: matplotlib: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `/matplotlib-0.86.2/debian/python-matplotlib-data/usr/share/matplotlib/mpl-data/Vera*.ttf': No such file or directory

2006-02-25 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: matplotlib Version: 0.86.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'matplotlib' in a clean unstable chroot, I get the following error: copying lib/matplotlib/backends/Matplotlib.nib/classes.nib -

Bug#354371: lastfmsubmitd: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

2006-02-25 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: lastfmsubmitd Version: 0.22-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'lastfmsubmitd' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_testroot # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. python setup.py clean --all make: python: Command not found make: ***

Bug#354371: marked as done (lastfmsubmitd: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:17:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#354371: fixed in lastfmsubmitd 0.22-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#354358: marked as forwarded (libswt-gtk-3.1-java: Unusable on amd64 (ia32-specific sources used))

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:08:47 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #354358, regarding libswt-gtk-3.1-java: Unusable on amd64 (ia32-specific sources used) to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) Billy Biggs [EMAIL

Bug#354379: wesnoth: Wesnoth crash Xorg

2006-02-25 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Package: wesnoth Version: 1.1.1-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software When starting wesnoth, the display becomes all black and the monitor display a label No signal. I cannot do anything but kill the Xserver (Ctrl+Alt+Backspace). I managed to run wesnoth from a console

Bug#354358: libswt-gtk-3.1-java: Unusable on amd64 (ia32-specific sources used)

2006-02-25 Thread Shaun Jackman
tag 354358 +confirmed severity 354358 serious retitle 322897 azureus: unusable on AMD64 retitle 331723 azureus: unusable on AMD64 block 322897 on 354358 thanks On 2/25/06, Lauri Alanko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: libswt-gtk-3.1-java Version: 3.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders

Bug#354075: util-linux-patch breaks nfs-user-server (fwd)

2006-02-25 Thread Timo Aaltonen
More info. Maybe the dump can be sent directly to the list (or CC'd). -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:39:17 -0500 From: Trond Myklebust [EMAIL PROTECTED] The difference between the two is that in case (1) (the good case) we're calling pmap_getmaps() in order

Bug#354379: wesnoth: Wesnoth crash Xorg

2006-02-25 Thread Isaac Clerencia
On Saturday, 25 February 2006 20:27, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: Package: wesnoth Version: 1.1.1-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software When starting wesnoth, the display becomes all black and the monitor display a label No signal. I cannot do anything but kill the Xserver

Bug#338006: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#338006: Postfix problem still there

2006-02-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote: Hello Kurt, will/could the changes in 0.9.8a-7 have any effect on the postfix issues I'm experiencing? Is it worth a try? A new postfix version has been uploaded to unstable, which has as changelog entry: * New upstream, fixes

Bug#353010: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-es: two problems

2006-02-25 Thread Manolo Díaz
Hi, After install the new package mozilla-thunderbird is still in English, even removing .mozilla-thunderbird dir. Afteward, I've tried to remove or reinstall the package with no success. Best regards, Manolo Díaz --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: pts 0 #~ LC_ALL=C aptitude reinstall

Bug#354351: kpathsea version

2006-02-25 Thread Gaël Le Mignot
Hello, I have the same problem kpathsea from tetex-bin version 2.0.2-31: kpathsea version 3.4.5 Copyright (C) 1997 - 2002 K. Berry O. Weber. It worked after I upgraded tetex-bin to 3.0-14: kpathsea version 3.5.4 Copyright (C) 1997 - 2004 K. Berry O. Weber. I think you should add a dependency

Bug#354361: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#354361: cdbs: FTBFS: FAIL: hdparm.sh

2006-02-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Andreas Jochens wrote: When building 'cdbs' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error: PASS: recursive.sh PASS: udeb-1.sh FAIL: hdparm.sh Yes, I had already made the same detection. It will be fixed in the next upload as soon as the current one goes through to testing. -- To

Bug#353010: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-es: two problems

