Bug#386833: patch

merge 384146 386833 tags 384146 patch tags 386833 patch thanks for all the fish --- Attached is a patch which gets the package building again. Basically I split the ENUM_DEFINITION macro into a ENUM_DEFINITION_BEGIN and a ENUM_DEFINITION_END so that the enums can be defined by the _BEGIN and

Processed: patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 384146 386833 Bug#384146: plptools: FTBFS (amd64): conflicting declaration 'typedef long long unsigned int u_int64_t' Bug#386833: plptools: FTBFS (i386/gcc-4.1) bad Merged 384146 386833. tags 384146 patch Bug#384146: plptools: FTBFS (amd64):

Bug#388708: apt: Upgrading to this version makes status file unparseable

Package: apt Version: 0.6.46 Severity: grave #_ aptitude -u ... upgrade ... #_ aptitude -vvv upgrade Reading package lists... Error! E: Unable to parse package file /var/lib/dpkg/status (1) E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. Reading package lists... Error! E:

Bug#388609: teapop-mysql: purging the package fails (update-inetd unavailable)

Bill Allombert wrote: Package: teapop-mysql Version: 0.3.7-4.1+b1 Severity: serious Hello Nick, There is an error when attempting to purge teapop-mysql: Removing teapop-mysql ... Purging configuration files for teapop-mysql ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/teapop-mysql.postrm: line 28:

Bug#387798: marked as done (libgutils1-dev: broken symlink (missing dep?))

Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:32:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#387798: fixed in sg3-utils 1.21-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#388695: geda-gschem: Probably parenthesis mismatch in errors in gschem

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:22:17PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:12:42PM -0400, H. S. wrote: (here is the bug again here for geda-gschem, instead of for geda) Thanks. geda-gschem 20060906 should be in etch in a day or two. Not if this RC bug is open, it won't be.

Bug#388521: libnotify-dev: Missing depedancies on libgtk2.0-dev

tags 388521 + confirmed, pending thanks. Thanks for the report. There is a fix in SVN and an upload is supposed to happen soon. Ciao ~marco signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente

Processed: Re: If the problem is that the user doesn't know he won't be able to reboot...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 345931 + patch Bug#345931: System fails to boot after updating boot sector from grub interactive shell Tags were: upstream Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#345931: If the problem is that the user doesn't know he won't be able to reboot...

tags 345931 + patch thanks In my previous response, I missed this post to this bug list. On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Marc Fargas wrote: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Surely this is still a bug in the grub shell for failing to notice that it had rendered the system unbootable? Grub

Processed: setting forwarded to upstream bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 388125 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8392 Bug#388125: osgcal FTBFS (sparc): bus error in xvfb Forwarded-to-address changed from http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2006-September/018251.html to

Bug#388711: ldap-account-manager failure when open in web browser and login

Package: ldap-account-manager Version: 1.0.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Today, after I upgrade my etch, the ldap-account-manager is unusable. When I open http://127.0.0.1/lam; in the web browser, I can not get correct web page and get some warning message, as

Processed: Re: libnotify-dev: Missing depedancies on libgtk2.0-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 388521 + confirmed, pending Bug#388521: libnotify-dev: Missing depedancies on libgtk2.0-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, pending thanks. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Thanks for the report. There is

Bug#388719: findimagedupes: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

Package: findimagedupes Version: 0.2-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... mkdir -p ./tmp chmod 755 findimagedupes_tmp ./findimagedupes_tmp Can't locate Image/Magick.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5

Bug#386845: python-support fails to remove modules from /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/

severity 386845 important tag 386845 + unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 03:50:18PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote: Package: python-support Version: 0.4.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 6.8 python-support installst private modules that should be installed into

Processed: Re: python-support fails to remove modules from /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 386845 important Bug#386845: python-support fails to remove modules from /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/ Severity set to `important' from `serious' tag 386845 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug#386845: python-support fails to remove modules from

