Package: ieee80211-source
Version: 1.1.14-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The compilation using module-assistant gives the following error. I am
pretty certain this is a package configuration problem. I am running the
latest packages from debian unstable.
dh_installdeb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 408036 normal
Bug#408036: udev doesn't load snd-midi-seq module when hotplugging my usb midi
device.
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
End of message, stopping
Package: udev
Version: 0.103-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Machine tracks Debian Sid somewhat intermittently. Running stock kernel.
On update to 17/1/2006 state of Debian Sid I noted that the initrd
images was updated.
The installation requested hotplug be purged.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 407913 linux-2.6
Bug#407913: kernel-patches: No documentation
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-patches'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-patches' to `linux-2.6'.
severity 407913 normal
Bug#407913: kernel-patches: No documentation
Severity
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justification: renders package unusable
please read the other bug reports, it's uncertain if the package will
still used or not. for ipw*, you don't need them anyway at the moment.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
Package: swi-prolog
Severity: serious
Version: 5.6.14-1
Tags: patch
Hi,
the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD, mips, mipsel.
It needs updated config.guess and config.sub.
Your package already build-depends on autotools-dev,
please use attached tweak for debian/rules
to
severity 408065 important
stop
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:12:19AM +, Simon Waters wrote:
Package: udev
Version: 0.103-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
i even doubt this justifies a bug report on it's own.
Machine tracks Debian Sid somewhat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 408065 important
Bug#408065: udev: Upgrade 0.087-2 to 0.103-2 broke boot from ReiserFS on VIA
Mini ITX
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
tags 403222 etch
severity 403222 critical
retitle 403222 [etch] lilo: fails to write the boot information (LVM system)
thanks
Hello,
Thanks for the tip. I didn't tried yet this work around on the system that
failed, but
reassign 408000 ghc6
thanks
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 02:22:44PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lHSrts_thr
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Looks like a GHC error. Reassigning there.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi mates
Today I tried it on hppa with debuild -us -uc (on paer.debian.org) and it
did not show me the error message you reported.
I know it is a pain as it builds really long here for me, but can you maybe
have a second look into it? I will also try to rebuild it tonight and check a
bit, but
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 408000 ghc6
Bug#408000: hpodder_0.99.1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depend???
Bug reassigned from package `hpodder' to `ghc6'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 386707 pending
Bug#386707: debmirror: Missing dependency on libdigest-sha1-perl
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
I plan to upload new versions of the scala and sbaz packages in the next
couple of weeks, so I do appreciate all of the sleuthing you guys have
done.
On a couple of notes:
I will use Frank's suggested tetex dependencies:
tetex-bin | texlive-latex-base, tetex-extra |
texlive-fonts-recommended
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 07:14:14PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I see there is a fix in the bug report now. Do you want to
create a -6 package, or do you want me to try -5.3 NMU?
Right now, I don't care. I personally feel that the manual build should
have been sufficient to get -5.2
Lex Spoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to upload new versions of the scala and sbaz packages in the next
couple of weeks, so I do appreciate all of the sleuthing you guys have
done.
On a couple of notes:
I will use Frank's suggested tetex dependencies:
tetex-bin |
reassign 384518 r-cran-rgl
reassign 357439 libwxgtk2.6-0
kthxbye
Looks like I still didn't look at these errors closely enough... :}
Looking at the function DoMakeCurrent() in the xorg-server file
glxcmds.c, it only returns BadMatch or GLXBadContextState under two
conditions, which are stated
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 384518 r-cran-rgl
Bug#384518: libgl1-mesa-glx: crashes R-cran-rgl when exporting to pdf
Bug reassigned from package `libgl1-mesa-glx' to `r-cran-rgl'.
reassign 357439 libwxgtk2.6-0
Bug#357439: amaya crashes with GDK error traced to this
On Jan 19, Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is exactly what this bug is about. I installed my system three
days ago, on 2007-01-16, using the daily build netinst.iso and I
did not create /etc/networks myself. My IP is static if you want
to reproduce it (so I said no to DHCP etc).
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 19, Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is exactly what this bug is about. I installed my system three
days ago, on 2007-01-16, using the daily build netinst.iso and I
did not create /etc/networks myself. My IP is static if you want
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 361376
Bug#361376: liferea-gtkhtml segfaults randomly with current gtkhtml, please use
liferea-mozilla instead for now
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug
Package: nagios2-common
Version: 2.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: prevents package installation
*** Please type your report below this line *** This is the first time
I've tried to install nagios2, the installation fails to configure
nagios2-common, here is the error:
:) [EMAIL
reopen 361376
found 361376 1.0.27-1
found 361376 1.1.7c-1
thanks
I'm still experiencing lots of segfaults with liferea-gtkhtml on amd64,
and not on i386. It happens with both the unstable and the experimental
version.
