Just a heads up, I noticed only after building that the test suite fails
for the ruby bindings. python and perl are fine though. Somehow an
svn_auth_baton is not passed correctly, I'll follow up with logs once I
have more time.
Greetings, Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xinetd
Version: 1:2.3.14-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/xinetd ...
sed: -e expression #1, char 1: unknown command: `-'
dpkg: error processing xinetd (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
sed
Package: wammu
Version: 0.24-1
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
The wammu package since version 0.24 sould depend on notification-daemon.
Without notification-daemon installed it crashes on startup:
# Wammu Error-File
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 452725 important
Bug#452725: assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-arm.c:3123 building d-i
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
tags 452725 + fixed-upstream
Bug#452725: assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-arm.c:3123 building d-i
Tags were: upstream
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:51:12 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453231: solfege: FTBFS: xvfb-run: error: xauth command not
found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
severity 452725 important
tags 452725 + fixed-upstream
thanks
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-24 20:04]:
Package: binutils
Version: 2.18.1~cvs20071027-1
Severity: serious
When building d-i on ARM, ld produces an assertion while reducing the
libraries:
Nick Clifton just
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 453376 +pending
Bug#453376: wammu should depend on notification-daemon
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:47:22 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#441493: fixed in waili 19990723-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:47:23 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453371: fixed in xinetd 1:2.3.14-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 453376 +pending
thanks
Hi,
The following change has been committed for this bug, and so the
fix will be in the next upload.
===
Changeset [36] by nijel, 2007-11-29 10:01:25 +0100 (Thu, 29 Nov 2007)
* Fix crash on missing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
severity 452901 normal
Bug#452901: libpam-mount: login fails with permission denied for all users
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453376: fixed in wammu 0.24-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 453223 +pending
Bug#453223: qalculate-kde: FTBFS: libqalculate-dev(inst 0.9.4-5 ! = wanted
0.9.6)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tag 453224 +pending
Bug#453224: qalculate-gtk: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libqalculate-dev(inst 0.9.4-5 !
=
tag 453223 +pending
tag 453224 +pending
thanks
hoi :)
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:38:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: qalculate-gtk
version: 0.9.6-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
libqalculate 0.9.6-1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
severity 434373 serious
Bug#434373: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as
zope:zope
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
End of message,
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/ruby-gnome2-0.16.0/poppler/src'
cc -I. -I/build/user/ruby-gnome2-0.16.0/glib/src -I.
-I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i486-linux -I.././poppler -DHAVE_RB_DEFINE_ALLOC_FUNC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
reassign 434373 zope2.9
Bug#434373: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as
zope:zope
Bug reassigned from package `zope-common' to `zope2.9'.
End of
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453161: fixed in libpri 1.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 434373 -1 -2
Bug#434373: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as
zope:zope
Bug 434373 cloned as bugs 453396-453397.
reassign -1 zope2.10
Bug#453396: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 434373 pending
Bug#434373: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as
zope:zope
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 453397 pending
Bug#453397: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as
zope:zope
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 453396 pending
Bug#453396: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as
zope:zope
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 453283 grave
Bug#453283: CVE-2007-6061: possible symlink attack
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
severity 453280 normal
Bug#453280: CVE-2007-6103: remote DoS
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 453283 normal
Bug#453283: CVE-2007-6061: possible symlink attack
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
converting the plain-text pam-mount.conf to the new XML format
(why, oh why)
why - throwing out BSD-era code and instead use established
libraries. libxml2 is installed anyway as a dependency of many programs.
(`rpm -e libxml2 21 | wc -l` alone gives 135 lines on a
casual user (kde/gnome in all
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 453180 pending
Bug#453180: plone-site: The package doesn't install at all: no instance created.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On 28/11/07 at 23:51 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on i386.
I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of the
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:09:18 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453222: orpie: FTBFS: `Depends' field, syntax error after
reference to package `ocaml-nox'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi Libc maintainers,
Could you please comment on this issue?
Thank you!
On 29/11/07 at 00:52 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:48:33AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
I will upload after confirming that this changing sys/time.h is supposed
to be OK (I don't believe it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
reassign 453210 lablgtk2
Bug#453210: lablgtk2-doc: FTBFS: Unbound type constructor
GtkSourceView_types.source_tag_style
Bug reassigned from package `lablgtk2-doc' to `lablgtk2'.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
severity 453180 serious
Bug#453180: plone-site: The package doesn't install at all: no instance created.
