Package: openvswitch-datapath-dkms
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: grave
Hi there!
First, thanks for maintaining OVS, this is a very nice software, which
I will use with XCP (for which I'm working on the packaging, together
with people from Citrix).
Now, the less nice stuff... :)
Package: mysql-5.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Multiple security issues have been announced in MySQL:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2012-366304.html#AppendixMSQL
Unfortunately Oracle refuses to release specific information, which allow
isolating
security fixes. As
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 2:1.4.1-2
Severity: critical
Note that although this bug was introduced at version 2:1.4.1-1, it is
different from #659235: my PVs and LVs and VGs don't have dashes in
their name.
The current sequence: grub loads the kernel and the initramfs; the
kernel boots; the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Moritz,
for mysql-5.5 in experimental there's currently a discussion ongoing
if mysql shall be replaced by MariaDB
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mysql-maint/2012-February/003866.html
I'm not sure about security policy in
didn't security support for oldstable end by the last monday? can this bug be
closed because of that?
yours,
gurkan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I've just manually built kfrebsd-* packages and uploaded them.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:10:06PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Package: openvswitch-datapath-dkms
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: grave
Hi there!
First, thanks for maintaining OVS, this is a very nice software, which
I will use with XCP (for which I'm working on the packaging, together
with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 659667 important
Bug #659667 [debian-edu-config] debian-edu-config: ldapdump.sh stops slapd at
night and fail to start it
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On 2012-02-12 20:46, Thomas Lange wrote:
Hi Andreas,
ich weiss nicht, ob du meine Mails bzgl. des dracut bugs
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657754
bekommen hast. Ich kann den Fehler nicht nachvollziehen.
piuparts installs the packages to be tested in a minimal chroot -
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
Severity #659692 critical
Bug #659692 [burp] burp: Compilations fails on autobuild farm
Severity set to 'critical' from 'important'
Severity #659454 wishlist
Bug #659454 [burp] embedded uthash code
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
End
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear ftp masters,
I recently uploaded (actually, my sponsor did...) a new version of the package
broadcom-sta[1], one of the changes was to set architecture to amd64 i386
because this package is only valid for these archs.
Since that, it is only available
Package: dracut
Severity: normal
I downgrade the severity, since it's not a violation of the Debian
policy. There's no reference to piuparts in the policy. IMO it's a
normal or minor bug, since it's very seldom that no kernel is
installed.
--
regards Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 657754 normal
Bug #657754 [dracut,dracut-network] dracut: fails to upgrade from squeeze
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
657754:
Package: src:lcgdm
Version: 1.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the buildds:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../shlib cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
-Wformat
Package: src:performous
Version: 0.6.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the buildds:
-- package 'jpeg' not found
Jpeg_INCLUDE_DIR=Jpeg_INCLUDE_DIR-NOTFOUND
Package: src:jansson
Version: 2.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the buildds:
dh_sphinxdoc -a
dh_sphinxdoc: Sphinx documentation not found
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2
Package: src:iceape
Version: 2.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the buildds. On kfreebsd with the
following error:
make -C app
Package: src:gem
Version: 1:0.93.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-*
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 657754 serious
Bug #657754 [dracut,dracut-network] dracut: fails to upgrade from squeeze
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
657754:
severity 657754 serious
thanks
Thomas,
the correct severity for this bug is serious. Basically, any package
needs to install properly, doing the following (disregard that /proc
isn't mounted an other stuff which doesn't matter in this case):
debootstrap sid sid
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 657754 dracut: fails to install when no kernel available
Bug #657754 [dracut,dracut-network] dracut: fails to upgrade from squeeze
Changed Bug title to 'dracut: fails to install when no kernel available' from
'dracut: fails to upgrade
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:17:49 +
with message-id e1rwxf3-0002aa...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#658310: fixed in hdf-eos5 5.1.13.dfsg.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #658310,
regarding FTBFS: Header hdfeos5.h or the compiled hdfeos5 library is not found
to be
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:08:11 +0100, Daniel Baumann
daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net said:
of course, the right fix is not to add a depends to a (virtual) kernel
It's a contradiction to say the bug is serious because of a missing
dependency but adding this dependency is not the
I think a proper fix would be to install a trigger like
initramfs-tools is doing this.
--
regards Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Vasudev Kamath asked me to include this information in the bug report.