Here is a sample backtrace:
#0 0x2ba95f4f2f64 in memcpy () from
Package: xosview
Veraion: 1.8.2-10
Severity: serious
Xosview doesn't properly search for the XOsview file (in app-defaults).
In etch, this is at /etc/X11/app-defaults/XOsview, but the primary search
path is /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults/XOsview and there's no symlink
associating the two (no
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a couple of notes:
I will use Frank's suggested tetex dependencies:
tetex-bin | texlive-latex-base, tetex-extra |
texlive-fonts-recommended
No, this is not what I suggested, and it's a receipe to get FTBFS bugs -
important for etch, RC as
Lex Spoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\usepackage{mathptmx}
\usepackage[scaled]{helvet}
is the correct replacement, except that Times is not an ideal font for
letter or A4 paper in single-column layout, it gives too many letters in
a line. s/mathptmx/mathpazo/ gives you Palatino which
Package: freetennis
Version: 0.4.8-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
on those architectures that don't have a native OCaml compiler (hppa,
mips, mipsel, s390), the binaries in your package start with
#!/usr/bin/ocamlrun
but the package doesn't depend on an OCaml runtime system for the
interpreter.
See
Package: john
Version: 1.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi!
John 1.7-2 (from experimental) fails to build from source on amd64, with
the following error:
gcc -s -m32 DES_fmt.o DES_std.o DES_bs.o BSDI_fmt.o MD5_fmt.o MD5_std.o
BF_fmt.o BF_std.o AFS_fmt.o LM_fmt.o batch.o bench.o
Package: fai-client
Version: 3.1.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The fix for #406125 breaks fai-class. Now, the HOSTNAME is not set
correctly any more, so most classes are not defined. This will stop
the installation when searching for a disk_config template.
--
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:27:37PM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
This is the first time
I've tried to install nagios2, the installation fails to configure
nagios2-common, here is the error:
:) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ sudo dpkg --configure -a
Setting up nagios2-common (2.6-2) ...
Reloading web
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
forwarded 406337 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399945
Bug#406337: evolution-common: The user manual contains a copyright notice which
renders it non-free
Noted your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 394142 f-spot
Bug#394142: FTBSF on ia64: error CS0136: A local variable named `args' cannot
be declared...
Bug reassigned from package `f-spot' to `f-spot'.
found 394142 0.2.1-1
Bug#394142: FTBSF on ia64: error CS0136: A local variable named
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 393457 grave
Bug#393457: mpd: Lockup when attempting to Pause and Resume
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#407350: fixed in kernel-patch-grsecurity2 2.1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hi,
This bug still shows up as affecting unstable, which afaik, it doesn't.
I think the easiest thing to do here is include the changelog from 2.1-2
in your next upload to unstable, or close it there too.
Afaik, the problem is just that the changelog from unstable doesn't
mention that it's
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 07:39:30PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
reopen 361376
found 361376 1.0.27-1
found 361376 1.1.7c-1
thanks
I'm still experiencing lots of segfaults with liferea-gtkhtml on amd64,
and not on i386. It happens with both the unstable and the experimental
version.
Hi,
reassign 394142 f-spot
found 394142 0.2.1-1
close 394142 0.2.1-1.1
thanks
Trying again, as it still showed up as affecting unstable.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
forcemerge 407538 408132
Bug#407538: netbase: /etc/networks should not be a conffile
Bug#408132: Policy change to /etc/networks breaks debian-installer
Forcibly Merged 407538 408132.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
# not unreleasable
severity 408147 important
Bug#408147: xosview: incorrect search patch for X defaults file
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
End of message, stopping
Am Dienstag, den 23.01.2007, 22:39 +0100 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 07:39:30PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
reopen 361376
found 361376 1.0.27-1
found 361376 1.1.7c-1
thanks
I'm still experiencing lots of segfaults with liferea-gtkhtml on amd64,
and not on i386.
Package: liblangscan-ruby
Version: 1.2+cvs20061228-2
Severity: serious
apt-get dist-upgrade stops with liblangscan-ruby overwriting files from gonzui
= 1.2.
Conflicts is not enough, please add Replaces as well.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
+++ Marc Haber [23/01/07 21:53 +0100]:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:27:37PM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
This is the first time
I've tried to install nagios2, the installation fails to configure
nagios2-common, here is the error:
:) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ sudo dpkg --configure -a
Setting up
Am Dienstag, den 23.01.2007, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
found 1.0.26-1
thanks
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:14:54PM +0100, Lars Lindner wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 23.01.2007, 22:39 +0100 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 07:39:30PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
reopen
found 1.0.26-1
thanks
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:14:54PM +0100, Lars Lindner wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 23.01.2007, 22:39 +0100 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 07:39:30PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
reopen 361376
found 361376 1.0.27-1
found 361376 1.1.7c-1
thanks
What is your audio output configuration?
libao, alsa, oss? If you're using libao, which libao driver are you
using? Also which sound card/kernel modules would be helpful, too.
