Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> retitle 346233 FTBFS: guile-gnome-platform: debuild fails,
> guile-gnome-gw-atk.c
Bug#346233: guile-gnome-platform: debuild fails, guile-gnome-gw-atk.c
Changed Bug title.
>
End of m
Hello,
the patch below is sufficient to fix the problem. I tested it with a
normal /usr/local/share and with a readonly one (simulated via chattr
+i).
diff -Naur hibernate-1.12/debian/hibernate.prerm
hibernate-1.12.enrico/debian/hibernate.prerm
--- hibernate-1.12/debian/hibernate.prerm 2
Hello,
the bug can be reproduced like this:
mkdir tmp
cd tmp
ln -s foo .
Then in gnomebaker, right click on foo and select "add folder".
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 02:56:51AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> This bug moved to Etch.
> manpages-dev still needs to add a Conflicts: glibc-doc (<< 2.3.6-8)
You mean "Replaces".
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 358310 + pending
Bug#358310: FTBFS: @LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS@: No such file or directory
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:23:49AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Package: mffm-fftw1c2
> Version: 1.6-1
> Followup-For: Bug #338537
> mffm-fftw1c2 needs to do both of the following:
> Conflicts: mffm-fmtw1
> Replaces: mffm-fftw1
> Ordinarily when a package is renamed, it Provides: the former
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 352902
Bug#352902: CVE-2006-0481: PNG_Set_Strip_Alpha Buffer Overflow
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping pr
Package: xpostit
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
It installs man pages still into /usr/X11R6/man. This is now a policy
violation since the old exceptions for X using packages have been
removed.
The path in the menu file is wrong when compiled with a current xutils.
Patch (Despite the changelog ent
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> # nothing unrelated here
> severity 368273 grave
Bug#368273: python-gnome2-extras: lack dependency on mozilla-browser
Severity set to `grave' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopp
Greetings, Steffen Moeller.
In Debian bug #366005
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=366005) it is claimed
that the address Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> does not
work, and indeed there is no DNS record for prz, but there is one for
pzr.uni-rostock.de. Is that the correct addr
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 22:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352902: fixed in gnomesword 2.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:29:50PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
>> Running "apt-src install package_name" fails with this message
>> "Unable to parse package file
>> /var/lib/apt/lists/_opt_deb-repo_source_Sources (2)E: No such source" for
>> whatever package.
>
[snipped]
Package: mffm-fftw1c2
Version: 1.6-1
Followup-For: Bug #338537
mffm-fftw1c2 needs to do both of the following:
Conflicts: mffm-fmtw1
Replaces: mffm-fftw1
Ordinarily when a package is renamed, it Provides: the former name as well,
but in this case it doesn't actually "provide" the previous name b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 360588 + patch
Bug#360588: hibernate: prerm renders package uninstallable with a read-only
/usr/local
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing h
I have applied the patch from Roberto Sanchez and done an NMU of the
package. Attached is the exact diff; it differs from Roberto's only in
the changelog.
--
Latest nerd movie: Once were hackers
diff -u xosview-1.8.2/config/configure.in xosview-1.8.2/config/configure.in
--- xosview-1.8.2/config/c
Attached is the diff for the NMU I'm about to do for trac to fix bug
#366827 (trac: FTBFS: Clean rule fails on clean package).
--
When in doubt, use brute force.
diff -u trac-0.9.5/debian/control trac-0.9.5/debian/control
--- trac-0.9.5/debian/control
+++ trac-0.9.5/debian/control
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 364629 + fixed
Bug#364629: FTBFS: error: previous declaration 'int snprintf...'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: xbat
Version: 1.11-9.1
Followup-For: Bug #368222
Subject: xbat: Unable to reproduce
Followup-For: Bug #368222
Package: xbat
Version: 1.11-9.1
I'm unable to reproduce the bug.
Altought I'm an excelent player :P, I lose all my lifes and the game
doesn't die. Maybe it's powerpc-specific.
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 21:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361575: fixed in manedit 0.6.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:29:50PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
> Running "apt-src install package_name" fails with this message
> "Unable to parse package file /var/lib/apt/lists/_opt_deb-repo_source_Sources
> (2)E: No such source" for whatever package.
> It appears that the file /var/lib/apt/lists
Package: xinput
Severity: serious
Hi.
xinput still uses debmake which is deprecated.
Please use some other helper tool like debhelper.
