Bug#308200: marked as done (blackbox-themes: Copyright status still not resolved)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 22:17:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308200: fixed in blackbox-themes 0.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#365794: cbrowser: Does not start: Error in startup script: syntax error

Matej Vela wrote: > I can't reproduce this with either tk8.4 or tk8.0-ja (though I tested > tk8.0-ja in testing because it is broken in unstable). And the Tcl code > seems pretty innocuous... Can you try installing tk8.4 and running > > wish8.4 /usr/bin/cbrowser That works, as does simply r

Bug#363462: marked as done (xdm: no login possible after restart of xdm)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367197: marked as done (xdm does not start after last upgrade)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367227: marked as done (xdm does not start after last upgrade)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365383: marked as done (xdm has stopped being launched at boot)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Fixed in NMU of asclassic 1.1b-28.3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 366831 + fixed Bug#366831: asclassic: FTBFS with new X packages (obsolete move from /usr/X11R6/man) There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system a

Bug#363169: marked as done (xserver-xorg gets removed by x11-common rather than upgraded)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363169: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#363462: marked as done (xdm: no login possible after restart of xdm)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366599: marked as done (xdm looks for /usr/bin/X, but I have /usr/X11R6/bin/X)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365383: marked as done (xdm has stopped being launched at boot)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366599: marked as done (xdm looks for /usr/bin/X, but I have /usr/X11R6/bin/X)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367227: marked as done (xdm does not start after last upgrade)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#362885: marked as done (x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362885: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366831: asclassic 1.1b-28.3 NMU

Hello, I'm doing an NMU of asclassic to fix #366831; diff attached. Thanks, Matej diff -u asclassic-1.1b/debian/changelog asclassic-1.1b/debian/changelog --- asclassic-1.1b/debian/changelog +++ asclassic-1.1b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +asclassic (1.1b-28.3) unstable; urgency=low + + * N

Bug#366516: marked as done (boot process of fresh etch installation does not lead to graphic login: inconsistent paths /usr/bin vs /usr/bin/X11)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365134: marked as done (wrong paths to executables or executables in wrong places)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367197: marked as done (xdm does not start after last upgrade)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366695: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365134: marked as done (wrong paths to executables or executables in wrong places)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366516: marked as done (boot process of fresh etch installation does not lead to graphic login: inconsistent paths /usr/bin vs /usr/bin/X11)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366695: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365794: cbrowser: Does not start: Error in startup script: syntax error

tag 365794 unreproducible moreinfo thanks Ted Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > $ cbrowser > Error in startup script: syntax error in expression "[info tclversion] < > 7.6" > ("if" test expression) > while compiling > "if {[info tclversion] < 7.6} { ..." > (file "/usr/bin/cbrowse

Processed: Re: cbrowser: Does not start: Error in startup script: syntax error

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 365794 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#365794: cbrowser: Does not start: Error in startup script: syntax error There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Bug#366494: marked as done (nvidia-kernel-source_1.0.8756-4_i386: Incompatible with kernel 2.6.16)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 22:12:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Invalid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#356769: Re^2: ndiswrapper-utils: Fails to detect manufaturer names in inf-file rendering unusable

On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 00:12 +0200, Silvério Santos wrote: > Hi Andres, > > wlagsall (generic Agere) is reported to have the driver installed. > wltos48 (special Toshiba Tecra 9000) is still an invalid driver. > > Will test the next days though, as I had to change the AP to WEP due to > the lack

Bug#367860: FTBFS in unstable: 'datadir' undeclared

Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: gnubg > Version: 0.14.3-6 > Severity: serious > _DATADIR gets defined as datadir and that doesn't exist. > Automatic build of gnubg_0.14.3-6 on bilbao by sbuild/sparc 85 I find it very strange that this would suddenly materialize when that

Bug#367986: sylpheed-gtk1: ..moving mail between folders within Sg1-1.0.6, crashes X.

Package: sylpheed-gtk1 Version: 1.0.6-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software ...moving mail between folders within Sylpheed-gtk1-1.0.6 (Sg1), crashes X, however X and KDM restarts ok, so "it's a simple case of just logging in again." I see no hint open data isn't lost fr

Bug#338589: Isn't this resolved already?

At least when I run ldd on grep, I get nothing unusual: chelcicky:~$ ldd /bin/grep linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7df) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f3d000) chelcicky:~$ Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Bug#367983: gnuserv built without Unix Domain sockets, Internet Domain sockets or System V IPC

Package: gnuserv Version: 3.12.7-2.1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Gnuserv's configure script has some logic (at line 1493) to edit out X header and library directories that are the same as the default /usr/include and /usr/lib & /lib. This is a problem now that Xorg packages actually place their f

Processed: Re: Bug#367975: libgtksourceview-common: file conflict with boo

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 367975 serious Bug#367975: libgtksourceview-common: file conflict with boo Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Processed: xvfb-run is back

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unblock 363072 by 363494 Bug#363072: pyopengl: FTBFS: Build depends on non-existing xlibmesa-glu-dev Was blocked by: 363373 363494 Blocking bugs removed: 363494, 363373 > unblock 363072 by 363373 Bug#363072: pyopengl: FTBFS: Build depends on non-existi

Processed: Fixed in NMU of sip-tester 1.1rc4-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 302092 + fixed Bug#302092: sip-tester_1.1rc1-2: FTBFS: invalid conversion from 'int*' to 'socklen_t*' Tags were: sid Tags added: fixed > tag 362178 + fixed Bug#362178: sip-tester_1.1rc4-2(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: arch-specific options in flags Ther

Processed: Re: Bug#367970: bacula: hyper-retaliation clause does not comply with the DFSG

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 367970 important Bug#367970: bacula: hyper-retaliation clause does not comply with the DFSG Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Bug#367970: bacula: hyper-retaliation clause does not comply with the DFSG

severity 367970 important thanks On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 12:12:08AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > This "hyper-retaliation" clause does *not* comply with the DFSG: > upstream should be persuaded to drop it. Hello Francesco, Thank you for pointing this out. The thread on debian-legal just beg

Bug#356769: Re^2: ndiswrapper-utils: Fails to detect manufaturer names in inf-file rendering unusable

Hi Andres, wlagsall (generic Agere) is reported to have the driver installed. wltos48 (special Toshiba Tecra 9000) is still an invalid driver. Will test the next days though, as I had to change the AP to WEP due to the lack of wpa_supplicant compatible drivers. BTW: the command ndiswrapper re

Bug#367783: Remove the brackets as possible workaround

Just found out that it does not segfault when removing the square brakets ~ # echo test | tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]' Segmentation fault ~ # tr 'a-z' 'A-Z' ~ # echo test | tr 'a-z' 'A-Z' TEST regards, Davide signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#367970: bacula: hyper-retaliation clause does not comply with the DFSG

Package: bacula Version: 1.38.9-9 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The copyright file states that parts of Bacula are licensed under the GNU GPL v2, plus additional conditions, among which the following one: | Termination for IP or Patent Action: | In addition to the termination cla

Bug#302092: sip-tester 1.1rc4-2.1 NMU

Hello, I'm doing an NMU of sip-tester to fix #302092 and #362178; diff attached. Thanks, Matej diff -u sip-tester-1.1rc4/debian/changelog sip-tester-1.1rc4/debian/changelog --- sip-tester-1.1rc4/debian/changelog +++ sip-tester-1.1rc4/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +sip-tester (1.1rc4-2.1) uns

Bug#360686: marked as done (sync broken with revent libsvn-core-perl)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 17:29:49 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Problem found with local system; closing 360686 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#104394: Message for sharon monroe 5.01%

How are you, My colleague has rec eived your form applied. http://geocities.com/CheriIsaac3496 Please cl ick the site above, Our office shall then re-confirm your infomation. With Ref to: sharon monroe and your histroy is not an issue. All lo an types have been Ap prove d for you

Bug#364504: Bug#363667: emacs21: Unreadable fonts since Xorg 7.0 update

Hi. I checked my xorg.conf, installed mule-ucs, re-set my locales to an ISO one and installed xfs, and my emacs is still nothing but unreadable rectangles where characters should be. -- ~ in the battle between my demons and my better angels, at least there is a fair fight - linux user # 408597

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xmon 1.5.6-1.4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 366527 + fixed Bug#366527: FTBFS: X.org changes: debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/man/man*/*: No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#366527: xmon 1.5.6-1.4 NMU

Hello, I'm doing an NMU of xmon to fix #366527; diff attached. (Sorry for not sending this earlier, wireless trouble.) Thanks, Matej diff -u xmon-1.5.6/debian/changelog xmon-1.5.6/debian/changelog --- xmon-1.5.6/debian/changelog +++ xmon-1.5.6/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +xmon (1.5.6-1.4)

Bug#367954: FTBFS: syntax error near unexpected token `else'

Package: curl Version: 7.15.3-1 Severity: serious Your package fails to build in unstable: checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes checking for a glibc strerror_r API... yes ../../configure: line 29513: syntax error near unexpected token `else' ../../configure: line 29513: `else' -- Mart

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 359232 fixed Bug#359232: libcrypt-cbc-perl security update broken. Tags were: sarge Tags added: fixed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: reassign 262925 to cman,cman-kernel,ccs,dlm-kernel,fence,gfs,gfs-kernel,gnbd,gnbd-kernel,iddev,magma,magma-plugins

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 262925 > cman,cman-kernel,ccs,dlm-kernel,fence,gfs-kernel,gnbd,gnbd-kernel,magma Bug#262925: gfs framework should not enter testing Warning: Unknown package 'iddev' Warning: Unknown package 'magma-plugins' Bug reassigned from package `cman,cm

Processed: reassign to right packages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 366494 nvidia-kernel-source Bug#366494: nvidia-kernel-source_1.0.8756-4_i386: Incompatible with kernel 2.6.16 Bug reassigned from package `nvidia-kernel-source_1.0.8756-4_i386' to `nvidia-kernel-source'. > reassign 356763 spca5xx-modules-2.6

Bug#297581: marked as done (gfs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:32:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Processed: Re: reassign 262925 to cman,cman-kernel,ccs,dlm-kernel,fence,gfs,gfs-kernel,gnbd,gnbd-kernel,iddev,magma,magma-plugins

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 262925 > cman,cman-kernel,ccs,dlm-kernel,fence,gfs-kernel,gnbd,gnbd-kernel,iddev,magma,magma-plugins Bug#262925: gfs framework should not enter testing Warning: Unknown package 'gfs' Warning: Unknown package 'iddev' Warning: Unknown package 'm

Bug#340712: marked as done (firebird2-server-common: binary file security.fdb is not a config file but uses ucf!)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 11:47:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340712: fixed in firebird2 1.5.3.4870-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#365134: Dirty work around

I got this working by changing: in /etc/init.d/xdm: /usr/bin/X11/xdm to /usr/bin/xdm in /etc/X11/default-display-manager: /usr/bin/X11/xdm to /usr/bin/xdm in /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers: /usr/bin/X to /usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg I am hoping that there will soon be an upgrade that will set the config files to

Bug#323099: License of wget.texi: suggest removal of invariant sections

Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Thu, 18 May 2006, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: >>> Including the text of the GPL in Wget's manual serves the purpose >>> of explaining Wget's copying terms to the user. As such, it seems >>> pertinent regardless of whether Wget is ac

Bug#367935: checkinstall's temporary script is deleted by installwatch and installation therefore fails

Package: checkinstall Version: 1.5.3-3 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable Checkinstall creates a script in a temporary directory for execution by installwatch. Installwatch also uses a temporary directory, which it removes if it already exists. Checkinstall and ins

Processed: merging 365230 230947

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > merge 365230 230947 Bug#230947: There is no package with name "FFI" for hppa Bug#365230: mcvs - FTBFS: There is no package with name "FFI" Bug#270876: clisp: FFI not available on arm

Processed: reassign 364688 to clisp

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > reassign 364688 clisp Bug#364688: common-lisp-controller: segfault durring setup Bug reassigned from package `common-lisp-controller' to `clisp'. > End of message, stopping processin

Bug#367884: marked as done (rep-gtk_0.18.cvs20060518-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-linux-gnu failed)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 10:17:30 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367884: fixed in rep-gtk 0.18.cvs20060518-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#367862: Interface problem with gmp (RC bug encountered)

Dear gmp maintainers, could you please take a look at #367862? Is it possible that there were some changes in the last gmp upload which should have warranted a SONAME bump? Like this it silently broke dependent applications. As a simple recompile of obby, the library, solved the problem, I strongl

Bug#365547: marked as done (manpages-dev uninstallable because of conflicting file sem_destroy.3.gz from glibc-doc)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 10:17:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365547: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367910: amarok freezes after a few songs

Subject: amarok freezes after a few songs Package: amarok Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** I just upgraded amarok to version 1.4 (via apt-get -t unstable amarok. I am running etch.) After having played two o

Bug#365134: which X server is correct?

I just ran into this problem as well, and was about to report the same workaround (changing /usr/bin/X11/xdm to /usr/bin/xdm in /etc/init.d/xdm and /etc/X11/default-display-manager). But I'm still not sure which X server to use in /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers. There's -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1878204 200

Bug#312932: xmlstarlet package

> > Are you still trying to maintain the Debian xmlstarlet package? There > > are currently a number of very old bugs that are very important that > > have been ignored for over a year. > > Thanks for reminding me, I'm working on the package now. > Unfortunately, the patch for bug #312932 induces

Bug#367862: Log for failed build of sobby_0.3.0-3 (dist=oldstable)

On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 17:34 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > sobby has the same problem: Ok, this is reproducible in my own sbuild instance. I'll check if this is solvable just with a BinNMU of obby. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Bug#312932: xmlstarlet package

Charles Fry wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Are you still trying to maintain the Debian xmlstarlet package? There > are currently a number of very old bugs that are very important that > have been ignored for over a year. Thanks for reminding me, I'm working on the package now. Unfortunately, the patch fo

Processed: confirm 367869

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 367869 + confirmed Bug#367869: FTBFS: too many arguments to function 'eel_alert_dialog_new' There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#323099: License of wget.texi: suggest removal of invariant sections

On Thu, 18 May 2006, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, 18 May 2006, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > >> If the point you're making is that someone might want to remove the > >> GPL text from the manual, for example to make it shorter, I guess > >> that's a valid con

Bug#323099: License of wget.texi: suggest removal of invariant sections

Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 18 May 2006, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: >> If the point you're making is that someone might want to remove the >> GPL text from the manual, for example to make it shorter, I guess >> that's a valid concern. > > Yes, that's the issue. I see. But that'

Bug#367862: Log for failed build of sobby_0.3.0-3 (dist=oldstable)

sobby has the same problem: > Automatic build of sobby_0.3.0-3 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by > sbuild/powerpc 0.44 > Build started at 20060511-0129 > ** > Checking available source versions... > Fetching source file

Bug#367888: FTBFS: ‘LIB_DIR’ was not declared in this scope

Package: xshisen Version: 1.51-1-2 Severity: serious Which is strange because -DLIB_DIR is there but I can reproduce this, so it seems real. > Automatic build of xshisen_1.51-1-2 on bilbao by sbuild/sparc 85 ... > g++ -c -g -Wall -O2 -DNO_GLOBAL_HIGHSCORE -I > -DLIB_DIR=\"/usr/share/games/xshi

Bug#367884: rep-gtk_0.18.cvs20060518-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-linux-gnu failed

Package: rep-gtk Version: 0.18.cvs20060518-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > debian/rules build > dh_testdir > CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" ./configure --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib \ > --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-linux-gnu -

Bug#323099: License of wget.texi: suggest removal of invariant sections

On Thu, 18 May 2006, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > If the point you're making is that someone might want to remove the > GPL text from the manual, for example to make it shorter, I guess > that's a valid concern. Yes, that's the issue. > Including the text of the GPL in Wget's manual serves the purpose

Bug#367882: FTBFS: 'VERSION' was not declared in this scope

Package: skim Version: 1.4.4-1 Severity: serious This package no longer builds in unstable: > Automatic build of skim_1.4.4-1 on bilbao by sbuild/sparc 85 ... > Install file: "scim/config/kconfig.la" as > "debian/tmp/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/Config/kconfig.la" > g++ -o src/socketserverthread.os -c

Processed: patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 367871 + patch Bug#367871: FTBFS: ./.libs/libefs.so: undefined reference to `crypt' There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#367871: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Log for failed build of bonobo_1.0.22-8 (dist=testing)]

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 12:47:44PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Do you see this too? Putting -lcrypt sooner works for me, as in: > gcc -g -O2 -Wall -lcrypt -Wl,--as-needed -o .libs/efstool efstool.o > ./.libs/libefs.so -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libglib.so -lz > but that doesn't seem right. > >

Bug#367872: FTBFS: too few arguments to function 'bfd_hash_table_init'

Package: lush Version: 1.1-4 Severity: serious > Automatic build of lush_1.1-4 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by > sbuild/powerpc 0.44 ... > powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNO_DEBUG -Wall -O3 > -mcpu=powerpc -I../include -pthread -INONE -c dldbfd.c > dldbfd.c: In function 'init_

Bug#367862: FTBFS: undefined reference to `obby::RSA::Key::set_k...

Hey Martin, On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 15:55 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > This package doesn't build in unstable: could you please send me the full build log together with config.log? I also need the list of dependencies you installed (most importantly gmp). I suspect an ABI break, but the last ob

Processed: on powerpc too

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 364688 grave Bug#364688: common-lisp-controller: segfault durring setup Severity set to `grave' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Bug#367869: FTBFS: too many arguments to function 'eel_alert_dialog_new'

Package: link-monitor-applet Version: 1.3-3 Severity: serious > Automatic build of link-monitor-applet_1.3-3 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de > by sbuild/powerpc 0.44 ... > if powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..-pthread -DORBIT2=1 > -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/

Bug#348014: bug seems to be still there

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > I'm just trying to install version 2.20.1-2 on a debian testing and i'm > having the same problem reported in this bug. > Again the problem has been solved by manually copying params file: > cp /usr/share/bugzilla/debian/params.new /etc/bugzilla/p

Bug#367871: FTBFS: ./.libs/libefs.so: undefined reference to `crypt'

Package: bonobo Version: 1.0.22-8 Severity: serious This package fails to build from source. Patch coming in a separate mail. > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 > -I/usr/lib/glib/include-g -O2 -Wall -c efstool.c > efstool.c: In function 'get_command': > efstool.c:205

Bug#367863: xulrunner: FTBFS: Problems finding jni.h

Package: xulrunner Version: 1.8.0.1-10 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... # Add here commands to configure the package. JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj \ MOZCONFIG=debian/mozconfig \ CFLAGS="-Wall -pipe" \ LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed" \ ./configure --ho

Bug#249320: want to meet?

Do not ignore me please, I found your email somewhere and now deacided to write byou. I am coming to your placbe in few weekas and thouaght we can meet each other. Let bme know if you do not mind. I bam a nice pretty girl. Don't reply to this email. Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Bug#367862: FTBFS: undefined reference to `obby::RSA::Key::set_k...

Package: gobby Version: 0.3.0-2 Severity: serious This package doesn't build in unstable: > Automatic build of gobby_0.3.0-2 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by > sbuild/powerpc 0.44 ... > powerpc-linux-gnu-g++ -g -O2 -o gobby gobby-main_connection_generic.o > gobby-buffer_wrapper.o gobby-i

Bug#367860: FTBFS in unstable: 'datadir' undeclared

Package: gnubg Version: 0.14.3-6 Severity: serious _DATADIR gets defined as datadir and that doesn't exist. > Automatic build of gnubg_0.14.3-6 on bilbao by sbuild/sparc 85 ... > if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./lib -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I./intl > -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -I/us

Bug#367843: xinput: FTBFS: Obsolete references to /usr/X11R6

Package: xinput Version: 1.2-5.2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... install -c -m 0444 xinput._man /tmp/buildd/xinput-1.2/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/xinput.1x install.man in . done make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xinput-1.2' chmod 644 `pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/man/man*

Bug#367854: libcaca: FTBFS: Fails to detect -lX11

Package: libcaca Version: 0.9-5.1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... checking slang/slang.h usability... no checking slang/slang.h presence... no checking for slang/slang.h... no checking for X... libraries , headers in standard search path checking for XOpenDisplay in -lX11... no

Bug#367852: xsim: FTBFS: Fails to detect X

Package: xsim Version: 0.3.9.4-6.1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... checking for i486-linux-gnu-ld... no checking for ld... ld checking for X... no configure: error: X Window System not found make: *** [config.status] Error 1 -- Daniel Schepler

Processed: severity of 312932 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 312932 serious Bug#312932: wrong binary name (xmlstarlet instead of xml) on i386 Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#367833: numlockx: FTBFS with new X packages: Fails to detect X

Le Jeudi 18 Mai 2006 15:07, Martin-Éric Racine a écrit : > to, 2006-05-18 kello 14:41 +0200, Daniel Schepler kirjoitti: > > checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X includes. Please check > > your installation and add the correct paths! make: *** [config.status] > > Error 1 > > Should I ass

Bug#367833: numlockx: FTBFS with new X packages: Fails to detect X

to, 2006-05-18 kello 14:41 +0200, Daniel Schepler kirjoitti: > Package: numlockx > Version: 1.1-3 > Severity: serious > > From my pbuilder build log: > > ... > checking dependency style of cc... none > checking for ranlib... ranlib > checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E > checking for

Bug#367833: numlockx: FTBFS with new X packages: Fails to detect X

to, 2006-05-18 kello 15:17 +0200, Daniel Schepler kirjoitti: > Le Jeudi 18 Mai 2006 15:07, Martin-Éric Racine a écrit : > > to, 2006-05-18 kello 14:41 +0200, Daniel Schepler kirjoitti: > > > checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X includes. Please check > > > your installation and add the

Bug#367844: xkeycaps: FTBFS: imake config files have moved

Package: xkeycaps Version: 2.47-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... debian/rules build dh_testdir imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config \ -D`dpkg --print-architecture` Imakefile.c:39: error: Imake.tmpl: No such file or directory imake: Exit code 1. Stop

Bug#367850: xoids: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

Package: xoids Version: 1.5-16.1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... gcc -m32 -O2 -g-I/usr/X11R6/include/X11 -Dlinux -D__i386__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE

Bug#367827: marked as done (FTBFS: conflicting types for 'question_get_variable')

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 06:02:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367827: fixed in cdebconf-entropy 0.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#348014: bug seems to be still there

I'm just trying to install version 2.20.1-2 on a debian testing and i'm having the same problem reported in this bug. Again the problem has been solved by manually copying params file: cp /usr/share/bugzilla/debian/params.new /etc/bugzilla/params Version reported by bugzilla main page is: Bugzil

Bug#367845: ftp.debian.org: zoo_2.10.orig.tar.gz missing from mirrors

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 "must include source code" -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 zoo_2.10.orig.tar.gz is not available from ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/z/zoo/ or mirrors ftp.uk.debian.org, mirror.ox.ac.uk, archive.progeny.com.

Bug#367839: xblast: FTBFS: Obsolete moving of files from /usr/X11R6

Package: xblast Version: 2.6.1-11 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... install -p-oroot -groot -m644 debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xblast/bitmap/block/* \ debian/xblast-data/usr/share/games/xblast/bitmap/block install: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xbl

Bug#367840: xboing: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

Package: xboing Version: 2.4-26.3 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... gcc -m32 -g -Dlinux -D__i386__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_S

Processed: pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 367827 +pending Bug#367827: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'question_get_variable' There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Bug#367713: marked as done (FTBFS with libnotify 0.4)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 05:47:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367713: fixed in rhythmbox 0.9.4.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

  1   2   >