--
Eric Wong
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 10:23:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
This bug still shows up as affecting unstable, which afaik, it doesn't.
I think the easiest thing to do here is include the changelog from 2.1-2
in your next upload to unstable, or close it there too.
I think the easiest thing
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:00:53AM +0100, Lars Lindner wrote:
If you want to drop support for 64 bit arches, this would be more
than just amd64/x86_64. This would include atleast alpha and ia64 too.
The reports I get upstream are all AMD64 related. I had somewhat good
experiences on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 361376 1.0.26-1
Bug#361376: liferea-gtkhtml segfaults randomly with current gtkhtml, please use
liferea-mozilla instead for now
Bug marked as found in version 1.0.26-1.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:17:01 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#408153: fixed in fai 3.1.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Monday 22 January 2007 23:14, David Cantrell wrote:
Apologies for it taking so long. The GNU parted team has shifted
around a bit in the past year or so.
That happens :-(
When resizing a Vista NTFS partition, be sure to start at sector 2048.
In the parted(8) interactive program, this can
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#408046: fixed in gfontview 0.5.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
[Summary for -release: Is removing liferea-gtkhtml too disruptive for etch?]
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:04:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:36:20PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Upstream's response to #361376 is to recommend the dropping of
Package: clamcour
Version: 0.2.2-1+b1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
clamcour build-deps on libclamav1-dev, but this package is not
available.
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500,
Package: openscenegraph
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
openscenegraph currently build-deps on libgdal-dev, but this package is
not available
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990,
Package: havp
Version: 0.82-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
havp build-deps on libclamav1-dev, but this package is not available.
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500,
Package: tapiir
Version: 0.7.1-9
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
tapiir build-deps on libasound-dev, but this package is not available.
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'),
Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
sylpheed-claws-gtk2 build-deps on libclamav1-dev, but this packages is
not available.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500,
Package: readseq
Version: 1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
readseq build-deps in ncbi-tools-dev, but that package is not available.
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'),
Package: parrot
Version: 0.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
parrot build-deps on libicu34-dev, but that package is not available.
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'),
Since libclamav-dev Provides: libclamav1-dev, do any of these actually
result in real world problems? Or are you just using a simplistic
metric for reporting that misses what happens in practice? Do these
need to be release critical? Can you post log snippets of a build
failure, for instance?
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:32:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#407039: fixed in partman-lvm 49
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:47:11 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#321102: fixed in kdepim 4:3.5.6.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:47:11 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#321102: fixed in kdepim 4:3.5.6.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:11:53 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#408196: FTBFS: build-deps on non-available libclamav1-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Hi Adam,
Version 1:0.6.2-7 of aircrack-ng in unstable which fixes this RC bug also
includes a new upstream version of a kernel patch, which far from fitting
the freeze exception criteria, was a response to a wishlist bug. Is it your
intention that this be the version of aircrack-ng that fixes
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:13:41 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#408199: FTBFS: build-deps on non-available libicu34-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:13:14 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#408197: FTBFS: build-deps on non-available ncbi-tools-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:10:27 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#408192: openscenegraph: FTBFS because of non-available
libgdal-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:12:31 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#408193: FTBFS: build-deps on non-available libclamav1-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:12:53 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#408194: FTBFS: build-deps on non-available libasound-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:12:14 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#408195: FTBFS: build-deps on non-available libclamav1-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: tomcat5.5
Version: 5.5.20-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
My attempt to install tomcat5.5 has failed. (Tomcat5 still runs cleanly.)
Although apt-get seems to have proceeded without problems, and even though an
attempt to start tomcat5.5 seems to work:
#
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 16:07 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
Package: gst-plugins-bad0.10
Version: 0.10.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: security patch
Hi,
gst-plugins-bad0.10 is affected by CVE-2006-4192: buffer overflow in
gst/modplug/libmodplug/sndfile.cpp. See GNOME #385788.
Le mercredi 24 janvier 2007 03:08, Steve Langasek a écrit :
Hi Adam,
Version 1:0.6.2-7 of aircrack-ng in unstable which fixes this RC bug also
includes a new upstream version of a kernel patch, which far from fitting
the freeze exception criteria, was a response to a wishlist bug. Is it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 398421
Bug#398421: segfaults on startup (amd64)
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
reopen 398421
thanks
Hi!
I'm afraid your patch didn't work. With 2.19-1.1:
$ makensis /dev/null
[...]
Processing plugin dlls: /usr/share/nsis/Plugins/*.dll
Violació de segment
$ strace makensis /dev/null
[...]
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
package gst-plugins-bad0.10 gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gst-plugins-bad0.10 gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad
tags 407956 + pending
Bug#407956: CVE-2006-4192:
Hi Luis,
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 06:15:15PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Yes, Lars has stated his intention to completely remove this rendering
engine.
To do so, I'd assume the right way to go would be to turn -gtkhtml
into a dummy package that pulls -xulrunner in.
In that
78 matches
Mail list logo
