Processed: Re: Bug#650840: transition: zita-convolver

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 650840 -1 Bug#650840: transition: zita-convolver Bug 650840 cloned as bug 652019. reassign -1 ir.lv2 Bug #652019 [release.debian.org] transition: zita-convolver Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ir.lv2'. found -1

Bug#651204: 1.3.7-1 in experimental

2011-12-14 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, I've uploaded a patched version to experimental. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-14 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
reopen 651452 retitle 651452 illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte') found 651452 0.11.0-8.2 clone 651452 -1 retitle -1 illuminat: Build-Conflicts on libmpich2-dev to strict thanks Hi! * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl

Processed: Re: Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 651452 Bug #651452 {Done: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org} [src:illuminator] illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte') 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed

Bug#640606: mythes-it: installation fails

2011-12-14 Thread Martin Pitt
tag 640606 pending thanks Lucas Nussbaum [2011-09-05 22:37 +0200]: + /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts /var/lib/dpkg/info/mythes-it.postinst: 7: /var/lib/dpkg/info/mythes-it.postinst: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: not found dpkg: error processing mythes-it (--configure): As this

Processed: Re: Bug#640606: mythes-it: installation fails

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 640606 pending Bug #640606 [mythes-it] mythes-it: installation fails Bug #640607 [mythes-it] openoffice.org-thesaurus-it: installation fails Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#515284: geg: Depends on GTK 1.2

2011-12-14 Thread Frederic Peters
Barry deFreese wrote: Here is a patch that builds with Gtk2 as well as fix several packaging issues and bump standards version, etc. The patch builds fine but seems like it may have some issues at runtime so it probably needs a bit more work. Hope it helps. Sorry for not answering

Bug#650021: marked as done (CVE-2011-4349: SQL injection)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:02:13 + with message-id e1rambf-0003mv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#650021: fixed in colord 0.1.15-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #650021, regarding CVE-2011-4349: SQL injection to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#640606: mythes-it: installation fails

2011-12-14 Thread Enrico Zini
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:27:40AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: Lucas Nussbaum [2011-09-05 22:37 +0200]: + /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts /var/lib/dpkg/info/mythes-it.postinst: 7: /var/lib/dpkg/info/mythes-it.postinst: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: not found dpkg: error

Bug#652035: wicd-curses: Crashs when running (Python UnicodeDecodeError)

2011-12-14 Thread Florian Birée
Package: wicd-curses Version: 1.7.1~b3-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, wicd-curses always crashs when I start the program. The error is: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/wicd/curses/wicd-curses.py, line 1063, in module main()

Bug#643782: ranger: Cannot be launched; ImportError raised

2011-12-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
Hi Raphael, * Raphael Plasson rplas...@gmail.com, 2011-09-29, 18:06: ranger can actually be launched normally if the link /usr/bin/python is changed, and point to /usr/bin/python/2.6 instead of the now default /usr/bin/python/2.7. Please never ever change the /usr/bin/python symlink

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-14 Thread Ian Jackson
Russ Allbery writes (Re: Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib): I don't know if it's worth the effort to unify /bin and /usr/bin or the other similar things that have been discussed from time to time, The situation we have,

Bug#643782: ranger: Cannot be launched; ImportError raised

2011-12-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
Hi Roman, * Roman Z. rom...@lavabit.com, 2011-11-10, 14:09: ranger can't run if it can't find the ranger python module. It must be in one of the PYTHONPATH directories. On my install, ranger was installed to /usr/share/pyshared Which is completely normal. which is not in PYTHONPATH so

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Alexander, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 10:09 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: reopen 651452 retitle 651452 illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte') found 651452 0.11.0-8.2 clone 651452 -1 retitle -1 illuminat:

Bug#652059: mlt: FTBFS(kfreebsd):

2011-12-14 Thread Christoph Egger
Package: src:mlt Version: 0.7.6+git20111213-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the

