Bug#638546: marked as done (Needs to be adapted for libav/0.7.1)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 06:02:34 + with message-id e1r3m4o-0008jc...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#638546: fixed in k3b 2.0.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #638546, regarding Needs to be adapted for libav/0.7.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#640709: marked as done (ibus-array: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libibus-dev (= 1.3))

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 06:17:10 + with message-id e1r3miw-0001il...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#640709: fixed in ibus-array 0.0.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #640709, regarding ibus-array: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libibus-dev (= 1.3) to be marked

Bug#640195: Remove paraview-dev

2011-09-13 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
2011/9/12 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezme...@gmail.com: On Dom 11 Sep 2011 06:00:39 Mathieu Malaterre escribió: [snip] Now ParaViewConfig.cmake should be installed by paraview-dev. To help the transition, all the packages that currently build-depend on paraview should be filled

Processed: notfound 634990 in rails/2.3.14, notfixed 634990 in 2.3.14

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 634990 rails/2.3.14 Bug #634990 {Done: Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org} [rails] CVE-2011-2197 Bug No longer marked as found in versions rails/2.3.14. notfixed 634990 2.3.14 Bug #634990 {Done: Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org} [rails]

Processed: tagging 629067

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 629067 + squeeze Bug #629067 [libactionpack-ruby] libactionpack-ruby: libactionpack update breaks redmine Added tag(s) squeeze. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 629067:

Bug#640572: paw: FTBFS: sed: can't read debian/paw-common/usr/share/man/man1/paw.1: No such file or directory

2011-09-13 Thread Lifeng Sun
Hi, Thank you for reporting, and sorry for reply late, I just returned from annual leave. This bug was introduced during fixing the lintian error temporary-debhelper-file of cernlib, it also occurs, though not FTBFS, in the packages mclibs and geant321. I would upload a new version of these

Bug#641405: several Django security issues

2011-09-13 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Package: python-django Severity: serious Tags: security Hi, Several security issues were announced in Django: https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/09/security-releases-issued/ and a regression fix was later posted: https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/10/127/ Can you please

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-13 Thread Ian Jackson
Josip Rodin writes (Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile): Since my reasoning here didn't seem to leave a particular positive dent with those tech-ctte members who have responded so far, I would just like to solicit Ian Jackson's input, given his role in defining and implementing

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start

2011-09-13 Thread Slavko
Package: libreoffice Version: 1:3.4.3-1 Severity: grave After upgrading to mentioned version, the libreoffice can't start and only display splash for small time. The syslog contains: Sep 13 11:18:18 bonifac kernel: [ 4125.783594] soffice.bin[11497]: segfault at 0 ip 7f8fbf7ab292 sp

Bug#641413: libreoffice: Crash on startup

2011-09-13 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: libreoffice Version: 1:3.4.3-1 Severity: serious Hi, on my current sid system, libreoffice crashes on startup. IMO, it's not the same issue as the other reported crashes, therefore reporting separately: $ /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin X IO Error $ (Run under screen now to

Bug#634538: Fix FTBFS

2011-09-13 Thread Matthias Klose
tag 634538 + patch user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com usertags 634538 oneiric ubuntu-patch user debian-d...@lists.debian.org usertags 634538 multiarch thanks patch at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/79765815/tcpreplay_3.4.3-2_3.4.3-2ubuntu1.diff.gz but I assume this hard coding will break again

Processed: Fix FTBFS

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 634538 + patch Bug #634538 [src:tcpreplay] tcpreplay: FTBFS: configure: error: Unable to find matching library for header file in /usr Added tag(s) patch. user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (was

Bug#556713: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:32:21 + with message-id e1r3qht-0005su...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#556713: fixed in xmms2-scrobbler 0.4.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #556713, regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: your mail

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 640610 + confirmed Bug #640610 [emacs-calfw] emacs-calfw: package removal fails Added tag(s) confirmed. severity 641363 serious Bug #641363 [emacs-calfw] emacs-calfw: prevents emacs upgrade Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' merge

Bug#641420: java-wrappers: /usr/lib/java-wrappers/jvm-list.sh doesn't know about openjdk-7

