Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Wed Mar 21 07:03:56 UTC 2012
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: a
href=http://packages.qa.debian.org/trash-cli;trash-cli/a
tags 662670 + pending
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:27:40 +0100
with message-id 4f6982ec.60...@gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#664633: libccid
has caused the Debian Bug report #664633,
regarding libccid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hi,
Thank you for reminding you of it.
I committed patches/09_fix_ftbfs_with_c99.patch.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2012/3/19 Ben Armstrong sy...@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca:
Package: libbluetooth-dev
Version: 4.99-1
Followup-For: Bug #661879
I encountered these same errors when trying to build
severity 664630 normal
thank
Le 19/03/12 15:13, Hendricus Kabouter a écrit :
Package: libpcsclite1
Subject: libpcsclite1
Version: 1.8.2-1
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 664630 normal
Bug #664630 [libpcsclite1] libpcsclite1
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
thank
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
664630: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664630
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 07:32:39 +
with message-id e1sag2b-0004zh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#652770: fixed in cimg 1.4.9-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #652770,
regarding cimg: FTBFS: dist.h:82:7: error: expected identifier before numeric
constant
to be marked
[resending to address that doesn't bounce for me with SPF complaint]
Could you please provide me with the SPF error, so that I can fix it? Or
is the issue on your side?
If you send to z...@debian.org, it works because I've white-listed the
Debian mail server, but I would still like to know if
Package: mc
Version: 3:4.8.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: inhibits normal usage
Hi,
just saw that I cannot copy /etc/skel/{,.}* into a user’s home
directory any more since it contains a zero-length file (from
grml-etc-core):
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Apr 2 2009
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:18:56 +
with message-id e1sahh2-0002yp...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#586550: fixed in ffmpeg-php 0.6.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #586550,
regarding ffmpeg-php: FTBFS with ffmpeg = 0.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:18:56 +
with message-id e1sahh2-0002yv...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#614474: fixed in ffmpeg-php 0.6.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #614474,
regarding ffmpeg-php: FTBFS: ffmpeg_frame.c:335: error: 'PIX_FMT_RGBA32'
undeclared (first
Hi,
Any advancement on this bug?
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 663566 + patch
Bug #663566 [tightvnc] tightvnc: FTBFS: dpkg-source: error: aborting due to
unexpected upstream changes
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
663566:
tags 663566 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for tightvnc (versioned as 1.3.9-6.3). The diff
is attached to this message. I've not uploaded this NMU as I'm not a DD
but I hope it is useful for you.
Regards.
diff -Nru tightvnc-1.3.9/debian/changelog
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org writes:
On 19.03.2012 15:34, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Did you read the wiki page?
Yes. Is the kind of information on which calling convention, basic
system library structures, and so on form the ABI for a given tuple
that I was
Dear maintainer,
Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed
this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security
Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites
through point releases:
squeeze (6.0.5) - use
reopen 660345
found 660345 2.1.10-5
quit
Am Dienstag, den 20.03.2012, 19:02 + schrieb Laurent Bigonville:
I still get this error.
$ LANG=C sudo aptitude safe-upgrade
[sudo] password for paul:
Resolving dependencies...
The following partially
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 660345
Bug #660345 {Done: Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org} [policycoreutils]
policycoreutils: fails to purge
Bug #662772 {Done: Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org} [policycoreutils]
post-inst fails: update-rc.d:
Package: php5-common
Version: 5.4.0-2
Severity: critical
The latest update of the php5 related packages to version 5.4.0-2
fails with the installation of php5-common
Setting up php5-common (5.4.0-2) ...
**
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 620799 2.8.0-1
Bug #620799 [rabbitmq-server] rabbitmq-server: fails to purge - command
(deluser|adduser) in postrm not found
Marked as found in versions rabbitmq-server/2.8.0-1.
found 662748 3.8-2
Bug #662748 [highlight] highlight: fails
severity 664849 minor
thank you
I am going to guess:
Your /bin/sh is not POSIX shell compliant.
O.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:01, J G Miller mil...@yoyo.org wrote:
Package: php5-common
Version: 5.4.0-2
Severity: critical
The latest update of the php5 related packages to version 5.4.0-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 664849 minor
Bug #664849 [php5-common] php5-common: instllation of latest update on Testing
to 5.4.0-2 fails
Severity set to 'minor' from 'critical'
thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Package: php5-curl
Version: 5.4.0-2
Severity: critical
Having removed the incorrectly inserted local from the
post installation of php5-common in order to get that to install
diffphp5-common.postinst~ php5-common.postinst
21,22c21,22
local md5sum=$(md5sum
Could you respond to my first mail about your POSIXness of your
shell before filling more bugreports?