Bug#651872: opencv: FTBFS on kfreebsd

2011-12-14 Thread Julien Cristau
tags 651872 patch kthxbye On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 20:15:54 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: Source: opencv Version: 2.3.1-1 Severity: serious opencv fails to build on the kfreebsd-* buildds: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=opencv Fixed with the patch below. On top of

Processed: Re: Bug#651872: opencv: FTBFS on kfreebsd

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 651872 patch Bug #651872 [src:opencv] opencv: FTBFS on kfreebsd Added tag(s) patch. kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 651872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651872 Debian Bug

Bug#637845: marked as done (deal.ii: FTBFS: arch-dependent build runs debian/rules build-doc target without Build-Depends-Indep packages installed)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:48:21 + with message-id e1raq85-0005yw...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#637845: fixed in deal.ii 7.0.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #637845, regarding deal.ii: FTBFS: arch-dependent build runs debian/rules build-doc target without

Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy?

2011-12-14 Thread Christoph Egger
Package: src:elmerfem Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the buildds: checking for dseupd_ in -larpack... yes configure: WARNING: No parallel arpack

Bug#652070: awstats: virtualname / SiteDomain accepts nearly everything

2011-12-14 Thread Andreas Rittershofer
Package: awstats Version: 7.0~dfsg-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?

Bug#641348: marked as done (trac-mercurial not up to date for trac 0.12 in debian wheezy)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:33:32 + with message-id e1raqpo-0003hl...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#641348: fixed in trac-mercurial 0.12.0.28-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #641348, regarding trac-mercurial not up to date for trac 0.12 in debian wheezy to be marked as

Bug#652072: Scala installs lib/jline.jar blob from upstream

2011-12-14 Thread Thomas Koch
Package: scala Version: 2.9.1.dfsg-1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, scala installs upstream's lib/jline.jar instead of relying on Debian's jline package. lib/jline.jar even contains a shared library (META-INF/native/linux32/libjansi.so). Regards, Thomas

Bug#652072: [Pkg-scala-maint] Bug#652072: Scala installs lib/jline.jar blob from upstream

2011-12-14 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 12/14/2011 04:36 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: scala installs upstream's lib/jline.jar instead of relying on Debian's jline package. lib/jline.jar even contains a shared library (META-INF/native/linux32/libjansi.so). Yeah… the sad thing is that the two are incompatible (Debian's jline.jar

Processed: Re: Bug#652070: awstats: virtualname / SiteDomain accepts nearly everything

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 652070 +moreinfo Bug #652070 [awstats] awstats: virtualname / SiteDomain accepts nearly everything Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 652070:

Bug#652070: awstats: virtualname / SiteDomain accepts nearly everything

2011-12-14 Thread Sergey B Kirpichev
tag 652070 +moreinfo thanks - AWstats runs fine for months. - Yesterday apt updated Perl. - Now AWSTats directives %virtualname and SiteDomain accepts nearly all records of the logfile, even with an arbirtray string as SiteDomain, for example SiteDomain=fhawefruzasdfh Please, test the

Bug#625343: gltron: diff for NMU version 0.70final-9.1

2011-12-14 Thread gregor herrmann
tags 625343 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for gltron (versioned as 0.70final-9.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' :

Processed: gltron: diff for NMU version 0.70final-9.1

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 625343 + pending Bug #625343 [gltron] gltron: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625343

Bug#625327: marked as done (filtergen: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:32:19 + with message-id e1rarkh-0002ym...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#625327: fixed in filtergen 0.12.4-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #625327, regarding filtergen: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#640597: marked as done (ekeyd: installation fails)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:32:10 + with message-id e1rarky-0002ux...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#640597: fixed in ekeyd 1.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #640597, regarding ekeyd: installation fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#652072: [Pkg-scala-maint] Bug#652072: Bug#652072: Scala installs lib/jline.jar blob from upstream

2011-12-14 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 12/14/2011 04:42 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 12/14/2011 04:36 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: scala installs upstream's lib/jline.jar instead of relying on Debian's jline package. lib/jline.jar even contains a shared library (META-INF/native/linux32/libjansi.so). Yeah… the sad thing is that