Bug#388717: libclass-dbi-perl: FTBFS: test failures

Package: libclass-dbi-perl Version: 3.0.14-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... /usr/bin/make test make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libclass-dbi-perl-3.0.14' PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t

Bug#388695: geda-gschem: Probably parenthesis mismatch in errors in gschem

reassign 388695 geda-symbols thanks On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:50:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:22:17PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:12:42PM -0400, H. S. wrote: (here is the bug again here for geda-gschem, instead of for geda)

Bug#388708: Additional information

Hi, I think perhaps the information lies in handling UTF-8: == #_ sed -n 's/^\([^ ]*\):.*/\1/p' /var/lib/dpkg/stat-old | sort -u Architecture Bugs Conffiles Config-Version Conflicts Depends Description Enhances Essential

Bug#386673: patch

Hi, The patched 2.6.8 version has hit debian unstable yesterday. It did build fine on ppc, great. Though, a user reported that when launching electricsheep (on ppc), he got the following error: $ electricsheep X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) Major

Bug#388718: e2fsprogs: FTBFS: Link error in e2fsck.static

Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.39-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... CC prof_err.c LD e2fsck.shared CP e2fsck LD e2fsck.static /usr/lib/libselinux.a(setrans_client.o): In function `fini_context_translations':

Processed: Re: Bug#388695: geda-gschem: Probably parenthesis mismatch in errors in gschem

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 388695 geda-symbols Bug#388695: geda-gschem: Probably parenthesis mismatch in errors in gschem Bug reassigned from package `geda-gschem' to `geda-symbols'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Processed: (no subject)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 386882 grave Bug#386882: kphotoalbum: Depends on libexiv2 v. 0.10 Bug#386855: kphotoalbum should depend on libexiv2 (0.10) Severity set to `grave' from `normal' severity 386855 grave Bug#386855: kphotoalbum should depend on libexiv2 (0.10)

Processed: This is more important I think

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 388289 serious Bug#388289: zope-cmfplone: Please deploy anti-link-spam patch as a matter of urgency Severity set to `serious' from `important' quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#388646: cpad-kernel-source: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

Hi Bill, That's fixed in cvs right now, but cvs needs a little more work to get it happy with Life in Today's World. The kernel has moved about a bit since I last hacked on this. Are you actually using it, or just qa checking? Either way, I'll try to find time to kick it into shape for an

Bug#379413: remove libpthread from the archive?

Steve Langasek wrote: If the maintainer hasn't responded in a week or two, this bug could be reassigned to ftp.debian.org and turned into a removal request. Dropping pth as a whole would break a number of packages that depend on the traditional libpth interface. Just wait.. I'll upload this

Processed: reopening 388322

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 reopen 388322 Bug#388322: python-logilab-common: sarge to etch upgrade fails 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate

Bug#358575: Bug #358575: mailman deletes all ucf-managed files on purge

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:45:58PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: People running mailman on sarge on i386 are recommended to recompile the package or install the future security update 2.1.5-8sarge3. I meant the future security update 2.1.5-8sarge5. -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#388719: marked as done (findimagedupes: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:17:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388719: fixed in findimagedupes 0.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: confirmed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 388557 + confirmed Bug#388557: mono-gac: uninstallable on ia64, dependency on libc6 is incorrect There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#388557: confirmed

tags 388557 + confirmed thanks This is a bug caused by dh_clideps from the cli-common package, only Mono is currently effected because the new version of cli-common wasn't released yet. A fix is in the way... After a short discussion on #debian-devel Steve agreed that a dependency on libc6 |

Bug#388734: xfonts: after a dist-upgrade, the font system is broken, fonts display erraticly

Package: xfonts Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After a dist-upgrade, font rendering is borked in xorg. Sorry if it's not the good package, i have no idea what package this is related to. It breaks display of gnome application, kde application, firefox, thunderbird. IT