O.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:20, J G Miller mil...@yoyo.org wrote:
Package: php5-curl
Version: 5.4.0-2
Severity: critical
Having removed the incorrectly inserted local from the
post
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 664849 grave
Bug #664849 [php5-common] php5-common: instllation of latest update on Testing
to 5.4.0-2 fails
Severity set to 'grave' from 'minor'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
664849:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 664853 minor
Bug #664853 [php5-curl] php5-curl: update to 5.4.0-2 fails
Severity set to 'minor' from 'critical'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
664853:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 664840 + confirmed upstream
Bug #664840 [mc] mc: cannot copy zero-length files
Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
664840:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 664840 important
Bug #664840 [mc] mc: cannot copy zero-length files
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
664840:
Hi David,
On 2012-03-06 14:45, David Bremner wrote:
Thanks for spotting this. For the record, the underlying problem is the
postrm of highlight_2.16-1, which removes conffiles 1) during remove and
purge, and 2) removes files actually belonging to highlight-common.
Is there a chance to get
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:54:45 +0100, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de
wrote:
Hi David,
On 2012-03-06 14:45, David Bremner wrote:
Thanks for spotting this. For the record, the underlying problem is the
postrm of highlight_2.16-1, which removes conffiles 1) during remove and
purge, and
On 21.03.2012 11:26, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Matthias Klosed...@debian.org writes:
On 19.03.2012 15:34, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Did you read the wiki page?
Yes. Is the kind of information on which calling convention, basic
system library structures, and so
659861 (cvs containing a dir.gz in the security update) also means
it is not coinstalable with other packages containing that file.
Currently amd64 does not have any other such package in stable,
but locally installed packages might have and perhaps some other
security update might introduce a
Package: ldc
Version: 0.9.1+hg1634-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
ldc cannot be installed because it depends on libconfig++8 which does
not exist.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (530, 'testing'), (520, 'unstable'),
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 03:47:19PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
[resending to address that doesn't bounce for me with SPF complaint]
Could you please provide me with the SPF error, so that I can fix it? Or
is the issue on your side?
If you send to z...@debian.org, it works because I've
Package: php-apc
Version: 3.1.9-0.1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
My system just got the PHP 5.4.0 upgraded packages. After
which, a lot of unhappiness ensued with APC. Disabling APC entirely
clears up my problems. I'm getting a lot of these:
---
*** glibc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 661520 login
Bug #661520 [src:shadow] Who: users logged in on the console are not shown
anymore
Bug reassigned from package 'src:shadow' to 'login'.
forcemerge 659957 661520
Bug #659957 [login] login: login at console no longer updates
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:25:39PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:59:01AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
BTW, it'd be really great if you could upload the fixed version of ovs.
FYI, It's blocking the migration of xen-api in Testing... :)
Yes, sorry about that, I'll try to
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:03:45 +
with message-id e1sapsv-0005y0...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#646177: fixed in python-djvulibre 0.3.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #646177,
regarding python-djvulibre: FTBFS: FAIL:
test_decode.test_documents.test_export_ps
to
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:03:30 +
with message-id e1sapsg-0005qy...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#663940: fixed in otrs2 3.1.2+dfsg1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #663940,
regarding otrs2: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - ERROR: relation
gi_webservice_config
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 615520 + patch
Bug #615520 [python-turbogears] python-turbogears: broken dependency list
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
615520:
forcemerge 659861 664872
thanks
Jens Stimpfle dixit:
Package: cvs
Version: 1:1.12.13-12+squeeze1
The last cvs package build apparently generates a global info index file
This report is a duplicate so I’m merging them.
Bernhard R. Link dixit:
So it would be nice to fix that package in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 659861 664872
Bug #659861 [cvs] cvs contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz
Bug #664872 [cvs] cvs: Excess dir.gz file in /usr/share/info
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
Added indication that 664872 affects release.debian.org
Marked as
Dixi quod…
For the record, the package I would have uploaded to fix the security
issue, with a non-bogus version number, did not have this issue:
In fact, neither do the auto-built packages on e.g. armel which
I can download to verify that.