From: Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de
Subject: Re: Accepted surf 0.4.1-6 (source i386)
To: Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:18:36 +0100
Message-ID: 87vcnemiwz@mid.deneb.enyo.de
* Vasudev
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:43:25 +0100
with message-id 20120213154325.ga2...@pc-ale.rete
and subject line Re: Bug#659742: FTBFS: Sphinx documentation not found
has caused the Debian Bug report #659742,
regarding FTBFS: Sphinx documentation not found
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:48:34 +
with message-id e1rwy8o-00081a...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#651472: fixed in python-apt 0.8.3+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #651472,
regarding python-apt: FTBFS(kfreebsd,ia64,hurd,): testsuite error KeyError:
The cache has no
On 13/02/12 16:45, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
jansson 2.23-2 has been uploaded like two minutes before you filed the bug,
and apparently everything is going well now [0].
Then please set the fixed version accordingly.
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 02/13/2012 04:20 PM, Thomas Lange wrote:
It's a contradiction to say the bug is serious because of a missing
dependency but adding this dependency is not the right fix.
cause != solution;
apart from that.. well, it should be common sense that on any valid
debian system (and a debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 659742 2.3-2
Bug #659742 {Done: Alessandro Ghedini al3x...@gmail.com} [src:jansson] FTBFS:
Sphinx documentation not found
Bug Marked as fixed in versions jansson/2.3-2.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
I wonder what the proper solutions is to detect if a kernel is
already installled. Any suggestions? I think I have to add a test to
the dracust.postinst script, to skip the call off
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/dracut `uname -r` if no kernel is installed.
Even if no kernel is installed (like in a
* Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de, 2012-02-13, 16:32:
surf (0.4.1-6) unstable; urgency=high
.
* QA upload.
* debian/patches:
+ Added fix-insecure-permissions.patch to fix world readable cookie jar
vulnerability CVE-2012-0842. (Closes: #659296)
-
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 01:09:27PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
Assigning to zlib, maintainers of zlib, what is your plan here?
Should we patch xetex (and probably many other packages have to be
fixed, too), or do you intend to fix this misbehaviour?
I've no intention to diverge from
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:49:54PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:10:06PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Package: openvswitch-datapath-dkms
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: grave
Hi there!
First, thanks for maintaining OVS, this is a very nice software, which
I
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:34:13 +
with message-id e1rwzn3-0002rh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#635550: fixed in pmw 4.231-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #635550,
regarding pmw: piuparts: fails to install (update-gsfontmap again)
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:34:13 +
with message-id e1rwzn3-0002rn...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#658229: fixed in pmw 4.231-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #658229,
regarding should not migrate
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: samba4
Version: 4.0.0~alpha17.dfsg2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
Package: xul-ext-openinbrowser
Version: 1.11-5
Severity: serious
Upgrading iceape to the version in sid is only possible by removing
xul-ext-openinbrowser:
,
| $ LANG=C aptitude -s install iceape
| The following packages will be upgraded:
| iceape
| The following packages are RECOMMENDED
On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
The config.log would be useful too.
Thomas, it's possible that you're hitting the following bug. I
committed a fix for it to all of our active branches a few minutes
ago (so obviously it isn't in Debian yet):
Package: expeyes
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package starts processes
where it shouldn't. This is very probably due to not using invoke-rc.d
as mandated by policy 9.3.3.2. This is seriously
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log?
I've attached it to this mail.
Here's the root of the problem:
checking for Linux build directory...
Package: libroar-compat2,libroar-dev,roaraudio
Version: 1.0~beta0~pr0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
Am 13.02.2012 19:08, schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
Package: libroar-compat2,libroar-dev,roaraudio
Version: 1.0~beta0~pr0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It
Package: libblas3
Version: 1.2.20110419-3~exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
at the call to
* Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de, 2012-02-13, 18:47:
Package: xul-ext-openinbrowser
Version: 1.11-5
Severity: serious
Upgrading iceape to the version in sid is only possible by removing
xul-ext-openinbrowser:
Thanks for the bug report.
Unless I'm missing something, conflicting with a priority
Package: libopenblas-base
Version: 0.1alpha2.3-1~exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails.
From the attached
Package: gcin
Version: 2.7.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid fails
because it tries to overwrite other
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#openinbrowser (1.11-6) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Mark the package as compatible with all versions of Iceape
#(closes: #659778). Thanks to Sven Joachim for the bug report.