2006-02-25 Thread Manolo Díaz
Hi, After install the new package mozilla-thunderbird is still in English, even removing .mozilla-thunderbird dir. Afteward, I've tried to remove or reinstall the package with no success. Best regards, Manolo Díaz --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: pts 0 #~ LC_ALL=C aptitude reinstall

Processed: severity of 354379 is normal

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 severity 354379 normal Bug#354379: wesnoth: Wesnoth crash Xorg Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#352849: forwarding and downgrading bug

2006-02-25 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
forwarded 352849 http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097 severity 352849 normal thanks After some more investigation, it is clear that this bug is only in tiff2pdf and not in the actual tiff library. (Other programs that use libtiff can handle this image fine, including tiff2ps

Bug#353315: Patch

2006-02-25 Thread Matt Kraai
tag 353315 patch thanks The attached patch implements Daniel's suggestion. I verified that it fixed the build. -- Matt diff -ru upsd-2.6-orig/Makefile upsd-2.6/Makefile --- upsd-2.6-orig/Makefile 2006-02-24 20:38:56.0 -0800 +++ upsd-2.6/Makefile 2006-02-24 20:39:34.0

Processed: forwarding and downgrading bug

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 352849 http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097 Bug#352849: libtiff-tools: tiff2pdf segfaults Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097. severity 352849 normal

Processed: Patch

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 353315 patch Bug#353315: upsd: FTBFS with new make There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#354351: fail to install

2006-02-25 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
Norbert Preining wrote: On Sam, 25 Feb 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote: Package: texinfo Version: 4.8-5 Severity: grave kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-var-value' Please tell me the output of which kpsewhich /usr/bin/kpsewhich and kpsewhich --version [EMAIL

Bug#354389: Checkinstall segfaults with latest Sid update

2006-02-25 Thread C.Y.M
Package: checkinstall Version: 1.5.3-3 Severity: grave When attempting to execute checkinstall scripts after updating Sid today, I get segfaults during package creation. Checkinstall was working prior to upgrading system packages. --SNIP-- checkinstall 1.5.3, Copyright 2001 Felipe Eduardo

Bug#347095: Patch

2006-02-25 Thread Matt Kraai
tag 347095 patch tag 349443 patch thanks The attached patch fixes both of these bugs. To fix bug 347095, it removes the build-dependency on xlibs-dev. To fix bug 349443, it removes the X11 subdirectory. -- Matt diff -ru pixmap-2.6pl4-orig/debian/control pixmap-2.6pl4/debian/control ---

Bug#353010: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-es: two problems

2006-02-25 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 08:53:41PM +0100, Manolo Díaz wrote: Hi, After install the new package mozilla-thunderbird is still in English, even removing .mozilla-thunderbird dir. Afteward, I've tried to remove or reinstall the package with no success. Yes, the prerm script is not correct, but

Processed: Patch

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 347095 patch Bug#347095: pixmap: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch tag 349443 patch Bug#349443: FTBFS: overrides internal X11 headers There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping

Processed: Re: Bug#323815: bzflag: This bug still present in both testing and unstable.

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 323815 Bug#323815: bzflag: shoots trough other players Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#323815: bzflag: This bug still present in both testing and unstable.

2006-02-25 Thread Steve Langasek
reopen 323815 thanks On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:22:01PM -0500, Chris Metzler wrote: This bug was marked fixed and closed four months ago; but the version which fixes the bug is not in unstable and never made it to testing. The version which was listed as fixing the bug is indeed present in

Bug#352103: marked as done (portreserve: init script does not work)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:47:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#352103: fixed in portreserve 0.0.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#354200: marked as done (e2undel: FTBFS with current make)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:47:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#354200: fixed in e2undel 0.8-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#354356: marked as done (python-htmltmpl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:47:15 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#354356: fixed in python-htmltmpl 1.22-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#323815: bzflag: This bug still present in both testing and unstable.