Bug#388743: rdoc1.8: NameError within ri_options.rb

Package: rdoc1.8 Version: 1.8.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable If requirering 'rdoc/usage', a NameError (uninitialized constant RI::Paths) is thrown due to missing require 'rdoc/ri/ri_paths' statement in ri_options. -- System Information: Debian Release:

Processed: Re: Bug#388734: xfonts: after a dist-upgrade, the font system is broken, fonts display erraticly

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 388734 xfonts-base Bug#388734: xfonts: after a dist-upgrade, the font system is broken, fonts display erraticly Warning: Unknown package 'xfonts' Bug reassigned from package `xfonts' to `xfonts-base'. -- Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#386882: marked as done (kphotoalbum: Depends on libexiv2 v. 0.10)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:32:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#386855: fixed in kphotoalbum 2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Fixed in upload of gpsim-lcd 0.2.5-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 346736 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#346736: gpsim-lcd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Tags were: fixed patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 387779 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#387779: ITA: gpsim-lcd -- LCD module for gpsim There

Bug#385834: marked as done (package build-depends on g++-3.4, which is not available on hppa)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:47:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#385834: fixed in kcheckgmail 0.5.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#386855: marked as done (kphotoalbum should depend on libexiv2 (0.10))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:32:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#386855: fixed in kphotoalbum 2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#388756: zaptel-source: wct4xxp and other modules are not built anymore on zaptel-1.2.8.dfsg-1

Package: zaptel-source Version: 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just rebuilt modules for the latest kernel (2.6.17-2) and some modules are missing, wct4xxp.ko is one of those. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing

Processed: Re: flexbackup: CVE-2005-4802: default config insecure temporary file creation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 334350 1.2.1-2 Bug#334350: flexbackup: CVE-2005-4802: default config insecure temporary file creation Bug marked as found in version 1.2.1-2. close 334350 1.2.1-3 Bug#334350: flexbackup: CVE-2005-4802: default config insecure temporary file

Bug#387185: picprog: Fails to detect programmer in amd64

On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 01:25:01AM +0200, Jan Wagemakers wrote: Normally picprog use the RDTSC instruction on x86_64/i386 platforms. By disabling this, picprog makes use of the delay-routines for platforms that don't have this RDTSC instruction. This should be done regardless of platform;

Bug#388756: zaptel-source: wct4xxp and other modules are not built anymore on zaptel-1.2.8.dfsg-1

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 01:29:28PM +0200, Alessandro Polverini wrote: Package: zaptel-source Version: 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just rebuilt modules for the latest kernel (2.6.17-2) and some modules are missing, wct4xxp.ko is one of those.

Bug#388649: marked as done (Probably parenthesis mismatch in errors in geda)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:48:06 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388649: Probably parenthesis mismatch in errors in geda has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#367267: ftp.debian.org: still not there

Package: ftp.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #367267 Hello, The packages are still not in the right places, couldn't something like a move by hand be done? In order to have my local mirror synced I have to ignore errors (debmirror) which I don't really like. I wonder if this would affect the

Processed: Fixed in upload of evolution 2.8.0-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 341172 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#341172: Please port to the experimental pilot-link 0.12 API Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 384280 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#384280: evolution: implicit pointer conversion Tags were:

Bug#388784: krb5-kdc: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

Package: krb5-kdc Version: 1.4.4-1 Severity: serious Hello Sam, There is an error when attempting to purge krb5-kdc: Removing krb5-kdc ... Purging configuration files for krb5-kdc ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/krb5-kdc.postrm: line 3: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory

Bug#388781: phpsysinfo: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

Package: phpsysinfo Version: 2.5.1-3 Severity: serious Hello Frederik, There is an error when attempting to purge phpsysinfo: Removing phpsysinfo ... Purging configuration files for phpsysinfo ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/phpsysinfo.postrm: line 12: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file

Bug#388779: postgrey: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable)

