Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:32:40 +
with message-id e1opv84-0005n8...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#585476: fixed in psqlodbc 1:08.03.0200-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #585476,
regarding FTBFS on mips: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: grave
Tags: squeeze
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
the driver pegasus freeze networking very often so one must to reboot
to get networking work again. At reboot the system hang and one can
see a message like:
[5952.880465] pegasus
|
|Build finished at 20100618-0041
|FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
[0] https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=libzorpll
Sebastian
-BEGIN PGP
Hi Jan,
I tried for a while with alternate hardware and the original controller but the
error did never happen again. I think your idea of a bug in e2fsck's handling
of multiply claimed blocks is the only explanation: Maybe during a corruption
long ago a number of multiply claimed blocks
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote on 2010-06-18 02:02:
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 20:37 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:11:04 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
:
:
And how would one go about setting this loader variable?
The loader variable is not documented in the
reopen 582755
severity 582755 important
severity 562945 serious
thanks
On Freitag, 18. Juni 2010, Gerrit Pape wrote:
severity 562945 normal
tags 562945 - moreinfo
quit
No response from the submitter.
Gerrit, you're making things complicated by mixing up these two bug reports.
#562945 is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 582755
Bug #582755 {Done: Gerrit Pape p...@smarden.org} [dnscache-run] modifying
files from another package
severity 582755 important
Bug #582755 [dnscache-run] modifying files from another package
Severity set to 'important' from
Package: cryptsetup
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.4
Installing cryptsetup gives me the following error message:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/cryptsetup_2%3a1.1.2-1_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/etc/bash_completion.d/cryptsetup', which is also in
On 2010-05-06 12:51:46 +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
Package: gcc-doc
deodand:~# apt-get install gcc-doc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:38:25 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
#562945 is definitly serious and I'm sorry that I don't have the time to read
policy for you. I also havent up my mind whether I should reassign this bug
to the NM committee or the tech committee. Seriously. A package has to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 586289 important
Bug #586289 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-486: Driver pegasus freeze
networking very often so one must reboot to get it to work again
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
tags 586289 - squeeze
Bug #586289
Source: pyside
Version: 0.3.2-1
Severity: serious
The build of pyside needs a lot of time and produces a huge log during
the build just to fail.
sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.60.0 (23 Feb 2010) on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu
[around 12000 lines and 50MB]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 582755 serious
Bug #582755 [dnscache-run] modifying files from another package
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
582755:
Hi,
On Freitag, 18. Juni 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
For high-priority prompts without a reasonable default answer,
maintainer scripts may abort if there is no controlling
terminal.
from where in policy is this? rgrep doesnt let me find this string...
Replacing
package pyside
tags 586305 +upstream
severity 586305 important
forwarded 586305 http://bugs.openbossa.org/249
thanks
Le vendredi 18 juin 2010 11:18:16 Bastian Blank, vous avez écrit :
Source: pyside
Version: 0.3.2-1
Severity: serious
The build of pyside needs a lot of time and produces a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
limit package src:pyside
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'src:pyside'
Limit currently set to 'package':'src:pyside'
tags 586305 + upstream
Bug #586305 [src:pyside] pyside - Produces huge build log
Added tag(s)
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:47:24 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Freitag, 18. Juni 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
For high-priority prompts without a reasonable default answer,
maintainer scripts may abort if there is no controlling
terminal.
from where
clone 586161 -1
reassign -1 bash-completion,cryptsetup
retitle -1 decide who should ship completion for cryptsetup
severity -1 normal
thanks
Hello people,
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:39:26 +0200, Sven wrote:
the current cryptsetup package already ships a bash-completion file and
thus the current
reassign 562945 tech-ctte
# unmerge 506898 224509
# policy-maintainers, I think you should do this ^
thanks
Hi,
for those coming late to the party: this bug is about a package which fails to
install cleanly:
Unpacking runit-run (from .../runit-run_1.1.1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 562945 tech-ctte
Bug #562945 [runit-run] fails to install
Bug #574223 [runit-run] runit-run: installation fails
Bug reassigned from package 'runit-run' to 'tech-ctte'.
Bug reassigned from package 'runit-run' to 'tech-ctte'.