#
limit source openinbrowser
Limiting to bugs with field
Package: dtc-xen
Version: 0.5.15-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:48:18 +
with message-id e1rx0wk-0003ps...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#659778: fixed in openinbrowser 1.11-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #659778,
regarding xul-ext-openinbrowser: incompatible with icape 2.7.1
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user debian...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was deb...@abeckmann.de).
found 632955 0.9.6
Bug #632955 [mini-buildd-bld] mini-buildd-bld: fails to install
Bug Marked as found in versions mini-buildd/0.9.6.
found
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Mon Feb 13 19:03:32 UTC 2012
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: php-horde-spellchecker
tags 657366 + pending
Bug #657366 [wnpp] ITP:
I noticed this same failure when I tried to build the package for Ubuntu.
However, what was weird was that it succeeded for amd64 but failed for i386.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cssutils/0.9.8-1build1
Same results in my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~barry/+archive/python/+packages
I
Duh. arch: all so nevermind.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:47:25 +
with message-id e1rx1rx-0002sf...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#657254: fixed in libnl3 3.2.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #657254,
regarding libnl-3-200: Fails to build from source due to missing build-dep on
source-highlight
to
Hi again,
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 22:30 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2012-02-09 22:25, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
One thing though: do you mind if we downgrade the severity temporarily?
There's a big transition about to happen [...]
Adjust as you need it ...
Turns out I'm wrong: elmerfem
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:43:15PM +0100, Simon Wenner wrote:
1. Create a data project
2. Add a folder with some files in it
3. Select a file inside this folder
4. Press on the new folder button
5. Enter a name and hit enter
6. Segfault
I just tried to figure out the issue here. It seems,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 658001 src:lxpanel
Bug #658001 [lxpanel] lxpanel: FTBFS
Bug reassigned from package 'lxpanel' to 'src:lxpanel'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions lxpanel/0.5.8-1.
forcemerge 658189 658001
Bug#658189: lxpanel: FTBFS: autotools
El 13 de febrer de 2012 14:40, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org ha escrit:
/build/buildd-iceape_2.7.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-OUU_j5/iceape-2.7.1/build-iceape/mozilla/dist/bin/libldap60.so:
undefined reference to `strlcpy'
Note that this can be fixed by adding -lbsd. However, if it's
including
Package: glipper
Version: 2.3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
glipper depends on python-gnomeapplet, but that package does not exist
in unstable (in fact, it only exists in stable). glipper is thus
uninstallable in unstable.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: libsbml5-octave
Version: 5.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
libsbml's control file contains the following in the libsbml5-octave
stanza:
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},
${misc:Depends},
octave3.2,
libc6 (=2.4)
Aside from the last entry being redundant (it will get added via
shlib:Depends if
Package: udev-discover
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
udev-discover is uninstallable on kfreebsd-* due to its dependency on
python-gudev, which does not exist on those architectures.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
tags 554752 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gtklp (versioned as 1.2.7-2.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' :
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 554752 + pending
Bug #554752 [src:gtklp] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
554752: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554752
Debian
Hi Ivo,
I'd (strongly) vote for simply droping this useless depends. If I would
have been your sponsor I have worked out together with you solving these
issues:
$ lintian libsbml_5.2.0-1.dsc
W: libsbml source: package-depends-on-hardcoded-libc libsbml5-octave depends
W: libsbml source:
Package: libxdmcp
Version: 6.0.0
Severity: critical
Tags: upstream
Justification: causes serious data loss
When running a php5-cli script, it finishes normally, but after the end, I get
a random Segmentation fault sign (on some runs it happens, on some - it
doesnt).
The /var/log/user.log gets
Source: audacious
Version: 3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
audacious FTBFS on sparc with an internal compiler error. This has been reported
to the gcc maintainers at http://bugs.debian.org/659793 but past
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 656274 important
Bug #656274 [collectd] collectd ftbfs on armhf and armel
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
656274:
On Mo, 13 Feb 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
I've no intention to diverge from upstream on this, maintaining a
different interface to upstream doesn't seem like a smart move. Given
Ok.
that the TeX upstream appears to have already changed their code for the
new zlib upstream it seems like they're
On 02/14/2012 02:09 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
There is no point in trying to run make if configure failed. The
make will fail too and the log will be harder to read.
CC: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
CC: Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Roland,
Am 13.02.2012 09:35, schrieb Roland Mas:
Package: cryptsetup Version: 2:1.4.1-2 Severity: critical
To be honest I don't agree with you on the severity of this bug. I
understand that the changes in LVM handling of cryptroot initramfs
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:00:39AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mo, 13 Feb 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
that the TeX upstream appears to have already changed their code for the
new zlib upstream it seems like they're not expecting any change in zlib
and will be updated to use the new
On Mo, 13 Feb 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
I just checked, it seems to *NOT* be necessary. During upgrades
xetex will be called only in -ini mode, and that still works.