Package: postgrey Version: 1.27-1 Severity: serious Hello Adrian, There is an error when attempting to purge postgrey: Removing postgrey ... Purging configuration files for postgrey ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/postgrey.postrm: line 26: ucf: command not found dpkg: error processing postgrey

Bug#388782: fonty: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

Package: fonty Version: 1.0-22 Severity: serious Hello Piotr, There is an error when attempting to purge fonty: Removing fonty ... Purging configuration files for fonty ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/fonty.postrm: line 10: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory dpkg: error

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

tags 388691 moreinfo thanks On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:36:24PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: The copyright file for ibm-3270 says: Copyrights on x3270 are a work in progress and any assistance in clarifying them would be appreciated. but there's no active bug about some issues. So it is

Processed: Re: Bug#375830: Acknowledgement (occasionally misdetects PCI-Express card for PCI and dies before DRI)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 375830 8.28.8-1 Bug#375830: occasionally misdetects PCI-Express card for PCI and dies before DRI Bug marked as found in version 8.28.8-1. severity 375830 serious Bug#375830: occasionally misdetects PCI-Express card for PCI and dies before DRI

Bug#388783: shfs-utils: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

Package: shfs-utils Version: 0.35-6 Severity: serious Hello Eduard, There is an error when attempting to purge shfs-utils: Removing shfs-utils ... Purging configuration files for shfs-utils ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/shfs-utils.postrm: line 2: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or

Processed: Re: Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 388691 moreinfo Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#388780: netenv: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

Package: netenv Version: 0.94.3-17 Severity: serious Hello Frank, There is an error when attempting to purge netenv: Removing netenv ... Purging configuration files for netenv ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/netenv.postrm: line 20: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory dpkg:

Processed: Re: Bug#387790: fillets-ng-data: broken symlinks

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 387790 serious Bug#387790: fillets-ng-data: broken symlinks Severity set to `serious' from `minor' tags 387790 +pending Bug#387790: fillets-ng-data: broken symlinks There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks lars Unknown command or

Bug#388646: cpad-kernel-source: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:29:33PM +0930, Ron wrote: Hi Bill, That's fixed in cvs right now, but cvs needs a little more work to get it happy with Life in Today's World. The kernel has moved about a bit since I last hacked on this. Are you actually using it, or just qa checking? Either

Bug#388489: marked as done (libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:56:06 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Processed: Cloning this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#387610: subversion: FTBFS on ia64

Troy Heber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's not an optimization bug, compiling O0 does not help. We know that lt-fs-base-test 2, creates and closes a new db, it then creates a new fs object and tries to re-open the db. The call to apr_hash_get returns NULL, so it's not finding the object in the

Processed: tags 387185 upstream

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 387185 upstream Bug#387185: picprog: Fails to detect programmer in amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream thanks bts Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#387249: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:32:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#387249: fixed in camstream 0.26.3+dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#387185: picprog: Fails to detect programmer in amd64

Jaakko, I have recently received this bug-report about picprog (Debian). http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=387185 Let me summerize what we have found so far. - When asking around various people have confirmed that picprog fails on the 64-bit amd64 platform. - Altering the

Bug#387663: marked as done (pygopherd: sid package broken (incompatible with python 2.4))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:02:43 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#387663: fixed in pygopherd 2.0.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#388222: marked as done (config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common, probably ucf))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:32:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388222: fixed in bacula 1.38.11-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#388220: marked as done (config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common, probably ucf))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:32:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388220: fixed in bacula 1.38.11-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#387790: fillets-ng-data: broken symlinks

pe, 2006-09-22 kello 16:34 +0200, Alexander Schmehl kirjoitti: * Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060916 20:01]: Severity: minor Hmmm... shouldn't broken symlinks due to missing dependencies be release critical? Most likely they will render the package unusable, won't they? Possibly

Bug#388571: [Pkg-awstats-devel] Bug#388571: awstats: Non-free Firefox icon included

Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? The only thing I could find is: http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons.html which says Mozilla Firefox and the Firefox logo are trademarks of The Mozilla Foundation. Usage