2006-02-25 Thread Chris Metzler
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:57:36 -0800 Steve Langasek wrote: The version which was listed as fixing the bug is indeed present in testing and unstable (rather, a later version is present). Whoops. For some dumb reason I took 2.0.4.20051017-0.1 as an earlier version than 2.0.4.20051017 because of

Bug#354401: Error chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid group when setting up tex-common

2006-02-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: tex-common Version: 0.18 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When setting up tex-common: Setting up tex-common (0.18) ... Adjusting permissions of TeX font cache... chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid group dpkg: error processing tex-common (--configure): subprocess

Processed: tagging 248654, tagging 260173, tagging 307813, tagging 314341, tagging 340299, tagging 340866 ...

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 tags 248654 + pending Bug#248654: should use the new debhelper 4.2 udeb support There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 260173 + pending Bug#260173: cdbs: Run dh_installmime

Bug#354351: fail to install

2006-02-25 Thread Norbert Preining
Dear Miguel! On Sam, 25 Feb 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote: kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-var-value' /usr/bin/kpsewhich and kpsewhich --version [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/media/loop0$ kpsewhich --version kpathsea version 3.4.5 Uuups, where did you got this from? Do you have

Processed: severity of 354342 is important

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 # as I said, FTBFS are only RC if there is a previous package version in the Debian archive severity 354342 important Bug#354342: FTBFS: can't find res_mkquery Severity set to

Bug#345604: [Fontinst] License of the fontinst documentation

2006-02-25 Thread Ulrik Vieth
Taco Hoekwater wrote: Frank Küster wrote: But there's also files in the talks subdirectory for which no source is currently available. Do you know about the license situation for them, or should I try to contact Ulrik or Taco? And, for that matter, I guess roadmap.eps has been created with

Bug#354401: Error chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid group when setting up tex-common

2006-02-25 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Vincent! On Son, 26 Feb 2006, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Adjusting permissions of TeX font cache... chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid group tex-common/groupname: UNKNOWN This is strange, how did the UNKNOWN came into the tex-common/groupname? Did you enter it? The default for groupname is

Bug#354401: Error chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid group when setting up tex-common

2006-02-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2006-02-26 01:42:04 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: This is strange, how did the UNKNOWN came into the tex-common/groupname? I really don't know. It was previously 82 (in my config.dat backup from 2006-02-22 01:07:52), and now UNKNOWN. In the past, /etc/group contained: users:x:82: (I had

Processed: Adding tags: confirmed, patch

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 354145 + confirmed patch Bug#354145: mindi: Cdrom not detected after cdrom boot There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#354145: mindi: Cdrom not detected after cdrom boot

2006-02-25 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
Salut Yann, Thanks a lot for reporting this issue and for mentioning the workaround you found! I can confirm the problem and it's all my fault: When I made the change in 1.06-2 to get DMA to work on VIA chipsets, I relied on the ide-generic module to get loaded later, which is wrong as the CD

Bug#328557: marked as done (twiki: TWiki Remote Command Execution Vulnerability)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:33:04 +1100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line twiki: TWiki Remote Command Execution Vulnerability has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#354389: checkinstall segfaults

2006-02-25 Thread C.Y.M
Updating checkinstall to version 1.6.0 fixes the segfaults with the latest Sid sources. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#354414: www.debian.org: Invalid URL in jigdo files used to download Debian Stable DVD ISO

2006-02-25 Thread Ferenczi Viktor
Package: www.debian.org Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I've downloaded jigdo and template files from http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/i386/jigdo-dvd/ After jigdo-lite (installed from the jigdo-file package) started to download files, I got error messages for

Bug#354145: Bug#268308: dvd+rw-tools: growisofs prejudiced against sudo

2006-02-25 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
Hi Daniel, I just stumbled across this bug whilst looking into an issue with the mondo package that I maintain and writing DVDs under sudo which does not work because of the situation described in this bug. I believe that rather than applying a patch as suggested by LaMont, all that would be

Bug#264972: marked as done (wv: Security problem with wv)

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:10:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#319673: Intent to NMU aspell-fo

2006-02-25 Thread Jurij Smakov
Hi Peter, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has kindly agreed to sponsor an NMU of aspell-fo based on my patch (included above). Please let us know if there any reason why it should not be done, otherwise it is going to be uploaded next weekend (March 4-5). Best regards, Jurij