Bug No longer
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unmerge 586162
Bug#586162: fails to upgrade, file conflict with cryptsetup
Bug#586161: bash-completion: Shipping completion file for cryptsetup conflicts
with cryptsetup package 2:1.1.2-1
Disconnected #586162 from all other report(s).
reassign
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:56:33 +0200
with message-id 20100618125633.0ce65...@pingu
and subject line Re: Bug#583027: fuseiso: FTBFS: features.h:273:34: error:
token \ is not valid in preprocessor expressions
has caused the Debian Bug report #583027,
regarding fuseiso: FTBFS:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 09:44:26PM -0300, André Nunes wrote:
Same problem here, bur a little bit worse: I can't get my system back! I
tryed to aptitude downgrade grub-pc and grub-common to 1.98-1 and also to
grub-legacy, but I keep getting the same error:
Even though everyone in this bug log
hey,
i just removed the bash-comletion file from cryptsetup svn. with the upload
of 2:1.1.2-2, cryptsetup will no longer ship this file. thus i suggest
to add a Conflicts: cryptsetup ( 2:1.1.2-2) to bash-completion in
order to fix bug #586161. i'll upload cryptsetup 2:1.1.2-2 within the
next
On Jun 18, 2010, at 3:12 AM, Buehl, Reiner wrote:
Hi Jan,
I tried for a while with alternate hardware and the original controller but
the error did never happen again. I think your idea of a bug in e2fsck's
handling of multiply claimed blocks is the only explanation: Maybe during a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 585821 0.9.0+git-2010-06-15-13-41-1
Bug #585821 {Done: Sebastian Dröge sl...@debian.org} [libvpx] libvpx:
includes non-free MD5 implementation
There is no source info for the package 'libvpx' at version
'0.9.0+git-2010-06-15-13-41-1' with
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 13:05:22 +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
hey,
i just removed the bash-comletion file from cryptsetup svn. with the upload
of 2:1.1.2-2, cryptsetup will no longer ship this file. thus i suggest
to add a Conflicts: cryptsetup ( 2:1.1.2-2) to bash-completion in
order to fix
On Jun 18, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Theodore Tso wrote:
It could be an e2fsck bug, or it could be a hardware issue. In my
experience, every time
I've tried digging into problems with e2fsck -fy not fixing all problems in a
single
pass, it's been a hardware problem. That being said, multiply
Hi Colin
I'm not the original reporter but experience the similar problem,
getting 'unaligned pointer 0x4c1b0297'. I tried to collect the
information you requested for that:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:04:15PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 09:44:26PM -0300, André Nunes
Source: gnome-mag
Version: 1:0.16.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python2.6
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source
Hello,
Your package fails to build from source:
[…]
| checking for python version... 2.6
| checking for python platform...
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
I have no problems with:
[..]
This bug should probably be closed (or reassigned, if the problem
is with some sources).
Evidently someone has uploaded gcc-4.4-doc since I reported the bug l-)
I agree that the bug can be closed.
ttfn/rjk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:59:15PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I'm not the original reporter but experience the similar problem,
getting 'unaligned pointer 0x4c1b0297'. I tried to collect the
information you requested for that:
Thanks. This is the most interesting part:
Generating
Nope, the file /boot/grub/stage2 is actually (system works) not
present in the given directory, or elsewhere under /boot.
Cheers Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi all!
I had a look at the libclutter's build log, and it is built for armv5t,
you're running on armv4t, so your cpu has probably some missing instructions.
I think the armel port should run on armv4t hardware, so libclutter should be
compiled with -march=armv4t.
Best regards
Marc
--
To
Hi
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:10:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:59:15PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I'm not the original reporter but experience the similar problem,
getting 'unaligned pointer 0x4c1b0297'. I tried to collect the
information you requested
On Thu, 20 May 2010 18:05:09 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
5.230-1 still FTBFS on some architectures; and now in an earlier test
than the one I patched to get more informations :/
Actually it's probably the same test (t/19_handle.t) but we don't see
any output.
More frustrating info: I just
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:18:23 +
with message-id e1opbsh-000776...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#583695: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #583695,
regarding /usr/sbin/update-initramfs: line 317: 1: unbound variable
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:18:23 +
with message-id e1opbsh-000776...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#583695: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #583695,
regarding [initramfs-tools] upgrade from 0.94.4 to 0.95 fails
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:18:23 +
with message-id e1opbsh-000776...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#583695: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #583695,
regarding initramfs-tools: package upgrade fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:18:23 +
with message-id e1opbsh-00077b...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#585991: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #585991,
regarding initramfs-tools: package installation fails (postinst scripts?)
to be marked as done.
Hello
I can confirm that I have /boot/grub/stage2 on a non-booting laptop.