Bug#388571: [Pkg-awstats-devel] Bug#388571: awstats: Non-free Firefox icon included

Charles Fry schrieb: Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? The only thing I could find is: http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons.html which says Mozilla Firefox and the Firefox logo are trademarks of The Mozilla

Bug#388809: htmldoc-common fails to upgrade smoothly

Package: htmldoc-common Version: 1.8.27-1 Severity: serious Preparing to replace htmldoc-common 1.8.26-1 (using .../htmldoc-common_1.8.27-1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement htmldoc-common ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/htmldoc-common_1.8.27-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to

Bug#388811: xlibmesa-dri: upgrade to xorg 7.1 causes savage opengl stop working

Package: xlibmesa-dri Version: 1:7.1.0-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software An upgrade from xorg 7.0 to xorg 7.1 causes 3d stop working with savage dri driver (with a mobile Prosavage KN133 twister). glxinfo report direct rendering=yes but glxgears and any other opengl

Bug#104394: Message for melissa groeber

How are you, Royal has receiieved your filled app. Mitch shall then Re-confirm yo ur data . http://AE0F4B.ssr.be For melissa groeber and your past Track Record is not an iss ue. All H 0me E quitytypes have been aprroveed for you melissa groeber Best Regards,

Processed: severity of 388776 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 severity 388776 serious Bug#388776: xserver-xorg-input-wacom: Source package fails to compile Severity set to `serious' from `normal' End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#388489: Processed: Cloning this bug

reopen 388489 thanks Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit : retitle -1 libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf There is no need for such a file. ld.so natively

Processed: Re: Processed: Cloning this bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 388489 Bug#388489: libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#388115: Re 388115: tetex-base postinst fails

I ran into this too. I ran update-fmtutil (as root) and re-reran the dist-upgrade. The problem remains. I'm not sure if this is the requested test, but it was my best interpretation of it. I can provide the details that others have, if that might be helpful. I think I can leave things in this

Processed: reassign 388811 to mesa, severity of 388811 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 reassign 388811 mesa Bug#388811: xlibmesa-dri: upgrade to xorg 7.1 causes savage opengl stop working Bug reassigned from package `xlibmesa-dri' to `mesa'. severity 388811 important

Processed: Debian Kerberosish: r2493 - krb5/trunk/krb5/debian

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 388784 pending Bug#388784: krb5-kdc: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

--- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Particularly, public use needs clarification: Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Atlanta, GA 30332. All Rights Reserved. GTRC hereby grants public use of this software. Neither I nor the ftp-team see a problem with that.

Bug#388431: improved patch

Hello! Here is an improved variant of patch. It allows system administrator to configure RLIMIT_RTPRIO RLIMIT_NICE via rt_priority and nice entries in /etc/security/limits.conf Best regards, Alexei. -- All science is either physics or stamp collecting. Index:

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: --- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Particularly, public use needs clarification: Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Atlanta, GA 30332. All Rights Reserved. GTRC hereby grants public use of

Processed: retitle 385296 to broken with ssl on amd64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 retitle 385296 broken with ssl on amd64 Bug#385296: tries to shutdown invalid file descriptor on amd64 Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#388838: sysv-rc-bootsplash: modifies files belonging to other packages

Package: sysv-rc-bootsplash Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: serious sysv-rc-bootsplash's postinst uses patch to modify /etc/init.d/rc and /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions. This means that the changes are lost if sysv-rc or initramfs-tools is upgraded, that the maintainer scripts fail if

Processed: Re: cbmlink: FTBFS: bashisms

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 379724 wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found Bug#379724: cbmlink: FTBFS: bashisms Changed Bug title. severity 379724 serious Bug#379724: wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found Severity set to `serious' from `important' thanks

Processed: subversion Debian ci: r687 - trunk/debian

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 387996 pending Bug#387996: subversion: [m68k] fix for the failing ruby tests Tags were: patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#388840: fglrx-driver: Conflict with Xorg-server 7.1.0 package