Bug#652081: derivations: FTBFS: error: 'class XRef' has no member named 'getLastXRefPos'

2011-12-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: derivations Version: 0.52.20100310-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source After fixing incompatibility with GCC 4.5 (see bug #615671), derivations still FTBFS: | /usr/bin/make -C PDF PDF.o | make[4]: Entering directory

Bug#652072: [Pkg-scala-maint] Bug#652072: Scala installs lib/jline.jar blob from upstream

2011-12-14 Thread Thomas Koch
Mehdi Dogguy: I wonder if I'm not just going to drop jline from scala'a package and rely on readline-editor instead (by using rlwrap -C scala). That would help us to not care about their fork of jline. (or I could build jline from src/jline). Inputs on this matter are welcome. I think it is

Bug#652082: gcc-msp430: FTBFS on sparc

2011-12-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: gcc-msp430 Version: 4.5.3~mspgcc-20110716-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc gcc-msp430 FTBFS on sparc: | sparc-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual

Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy?

2011-12-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Christoph, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 16:01 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: Package: src:elmerfem Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the

Bug#651597: marked as done (Missing dependency on python-sphinx)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:03:16 + with message-id e1rasee-0006hl...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651597: fixed in fabric 1.3.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #651597, regarding Missing dependency on python-sphinx to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#651602: marked as done (FTBFS: make[2]: sphinx-build: Command not found)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:03:16 + with message-id e1rasee-0006hl...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651597: fixed in fabric 1.3.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #651597, regarding FTBFS: make[2]: sphinx-build: Command not found to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#651599: marked as done (fabric does not ship any binary)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:03:16 + with message-id e1rasee-0006hp...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651599: fixed in fabric 1.3.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #651599, regarding fabric does not ship any binary to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#651597: marked as done (Missing dependency on python-sphinx)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:03:16 + with message-id e1rasee-0006hv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651602: fixed in fabric 1.3.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #651602, regarding Missing dependency on python-sphinx to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#651602: marked as done (FTBFS: make[2]: sphinx-build: Command not found)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:03:16 + with message-id e1rasee-0006hv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651602: fixed in fabric 1.3.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #651602, regarding FTBFS: make[2]: sphinx-build: Command not found to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy?

2011-12-14 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mercredi 14 décembre 2011 à 11:58 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit : Hi Christoph, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 16:01 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: Package: src:elmerfem Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built

Processed: severity of 646886 is important

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 646886 important Bug #646886 [src:gnome-online-accounts] FTBFS on kbsd: 'SYS_gettid' undeclared Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 646886:

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-14 Thread Zachary Harris
Wow, if this sort of bug report is re-evoking questions on the whole relevance of the historical FHS to modern distros, it does seem that some real soul searching is in order on the part of the community as far as the future of where people see Debian/GNU/Linux headed. Begin with the end in

Bug#652094: mysql-mmm-tools: missing dependancy on libpath-class-perl

2011-12-14 Thread Rémi Paulmier
Package: mysql-mmm-tools Version: 2.2.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable # /usr/sbin/mmm_backup Can't locate Path/Class.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.1 /usr/local/share/perl/5.10.1 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.10

Bug#649175: I Need Your help

2011-12-14 Thread Dr. Fatih Baja
-- Dear Friend,I have a very important and vital information for you which will benefit us and you have to know about it. Please contact me through my email so we can talk about it; Dr. Fatih Baja

Bug#652070: [Anfrage#: 4222203] Bug#652070: awstats: virtualname / SiteDomain [...]

