Grant H. sirgr...@member.fsf.org writes:
After reviewing the copyright file[1] for the package yforth[2] I
thought that it did not qualify as free software.
Why do you say this? The intent of the author was clearly to be fully
permissive as long as attribution is retained.
For a fairly
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 05:20:12AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:03:13 +0300
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:19:50AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
Package: perl
Version: 5.14.2-12
Severity: critical
I kicked off an upgrade of
Package: telepathy-gabble
Version: 0.16.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: maintainer's opinion
Tags: fixed-upstream
Forwarded: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53087
iChat has a bug in which, if it receives an error reply to a
capability-discovery (disco) request, it will resend
On mer., 2012-09-12 at 14:35 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Please excuse me for reopening but I've just noticed that Wheezy is still
affected by this issue. I can't reproduce with version in experimental but
xfce4-panel in testing is loosing settings like crazy.
Also I raised severity as
Package: udev
Version: 175-7
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
I have experienced problems with udev's creation of links in /dev/disk/by-path
on multiple machines (real and
virtual) including missing links and incorrect links (ie, two
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Alex Goebel alex.goe...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this still an issue with radeon?
For my nvidia system it disappeared several weeks ago with a nouveau update.
Seems fixed for us here too !
--
Julien Palard - jul...@eeple.fr
CTO - meltyNetwork
Mobile : +33 (0)6 21
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 562104 evince/2.30.3-2+squeeze1
Bug #562104 [evince] evince: Incorrect rendering of first page
Marked as found in versions evince/2.30.3-2+squeeze1.
severity 562104 grave
Bug #562104 [evince] evince: Incorrect rendering of first page
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 687379 grave
Bug #687379 [evince] evince is not capable of displaying images
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
687379:
found 687379 evince/3.4.0-3
thanks
Display is still bogus using evince from sid. xpdf display is also bogus.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 687379 evince/3.4.0-3
Bug #687379 [evince] evince is not capable of displaying images
The source evince and version 3.4.0-3 do not appear to match any binary packages
Marked as found in versions evince/3.4.0-3.
thanks
Stopping processing
Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:38:27 +0200
with message-id
CA+7wUsy1Ts7=hvx3uv1yrvvx2jdauvsuevhsshmorbwhy4n...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #562104,
regarding evince: Incorrect rendering of first page
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 562104 evince/3.4.0-3
Bug #562104 [evince] evince: Incorrect rendering of first page
The source evince and version 3.4.0-3 do not appear to match any binary packages
Marked as fixed in versions evince/3.4.0-3.
thanks
Stopping processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 685766 pending
Bug #685766 [docbook-utils] docbook2man fails on ia64
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
685766: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685766
Debian
Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:17:44 +
with message-id e1tbk0u-00085m...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#685766: fixed in docbook-utils 0.6.14-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #685766,
regarding docbook2man fails on ia64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: 0ad
Version: 0~r11863-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
0ad-data has been updated to alpha 11, rendering 0ad
uninstallable. Please fix this.
(and the SVN for 0ad-data has not been updated either,
that should probably be fixed as well)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
I just uploaded 8.032.00-1, perhaps this helps.
Please try a current kernel (that would be 3.2.0-3-amd64 currently), too.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Processing control commands:
tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #686170 [r8168-dkms] r8168-dkms: kernel BUG at
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-1-common/include/linux/netdevice.h:495!
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
686170: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686170
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Hi Cristian,
I have seen that you cherry picked from the experimental branch patches
to close several bugs but I think due to bug #642733 the package can not
yet go to testing and thus there is the danger that its reverse depends
will be kicked as well. Would you please consider fixing #642733
Finished at 20120912-1456
Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disc space
-
So the build fails without any error message being displayed.
I would expect the build to proceed normally (the package can be built
manually).
Or at least the Check arch
Source: beast
Version: 0.7.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash
On 26/07/12 at 11:39 +0200, ghe. rivero wrote:
tags 681582 fixed pending
Hi,
You tagged this bug fixed and pending, but did not make an upload?
Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Source: rhash
Version: 1.2.9-7
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -c -pipe
* Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org [120912 12:32]:
For the record, I do not consider this bug to be RC. As far as I know,
it only manifested itself for iceweasel and only because iceweasel
does really funky things with its symbols. The bug now contains enough
information for a useful upstream
Source: beanstalkd
Version: 1.4.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: scim-anthy
Version: 1.2.7-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
[ It seems that the fix for #680790 was not applied to
libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
Source: audiofile
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[5
Source: jscribble
Version: 1.7.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: racket
Version: 5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2+deb7u1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64
Source: xdotool
Version: 1:2.20100701.2961-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: voms-api-java
Version: 2.0.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 684817 serious
Bug #684817 [src:lilypond] segfault in lilypond
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
684817:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 685470 confirmed
Bug #685470 [xmess-x,xmess-sdl] xmess-x,xmess-sdl: missing copyright file after
squeeze-wheezy upgrade
Added tag(s) confirmed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
685470:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:34:29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
* do you have a reliable way to reproduce the issue?