So I highly suspect someone entrusted with
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Based on Ian's last response, I think the ballot has two options plus
further discussion, since I'm quite sure that we're not going to outlaw
dh:
A. debian/rules is not required to be a makefile, only to implement the
same interface as a debian/rules
Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:50:05 +
with message-id e1saqbl-zr...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#664820: fixed in samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #664820,
regarding samba4: FTBFS: ../source4/kdc/pac-glue.c:484:2: error: incompatible
type
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 639857 + wheezy sid
Bug #639857 [nvidia-cg-toolkit] nvidia-cg-toolkit: Fails to install with libc6
(= 2.13-17)
Added tag(s) sid and wheezy.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
639857:
Package: squirrelmail
Version: 2:1.5.1-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
With the upgrade to PHP 5.4.0 coming down the pipeline,
SquirrelMail has been rendered unusable. Commenting out the
session_(un)register functions get things working somewhat again, but SM
is
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Based on Ian's last response, I think the ballot has two options plus
further discussion, since I'm quite sure that we're not going to outlaw
dh:
A. debian/rules is not required to be a makefile, only to implement the
I should say that the version of SM in testing/unstable
(2:1.4.22-1) actually works much better even than the
experimental version and only requires hex2bin to be fixed. A
patch for that looks like it's already been submitted upstream:
---
Source: libio-socket-ssl-perl
Version: 1.59-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
libio-socket-ssl-perl FTBFS:
dh_auto_test
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/salvi-libio-socket-ssl-perl_1.59-1-amd64-fsWlQT/libio-socket-ssl-perl-1.59'
tag 662658 +patch
kthxbye
Hi!
The patch below compiles on both linux-amd64 and kfreebsd-amd64. I
have tested the resulting binary on both architectures and it seems to
work. output of `x86info -a` on the same hardware (Thinkpad X220 with
Intel i5 2520M) is identical (apart from 2 different
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 662658 +patch
Bug #662658 [src:x86info] x86info: FTBFS(kfreebsd): fatal error: asm/mtrr.h: No
such file or directory
Added tag(s) patch.
kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
662658:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 651317 + patch
Bug #651317 [src:pike7.8] pike7.8: FTBFS on i386: Segmentation fault
Added tag(s) patch.
# in theory: 651317 and 640818 should be merged, not sure if the BTS
# has recovered yet
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
tag 651317 + patch
# in theory: 651317 and 640818 should be merged, not sure if the BTS
# has recovered yet
thanks
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:56:26 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
pike7.8 FTBFS on i386:
| Making dynamic: post_modules/GL
| Original CFLAGS: -g -g -ggdb3 -mtune=i686 -O3 -pipe -W
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
affects 659861 + security.debian.org
Bug #659861 [cvs] cvs contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz
Bug #664872 [cvs] cvs: Excess dir.gz file in /usr/share/info
Added indication that 659861 affects security.debian.org
Added indication that 664872 affects
Source: audacious-dumb
Version: 0.65-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
cc -o obj/audacious
Source: tennix
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -W -Wall -ansi -pedantic
Source: postgresql-pljava
Version: 1.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -c -g -O2
Source: stardict-tools
Version: 3.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: xbubble
Version: 0.5.11.2-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I
Source: octave-nurbs
Version: 1.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: node-sqlite3
Version: 2.0.17+ds1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: node-glob
Version: 2.0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: desmume
Version: 0.9.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\desmume
Source: tcsh
Version: 6.18.01-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -o tcsh -Wl,-z,relro -g
Source: kcm-fcitx
Version: 0.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: node-zipfile
Version: 0.2.4+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: octave-fixed
Version: 0.7.10-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: obexpushd
Version: 0.11.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: octave-octgpr
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: odin
Version: 1.8.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX
Source: kbibtex
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: wmauda
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
cc -Wall -g -Wl,--as-needed
Source: viruskiller
Version: 1.0-1.dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ `sdl-config
Source: python-drizzle
Version: 1.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: node-mapnik
Version: 0.5.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: warmux
Version: 1:11.04.1+repack-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g
Source: ekiga
Version: 3.2.7-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash
Source: openldap
Version: 2.4.28-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
../../../debian/build
Source: jzip
Version: 210r20001005d-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -Wall -g -O2
Source: aprsdigi
Version: 2.4.4-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME
Source: fceu
Version: 0.98.12-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME
Source: octave-ad
Version: 1.0.6-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
test
Source: ax25mail-utils
Version: 0.11-6.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
x86_64-linux-gnu
Source: openchange
Version: 1:0.11.dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/ld
Source: tqsllib
Version: 2.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CXX
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# not a parallel build issue
severity 628247 serious
Bug #628247 [src:sofia-sip] sofia-sip: FTBFS: ./sofia-sip/sip_extra.h:2:1:
error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping
Source: egenix-mx-base
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -pthread
Source: pyentropy
Version: 0.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: flpsed
Version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/ld: GsWidget.o
Source: imview
Version: 1.1.9c-8
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/ld: imview.o
Source: freepops
Version: 0.2.9-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux
Source: nipype
Version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: spatialite-tools
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/ld: note
Source: epm
Version: 4.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/ld: libepm.a(support.o
Source: gmsh
Version: 2.5.1~beta2~svn11604~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin
Source: dillo
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/ld: bw.o: relocation
Source: goplay
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/ld: ../libxdgutils
Source: hpodder
Version: 1.1.5.0+nmu3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gdc-4.6
Version: 0.29.1-4.6.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: haskell-hledger-vty
Version: 0.16.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