2011-09-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: java-wrappers Version: 0.1.23 Severity: serious Tags: patch -- snip -- $ azureus [warning] /usr/bin/azureus: No java runtime was found [warning] /usr/bin/azureus: No JAVA_CMD set for run_java, falling back to JAVA_CMD = java -- snip -- openjdk-7-jre is the only JRE I have

Bug#632225: Investigating #632225 (subvertpy testsuite failure on ia64)

2011-09-13 Thread Roland Mas
Hi, I started having a look at the bug in the sid chroot of merulo (the ia64 porterbox). After a failed debuild, I re-ran the last command of the debian/rules, and tried to separate the different tests to see which were failing. My results:

Bug#625068: liborigin: FTBFS: tree.hh:138:21: error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type

2011-09-13 Thread Colin Watson
tags 625068 patch user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com usertags 625068 ubuntu-patch oneiric thanks On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:33:55PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: g++ -c -pipe -Wall -W -O2 -fPIC

Processed: Re: Bug#625068: liborigin: FTBFS: tree.hh:138:21: error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 625068 patch Bug #625068 [src:liborigin] liborigin: FTBFS: tree.hh:138:21: error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type Added tag(s) patch. user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (was

Bug#641430: libgetopt-euclid-perl: 0.2.9 does not recognise options in a =head2 inside =head1 OPTIONS

2011-09-13 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: libgetopt-euclid-perl Version: 0.2.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: unpredictable effects on previously-working software mpd-dynamic, a script provided by libaudio-mpd-perl, uses Getopt::Euclid for command-line options. G::E 0.2.7 recognises that it has command-line options, but G::E

Processed: affects 641430

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: affects 641430 libaudio-mpd-perl Bug #641430 [libgetopt-euclid-perl] libgetopt-euclid-perl: 0.2.9 does not recognise options in a =head2 inside =head1 OPTIONS Added indication that 641430 affects libaudio-mpd-perl thanks Stopping processing

Bug#621778: stimfit: FTBFS on powerpc: Both BIG_ENDIAN and LITTLE_ENDIAN defined

2011-09-13 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Version 0.10.18-1 I think we can close it this way ;-) On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Christoph Schmidt-Hieber wrote: 0.10.18-1 seems to build fine on powerpc; see e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stimfit/0.10.18-1/+build/2781444 Can we consider this bug as fixed? If so, how do I mark it?

Bug#621778: stimfit: FTBFS on powerpc: Both BIG_ENDIAN and LITTLE_ENDIAN defined

2011-09-13 Thread Christoph Schmidt-Hieber
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 07:44:26AM +0100, Sebastian Siewior wrote: * Thus spake Christoph Schmidt-Hieber (c.schmidt-hie...@ucl.ac.uk): On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Sebastian Siewior wrote: It seems to build now but I have no clue if it works. A testsuite could show that :) $ make check ...

Processed: severity of 641419 is grave

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # data loss severity 641419 grave Bug #641419 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: sendfile(2) behaves incorrectly in 2.6.32-5-amd64, overwriting written data Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: tagging 641419

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 641419 + moreinfo patch Bug #641419 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: sendfile(2) behaves incorrectly in 2.6.32-5-amd64, overwriting written data Added tag(s) moreinfo and patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#640672: marked as done (moving files to arch specific include breaks compilations with -m32)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:51:21 +0100 with message-id 1315918287.31127.19.camel@deadeye and subject line Re: moving files to arch specific include breaks compilations with -m32 has caused the Debian Bug report #640672, regarding moving files to arch specific include breaks

Bug#640195: Remove paraview-dev

2011-09-13 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Mar 13 Sep 2011 04:06:12 Mathieu Malaterre escribió: [snip] Just FYI. *.cmake files have been moved to paraview-dev, if you take the latest from git. What is left to do is: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/paraview.git;a=

Bug#641052: [Evolution] Bug#641052: Bug#641052: evolution uses insecure connection when storing the sent message to the sent folder

2011-09-13 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On ven., 2011-09-09 at 23:53 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: reassign 641052 src:evolution-data-server3 forwarded 641052 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648277 clone 641052 -1 reassign -1 evolution-data-server thanks On ven., 2011-09-09 at 23:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:

Bug#641405: several Django security issues

2011-09-13 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Several security issues were announced in Django: https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/09/security-releases-issued/ and a regression fix was later posted: https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/10/127/ Can you please ensure

Bug#620246: marked as done (idanish: Conflicts with newest ispell)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:02:13 + with message-id e1r3scv-0008cv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#620246: fixed in dsdo 1.6.25-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #620246, regarding idanish: Conflicts with newest ispell to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#620246: Announcing dsdo NMU for #607389, #620246 and #629077

2011-09-13 Thread Agustin Martin
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:07:15PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: Package: myspell-da Version: 1.6.25-1 Severity: normal Hi, Your package still uses an entry in maintainer scripts that calls the soon to disappear update-openoffice-dicts script in a way that will fail once it is removed.

Processed: tagging 641052

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 641052 + security Bug #641052 [src:evolution-data-server3] evolution uses insecure connection when storing the sent message to the sent folder Added tag(s) security. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#635122: marked as done (gedit-valencia-plugin: Please update for gedit 3.0 plugin path changes)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:32:20 + with message-id e1r3t64-0004c4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#635122: fixed in gedit-valencia-plugin 0.3.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #635122, regarding gedit-valencia-plugin: Please update for gedit 3.0 plugin path changes to

Bug#639059: marked as done (z88: FTBFS: /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdktypes.h:55:23: fatal error: gdkconfig.h: No such file or directory)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:48:54 + with message-id e1r3tm6-00078t...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#639059: fixed in z88 13.0.0+dfsg2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #639059, regarding z88: FTBFS: /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdktypes.h:55:23: fatal error: gdkconfig.h: No

Bug#641450: backuppc: new upstream release fixes security issue

2011-09-13 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Package: backuppc Severity: serious Tags: security patch Hi, BackupPC 3.2.1 was released back in April. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=f1f1ef74-716d-4af8-b1bf-c1ba6d9a98a1%40SC1EXHC-02.global.atheros.comforum_name=backuppc-devel The release includes a security fix. Can

Bug#641380: surefire: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!

2011-09-13 Thread Miguel Landaeta
tag 641380 + pending thanks This is fixed in svn. -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secure email with PGP 0x7D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/ Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: surefire: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 641380 + pending Bug #641380 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [surefire] surefire: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#641378: sat4j: FTBFS: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: not found

2011-09-13 Thread Miguel Landaeta
tag 641378 + patch thanks The attached patch solves this issue. BTW, the default-jdk on s390 recently switched to openjdk-6-jdk, so I'm not sure if the conditional setting of JAVA_HOME is still needed. -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secure email with PGP 0x7D8967E9 available at

Processed: Fwd: sat4j: FTBFS: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: not found

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 641378 + patch Bug #641378 [sat4j] sat4j: FTBFS: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: not found Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641378:

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start

2011-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
tag 641412 + moreinfo thanks On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Slavko wrote: After upgrading to mentioned version, the libreoffice can't start and only display splash for small time. And using the same version in sid? Sorry, but there's not enough resources to support this in testing

Processed: Re: Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 641412 + moreinfo Bug #641412 [libreoffice] [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641412:

Bug#641413: libreoffice: Crash on startup

2011-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
tag 641413 + moreinfo thanks On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:39:28AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: on my current sid system, libreoffice crashes on startup. IMO, it's not the same issue as the other reported crashes, therefore reporting separately: And why did you not report this 12 days ago when

Processed: Re: Bug#641413: libreoffice: Crash on startup

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 641413 + moreinfo Bug #641413 [libreoffice] libreoffice: Crash on startup Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641413

Bug#628909: python-ns3: Python 2.7 extensions linked with libpython2.6

2011-09-13 Thread YunQiang Su
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:45 PM, YunQiang Su wzss...@gmail.com wrote: My fault. There is a GSoC project are working. I will try to fix it when this GSoC project is finished. python2.7 ./waf build should work. I will support it when 3.13, and python3 may be included. Sorry for this version.