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
End of message, stopping
Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Hi Libc maintainers,
Could you please comment on this issue?
As far as I understand, the patch is correct. If you need a header you
have to include it and do not assume it is included by another one. This
also improves portability among various OS.
Aurelien
Thank
Package: klibc
Version: 1.5.7-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of klibc_1.5.7-3 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by sbuild/s390
98
[...]
KLIBCCC usr/klibc/__shared_init.o
KLIBCLD usr/klibc/libc.so
ld: s390:31-bit architecture of
Package: klibc
Version: 1.5.7-3
Severity: serious
The klibc binary package includes 64-bit binaries if built on a powerpc
system.
Bastian
--
Ahead warp factor one, Mr. Sulu.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: doxygen-gui
Version: 1.5.3-20071020-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
doxywizard crashes with the following error:
doxywizard: Symbol `_ZTI7QWidget' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
tags 452572 + pending
Bug#452572: coq - FTBFS: Error! (unexpected output)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Package: camelbones
Version: 0.2.3.cvs20040220-2.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Last maintainer upload in 2004.
* Low popcon.
* RC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 438179 wishlist
Bug#438179: Please provide a way to override RFC3484
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452572: fixed in coq 8.1.pl2+dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
# note that this bug is also found in the version in testing
found 452730 1.14.7
Bug#452730: changelogs out of sync
Bug marked as found in version 1.14.7.
End of message, stopping
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
As far as I understand, the patch is correct. If you need a header you
have to include it and do not assume it is included by another one. This
also improves portability among various OS.
My concern was that this is breaking various unrelated packages.
Lucas said though
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
# note that this bug is also found in the version in testing
found 452730 1.14.7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:26:23AM -0700, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
octave-plplot doesn't work at all, e.g.:
octave:1 plot([1:10])
usage: plot (y)
plot (x, y, ...)
plot (x, y, fmt, ...) plot (x, y, property, value, ...)
error: evaluating if command near line 28, column
severity 453128 important
retitle 453128 octave-plplot: usage documentation out of date; hard to setup
thanks
On Thursday 29 November 2007 09:18:16 Andrew Ross wrote:
Can you confirm exactly what you are doing? The octave instructions
are from upstream and not Debian specific. They are also out
On 16/11/07 at 03:20 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Given the cvs
snapshot it is and the number of uploads, it looks to me that it could
be orphaned at least, and removed at best (didn't check popcon, though).
Well spotted, removal bug filed.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 05/11/07 at 18:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: dak
Version: 1.0-8.4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi Joerg and James,
I have a script that finds packages which are good candidates to be
orphaned or removed from Debian, and dak came up.
close 444724 -1
reassign -1 wnpp
severity -1 normal
retitle -1 O: tmda -- Tagged Message Delivery Agent
thanks
On 30/09/07 at 16:36 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: tmda
Version: 1.0.3-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing
severity 444713 normal
reassign 444713 wnpp
retitle 444713 O: prc-tools -- GCC, GDB, binutils, etc. for PDAs using the
PalmOS
thanks
Hi,
Since the situation didn't improve, and the maintainer never answered
this bug report, I'm now orphaning the package, as originally suggested.
Thank you,
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 444713 normal
Bug#444713: prc-tools: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 444713 wnpp
Bug#444713: prc-tools: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `prc-tools' to `wnpp'.
Faidon Liambotis a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
As far as I understand, the patch is correct. If you need a header you
have to include it and do not assume it is included by another one. This
also improves portability among various OS.
My concern was that this is breaking various unrelated
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 453128 important
Bug#453128: octave-plplot: doesn't work at all
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
retitle 453128 octave-plplot: usage documentation out of date; hard to setup
Bug#453128: octave-plplot: doesn't work at all
Changed Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 429393 pending
Bug#429393: zope-common: dzhandle chokes while reinstalling removed dzinstances
There were no tags set.
Bug#444618: Zope2.9 instance 'plone-site' already exists
Tags added: pending
tag 431604 pending
Bug#431604: dzhandle: handle
severity 444723 normal
reassign 444723 ftp.debian.org
retitle 444723 RM: tinysnmp -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy, alternatives
available
thanks
Hi,
Since the situation didn't improve, and the maintainer never answered
this bug report, I'm now orphaning the package, as originally suggested.