2011-12-14 Thread Technik
Sehr geehrte/r Anfrager/in, Ihre Mail mit dem Absender Sergey B Kirpichev haben wir empfangen. Vielen Dank für Ihre Anfrage. Sergey B Kirpichev skirpic...@gmail.com schrieb: tag 652070 +moreinfo thanks - AWstats runs fine for months. - Yesterday apt updated Perl. - Now AWSTats

Bug#652097: sysvinit: breaks system on reboot

2011-12-14 Thread Brian Paterni
Package: sysvinit Version: 2.88dsf-14 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Dear Maintainer, The new sysv packages in experimental look like they are breaking my system. reboot via # shutdown -r now, or # shutdown -h now, do not work, and the only way to reboot my machine is

Bug#648744: zfsutils migration (Re: new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid)

2011-12-14 Thread Robert Millan
El 13 de desembre de 2011 19:07, Arno Töll deb...@toell.net ha escrit: Note, I didn't find any /real/ problem when using zfsutils 8.3 with a 8.2 kernel. I didn't try it with 8.1 but I don't see why it would be different there. Well, zfs list fails with EINVAL on 8.1 kernel, and I recall seeing

Bug#652070: marked as done (awstats: virtualname / SiteDomain accepts nearly everything)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:02:12 + with message-id e1rau5k-0004gx...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#652070: fixed in awstats 7.0~dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #652070, regarding awstats: virtualname / SiteDomain accepts nearly everything to be marked as done.

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Wed Dec 14 19:03:25 UTC 2011 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html # # Source package in NEW: qapt tags 635380 + pending Bug #635380 [wnpp] ITP: qapt -- Qt wrapper around the

Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy?

2011-12-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Sylvestre, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:50 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Le mercredi 14 décembre 2011 à 11:58 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit : Hi Christoph, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 16:01 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: Package: src:elmerfem Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-3 Severity:

Bug#652025: marked as done (illuminat: Build-Conflicts on libmpich2-dev to strict)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:28:56 -0500 with message-id 1323890937.23861.3.camel@workhorse and subject line Self-contradictory bug has caused the Debian Bug report #652025, regarding illuminat: Build-Conflicts on libmpich2-dev to strict to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#652035: wicd-curses: Crashs when running (Python UnicodeDecodeError)

2011-12-14 Thread David Paleino
Hello, On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:45:08 +0100, Florian Birée wrote: wicd-curses always crashs when I start the program. The error is: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/wicd/curses/wicd-curses.py, line 1063, in module main() File /usr/share/wicd/curses/wicd-curses.py,

Bug#615120: marked as done (eglibc: alloca memory corruption)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:55:32 + with message-id e1rauvm-0002ma...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#615120: fixed in eglibc 2.11.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #615120, regarding eglibc: alloca memory corruption to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#652097: sysvinit: breaks system on reboot

2011-12-14 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:36:50PM -0600, Brian Paterni wrote: The new sysv packages in experimental look like they are breaking my system. Sorry to hear that. Knowing what went wrong here would help correct it. I'm running it without issues, but that's not to say your system is not different

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-14 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:53:24PM -0500, Zachary Harris wrote: Throwing my own two cents in: as far as Debian itself goes, I think this distro ('stable', in particular) has a reputation of being a solid, stable, rock of confidence that others can build off of and deviate from. The center

Bug#651452: marked as done (illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte'))

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:05:44 + with message-id e1raw1i-00017z...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#651452: fixed in illuminator 0.11.0-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #651452, regarding illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam (tsview-tsview.o: undefined

Bug#652011: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Roger Leigh wrote: The question that needs answering is this: what are the reasons, today, for a separate /usr? No, I don't think an answer to that precise question today would be especially helpful. As far as I can tell, it is not especially unsensible to use separate partitions for /usr,

Bug#652109: python-nautilus: Cannot be initialized by Nautilus

2011-12-14 Thread Louis
Package: python-nautilus Version: 1.1-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Hello, since update of python-nautilus to version 1.1-2, it cannot be initialized by Nautilus, rendering applications using it useless. When running nautilus, the following messages

Bug#634419: marked as done (libphone-ui-shr: FTBFS: util/ui-utils.c:505:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'elm_list_horizontal_mode_set' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:17:49 + with message-id e1rawcz-0002tq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#634419: fixed in libphone-ui-shr 0.1+git20110827-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #634419, regarding libphone-ui-shr: FTBFS: util/ui-utils.c:505:2: error: implicit