Since debmake will be removed this is filed as serious bug.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT pre
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 368004 ftp.debian.org
Bug#368004: banshee-daap: not installable in sid
Bug reassigned from package `banshee-daap' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> severity 368004 normal
Bug#368004: banshee-daap: not installable in sid
Severity set to `normal' from `gra
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 20:47:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368220: fixed in xmame 0.105-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reassign 368004 ftp.debian.org
severity 368004 normal
retitle 368004 please accept avahi-sharp from NEW
thanks
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:40:00AM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> here is the problem:
> # apt-get install banshee-daap
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Do
Package: python-gnome2-extras
Version: 2.12.1-2.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Currently, neither python2.3-gnome2-extras nor python2.4-gnome2-extras depend
on mozilla-browser. Without this dependency, any software which use gtkembedmoz
python binding will crash if m
I'm going to take this up with upstream. There isn't a willingness to
try to change the license of that doc so the aim will be to have the
non-free documentation released separately from the code.
1.6 is currently in beta and will be released in time for the etch
freeze so I'd rather keep the sou
Package: mffm-fftw1c2
Version: 1.6-1
Followup-For: Bug #338537
I just upgraded wsola, which now depends on mffm-fftw1c2. Breakage ensues.
The right way to fix it is probably the same way the other c2 packages fixed
this sort of thing; with a "Conflict:
mffm-fftw1" in mffm-fftw1c2 control.
Pea
Package: quagga
Version: 0.98.3-7.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading to 0.98.3-7.2 all propagated routes are not imported
into the routingtable. I downgraded to 0.98.3-7 and I have got the
routes of my firewall back. After upgrading again I have lost those
ro
Package: pdnsd
Severity: serious
Tags: security
CVE-2006-2076: "Memory leak in Paul Rombouts pdnsd before 1.2.4 allows
remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a
DNS query with an unsupported (1) QTYPE or (2) QCLASS, as demonstrated
by the OUSPG PROTOS DNS test suite.
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 16:02:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360164: fixed in kmymoney2 0.8.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sat, 20 May 2006 13:20:51 -0400 Andrew Moise wrote:
> I know I sound like a pain in the ass, but the new copyright file
> still doesn't list detailed copyright and upstream information.
I agree that this should be fixed.
> Also,
> the GPL is a bad license to apply to images, because it requ
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 15:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359892: fixed in libfoundation1.0 1.0.84-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Partial Project support can be created by copying a default
package.anjuta file (like the one attached) into the source tree, using
the prefix of the intended project.
cp junk4.anjuta ../package/package.anjuta
The Project menu options do not work and the Project view still shows no
project loaded
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 15:04:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367863: fixed in xulrunner 1.8.0.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
hi guys,
i had a short look at the latest xcircuit upstream version last week. Both the
current stable and unstable versions of xcircuit do not compile with python
support enabled (and i dont want to upload a package without). I have contacted
upstream about this issue and he seems to have fixed i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:09:22AM +0100, Paul Cupis wrote:
>> tag 367618 + patch
>> thanks
>>
>> Please find attached my patch which moves libexpect5.43.so back into the
>> expect package.
>>
>> expect-dev Depends on expect, so the shared object will available to
>> link
Package: alsa-lib
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
The building of the alsa-lib source package aborts with the following
error:
# BEGIN EXTRACT OF BUILD LOG (tail -n20 alsa-lib*build)
make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/build/alsa-lib-1.0.11/bibuild/src'
test -z "/usr/l
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.36
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.6
python-setuptools is missing in Build-Depends fied. It returns fail in
distutils-3.sh and distutils-4.sh. A simple patch is attached.
Thanks,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
Just FYI, this builds finally fine on ia64 with -4, even though I didn't
reopen/close it one more time.
cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Package: libaqbanking0-dev
Version: 1.6.2-5
Severity: serious
libaqbanking0-dev is not installable in unstable.
Bastian
--
Spock: The odds of surviving another attack are 13562190123 to 1, Captain.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 14:02:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367278: fixed in obexftp 0.19-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> package xblast xblast-data xblast-sound
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xblast xblast-data xblast-sound
> tags 361730 + pending
Bug#361730: xblast: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd
Tags were: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 357947 serious
Bug#357947: libgnomeprint2.2-0: Too weak dependancy on libgnomecups-1.0
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks robot
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Package: k3d
Version: 0.5.0.35-1
Severity: serious
k3b build-depends on xlibmesa-glu-dev, which is no longer in sid.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At this point, my best guess is that this may be a bug in 1.6.7 that
> has been fixed in 1.6.8. I believe a number of GC and syntax related
> bugs have been fixed since 1.6.7, and I wouldn't be surprised if one
> of those is the culprit.
>
> Unfortunatel
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:08:43PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> You told the debconf menu not to stop the server and thus to abort the
> upgrade, right?