On 15/10/07 at 08:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 15/10/07 at 11:47 +1000, Niv Sardi wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package
came up as a possible candidate for removal from
On 12/05/07 at 18:41 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 11/05/07 at 11:03 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
I do not agree with the removal and find the suggestion of it a slap in
the face for the time spent trying to work with upstream to get the
licensing issues that would allow the fix to
On 13/10/07 at 19:25 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I will be very much grateful for its up-to-date and complete version.
Chris, could you give us an update on that?
I have half-packaged the latest upstream, just a few of the extra packages
(like -xpce, etc.) are now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 444704 wnpp
Bug#444704: ttyrec: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `ttyrec' to `wnpp'.
severity 444704 normal
Bug#444704: ttyrec: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
retitle
On 15/10/07 at 12:21 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 15/10/07 at 08:33 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 11/05/07 at 11:02 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
I do not agree with the removal and find the suggestion of it a
On 26/10/07 at 10:53 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Lucas Nussbaum]
Any update on that?
Nope. I've asked upstream a while back, but have not received any
feedback yet.
Since it has been useless for a long time now, maybe it's better to
remove it now, and re-upload to unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 444723 normal
Bug#444723: tinysnmp: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 444723 ftp.debian.org
Bug#444723: tinysnmp: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `tinysnmp' to
clone 444709 -1
reassign -1 wnpp
severity -1 normal
retitle -1 O: phpqladmin -- LDAP user administration interface
thanks
Hi,
Since the situation hasn't evolved, I am now orphaning this package.
I still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this
orphaning could allow someone to
reassign 444704 wnpp
severity 444704 normal
retitle 444704 O: ttyrec -- A tty recorder
thanks
Hi,
There still seems to be some interest in keeping ttyrec in Debian. But
since the maintainer never replied on this thread, I'm now orphaning it.
Feel free to adopt it.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL
Hi Florian,
first of all, many thanks to Noritada-san and Kinoshita-san for
bugreport and analysis.
Just for the record, currently I'm drafting a letter to upstream. I'm
going to ask for a retroactive license change/upgrade to CC by-sa 3.0,
so that this problem can hopefully be resolved
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 444709 -1
Bug#444709: phpqladmin: should this package be removed?
Bug 444709 cloned as bug 453453.
reassign -1 wnpp
Bug#453453: phpqladmin: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `phpqladmin' to `wnpp'.
severity -1 normal
severity 423354 normal
clone 423354 -1
reassign 423354 ftp.debian.org
retitle 423354 RM: pnetc -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: pnet-assemblies -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy
thanks
Hi,
I'm proceeding with the removal of both pnetc and pnet-assemblies
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 423354 normal
Bug#423354: pnetc: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
clone 423354 -1
Bug#423354: pnetc: should this package be removed?
Bug 423354 cloned as bug 453456.
reassign 423354 ftp.debian.org
Package: t-code
Version: 2:2.3.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* no upload since 2003
* several RC bugs open
If you think that it should
This is not reproducible.
I have nvidia kernel module built for both 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 without any
problems.
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
Necessity is the mother of invention.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
retitle 376442 phpqladmin: CVE-2006-3301 multiple XSS vulnerabilities
Bug#376442: phpqladmin: many cross site scripting problems
Changed Bug title to `phpqladmin: CVE-2006-3301
I'd suggest you always try to stick to the latest nvidia driver release once
Randall packages and pushes it.
I've been following this path and have not seen issues.
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
Necessity is the mother of invention.
signature.asc
Hi,
* Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-29 19:43]:
[...]
Since the situation hasn't evolved, I am now orphaning this package.
I still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this
orphaning could allow someone to adopt the package if appropriate.
[...]
If you plan to adopt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
tags 453080 - patch
Bug#453080: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: openoffice crashes when loading a
document which has de-at spellcheck enabled
Tags were: confirmed patch
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
tags 453080 + pending
Bug#453080: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: openoffice crashes when loading a
document which has de-at spellcheck enabled
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added:
[Lucas Nussbaum]
Any news since a month ago?
Yes. I got this reply from Lorn Potter today:
I haven't really worked on gutenbrowser lately, but I do have a (very
basic) working version that uses qt 4.
I will try to update the repository today or this weekend.
I hope this new version will be
Package: jde
Version: 2.3.5.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-orphan
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:
* old standing RC bugs
* no maintainer activity
* last upload
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
notfixed 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5
Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?
Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5.
found 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5
Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?