Bug#620960: RFS: inspircd

2011-12-14 Thread Guillaume Delacour
Le samedi 03 décembre 2011 à 11:39 +0100, Jan Lübbe a écrit : Hi! Hi, On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 22:00 +0100, Guillaume Delacour wrote: To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/inspircd Alternatively, one

Bug#652011: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Two clarifications: Jonathan Nieder wrote: Roger Leigh wrote: The question that needs answering is this: what are the reasons, today, for a separate /usr? No, I don't think an answer to that precise question today would be especially helpful. I'd like to apologize for this response.

Bug#642476: marked as done (postfix: FTBFS on Linux 3 due to missing multiarch search path)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:43:05 +0100 with message-id 20111214214305.ga8...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#642476: postfix: FTBFS on Linux 3 due to missing multiarch search path has caused the Debian Bug report #642476, regarding postfix: FTBFS on Linux 3 due to missing

Bug#652109: python-nautilus: Cannot be initialized by Nautilus

2011-12-14 Thread Michael Biebl
severity 652109 serious tags 652109 - upstream thanks On 14.12.2011 22:17, Louis wrote: Package: python-nautilus Version: 1.1-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Hello, since update of python-nautilus to version 1.1-2, it cannot be initialized by

Processed: Re: Bug#652109: python-nautilus: Cannot be initialized by Nautilus

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 652109 serious Bug #652109 [python-nautilus] python-nautilus: Cannot be initialized by Nautilus Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave' tags 652109 - upstream Bug #652109 [python-nautilus] python-nautilus: Cannot be initialized by

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-14 Thread J.A. Bezemer
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote: [..] The same argument applies to encryption. / and /usr both contain a selection of programs, libraries etc. If you're encrypting one, why would you not encrypt all of it? Speed. On one of my relatively low-power portable systems, I have everything

Bug#652097: sysvinit: breaks system on reboot

2011-12-14 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-12-14 21:10 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:36:50PM -0600, Brian Paterni wrote: The new sysv packages in experimental look like they are breaking my system. Sorry to hear that. Knowing what went wrong here would help correct it. I'm running it without issues,

Bug#629795: marked as done (vala-terminal: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:17:56 + with message-id e1rax9a-0001tg...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#629795: fixed in vala-terminal 1.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #629795, regarding vala-terminal: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev to be marked as

Bug#652097: I can confirm the failure to shutdown

2011-12-14 Thread Eric Valette
And will probably need a bootable CD! --eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#652097: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#652097: sysvinit: breaks system on reboot

2011-12-14 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Sven Joachim] I'm having the same problem after upgrading all four packages, and it disappeared after downgrading sysvinit-utils to the version in unstable. Symptoms: On entering runlevel 6, sulogin was spawned, no way out except with sysrq keys. After a reboot, none of the initscripts

Bug#652097: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#652097: sysvinit: breaks system on reboot

2011-12-14 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:33:23PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Sven Joachim] I'm having the same problem after upgrading all four packages, and it disappeared after downgrading sysvinit-utils to the version in unstable. Symptoms: On entering runlevel 6, sulogin was spawned, no

Bug#652097: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#652097: sysvinit: breaks system on reboot

2011-12-14 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Roger Leigh] Looks like we've found the problem. It's due to the updated packaging not applying the patches in debian/startpar/patches. Looks like a simple enough fix. If we move debian/startpar into a patch, then the entire patchset can go into debian/patches so it's all automatically

Bug#652115: ruby1.8: FTBFS on sparc: ./sample/test.rb:1848: [BUG] Bus Error

2011-12-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: ruby1.8 Version: 1.8.7.352-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc ruby1.8 FTBFS on sparc: | ./sample/test.rb:1848: [BUG] Bus Error | ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30 patchlevel 352) [sparc-linux] | | test failed | make[1]:

Bug#652116: lua-lpeg: FTBFS on sparc: Segmentation fault

2011-12-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: lua-lpeg Version: 0.10.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc lua-lpeg FTBFS on sparc: | *** app static ** | ldd ./app | liblua5.1.so.0 =

Bug#652117: bouncycastle: FTBFS on sparc: ICE: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

2011-12-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: bouncycastle Version: 1.44+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc bouncycastle FTBFS on sparc: | /usr/bin/gcj -c -fsource-filename=/tmp/filev1tpRI -g -O2 -fPIC -findirect-dispatch -fjni bcprov-1.44.jar.3.jar

Bug#640012: postfix: diff for NMU version 2.8.5-1.1

2011-12-14 Thread Julien Cristau
tags 640012 + pending thanks Hi LaMont, I've prepared an NMU for postfix (versioned as 2.8.5-1.1) and will upload it shortly. Please find the diff attached. Cheers, Julien diff -u postfix-2.8.5/makedefs postfix-2.8.5/makedefs --- postfix-2.8.5/makedefs +++ postfix-2.8.5/makedefs @@ -381,7

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-14 Thread Michael Biebl
On 14.12.2011 22:43, J.A. Bezemer wrote: So I'd say preferably not move /bin and /lib to /usr; but I'd say absolutely definitely not move /usr/bin and /usr/lib to /. (Well, in the latter case: unless you make sure that /bin and /lib are actually mountable separately. But that would really

Processed: postfix: diff for NMU version 2.8.5-1.1

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 640012 + pending Bug #640012 [src:postfix] postfix: FTBFS: kFreeBSD check hardcodes kernel version 5,6,7, current is 8 + no NIS on !linux Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#639194: marked as done (phoneuid: FTBFS: libphone-ui.so: undefined reference to `free_smartphone_pim_get_messages_proxy')

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:48:39 + with message-id e1raxct-0005cu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#639194: fixed in phoneuid 0.1+git20110506-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #639194, regarding phoneuid: FTBFS: libphone-ui.so: undefined reference to

Bug#650534: util-linux: FTBFS: undefined reference to `rmd160_hash_buffer'

2011-12-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thorsten Glaser, le Wed 30 Nov 2011 18:12:56 +, a écrit : util-linux FTBFS on all (release _and_ debian-ports) architectures: ‣ https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=util-linux ‣ http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=util-linux Ping? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#640012: marked as done (postfix: FTBFS: kFreeBSD check hardcodes kernel version 5,6,7, current is 8 + no NIS on !linux)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:04:07 + with message-id e1raxrr-0007gv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#640012: fixed in postfix 2.8.5-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #640012, regarding postfix: FTBFS: kFreeBSD check hardcodes kernel version 5,6,7, current is 8 + no NIS

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-14 Thread Michael Biebl
On 14.12.2011 06:00, Russ Allbery wrote: I'm increasingly convinced by the recent discussion on debian-devel that doing all the (rather substantial) work required to keep this separation working is a waste of our collective time. We're not doing a very good job at it anyway, chasing all the

Bug#652097: You can manually start the system

2011-12-14 Thread Eric Valette
I managed to login once I figured out the keybord was back in querty mode. Then simulating a normal boot (mount /proc /sys, restart udev, clear mtab, mount -a, then networking. SO you do not absolutely need a boot disk. Annoying still. And yes only ssyinit-utils (and thus startpar is enough

Bug#652097: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#652097: sysvinit: breaks system on reboot

2011-12-14 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:33:23PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Sven Joachim] I'm having the same problem after upgrading all four packages, and it disappeared after downgrading sysvinit-utils to the version in unstable. Symptoms: On entering runlevel 6, sulogin was spawned, no

Bug#645258: marked as done (python-django-lint: missing dependency on python-pkg-resources)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:33:11 + with message-id e1rayjz-00024r...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#645258: fixed in python-django-lint 0.13-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #645258, regarding python-django-lint: missing dependency on python-pkg-resources to be marked as