Bug#641405: several Django security issues

2011-09-13 Thread Chris Lamb
Raphael Hertzog wrote: Chris, will you take care of the uploads or do you need help? Should manage to do it this evening. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start

2011-09-13 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:17:43 +0200 Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org napísal: tag 641412 + moreinfo thanks On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Slavko wrote: After upgrading to mentioned version, the libreoffice can't start and only display splash for small time. And using

Bug#635488: ploticus: diff for NMU version 2.41-3.1

2011-09-13 Thread gregor herrmann
tags 635488 + patch tags 635488 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ploticus (versioned as 2.41-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID:

Processed: ploticus: diff for NMU version 2.41-3.1

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 635488 + patch Bug #635488 [src:ploticus] ploticus: FTBFS Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev Added tag(s) patch. tags 635488 + pending Bug #635488 [src:ploticus] ploticus: FTBFS Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start

2011-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:49:56PM +0200, Slavko wrote: Note that this version survivied 12 days in sid without showing any sign of this problem. it may be some dependencies (versions), which are do not in testing yet yes, maybe, but I would wonder about that becuase a) ttbomk

Bug#638002: marked as done (Improper seteuid() calls in src/log.c and src/masqmail.c)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:48:13 + with message-id e1r3w9d-0002jc...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#638002: fixed in masqmail 0.2.30-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #638002, regarding Improper seteuid() calls in src/log.c and src/masqmail.c to be marked as done. This

Processed: Re: Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 641412 + unreproducible Bug #641412 [libreoffice] [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start Added tag(s) unreproducible. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641412:

Bug#641479: alpine: Contains non-free code

2011-09-13 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: alpine Version: 2.00+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1.3 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet The file pico/msmem.c contains the following comment: === * This code originally written by Stephen Chung and posted to a

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start

2011-09-13 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:26:32 +0200 Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org napísal: Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:49:56PM +0200, Slavko wrote: Note that this version survivied 12 days in sid without showing any sign of this problem. it may be some dependencies (versions), which are

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start

2011-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 06:54:38PM +0200, Slavko wrote: Dňa Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:26:32 +0200 Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org napísal: Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:49:56PM +0200, Slavko wrote: Note that this version survivied 12 days in sid without showing any sign of this

Bug#641413: libreoffice: Crash on startup

2011-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:21:39PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: $ /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin X IO Error X Io error doesn't sound like a crash to me but like a X IO Error. As X is mentioned: Which X driver do you use? #10 0xf7dd1078 in XPending () from

Bug#620918: imms: FTBFS for +b1: install: cannot stat `build/libaudaciousimms.so': No such file or directory

2011-09-13 Thread Iain Lane
tags 620918 + patch user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com usertag 620918 + origin-ubuntu oneiric thanks On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:54:05AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Source: imms Version: 3.1.0~rc8-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, your package FTBFS for its +b1 binNMU round

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start

2011-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
tag 641412 + unreproducible thanks Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 06:26:32PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:49:56PM +0200, Slavko wrote: Note that this version survivied 12 days in sid without showing any sign of this problem. it may be some dependencies

Bug#639178: tar: FTBFS(kfreebsd): 56: incremental dump when the parent directory is unreadable FAILED (listed03.at:25)

2011-09-13 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:03:04 +0200 (CEST), Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz wrote: just to make it clear. The tar works as expected, it just emits extra warning. Maybe a patch to this test that would allow it to succeed in the presence of the extra warning makes sense for now? I would

Bug#641488: bup: FTBFS on sparc (bus error in bloom test)

2011-09-13 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: bup Version: 0.24b-1.1 Severity: serious Hi, bup FTBFS on sparc: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=buparch=sparcver=0.24b-1.1stamp=1313905299 The failure is reproducible on smetana.d.o. From what I can tell, it crashes in lib/bup/t/tbloom.py:test_bloom, line 18

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on

2011-09-13 Thread Davide Prina
Package: libreoffice Version: 1:3.4.3-1 I have had the same error and I found that the installation process stop with an error (sorry for the Italian message from my log): -8---8---8---8---8---8---8-- Elaborazione dei trigger per libreoffice-common... ERROR:

Bug#640672: moving files to arch specific include breaks compilations with -m32

2011-09-13 Thread Daniel Bayer
Hi! On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:29:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:14:58PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 14:44 +0200, Daniel Bayer wrote: Package: linux-libc-dev Version: 3.0.0-3 Severity: normal File:

Bug#640672: moving files to arch specific include breaks compilations with -m32

2011-09-13 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-09-13 21:04 +0200, Daniel Bayer wrote: Now I updated to linux-libc-dev 3.0.0-3 to test. After this /usr/include/asm is an empty directory which belongs to gcc-multilib: Congratulations, you have just rediscovered bug #638418. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on

2011-09-13 Thread Davide Prina
Package: libreoffice Version: 1:3.4.3-1 Followup-For: Bug #641412 I have forgotten to say a thing: when the libreoffice crash (I don't have see the error in the installation process) I have moved the .libreoffice directory in .libreoffice_old and than I have do the apt-get -f install. Then I

Bug#632225: Investigating #632225 (subvertpy testsuite failure on ia64)

2011-09-13 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
On Tue 13 Sep 2011 12:19:35 CEST, Roland Mas wrote: Hi, I started having a look at the bug in the sid chroot of merulo (the ia64 porterbox). After a failed debuild, I re-ran the last command of the debian/rules, and tried to separate the different tests to see which were failing. My results:

Bug#641489: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables

2011-09-13 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: adolc Version: 2.1.8-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet The source package contains the files vcredist_x86.exe and vcredist_x64.exe. The following is an excerpt from eula.rtf contained in those CAB

Bug#640966: marked as done (Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:00:36 + with message-id e1r3z9o-a4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#640966: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35squeeze2 has caused the Debian Bug report #640966, regarding Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, regression in fix for

Bug#640974: marked as done (After installing linux-image-2.6.32-35squeeze1 popularity-contest daily cronjob gets killed)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:00:36 + with message-id e1r3z9o-a4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#640966: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35squeeze2 has caused the Debian Bug report #640966, regarding After installing linux-image-2.6.32-35squeeze1 popularity-contest daily

Bug#641018: marked as done (Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:00:36 + with message-id e1r3z9o-a4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#640966: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35squeeze2 has caused the Debian Bug report #640966, regarding Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, regression in fix for

Bug#641040: marked as done (Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:00:36 + with message-id e1r3z9o-a4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#640966: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35squeeze2 has caused the Debian Bug report #640966, regarding Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, regression in fix for

Bug#641171: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all: kernel oops with google-chrome-unstable)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:00:36 + with message-id e1r3z9o-a4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#640966: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35squeeze2 has caused the Debian Bug report #640966, regarding linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all: kernel oops with google-chrome-unstable to be

Processed: found 636396 in 1.8.3-1

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 636396 1.8.3-1 Bug #636396 [mercurial] mercurial: Cloning fails with: mpatch.mpatchError: patch cannot be decoded Bug Marked as found in versions mercurial/1.8.3-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#641430: libgetopt-euclid-perl: 0.2.9 does not recognise options in a =head2 inside =head1 OPTIONS

2011-09-13 Thread gregor herrmann
tag 641430 + confirmed upstream thanks On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:27:01 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: The cause seems to be a couple of =head2 headings inside the OPTIONS =head1: =head1 OPTIONS =head2 General behaviour You can customize the usage of mpd-dynamic with the

Processed: Re: Bug#641430: libgetopt-euclid-perl: 0.2.9 does not recognise options in a =head2 inside =head1 OPTIONS

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 641430 + confirmed upstream Bug #641430 [libgetopt-euclid-perl] libgetopt-euclid-perl: 0.2.9 does not recognise options in a =head2 inside =head1 OPTIONS Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: bug 641430 is forwarded to http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=70942

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 641430 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=70942 Bug #641430 [libgetopt-euclid-perl] libgetopt-euclid-perl: 0.2.9 does not recognise options in a =head2 inside =head1 OPTIONS Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on

2011-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:07:08PM +0200, Davide Prina wrote: I have had the same error and I found that the installation process stop with an error (sorry for the Italian message from my log): Ah. -8---8---8---8---8---8---8-- Elaborazione dei trigger per