Bug
notfixed 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5
found 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5
thanks
On 15/10/07 at 00:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi Roy,
On 15/10/07 at 11:03 +1300, Roy Ward wrote:
* New upstream release available for a long time now
I'm working on packaging that - it's still going
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 11:19:49AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
- check how the libstdc++ 64 multilib build is configured (config.status)
It got broken somewhere between 20061022-1 and 20070326-1.
20061022-1:
| Adding multilib support to Makefile in ../../../src/libstdc++-v3
| multidirs=64
|
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
reassign 453080 myspell-de-at
Bug#453080: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: openoffice crashes when loading a
document which has de-at spellcheck enabled
Bug reassigned from package
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:47:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453080: fixed in igerman98 20070829-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 09:36:08PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
It lacks a 64bit build of libgcc, which is AFAIK the first thing which
is built.
I forgot that large parts of the multilib support is added by patches.
So the following happens:
config-ml.in tries to link something with -m64. As
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:33:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
I forgot that large parts of the multilib support is added by patches.
So the following happens:
config-ml.in tries to link something with -m64. As this is the libgcc,
which emits crtbegin.o for not-main-arch, it fails as the
This is already fixed in ruby-pkg-extras' team svn.
Packages will soon follow.
--
Arnaud Cornet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:32:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#451445: fixed in lynkeos.app 1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: strigi-daemon
Version: 0.5.7-1
Severity: grave
strigi-daemon segfaults quite short after starting the indexing.
Here is the last output of strigi-daemon:
/usr/lib/strigi/strigila_namespaceharvester.so
/usr/lib/strigi/strigita_xbm.so
/usr/lib/strigi/strigita_pcx.so
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-4
Severity: grave
Hi,
I had problems launching eclipse. Every time I tried, the java process
was using up to 80% of the memory.
% eclipse -debug
searching for compatible vm...
testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found
Could not create
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452829: fixed in libgpod 0.6.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#447447: fixed in preferences.app 1.2.100.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 441684 + patch
Bug#441684: libdb4.3-ruby: FTBFS: bdb.h:2:21: error: version.h: No such file or
directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
On 16/11/2007, Philipp Kern wrote:
Your package failed to auto-build on sparc because of this issue but I
could easily reproduce the issue on my machine by calling
`debian/rules apply-patches' and then running `./configure make'.
A common workaround would be to “touch configure” before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 441684 + patch
thanks
Hi,
upstream ruby removed file version.h . But we already have lots of fixes
based on string RUBY_VERSION_CODE, so it's easier to recreate this
version.h for ruby1.9 package. This patch fix this bug.
It also fix another
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:49:09PM +0100, NoX wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-4
Severity: grave
Hi,
I had problems launching eclipse. Every time I tried, the java process
was using up to 80% of the memory.
Please update to glibc 2.7-3 and retry and report back if its better.
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi,
I had problems launching eclipse. Every time I tried, the java process
was using up to 80% of the memory.
% eclipse -debug
searching for compatible vm...
testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:50:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 28/11/07 at 23:51 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
However, the test probably tries to *run* the code, not just compile
it.
That's right, it is run via the AC_RUN_IFELSE macro, where the
condition for cross-compiling is set to
On Nov 28, 2007 8:10 PM, brian m. carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
__vdso_clock_gettime is a fast version of clock_gettime that lives in
the Linux VDSO (linux-vdso.so.1 on amd64), which is a dummy library that
is part of the kernel (and mapped by the kernel into every process's
address
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Have you made some progress on this package?
Some, but not enough to submit a package.
One bit of news is that gcc-3.3 is going to be the required compiler. I've looking at building Mercury 0.13.1 with
several versions of gcc on x86 and amd64, and while projects are fine
Package: python-numpy
Version: 1:1.0.1-8
Followup-For: Bug #450443
The attached patch solves the packaging bug.
Kind regards,
- Jonas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
I cannot reproduce this on any of my machines. What type of video are
you using? Do you get any more details on the segfault? Is there any
chance you could produce a stacktrace?
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 453616 gcc-4.1
Bug#453616: gcc-4.1: cross build failure: gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu not build
Warning: Unknown package 'gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu'
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu' to `gcc-4.1'.
severity 453616 important
Bug#453616:
Package: gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu
Version: 4.1.2-17
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
I have executed the following:
sh$ apt-get source gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu
sh$ cd gcc-4.1-4.1.2/
sh$ fakeroot
sh# dpkg-buildpackage
The build reported
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