Bug#515284: geg: Depends on GTK 1.2

2011-12-14 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
retitle 515284 RM: geg -- RoM, depends on removed GTK 1.2 reassign 515284 ftp.debian.org thanks On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:30:58AM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: Barry deFreese wrote: Here is a patch that builds with Gtk2 as well as fix several packaging issues and bump standards version,

Processed: Re: Bug#515284: geg: Depends on GTK 1.2

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 515284 RM: geg -- RoM, depends on removed GTK 1.2 Bug #515284 [geg] geg: Depends on GTK 1.2 Changed Bug title to 'RM: geg -- RoM, depends on removed GTK 1.2' from 'geg: Depends on GTK 1.2' reassign 515284 ftp.debian.org Bug #515284 [geg]

Bug#596275: marked as done (phoneui-apps: not installable in sid on any architecture)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:57:34 +0100 with message-id 20111214235734.GA21978@earth.universe and subject line phoneui-apps is now installable has caused the Debian Bug report #596275, regarding phoneui-apps: not installable in sid on any architecture to be marked as done. This means

Bug#652109: marked as done (python-nautilus: Cannot be initialized by Nautilus)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:17:52 + with message-id e1raz1e-0008db...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#652109: fixed in nautilus-python 1.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #652109, regarding python-nautilus: Cannot be initialized by Nautilus to be marked as done. This

Processed: limit source to swi-prolog, tagging 644974

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #swi-prolog (5.10.4-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * Make swi-prolog-nox depend on libncurses5-dev (closes: #644974) # limit source swi-prolog Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'swi-prolog' Limit currently set to

Processed: cloning 644593, retitle -1 to swi-prolog-java: add support for other architectures ...

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 644593 -1 Bug#644593: swi-prolog: FTBFS: No rule to make target `install'. Stop. Bug 644593 cloned as bug 652130. retitle -1 swi-prolog-java: add support for other architectures Bug #652130 [src:swi-prolog] swi-prolog: FTBFS: No rule to

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

2011-12-14 Thread Zachary Harris
On 12/14/2011 04:43 PM, J.A. Bezemer wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote: [..] The same argument applies to encryption. / and /usr both contain a selection of programs, libraries etc. If you're encrypting one, why would you not encrypt all of it? Speed. On one of my

Bug#652097: marked as done (sysvinit: breaks system on reboot)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:49:00 + with message-id e1razvm-0003ot...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#652097: fixed in sysvinit 2.88dsf-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #652097, regarding sysvinit: breaks system on reboot to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#650958: Is this really RC

2011-12-14 Thread Sam Hartman
So far it sounds like this affects one user and is hard for others to reproduce. I'm wondering if this is really RC? (I'd like to see the new krb5 get into testing and samba has to migrate first. I'm not sure what besides this bug is holding it back, possibly it's moot because of transition

Bug#647030: marked as done ([kbibtex] FTBS on ia64: maybe bug on qt)

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 03:32:26 + with message-id e1rb23w-00038r...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#647030: fixed in kbibtex 0.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #647030, regarding [kbibtex] FTBS on ia64: maybe bug on qt to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#652115: ruby1.8: FTBFS on sparc: ./sample/test.rb:1848: [BUG] Bus Error

2011-12-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 14/12/11 at 23:40 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: Source: ruby1.8 Version: 1.8.7.352-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc ruby1.8 FTBFS on sparc: | ./sample/test.rb:1848: [BUG] Bus Error | ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30

Bug#650958: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#650958: Is this really RC

2011-12-14 Thread Christian PERRIER
severity 650958 important thanks Quoting Sam Hartman (hartm...@mit.edu): So far it sounds like this affects one user and is hard for others to reproduce. I'm wondering if this is really RC? (I'd like to see the new krb5 get into testing and samba has to migrate first. I'm not sure what

Processed: Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#650958: Is this really RC

2011-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 650958 important Bug #650958 [samba] samba INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 - PANIC - BACKTRACE: 16 stack frames Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 650958: