Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 413288 + unreproducible
Bug#413288: FTBFS on mipsel/experimental (Was: Re: Log for failed build of
postfix_2.4.0~rc2-1 (dist=experimental))
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 22:28:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line odbc-postgresql: odbc driver broken on 64 bit architectures
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #oops
> unmerge 413469
Bug#413469: ion3: The package is outdated
Bug#415287: dummy bug; should not be in testing
Disconnected #413469 from all other report(s).
> severity 415287 serious
Bug#415287: dummy bug; should not be in testing
Severity set to `s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 413469 415287
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> #Reports about different issues
> close 413469 20070203-1
Bug#413469: ion3: The package is outdated
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#
unmerge 413469 415287
#Reports about different issues
close 413469 20070203-1
severity 413469 wishlist
#Same as previously
thanks
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:53:46AM -0400, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
Steve, why did you reopen this bug?
Because the package is sti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 413534 patch
Bug#413534: odbc-postgresql: odbc driver broken on 64 bit architectures
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 413534 patch
thanks
Hi Peter,
I've had a chance now to look over Stephen's proposed bugfix. I haven't
verified that this is a complete fix for all related 64-bit issues, but I
agree that there are 64-bit problems in this code and that his/upstream's
changes appear to be a correct, minimal f
Your message dated Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415233: fixed in gpgme1.0 1.1.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
tags 386469 + patch
thanks
I've attempted to implement the first solution proposed by Steve in the
attached file to be placed in debian/ ;
* Workaround upgrades failing in some situations by stopping openbsd-inetd in
postinst before starting it, in case it was started between prerm and
postins
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 386469 + patch
Bug#386469: "openbsd-inetd, action "start" failed" when upgrading
Tags were: help
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Hi,
I don't know why this didn't happen in my i386 pbuilder also. Perhaps
there is some other package dependeing on libpth-dev in i386 but not in
other arches
El sáb, 17-03-2007 a las 12:24 +0100, Kurt Roeckx escribió:
> Package: gpgme1.0
> Version: 1.1.2-3
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 415236 important
Bug#415236: swf-player: This SWF file is known to trigger bugs in the swfdec
decoder. Playback is cancelled.
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
severity 415236 important
thanks
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:50:21PM -0700, David Schleef wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:07:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 12:59:01PM -0700, David Schleef wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:04:26PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> merge 413469 415287
Bug#413469: ion3: The package is outdated
Bug#415287: dummy bug; should not be in testing
Merged 413469 415287.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 21:49:30 +, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: ion3
> Version: 20061223-2
> Severity: serious
>
What's the purpose of this bug that isn't already achieved by #413469?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 22:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#412451: fixed in qgit 1.5.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 22:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415077: fixed in ppp 2.4.4rel-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 414999 + confirmed
Bug#414999: File conflicts between libtrace-tools and ltt-visualizer
Tags were: sid
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
tag 414999 + accepted
thanks
The libtrace upstream maintainer has agreed to rename their tool to
tracepktdump to help clarify that libtrace operates on network packets. As
soon as I receive the new upstream release I will prepare a new upload.
Cheers
On 3/16/07, Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 414999 + accepted
Unknown tag/s: accepted.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n
Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> Phil Dibowitz schrieb am Dienstag, den 13. März 2007:
>>
>>> Yes - I'd love it if you could make those packages available on people.d.o.
>>>
>>> Also, since this libnfnetlink is sitting in new (which I missed) go ahead
>>> and close the other bug that
Package: ion3
Version: 20061223-2
Severity: serious
This is a dummy bug report to avoid that current ion3 enter testing.
In #413469 msg 67, Norbert Tretkowski requested as ex-maintainer that
ion3 and its dependants be removed from Etch. Upstream maintainer Tuomo
Valkonen requested not to include t
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:07:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 12:59:01PM -0700, David Schleef wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:04:26PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > I've tried swf-player with various sites. For every .swf file I've
> > > tried so far, I get the e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 414709 upstream confirmed
Bug#414709: firebird2.0_2.0.0.12748.ds1-5(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: create_db
fails with bus error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, conf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # severity may be wrong?
> tags 415254 security
Bug#415254: SuPHP security issue: using AddHandler instead of AddType
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
>
End of message, s
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 12:59:01PM -0700, David Schleef wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:04:26PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I've tried swf-player with various sites. For every .swf file I've
> > tried so far, I get the error:
> > This SWF file is known to trigger bugs in the swfdec decoder.
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415031: fixed in camas 1.2.21-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398371: fixed in xfingerd 0.6-5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> # eddyp: Suggest raising the BR to serious and
> # prepare a high prio upload.
> # ok
> # Broken networking setup is definitely RC.
> severity 415077 serious
> tags 415077 patch
> thanks
yeah, mistakes...
> Filipus Klutiero
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 414709 upstream confirmed
thanks
Upstream is working on fixing this, perhaps there will be a fix soon.
dam
- --
Damyan Ivanov Modular Software Systems
phone +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993 fax +359(2)920
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # eddyp: Suggest raising the BR to serious and
> # prepare a high prio upload.
> # ok
> # Broken networking setup is definitely RC.
> severity 415077 serious
Bug#415077: creates resolv.conf 0600
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> tags 4150
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # bogus RC severity
> severity 415256 normal
Bug#415256: oolite-data: license change: should be a part or main in Etch
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # bogus RC severity
> severity 415255 normal
Bug#415255: oolite: license change: should be a part or main in Etch
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping p
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:04:26PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I've tried swf-player with various sites. For every .swf file I've
> tried so far, I get the error:
> This SWF file is known to trigger bugs in the swfdec decoder. Playback
> is cancelled.
This is fixed in swfdec-0.4.2, which is stuck
Is this bug still relevant? ikvm has successfully built on amd64 since
this bug was filed, and it works on my amd64 machine. ISTR that some
bug was present in Mono a few months ago, and that might have affected
the build environment.
I can test come Monday or Tuesday (probably the latter) that i
Just a short ack that I received the bug report. I also have those error
messages but nothing crashes and basic functionality works. I haven't
found the time to look into it in detail, but I could need some more
infos.
Unfortunately I won't be able to work on this for the next week or so.
I'm ru
I NUM'd the package to delayed+1 to fix this RC bug.
Attached the patch.
--
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group Member.
Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
--
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http://www.gnu.
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414644: fixed in popularity-contest 1.41
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 415245 important
Bug#415245: xine-ui: xine crashes with a segmentation fault immediately
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 415245 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#415245: xine-ui: xine crashes with a segmentation fault immediately
T
I NUM'd the package to delayed+1
Let's get this bug squashed!
Attached the patch.
--
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group Member.
Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
--
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http:/
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:48:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.65-2 of oolite-data
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:50:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.65-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # I forgot to update the bug number for oolite-data
> found 415255 1.65-2
Bug#415255: oolite: license change: should be a part or main in Etch
Bug marked as found in version 1.65-2.
> notfound 415256 1.65-2
Bug#415256: oolite-data: license change: shou
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the version in unstable has the updated copyright info,
> # was uploaded in main 5 days ago
> notfound 415255 1.65-2
Bug#415255: oolite: license change: should be a part or main in Etch
Bug marked as not found in version 1.65-2.
> thanks
Stopping pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# the version in unstable has the updated copyright info,
# was uploaded in main 5 days ago
notfound 415255 1.65-2
thanks
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Package: oolite-data
> Version: 1.65-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: should be in main
>
>
> Hell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# the version in unstable has the updated copyright info,
# was uploaded in main 5 days ago
notfound 415255 1.65-5
thanks
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Package: oolite
> Version: 1.65-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: should be in main
>
> Hello,
>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the version in unstable has the updated copyright info,
> # was uploaded in main 5 days ago
> notfound 415255 1.65-5
Bug#415255: oolite: license change: should be a part or main in Etch
Bug marked as not found in version 1.65-5.
> thanks
Stopping pro
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:51:29 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mozart_1.2.3.20011204-3woody1: Wrong Architecture line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: oolite-data
Version: 1.65-1
Severity: serious
Justification: should be in main
Hello,
This package has changed license recently and now it fit for main.
IMO this package should be in main during Etch's life time since from
now on, all upstream releases will be DFSG free and people will
severity 415245 important
tags 415245 unreproducible needsinfo
stop
Jörn Reder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: xine-ui
> Version: 0.99.4+dfsg+cvs2006-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> When starting xine the splash screen and video window
> appear for the
Package: oolite
Version: 1.65-4
Severity: serious
Justification: should be in main
Hello,
This package has changed license recently and now it fit for main.
IMO this package should be in main during Etch's life time since from
now on, all upstream releases will be DFSG free and people will expect
Package: libapache-mod-suphp
Version: 0.5.2-3
Severity: critical
There seems to be a serious security bug when using suphp
with apache 1.3.x on Sarge (and also on Etch).
Due to a bug in the suphp (or apache) package it is
necessary to use
AddHandler x-httpd-php .php
instead of the prefer
Pierre Bauduin wrote:
> Package: kcheckgmail
> Version: 0.5.5-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: upstream
> Architecture: i386
>
> Hi there,
>
> I think I have found a grave problem in the kcheckgmail that comes
> with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 "etch".
>
> Basically, it always fails to authenticate to gmail.co
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.4+dfsg+cvs2006-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When starting xine the splash screen and video window
appear for the fraction of a second, then it crashes
with a segmentation fault:
% xine
This is xine (X11 gui) - a free video player
Package: swf-player
Version: 0.3.6-2.2
Severity: grave
Hi,
I've tried swf-player with various sites. For every .swf file I've
tried so far, I get the error:
This SWF file is known to trigger bugs in the swfdec decoder. Playback
is cancelled.
It looks to me like this package is currently not us
Package: kcheckgmail
Version: 0.5.5-2
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Architecture: i386
Hi there,
I think I have found a grave problem in the kcheckgmail that comes with
Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 "etch".
Basically, it always fails to authenticate to gmail.com, with the following
error message:
"Erre
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:30:46PM +0300, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
> On 3/17/07, Aurélien GÉRÔME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I came upon this while wanting to try qgit and really felt
> >frustrated. To my mind, our users deserve better. I can prepare a
> >NMU if you do not have the time to dea
Sorry, I just realized that the latest etch hal version is (0.5.8.1-6.1), which
doesn't include latest patches:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.5.8.1-9/changelog
That's the reason why the "bug" was still there.
Attached some details about a DVD media which doesn't ge
On 3/17/07, Aurélien GÉRÔME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I came upon this while wanting to try qgit and really felt
frustrated. To my mind, our users deserve better. I can prepare a
NMU if you do not have the time to deal with it, just let me know...
Sure they do. I'll upload 1.5.5 today.
--
Re
Package: gpgme1.0
Version: 1.1.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for GNU Pth... *FAILED*
++
| Unable to locate GNU Pth in any system-wide location (see $PATH).
|
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 08:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410338: fixed in moin 1.5.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 08:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373464: fixed in moin 1.5.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 08:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410338: fixed in moin 1.5.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: syck
Version: 0.55-3.3
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of syck_0.55-3.3 on nasya by sbuild/sparc 0.52
> Build started at 2007031
Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Phil Dibowitz schrieb am Dienstag, den 13. März 2007:
>
>> Yes - I'd love it if you could make those packages available on people.d.o.
>>
>> Also, since this libnfnetlink is sitting in new (which I missed) go ahead
>> and close the other bug that I re-opened earlier.
> Sure
65 matches
Mail list logo