With system-rescuecd, I've moved stage2 in stage2.bak, but this is not enough
to fix the problem.
For other googlers, here's how I fixed my laptop:
- boot systemrescuecd
- mount -t ext3 /dev/sda2 /mnt/custom/dev
-
dnscache-run modifies /etc/resolv.conf. So do several other packages.
All these packages overwrite one another's changes. That is bad.
The resolvconf package was created in order to resolve this and related
problems. Resolvconf allows packages to add information to the resolver
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:09:31 +0100, Chris Butler wrote:
It seems that the API in json2.js is compatible with the current json.js in
jifty. We can probably upload a new package replacing this file with the
newer one from json.org.
I've now prepared a package in svn that
- removes the non-free
Hi Dominique,
I tried to reproduce on how to fix the problem: You have a little
typo, here are the correct steps:
1. boot systemrescuecd
2. mount -t ext3 /dev/sda2 /mnt/custom --- TYPO
3. mount --bind /proc /mnt/custom/proc
4. mount --bind /dev/ /mnt/custom/dev
5. chroot /mnt/custom bin/bash
6.
These informations in addition:
# df | grep custom
/dev/sdb2 24034944 2740660 20073344 13% /mnt/custom
# mount | tail -3
/dev/sdb2 on /mnt/custom type ext4 (rw)
/proc on /mnt/custom/proc type none (rw,bind)
/dev on /mnt/custom/dev type none (rw,bind)
From my testing:
--- MOUNTS
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 04:25:38 -0400 (EDT), Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote on 2010-06-18 02:02:
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 20:37 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
And how would one go about setting this loader variable?
The loader variable is not documented in the man page
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 07:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Thanks for the report. As said upstream, I'm not sure if it's related to
largefile support, and even if it is, it should be fixed, not disabled
(thought disabling might be a temporary workaround).
In case you didn't notice the comment
Package: libsysactivity
Version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: serious
src/*BSD/cpu.c
* This program may be freely redistributed,
* but this entire comment MUST remain intact.
Does not explicitly allow modification.
The parts under this license was found under the BSD license (from the
same author)
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55:35AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
So far, Ben has only agreed to reinstate the historic function of
do_bootloader = yes
in /etc/kernel-img.conf for Lenny kernel maintainer scripts.
It hasn't actually happened yet, but
he has agreed to restore its former
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:04:48 +
with message-id e1ope3k-0002fj...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#584651: fixed in kdebindings 4:4.4.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #584651,
regarding libkde4-ruby1.8 missing dependency on libqt4-ruby1.8
to be marked as done.
This
Source: tomoe
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python2.6
Tags: patch
Justification: FTBFS
Hello,
tomoe fails to build from source. The relevant bits of the build log:
[…]
| checking for python... /usr/bin/python
| checking for python version...
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:10:46 +
with message-id e1ope9w-0003om...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#584932: fixed in opie 2.32.dfsg.1-0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #584932,
regarding CVE-2010-1938
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#libsysactivity (0.5.3+cvs20100613-1) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * New upstream release.
#- Pulled from CVS to deal with some non-DFSG compatible licenses.
#(Closes: #586342)
#
limit source libsysactivity
Limiting to bugs with field
Source: gwp
Version: 0.4.0-1.2+b2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.60.0 (23 Feb 2010) on lxdebian.bfinv.de
[...]
s390-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wunused -Wswitch -Wcomment
-Wuninitialized -Wparentheses
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:55:06AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Even when rebuild with Python 2.6 as the default version, ensyble
doesn't work with 2.6:
From a quick look at upstream, a new version is out which claims 2.6
support. I will look at this, but I'm not sure how quickly as I have
a
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org writes:
Ah, thanks. You didnt quote the following sentence though:
However, this situation should be avoided if at all possible, since it
prevents automated or unattended installs. In most cases, users will
consider this to be a bug in the package.
which
Source: openturns
Version: 0.13.2-4
Severity: serious
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python2.6
Tags: patch
Justification: FTBFS
Hello,
openturns fails to build from source. The relevant bits of the build log:
[…]
| checking for python... /usr/bin/python
| checking for python
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:15:38 Christian Ohm wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 June 2010 at 19:02, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
Could you try and see if it is an issue with glewmx 1.5.3-3 or glewmsx
1.5.3-2 ?
libglewmx1.5 1.5.3-3 also works, just 1.5.4-1 breaks things...
Okay, I've given this some
Dear all,
(please cc)
I have seen the CVE, I have seen you rresponse, but I consider that
the wrong approach.
You should ship the flash plugin but disable it, and provide
a way to enable it in the README file.
THe way it is currently handled is a real pain.
Best wishes
Norbert
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
reassign 562945 tech-ctte
# unmerge 506898 224509
# policy-maintainers, I think you should do this ^
thanks
for those coming late to the party: this bug is about a package which fails
to
install cleanly:
Unpacking
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:10:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:59:15PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I'm not the original reporter but experience the similar problem,
getting 'unaligned pointer 0x4c1b0297'. I tried to collect the
information you requested for
Hi!
I can confirm the bug, on a desktop machine I was unable to boot - it
worked on a laptop -on the desktop I had to chroot the system and to downgrade
grub-pc and grub-common. I decided to find some informations on the bug, read
all the messages on bugs.debian.org concerning this one,and
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:31:44PM +0200, Andreas Jacob wrote:
Nope, the file /boot/grub/stage2 is actually (system works) not
present in the given directory, or elsewhere under /boot.
In that case, I think you have some different problem, since the other
respondents on this bug (including the
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:48:06PM +0200, mahashakti89 wrote:
I can confirm the bug, on a desktop machine I was unable to boot - it
worked on a laptop -on the desktop I had to chroot the system and to downgrade
grub-pc and grub-common. I decided to find some informations on the bug, read
all
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 570573 - patch
Bug #570573 [viewvc] viewvc: XS-P-V: current and Python 2.6 as default
Removed tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
570573:
tag 570573 - patch
thanks
Looks like python + java packages need rpath (see
http://bugs.debian.org/562622)
Also Sandro's NMU patch results in installation to
python2.6/site-packages. Adding a dh_pysupport call cleans it up, but
the package still doesn't work:
| import lucene
| Traceback (most
tag 570573 + patch
thanks
EEK. Wrong bug. Sorry,
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tag 571545 - patch
thanks
Looks like python + java packages need rpath (see
http://bugs.debian.org/562622)
Also Sandro's NMU patch results in installation to
python2.6/site-packages. Adding a dh_pysupport call cleans it up, but
the package still doesn't work:
| import lucene
| Traceback (most
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 570573 + patch
Bug #570573 [viewvc] viewvc: XS-P-V: current and Python 2.6 as default
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
570573:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 571545 - patch
Bug #571545 [src:pylucene] pylucene: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default
Removed tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
571545:
He's an improved patch that builds against the current Debian Python
default version.
Adam: Python 2.6 is now the default in sid, you might as well make teh
change.
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127
diff -Nru
Hi,
btw, thank you all (tech-ctte) for helping in resolving this! Much
appreciated.
On Freitag, 18. Juni 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
Personally, I don't think runit-run's behavior here is what's intended to
be allowed under Policy. IMHO, if the question is do you want to install
this
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 Colin Watson wrote :
Could you please confirm whether or not you have a file
/boot/grub/stage2 on your system?
I purged the boot directory from all stage files belonging to the old
GRUB package. There is now no such file (stage2) on my system.
Regards
mahashakti89
Hello,
this grub version needs to be removed immediately from unstable. It discourages
enormously the use of unstable to filter for testing.
The /boot/grub/stage/stage2 and stage1 files are existing on my system.
Maybe I was too happy with unstable for too long and have given my 64bit
Sorry for the second post , my first message could be ambiguous, so ...
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 Colin Watson wrote :
Could you please confirm whether or not you have a file
/boot/grub/stage2 on your system?
A LONG TIME AGO I purged the boot directory from all stage files belonging to
the old
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Fri Jun 18 20:03:09 UTC 2010
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: plasma-widget-networkmanagement
tags 584360 + pending
Bug #584360
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:49:57PM +0200, mahashakti89 wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 Colin Watson wrote :
Could you please confirm whether or not you have a file
/boot/grub/stage2 on your system?
A LONG TIME AGO I purged the boot directory from all stage files
belonging to the old GRUB
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:51:11 -0400 (EDT), maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55:35AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
As for update-initramfs -u, it *will* invoke lilo if lilo is installed
and do_bootloader = yes is specified in /etc/kernel-img.conf, which I
highly recommend.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:42:29PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
this grub version needs to be removed immediately from unstable. It
discourages enormously the use of unstable to filter for testing.