Only a normal run to process a document, which loads the format,
will not work.
I was thinking for the case where someone
On 02/14/2012 07:41 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 02/14/2012 02:09 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
There is no point in trying to run make if configure failed. The
make will fail too and the log will be harder to read.
CC: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
CC: Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:41:05AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 02/14/2012 02:09 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
There is no point in trying to run make if configure failed. The
make will fail too and the log will be harder to read.
I can confirm that the above fixes the issue.
The commit that
/bin/bash: line 1: 8437 Bus error ../../../src/seed
../../../doc/modules/make-functions.js
../../../doc/modules/readline/readline.js
../../../doc/modules/readline/readline-funcs.xml
make[5]: *** [readline-funcs.xml] Error 138
I have gained access to a sparc box (initially to
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:50:23AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 02/14/2012 07:41 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 02/14/2012 02:09 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
-MAKE=./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build ; make -C
datapath/linux
+MAKE=./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname
DKMS passes in an explicit variable for the kernel source directory, so we
should use that instead of `uname -r`.
CC: 659...@bugs.debian.org
Reported-by: Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com
---
debian/dkms.conf.in |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+),
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# not failing on squeeze
tags 654281 + wheezy sid
Bug #654281 {Done: HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) d...@debian.org} [kplayer]
kplayer: FTBFS on armhf/s390x, reproduced on amd64: not defined Entities while
generating index.cache.bz2
Added tag(s) sid
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log?
I've attached it to this mail.
Here's the root of the problem:
Package: apt-cudf
Version: 2.9.13-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
From the
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:31:18AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log?
Assuming it's the fully correct path, it looks reasonable to me.
--Justin
On Feb 13, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
DKMS passes in an explicit variable for the kernel source directory, so we
should use that instead of `uname -r`.
CC: 659...@bugs.debian.org
Reported-by: Thomas Goirand
Package: evolution
Version: 3.2.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Looks like the window gets built, then segfault.
Attached is the backtrace. See also libcairo2 bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657097
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:48:00 -0600
with message-id 20120214024626.GA8687@burratino
and subject line Re: policykit-1 local root exploit CVE-2011-1485
has caused the Debian Bug report #644500,
regarding policykit-1 local root exploit CVE-2011-1485
to be marked as done.
This means
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:35:15PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:31:18AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I have tested this patch and the path and resulting package
appear to be correct.
I see ./configure --with-linux=/usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-amd64
in the resulting config.log
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 06:05:19PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
Assuming it's the fully correct path, it looks
On 12.02.2012 22:19, Eric Lavarde wrote:
vdr-sxfe is just starting and dropping with a segfault:
[ 3817.674930] vdr-sxfe[6098]: segfault at 8 ip 7f1285ce3f36 sp
7f1287ffebd0 error 4 in xineplug_inp_xvdr.so[7f1285ccf000+25000]
Sorry, I can't reproduce this. Can you play videos and VDR
Package: wbritish
Version: 7.1-1
Severity: grave
Dear wbritish maintainers,
The wbritish wordlist /usr/share/dict/british-english
does not contain British English.
For instance, it contains the American word color.
This means the wordlist is unable to function correctly, it does not
perform
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:16:25PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:35:15PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:31:18AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:07:36PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:16:25PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:35:15PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:31:18AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Ben
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:48:48 +
with message-id e1rxbfw-mw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#659685: fixed in openvswitch 1.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #659685,
regarding fails to build the kernel module
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:20:11 +
with message-id e1rxbkj-0003ms...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#657275: fixed in libswe 1.77.00.0005-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #657275,
regarding libswe: FTBFS - unoconv expects writable home, loopback network(?)
to be marked as
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:32:14 +
with message-id e1rxbvy-00059p...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#658258: fixed in cups-filters 1.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #658258,
regarding Cups 1.5.0-16 breaks plain text printing
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:49:29AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mo, 13 Feb 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
I was thinking for the case where someone upgrades zlib but for whatever
reason doesn't upgrade TeX at all - it's not exactly going to be common
but it's simple enough to do.
Ok, yeah,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 621985
Bug #621985 {Done: Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@debian.org} [src:guile-1.6]
guile-1.6: FTBFS: guile.c:92:33: error: conflicting types for
'lt__PROGRAM__LTX_preloaded_symbols'
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 659834 + pending
Bug #659834 [apt-cudf] apt-cudf: fails to install - Can't locate
File/Basename.pm
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
659834:
97 matches
Mail list logo
