Package: lwat
Version: 0.14-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When installed lwat from unstable/testing, I get no /etc/lwat/admin.ini
This makes it impossible to add new users, which is a core function for lwat.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 09:01:04 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug
Joey Hess a écrit :
Just spent half an hour since my slug wouldn't boot and I had to reflash
an old initramfs. This bug should be fixed ASAP before it breaks a lot
of systems.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/initramfsmkinitramfs -o out -k
Working files in /root/tmp/mkinitramfs_tj3082 and overlay in
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Joey Hess a écrit :
Just spent half an hour since my slug wouldn't boot and I had to reflash
an old initramfs. This bug should be fixed ASAP before it breaks a lot
of systems.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/initramfsmkinitramfs -o out -k
Working files in
I had lwat 0.14-3 on my debian-edu etch system. /etc/lwat/admin.ini present
purged lwat and reinstalled with lwat from sid version 0.14-3
I have /etc/lwat/admin.ini both in my etch installed from dvd and after
the apt-get from sid.
Ronny Aasen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 09:53:00 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426332: initramfs-tools: architectural confusion - looks
for 486 instead of K7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
severity 426395 important
Bug#426395: initramfs-tools: omission of libgcc_s.so.1 from initramfs makes
Linksys NSLU2 unbootable
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
End of
* Florian Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-27 16:39]:
Package: cinelerra
This package doesn't appear to be in Debian. Did you get it from
another web site?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
* Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-28 13:56]:
Package: libtalloc-dev
Version: 1.0.1-1
There's no such package afaict. Where did you find it?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 08:47:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426023: fixed in poppler 0.5.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 09:07:14 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#424770: can't install git-core and cogito
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
/etc/ld.so.conf.d is not for private libs. Use rpath.
Furthermore, the same failure is still happening on the buildds when using
aolserver4 4.5.0-6.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 11:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#422957: fixed in scim-thai 0.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: dosemu-freedos
Severity: serious
Tags: confirmed patch pending
I intend to merge dosemu and dosemu-freedos. The new name is dosemu.
The severity is serious as in in the package maintainer's opinion,
makes the package unsuitable for release.
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 13:02:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426533: fixed in ispell-et 20030606.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 13:02:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426537: fixed in rus-ispell 0.99g4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Yes, the bug seems to be fixed thanks to changes in mono packages.
Marc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:15:41PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Sun May 27, 2007 at 12:47:58 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
I guess we should fix this, it's indirectly remotely exploitable at least
by providing someone a malformed TTF font file. As libfreetype is an
important
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 15:13:37 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#425784: glibc_2.6~20070518-2(hppa/experimental): FTBFS:
Lowlevel primitives for ld.so not implemented
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
forcemerge 366100 426054
thanks
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 05:44:25AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Package: ispell
Version: 3.1.20.0-4.3
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual
Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual', line 16: `Index' value missing
for format info
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forcemerge 366100 426054
Bug#366100: doc-base: `Index' value missing for `info'
Bug#426054: /usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual: error upon upgrade: info...
Bug#364535: Buggy /usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual line 16
Bug#384157: ispell: install error:
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 16:06:58 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#263358: minit: Minit not to be included in sarge,
experimental packaging
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hello Hervé,
Thanks for adopting minit!
best regards,
Erich Schubert
--
erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org)--GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C(o_
Reality continues to ruin my life --- Calvin//\
Die kürzeste Verbindung zwischen zwei Menschen ist ein Lächeln. V_/_
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
MIPSers,
I have an open FTBFS [1] again quantlib-swig, and I don't understand it. The
package builds fine on a number of architectures, used to build on mips too,
has not changed its build instructions but now fails. For the newest from
today see [2]. Older logs
Hi Thimo,
Thanks for the feedback -- much appreciated.
On 30 May 2007 at 16:07, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| MIPSers,
|
| I have an open FTBFS [1] again quantlib-swig, and I don't understand it.
The
| package builds fine on a number of architectures, used to
Tags: patch
Hi! Attached is the NMU I'd like to upload shortly.
Thanks,
-Kees
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
diff -u libgtkada2-2.8.1/debian/control libgtkada2-2.8.1/debian/control
--- libgtkada2-2.8.1/debian/control
+++ libgtkada2-2.8.1/debian/control
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:05:52AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
I'd check if update-manager is using the sid source
in /usr/share/update-manager/channels/Debian.info
Or just monitor network activity while checking updates.
Yes, indeed, Debian.info shows getting sid from
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Hi Thimo,
Thanks for the feedback -- much appreciated.
On 30 May 2007 at 16:07, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| MIPSers,
|
| I have an open FTBFS [1] again quantlib-swig, and I don't understand it.
The
| package builds fine on a
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 16:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#422482: fixed in scim-uim 0.2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 30 May 2007 at 17:17, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
| | which is a soon-to-be fixed bug in libc. I believe the specialcase for
MIPS
| | was introduced back when the buildds were too memory limited. Since the
| | system I tested on (a bcm91250a with 1GB RAM) is the same hardware as our
| | current
James Cloos wrote on 27/05/2007 17:48:
I get this on startup with the current version of spampd:
F***
You are right. Sorry for not noticing this when I checked the fixed up
patch.
Starting spam checking proxy daemon: spampd
util: cannot untaint path: REF(0x8c6d024)/bayes
util: cannot
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Package: ipolish
dpkg-source: building ipolish in ipolish_20070410-3.dsc
cannot read character map directory `/usr/share/i18n/charmaps': No
such file or directory
(on another system); you seem to miss a build-dep on locales.
Which version is your local ipolish
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4ubuntu4
tags 421140 patch
Bug#421140: FTBFS: can't find file `epsf.tex'.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 388141 www.debian.org SPI copyright claim not legally valid until all
contributors are contacted for relicensing
Bug#388141: www.debian.org copyright statements are false website is illegal
to publish until all contributors are contacted for
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 20:09:23 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426361: banshee: banshee crashed at startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: linux-modules-extra
Version: 2.6.18-7+etch2
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
gnbd.ko block device is not packaged into the binary debian package.
This makes impossible to use gnbd_import from redhat-cluster packages.
Regards.
Andre Felipe Machado
---
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 18:32:09 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#425781: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 18:32:09 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#425781: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 17:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#425802: fixed in spampd 2.30-19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
severity 426751 serious
Bug#426751: libao2: should Replace (and Conflict?) libao-pulse
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 19:02:09 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#425781: fixed in texlive-base 2007-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 19:02:09 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#425781: fixed in texlive-base 2007-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 19:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426751: fixed in libao 0.8.8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Kees Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tags: patch
Hi! Attached is the NMU I'd like to upload shortly.
Approved.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Version: 2.6.18-7+etch2
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
gnbd.ko block device is not packaged into the binary debian package.
This makes impossible to use gnbd_import from redhat-cluster packages.
Regards.
Andre Felipe Machado
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:41:25AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
/etc/ld.so.conf.d is not for private libs. Use rpath.
Furthermore, the same failure is still happening on the buildds when using
aolserver4 4.5.0-6.
Interestingly enough I'm not able to reproduce that on my own box. Is
that
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 07:21:20PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:41:25AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
/etc/ld.so.conf.d is not for private libs. Use rpath.
Furthermore, the same failure is still happening on the buildds when using
aolserver4 4.5.0-6.
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-28 13:56]:
Package: libtalloc-dev
Version: 1.0.1-1
There's no such package afaict. Where did you find it?
Current unstable:
$ apt-cache policy libtalloc-dev
libtalloc-dev:
Installed: 1.0.1-1
Candidate: 1.0.1-1
I've got the same error message when I try to launch democracypalyer.
--
+---+
| gpe92 |
+---+
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 426769 wishlist
thanks
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:50:47PM -0700, andremachado wrote:
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Version: 2.6.18-7+etch2
Severity: serious
What?
Bastian
--
A father doesn't destroy his children.
-- Lt. Carolyn Palamas, Who Mourns for Adonais?,
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:13 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#407374: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:13 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426497: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:13 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426498: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:13 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426500: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:13 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426499: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
found 426107 0.2.1-1
Bug#426107: molly-guard: Molly-guard failed to stop me halting my server
Bug marked as found in version 0.2.1-1.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 422574 grave
Bug#422574: trang not installable (depends on missing libgcj7-0)
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 22:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400344: fixed in rubrica 2.0~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 11:52, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit :
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:05:52AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
I'd check if update-manager is using the sid source
in /usr/share/update-manager/channels/Debian.info
Or just monitor network activity while checking updates.
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 13:02:14 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line should be at kernel or redhat-cluster source pkg (gnbd.ko
block device not packaged)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421140: fixed in libgtkada2 2.8.1-5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Wed May 30, 2007 at 06:19:29 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Signed package for etch is on its way up to
http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/freetype/ right now (built with -sa, so
should indeed be ready for upload straight to security-master).
Thanks a lot, Steve.
Let me know if there's
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #425390
It looks like something is wrong when Icedove starts.
I started icedove with the following command:
icedove -ProfileManager -jsconsole
and these were shown in the Error Console:
Error: [Exception... Component returned failure
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 426769 wishlist
Bug#426769: gnbd.ko block device not packaged
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:42:07AM +0300, Igor Stirbu wrote:
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #425390
It looks like something is wrong when Icedove starts.
I started icedove with the following command:
Try:
first uninstall ... then install icedove again.
-
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:24:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
I think we misunderstand. /usr/share/update-manager/channels/Debian.info is
not a configuration file, but shipped by update-manager.
Ah, OK. It just looked a lot like a configuration file :-)
I also have http.us.debian.org in
Hi Sebastian,
Ok, now that etch is release what shall we do about this bug, Anuradha?
Does your upstream consider to change the name of the binary?
Sorry for the late response, but I've been a bit busy lately and I've
not had much time for anything else. But things should change soon,
I'm currently suffering from this bug as well. If it's any comfort
to you, your address book isn't lost. You can still get information
from ~/.mozilla-thunderbird/*.default/abook.mab
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 20:35, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit :
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:24:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
I also have http.us.debian.org in that file, but my system does not seem
affected by the problem. What I wanted to ask is, can you deny/confirm
that the
Package: coreutils
Version: 5.97-5.3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Running 'tar -r -W -f archive.tar anotherArchive.tar' causes only the contents
of anotherArchive to be visible, thus rendering whatever was in the archive
prior to 'appending' anotherArchive.tar to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
tags 422087 pending
Bug#422087: slapd: syncprov follows referrals
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
tags 390954 pending
Bug#390954: slapd is compiled withou SLAPI support
There
Package: tripod
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I get a segfault directly:
- Open
- It detects my white 30G iPod (late 2006) mounted
- I click to add a new album
- Name it All
- Click OK
- Seg fault
I'll try on ia32 port to see if it is amd64
Package: tripod
Version: 0.7.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #426810
Yes, it crashes under an ia32 environment.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (90, 'unstable'), (50,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Package: suitesparse
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: serious
As the subject says... Packages in main are not allowed to Build-Depend on
packages in contrib or non-free.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Package: rofs-fuse
Version: 2006.11.28-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/rofs-fuse-2006.11.28'
cc `pkg-config fuse --cflags --libs` rofs.c -o rofs
/bin/sh: pkg-config: command not found
In
Package: jruby1.0
Version: 1.0.0~rc2-3
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
[zip] Building zip: /tmp/buildd/jruby1.0-1.0.0~rc2/jruby-bin-1.0.0RC2.zip
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 21 seconds
tar -zxf jruby-bin-1.0.0~rc2.tar.gz -C
Package: et131x
Version: 1.2.3-2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/et131x-1.2.3'
#@/usr/bin/make -C /lib/modules/2.6.21-1-686/build M=/tmp/buildd/et131x-1.2.3
modules
make: Entering an unknown directory
make: ***
Package: rus-ispell
Version: 0.99g4-3
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
# Generate myspell dictionary
i2myspell -d ./russian.dict ru_RU.dic
/bin/sh: i2myspell: command not found
make: *** [build-arch] Error 127
--
Daniel Schepler
Version: 0.99.6-1.1
As pointed out to me over private email, smc now builds, so I'm closing the
FTBFS bug now.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2007 01:26:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Really close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
80 matches
Mail list logo
