On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:23:42PM +0200, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
/usr/lib32 is a compliant location. The multiarch directory too but,
/usr/lib32 is a symlink to /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib. There are at least
two reasons why this means I can't ship files there. Furthermore, I
don't believe
I am able to reproduce this issue. I rebuild libpam-devperm with
debug symbols and ran 'valgrind atd -d' to get more details on the
crash, and this is the report:
==21819== Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
==21819==at 0x0: ???
==21819==by 0x403339A:
Kevin Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you run ldconfig? I was trying to find the right thing to force
that, but from what I saw, when you install in /usr/local/lib, libtool
Your message dated Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:06:14 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line dom4j: BFS: Entirely normal build-dependency: openjdk-6-jdk
has caused the Debian Bug report #487036,
regarding dom4j: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: openjdk-6-jdk
to be marked as done.
Log is attached
--
Olleg Samoylov
2008/08/02 03:06:16.239 0:00.131 ekiga-gtkonly ekiga-gtkonly Version 2.0.12 by on Unix Linux (2.6.25-2-amd64-x86_64) at 2008/8/2 3:06:16.239
2008/08/02 03:06:16.239 0:00.131 ekiga-gtkonly Detected audio plugins: ALSA
2008/08/02
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:47:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#467474: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-85
has caused the Debian Bug report #467474,
regarding gcl: Builds broken package with gcc-4.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:47:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#469178: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-85
has caused the Debian Bug report #469178,
regarding gclcvs 2.7.0-84 uninstallable: requires exact obsolete version of
binutils-dev
to be marked as done.
Package: iceweasel
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: grave
The first time I start iceweasel, everything seems to work fine. The
next time I try to start it (and subsequent times after that), I get either:
Error: in (function call): procedure or syntax required but got: Error:
fatal: looped fatal
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:47:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#487435: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-85
has caused the Debian Bug report #487435,
regarding gcl: FTBFS [amd64]: cannot trap sbrk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: rubygems1.9
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable)
Unpacking rubygems1.9 (from .../rubygems1.9_1.2.0-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/rubygems1.9_1.2.0-1_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite
* Flavio Stanchina [Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:11:16 +0200]:
Package: fatresize
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hello, Flavio.
After running fatresize on my iPod nano, it refused to boot. The
firmware partition disappeared from the partition table.
Package: qcad
Version: 2.0.5.0-1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
Given that qcad presumably still needs its architecture-independent
data, it should depend on the new qcad-data package that now contains
them.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
tag 491097 + patch
quit
Hi,
These three bugs are all caused by the same buggy if statement:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491655
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491097
http://bugzilla.atheme.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
Skotlex's patch (attached at the Atheme
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
forwarded 493210 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545138
# fixed in http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/brasero?view=revisionrevision=1039
tags 493210 fixed-upstream
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
forwarded 493210 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545138
Bug#493210: brasero - FTBFS: missuse of va_list
Bug#493211: brasero: FTBFS on alpha
Noted your statement that Bug has
There is no relation between the 95% in splashy and the 99 in the S99timidity
AFAIK.
well i removed the S99timidity and reboot, next reboot everything was fine
the relation is that 99 is the last service to start and splashy calculated it
to be the 95%.
Do you have timidity enabled as system
Your message dated Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#493217: fixed in libnfsidmap 0.21-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #493217,
regarding libnfsidmap2: rpc.idmapd broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#493210: fixed in brasero 0.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #493210,
regarding brasero: FTBFS on alpha
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
clone 472800 -1
retitle -1 gnome-power-manager does not act upon battery low nor button press
submitter -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity -1 important
tag -1 unreproducible
close 472800 2.22.1-1
thanks
Le mardi 22 juillet 2008 à 18:59 +0200, alberto maurizi a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at
Your message dated Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#493210: fixed in brasero 0.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #493210,
regarding brasero - FTBFS: missuse of va_list
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 472800 -1
Bug#472800: gnome-power-manager: fails to act when battery power critically low
Bug 472800 cloned as bug 493318.
retitle -1 gnome-power-manager does not act upon battery low nor button press
Bug#493318: gnome-power-manager: fails to
tag 489077 patch
thanks
The problem is that wxwidgets2.8 uses the name of the build directory
to determine if it's supposed to build a special flavour of packages.
Since the changelog also has to be modified, the attached patch makes
debian/rules extract the flavour from there instead, making the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 493210 patch
Bug#493210: brasero - FTBFS: missuse of va_list
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Bug#493211: brasero: FTBFS on alpha
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Howdy,
Section 4.9 of the policy manual doesn't mention anything about the
binary target removing files. It does mention that the clean target
should undo the effects of the build and binary targets, but it
already does so (at least on my system). In particular, the make
maintainer-clean
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 489077 patch
Bug#489077: wxwidgets2.8: FTBFS:
../../../../contrib/src/mmedia/../../include/wx/mmedia/vidbase.h:19: 23: error:
calling fdopen: Bad file descriptor
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
tag 493210 patch
thanks
The problem is caused by the if condition in the following code:
if (arg_list)
message = g_strdup_vprintf (format, arg_list);
else
message = g_strdup (format);
It should be safe to remove this check unless there are cases
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 492243 serious
Bug#492243: unbound: fails to install/configure
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 493096 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16957
Bug#493096: xserver-xorg-video-intel: [855GM] External monitor unusable
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16957.
thanks
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 05:36:07PM -0700, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
Package: releaseforge
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: normal
Asheesh,
I have prepared packages of the new upstream release (1.3) of
ReleaseForge. Would it be possible for you to test them out for me?
You can obtain them here:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 07:52:20PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
Package: iceweasel
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: grave
The first time I start iceweasel, everything seems to work fine. The
next time I try to start it (and subsequent times after that), I get either:
Error: in (function call):
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:33:32PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
Iceweasel 3.0.1-1 also crashes on startup on Alpha. First noted when
version 3.0~rc2-2 came through into Lenny and problem persists into
3.0.1-1. Indeed, Epiphany Web Browser (2.22.3-1) also crashes on
startup!
A backtrace
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 05:36:07PM -0700, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
Package: releaseforge
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: normal
Asheesh,
I have prepared packages of the new upstream release (1.3) of
ReleaseForge. Would it be possible for you to test
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