No. I'll be fixing it very soon (as soon as I get a few hours in a row
where I can concentrate
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 550477 pending
Bug #550477 [grub-pc] grub-pc: after update-from-grub-legacy the system stopped
booting
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing
Hi logcheck maintainer(s)
So which one should change here. You or I :-)
Best regards,
// Ola
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:06:50AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Package: logcheck-database,ntop
Version: logcheck-database/1.3.9
Version: ntop/3:3.3-13
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 577426 serious
Bug #577426 [xt] xtraceroute ends with a segfault
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
577426:
this grub version needs to be removed immediately from unstable. It
discourages enormously the use of unstable to filter for testing.
Oh sre.
No. I'll be fixing it very soon (as soon as I get a few hours in a row
where I can concentrate on it); removing it would make it very
Package: netsed
Severity: normal
Hi there,
I have a forked version of netsed on my blog, that I wrote 4 years ago...
I did rewrite most waiting to use 'select' so even if I don't remember seeing
that particular point it might be fixed (or fixable), I will check it.
As for #230406 regarding UDP
|
|Build finished at 20100618-0041
|FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
[0] https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=libzorpll
Sebastian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux
tags 586197 + patch
thanks
Ick, this patch makes me feel dirty. You *really* want to package that
new version, using distutils :)
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127
diff -u ensymble-0.28/debian/changelog
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 586197 + patch
Bug #586197 [src:ensymble] ensymble: doesn't work with Python 2.6: TypeError:
import_module() takes at most 5 arguments (6 given)
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Hi again,
Just tried your testcase with netsed and my modified version.
And while I could reproduice the heavy cpu load with original netsed, my
version is not impacted.
Best regards
Julien VdG
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 18 June 2010 23:10, Julien Viard de Galbert jul...@vdg.blogsite.org wrote:
Hi again,
Just tried your testcase with netsed and my modified version.
And while I could reproduice the heavy cpu load with original netsed, my
version is not impacted.
This is good. Could you provide a link to
tags 585174 + patch
thanks
Trivial Patch attached
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127
diff -Nru kdebase-workspace-4.4.4/debian/plasma-scriptengine-python.install kdebase-workspace-4.4.4/debian/plasma-scriptengine-python.install
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 585174 + patch
Bug #585174 [kdebase-workspace] [kdebase-workspace] FTBFS with python-2.6
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
585174:
Hi,
Am 18.06.2010 21:42, schrieb Steffen Möller:
this grub version needs to be removed immediately from unstable.
just purge the grub2 related binary packages from your system if you do
not like them. :)
Removing a package from unstable would remove it from testing too
because testing tracks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#kdebase-workspace (4:4.4.4-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Do not hardcode python version in plasma-scriptengine-python.install
#(Closes: #585174).
# * Add patch 01_plasma_netbook_no_autostart.diff from kubuntu
#to fix
Hi Torsten,
Datum: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:23:17 +0200
Von: Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org
Am 18.06.2010 21:42, schrieb Steffen Möller:
this grub version needs to be removed immediately from unstable.
just purge the grub2 related binary packages from your system if you do
not like them.
Hi Colin
Could it be that grub-install, or your patched debug version did
remove the stage2 file? When I execute a grub-install, it seems to
touch or to rewrite almost all files under /boot/grub. May be it also
deletes the stage2 file?
Unfortunately i have no backup from /boot where i can look
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:38:11 -0700, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
Personally, I don't think runit-run's behavior here is what's intended to be
allowed under Policy.
I agree. The current behavior in the case where the question is
answered yes seems completely inadequate, and the mere
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98+20100614-2
Severity: grave
Hi,
I've upgraded from 1.98+20100602-2 to 1.98+20100614-2 yesterday.
And when I tried to boot today I got message about a misaligned
pointer before getting in the menu. I couldn't do anything.
After running install-grub things were
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:07:06AM +0200, Andreas Jacob wrote:
Could it be that grub-install, or your patched debug version did
remove the stage2 file? When I execute a grub-install, it seems to
touch or to rewrite almost all files under /boot/grub. May be it also
deletes the stage2 file?
No,
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98+20100614-2
Severity: serious
I had to boot from a rescue CD with an older kernel and chrooted
into my /, which is /dev/hda1 for that kernel. I ran update-grub
and isntall-grub.
I then rebooted and it passed root=/dev/hda1 to the kernel. But
the new kernel calls
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:23:16AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98+20100614-2
Severity: grave
Hi,
I've upgraded from 1.98+20100602-2 to 1.98+20100614-2 yesterday.
And when I tried to boot today I got message about a misaligned
pointer before getting in the menu.
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