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on

2011-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:55:07PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: -8---8---8---8---8---8---8-- Elaborazione dei trigger per libreoffice-common... ERROR: com.sun.star.registry.SimpleRegistry.open(file:///usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/services.rdb):

Bug#625393: openr2: fix ftbfs (patch attached)

2011-09-13 Thread Julien Lavergne
Package: openr2 Version: 1.3.0-2 Followup-For: Bug #625393 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch *** /tmp/tmp9QEj45 In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to fix the FTBFS. This variable can be removed because it's a copy/paste from other functions

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on

2011-09-13 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:04:04 +0200 Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org napísal: This looks like #641357. Slavko, did you have that, too? Actually I meant #641005... No, i was no errors while upgrade (installation) any of the libreoffice* packages. Only a

Bug#641412: [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on

2011-09-13 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:55:07 +0200 Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org napísal: Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:07:08PM +0200, Davide Prina wrote: I have had the same error and I found that the installation process stop with an error (sorry for the Italian message from my log): Ah.

Bug#641489: marked as done (adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:15:23 +0100 with message-id E1R3aKB-0006j8-CM@port-kdr.hamilton.local and subject line Re: Bug#641489: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables has caused the Debian Bug report #641489, regarding adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables to be marked

Bug#625373: libphone-ui: Fix ftbfs (patch attached)

2011-09-13 Thread Julien Lavergne
Package: libphone-ui Version: 0.1+git20100517-1 Followup-For: Bug #625373 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch *** /tmp/tmpXVdOAK In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to fix the FTBFS. Those variables are only set but not used in their

Processed: affects 640610

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: affects 640610 emacs23 Bug #640610 [emacs-calfw] emacs-calfw: package removal fails Bug #641363 [emacs-calfw] emacs-calfw: prevents emacs upgrade Added indication that 640610 affects emacs23 Added indication that 641363 affects emacs23 thanks

Bug#628256: FTBFS: g++: error: unrecognized option '--export_dynamic'

2011-09-13 Thread Daniel T Chen
Package: boinc-app-milkyway Version: 0.18d-1 Followup-For: Bug #628256 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * bin/make.linux: Correct syntax that broke the build. Fixes FTBFS.

Bug#635687: marked as done (ecore: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:17:40 + with message-id e1r3cew-0003ou...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#635687: fixed in ecore 1.0.0-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #635687, regarding ecore: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev to be marked as done. This

Bug#640750: marked as done (libxbean-java: FTBFS: POM 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin:2.8' not found in repository)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:18:56 + with message-id e1r3cfk-0003k4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#640750: fixed in libxbean-java 3.7-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #640750, regarding libxbean-java: FTBFS: POM 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin:2.8' not

Bug#634409: libparserutils: Fix ftbfs (patch attached)

2011-09-13 Thread Julien Lavergne
Package: libparserutils Version: 0.0.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #634409 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch *** /tmp/tmpMRCwIg In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to fix the FTBFS. Changelog : * debian/patches: - 01-remove-used-variable.patch:

Bug#625330: fileschanged: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-09-13 Thread Colin Watson
tags 625330 patch user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com usertags 625330 ubuntu-patch oneiric thanks On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:32:46AM +, Matthias Klose wrote: This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings which will make the package fail to build. Currently a Debian

Processed: Re: Bug#625330: fileschanged: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 625330 patch Bug #625330 [fileschanged] fileschanged: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror Added tag(s) patch. user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (was cjwat...@ubuntu.com). usertags 625330 ubuntu-patch

Bug#641509: shotwell: Shotwell starts, but crashes after main window opens

2011-09-13 Thread Dean Loros
Package: shotwell Version: 0.11.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropiate *** * What led up to the situation? Trying to start Shotwell * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective

Bug#641509: libgexiv2

2011-09-13 Thread Michael Ott
Hi! I believe that you have the same problem as I had. It is not a shotwell problem but a gexiv2 problem. Look also here (639602) and here (622375) CU Michael -- ,''`. : :' : Michael Ott `. `'e-mail: michael at king-coder dot de `-