Package: fglrx-driver Version: 8.28.8-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I updated Today my Debian unstable, it updated the Xorg-sevrver too. But It also remove fglrx-driver. So now I must use the xorg radeon driver instead of the ati One -- System Information:

Bug#388717: libclass-dbi-perl: FTBFS: test failures

On 21/09/06, Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: libclass-dbi-perl Version: 3.0.14-1 Severity: serious [ FTBFS] Thanks for the bug report, I was not previously aware of the problem. This appears to be caused by a bug introduced into libdbd-sqlite3-perl version 1.13. If you

Bug#388223: marked as done (config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common, probably ucf))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:22:11 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line not a bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#388844: xmms2d crashes on start with Bad glib version message...

Package: xmms2 Version: 0.2DrFeelgood-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello! I've just installed xmms2 and other dependencies + some other plugins (smb, wma). Now i'am trying to launch xmms2 antono[23:57]~

Bug#341172: Processed: Fixed in upload of evolution 2.8.0-1 to experimental

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:34:00AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: tag 341172 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#341172: Please port to the experimental pilot-link 0.12 API Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental Did you not understand that this version of pilot-link is now in

Processed: possible NMU patch for RC bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 379724 patch Bug#379724: wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found There were no tags set. Tags added: patch usertag 379724 supplied-patch Bug#379724: wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found There were no usertags set. Usertags are now:

Bug#388214: marked as done (config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common, probably ucf))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:47:30 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388214: fixed in cacti 0.8.6h-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#379724: possible NMU patch for RC bug

tags 379724 patch usertag 379724 supplied-patch thanks Hi, I have prepared a simple patch for the FTFBS which is attached. As I am no DD yet, I can not do the actual NMU. Marga would you like to do the actual upload? Greetings Arjan Changelog of my NMU: * Non-maintainer upload. * Set

Bug#387610: subversion: FTBFS on ia64

On 09/22/06 16:32, Philip Martin wrote: The first time the breakpoint is reached it's from the svn_test__create_fs line, the second time it's from the svn_fs_open_berkeley line. The key has the same value in each case, and the second time that value is present in the cache, so the hash

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

[sent also to debian-legal for advice] --- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: --- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Particularly, public use needs clarification: Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

--- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [public use] Your reading of this clause is not the plain English reading of it. public use does not mean use in public, in means use by the public -- i.e., use by anyone. I don't know if it is clear enough, at least for a non-native English

Processed: purge failures w/o debconf not RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 388646 important Bug#388646: cpad-kernel-source: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable) Severity set to `important' from `serious' severity 388155 important Bug#388155: cyrus21-common: purging the package fails (require debconf)

Bug#387610: apr_atomic_cas broken in 0.9.x

Troy Heber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In any case, this looks like the culprit. Agreed, I've cc'd [EMAIL PROTECTED] The C implementation of apr_atomic_cas on the 0.9.x branch is broken on ia64, and probably any other 64 bit platform that uses the same code. For the full story see:

Bug#352854: marked as done (FTBFS: Packages required but not available: mlmRev)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:07:21 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed in new version of lme4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#388031: marked as done (radeontool FTBFS on powerpc/unstable)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:02:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388031: fixed in radeontool 1.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#387610: apr_atomic_cas broken in 0.9.x

Philip or Troy - would you care to prepare and test the backport to ensure we can commit this for the next 0.9 release, coming within days? Bill Philip Martin wrote: Troy Heber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In any case, this looks like the culprit. Agreed, I've cc'd [EMAIL PROTECTED] The C

Bug#388489: Processed: Cloning this bug

reopen 388489 severity wishlist thanks Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: reopen 388489 thanks Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit : retitle

Processed: Re: Processed: Cloning this bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 388489 Bug#388489: libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf Bug reopened, originator not changed. severity wishlist Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

  1   2   >