"not to stop" and "abort the upgrade" are different things.
The question defaults to false and is not displayed at all. So this is a
simple
On 2006-05-20 Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:08:43PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > You told the debconf menu not to stop the server and thus to abort the
> > upgrade, right?
>
> "not to stop" and "abort the upgrade" are different things.
>
> The question defaults to fal
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:09:22AM +0100, Paul Cupis wrote:
> tag 367618 + patch
> thanks
>
> Please find attached my patch which moves libexpect5.43.so back into the
> expect package.
>
> expect-dev Depends on expect, so the shared object will available to
> link with (re: bug #367325).
Well th
On 2006-05-20 Bastian Blank wrote:
> Preparing to replace quagga 0.99.3-1 (using .../quagga_0.99.4-2_amd64.deb)
> As requested via Debconf, the Quagga daemon will not stop.
You told the debconf menu not to stop the server and thus to abort the
upgrade, right?
In this case, of course, the packag
Package: xbat
Version: 1.11-9.1
Severity: grave
Hi,
xbat dies after losing the game.
Here is the log:
This GDB was configured as "powerpc-linux-gnu"...(no debugging symbols
found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/games/xbat
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 11:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358139: fixed in gauche 0.8.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:34:17PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
> unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
> message then please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruno Barrera C.) by replying
> to this e
Package: anjuta
Version: 2.0.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Existing Anjuta project files created with Anjuta1 are unusable. The import
wizard complains that the wrong directory is in use or that Gnome Devel
Framework does not exist. This is down to a complete inabil
At this point, my best guess is that this may be a bug in 1.6.7 that
has been fixed in 1.6.8. I believe a number of GC and syntax related
bugs have been fixed since 1.6.7, and I wouldn't be surprised if one
of those is the culprit.
Unfortunately, the only way I know of to reproduce this problem
Package: quagga
Version: 0.99.4-2
Severity: serious
quagga fails to upgrade:
| Preparing to replace quagga 0.99.3-1 (using .../quagga_0.99.4-2_amd64.deb) ...
| As requested via Debconf, the Quagga daemon will not stop.
| dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
| dpkg -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 364869 patch
Bug#364869: epylog: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
Tags were: pending
Tags added: patch
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:40:51PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> The version currently in the archives provides set_n with the following
> signature (provides by objdump -T -C):
> obby::RSA::Key::set_n(__gmp_expr<__gmpz_value, __gmpz_value> const&)
>
> The recompiled version has instead this one:
Package: xmame
Severity: serious
Hello,
your package fails to build from source because it declares build
dependencies on the no longer available package
xlibmesa-glu-dev. Please use build dependencies on libgl1-mesa-dev and
libglu1-mesa-dev instead of xlibmesa-glu-dev and xlibmesa-gl-dev.
Pleas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 368217 normal
Bug#368217: vim: All characters are black in gnome-terminal
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
severity 368217 normal
thanks
* Nicolas Patrois wrote:
> Sometimes, when I try to edit a file with vim, all the characters
> are drawn in black, while I need white as specified in my
> gnome-terminal profile. This bug happens with all users (root and
> me), and even if I call syntax on.
>
> Plea
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 08:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368201: fixed in bzrtools 0.8.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: vim
Version: 1:6.4-007+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Sometimes, when I try to edit a file with vim, all the characters are
drawn in black, while I need white as specified in my gnome-terminal
profile.
This bug happens with all users (root and me), and even if
Le samedi 20 mai 2006 à 14:48 +0200, Mario Iseli a écrit :
> Package: gnome-desktop-environment
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Since my update today (on unstable, version of gde is 1:2.12.3) when i
> login i do not get the grey menubar on the top of the screen, so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 366389 fixed
Bug#366389: wmdate: uninstallable due to Xorg 7.0 transition
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Hi Philipp,
> Dear gmp maintainers,
>
> could you please take a look at #367862? Is it possible that there were
> some changes in the last gmp upload which should have warranted a SONAME
> bump? Like this it silently broke dependent applications. As a simple
> recompile of obby, the library, solv
Howdy,
I am able to reproduce this problem. Here are the root-related
settings in /etc/pbuilderrc:
> #for pbuilder debuild
> BUILDSOURCEROOTCMD="fakeroot"
> PBUILDERROOTCMD="sudo"
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 10:22 -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Otherwise, it would help me if you could point out what part of gmp
> you believe has changed. In this bug report, the errors have to do
> with missing methods of obby::RSA::Key:
[snip]
> Since you know the obby source better than I, may
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign manpages-dev
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> merge 365547 368160
Bug#365547: manpages-dev uninstallable because of conflicting file
sem_destroy.3.gz from glibc-doc
Bug#368160: upgrade-reports: glibc-doc can't write manpag
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 14:22:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nagios cve-2006-2489 / cve-2006-2162
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 15:45:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: tries to use gcc-3.4 without b-d
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 14:22:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nagios cve-2006-2489 / cve-2006-2162
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2006 06:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367484: fixed in duplicity
0.4.2-2+sftp+amazons3+compression
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
* Stefan Huehner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-20 14:04]:
> Package: zope-textingdexng2
> Version: 1:2.2.0-2
There's no such package in Debian. Did you make a typo or where is it
from?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Package: bzrtools
Severity: serious
Version: 0.7-2
Hello,
bzrtools is uninstallable due to an unmet dependency on bzr (< 0.8)
whereas the current version of bzr in the repository is 0.8.2.
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstab
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> clone 368193 -1
Bug#368193: nagios: CVE-2006-2489: remote DoS and possible code execution
Bug 368193 cloned as bug 368199.
> reassign -1 nagios2
Bug#368199: nagios: CVE-2006-2489: re
Package: zope-textingdexng2
Version: 1:2.2.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package depends on zope2.7 which isn't anylonger in the archive.
Please consider transitioning to zope2.8,zope2.9 or zope3.
Regards,
Stefan
-- System Information:
Debian Release: test
Package: zope-zms
Version: 1:2.3.2b57a09-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package depends on 'zope2.7' which isn't anymore in the archive.
Please consider transitioning to zope2.8,zope2.9 or zope3.
Regards,
Stefan
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/
Package: zope-docfindertab
Version: 0.5.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package depends on ' zope (>= 2.5.1-2.7) | zope2.7' which are no longer
in the archive.
Please consider transitioning to zope2.8,zope2.9 or zope3.
Regards,
Stefan
-- System Information:
Package: nagios
Severity: grave
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CVE-2006-2489: "Integer overflow in CGI scripts in Nagios 1.x before
1.4.1 and 2.x before 2.3.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of
service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a conte
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Bazaar is abadonned by upstream[1], maintainer is said to be MIA since
seven months. Has a new development branch, but that's called
bazaar-ng[2], a package is requested for it[3].
Has several RC bugs[4].
Holding neon 2.4 -> 2.5 transition[5] and with it th
Package: zope-extfile
Version: 1.4.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package depends on 'zope (>= 2.6.2) | zope2.7' which are no longer in the
archive.
Please consider transitioning to zope2.8,zope2.9 or zope3.
Regards,
Stefan
-- System Information:
Debian R
Package: zope-zwiki
Version: 0.37.0-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package depends on 'zope (>= 2.5.1-2.7) | zope2.7' which
both cannot be satisfied in unstable.
Please consider transitioning to zope2.8,zope2.9 or zope3.
Regards,
Stefan
-- System Information:
Package: classpath
Version: 2:0.91-2
Severity: serious
After updating classpath to version 0.91, cacao is unable to find any
classes, and jamvm sometimes segfaults. I believe this is because of
changes done in the Classpath<->JVM interface, and that classpath
because of this should conflict with
tag 367618 + patch
thanks
Please find attached my patch which moves libexpect5.43.so back into the
expect package.
expect-dev Depends on expect, so the shared object will available to
link with (re: bug #367325).
diff -Naur expect-5.43.0-orig/debian/changelog expect-5.43.0/debian/changelog
--- e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 367863 confirmed pending
Bug#367863: xulrunner: FTBFS: Problems finding jni.h
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 367618 + patch
Bug#367618: libexpect5.43.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
tag 366723 patch
thanks
I believe that the build-dependency on xlibmesa-glu-dev should be
changed to libglu1-mesa-dev or libglu-dev. According to its
description, libglu1-xorg-dev is a transitional package so I don't
think it should be used. The attached patch uses libglu1-mesa-dev,
which fixes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 366723 patch
Bug#366723: libsdl-erlang: FTBFS: Build dependency on xlibmesa-glu-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 365547 2.28-1
Bug#365547: manpages-dev uninstallable because of conflicting file
sem_destroy.3.gz from glibc-doc
Bug marked as found in version 2.28-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
reopen 365547
reassign 365547 manpages-dev
thanks
This bug moved to Etch.
manpages-dev still needs to add a Conflicts: glibc-doc (<< 2.3.6-8)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 365547
Bug#365547: manpages-dev uninstallable because of conflicting file
sem_destroy.3.gz from glibc-doc
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originat
91 matches
Mail list logo