* some comments seem to indicate that it might be related to issues in
session saving, which should be fixed with xfce4-session 4.8.3-3 (not
yet uploaded). It might be worth testing with
tags 685958 patch
thanks
Hi
I have prepared a patch which fixes the invalid email address. The
solution is identical to bug #675214. [1]
The maintainer seems to use two different email addresses
invalid:
gurkan [at] linuks [dot] mine [dot] nu
valid:
gurkan [at] phys [dot] ethz [dot] ch
My
tags 685959 patch
thanks
Hi
I have prepared a patch which fixes the invalid email address. The
solution is identical to bug #675214. [1]
The maintainer seems to use two different email addresses
invalid:
gurkan [at] linuks [dot] mine [dot] nu
valid:
gurkan [at] phys [dot] ethz [dot] ch
My
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:14:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[ http://bugs.debian.org/687403 ]
[ It seems that the fix for #680790 was not applied to
libio-async-loop-epoll-perl ? Or is it only because the fixed
libio-async-perl did not reach testing? ]
Hm. Mysterious.
My understanding of
tags 675220 patch
thanks
Hi
I have prepared a patch which fixes the invalid email address. The
solution is identical to bug #675214. [1]
The maintainer seems to use two different email addresses
invalid:
gurkan [at] linuks [dot] mine [dot] nu
valid:
gurkan [at] phys [dot] ethz [dot] ch
My
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 685958 patch
Bug #685958 [sauerbraten-wake6] Maintainer or uploader address bounces
Added tag(s) patch.
tags 685959 patch
Bug #685959 [kic] Maintainer or uploader address bounces
Added tag(s) patch.
tags 675220 patch
Bug #675220
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:03:18 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
If you update libio-async-perl to 0.52, you should find that the
Epoll loop now skips those tests, because it doesn't declare
_CAN_SUBSECOND_ACCURATELY.
(And the patch in 0.51-3 backports this 0.52 change.)
Which I just confirmed by
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:03:18 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
[ http://bugs.debian.org/687403 ]
[0] from CPAN RT#78892:
If you update libio-async-perl to 0.52, you should find that the
Epoll loop now skips those tests, because it doesn't declare
_CAN_SUBSECOND_ACCURATELY.
(And the patch in
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:29:10 +1200, Olly Betts wrote:
https://patches.ubuntu.com/w/wxwidgets2.8/wxwidgets2.8_2.8.12.1-11ubuntu2.patch
+ - Add conflict on python-wxgtk2.8 ( 2.8.12.1-6ubuntu1~) to
+python-wxversion to guarantee upgrade ordering when moving from
+
A couple things, intent and what actually happens are two different
things. According to Debian legal (as I linked above) it currently does
not meet the DFSG which is the expectation it has to meet.
Regardless, I got a response from Luca and he is willing to re-license
it under a established
Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:17:52 +
with message-id e1tbohm-0006c0...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#685189: fixed in pygame 1.9.1release+dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #685189,
regarding pygame: incomplete and inaccurate debian/copyright
to be marked as done.
This
Processing control commands:
tag -1 - unreproducible
Bug #684843 [src:krusader] krusader: FTBFS: tstring.h:137:5: error: 'make_pair'
was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by
argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
Removed tag(s)
On 09/12/2012 09:20 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: xdotool
Version: 1:2.20100701.2961-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:01:49PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
found 685970 openjpeg/1.3+dfsg-3
found 685970 openjpeg/1.3+dfsg-4.1
found 685970 openjpeg/1.3+dfsg-4.5
fixed 685970 openjpeg/1.5.0-3
thanks
I cannot reproduce #685970 with openjpeg 1.5.0
$ ./bin/j2k_to_image -i test2.j2k
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:59:32PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Doesn't seem to have a fix yet.
I'll mark it as no-dsa in the Security Tracker for wheezy for now.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 01:32:36PM +0200, Thomas Müller wrote:
Hi,
I plan to prepare an upload until the end of this week.
THX for the notification,
What's the status?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Am Mittwoch, dem 12.09.2012 um 18:18 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 01:32:36PM +0200, Thomas Müller wrote:
Hi,
I plan to prepare an upload until the end of this week.
THX for the notification,
Thanks for the buxx kicking! ;-)
What's the status?
Half way
Package: keystone
Version: 2012.1.1-5
Severity: grave
Title: Revoking a role does not affect existing tokens
Impact: High
Reporter: Dolph Mathews (Rackspace)
Products: Keystone
Affects: Essex, Folsom
Description:
Dolph Mathews reported a vulnerability in Keystone. Granting and
revoking roles
clone 687379 -1
reassign -1 xpdf
retitle -1 xpdf is not capable of displaying images
thanks
Since this affect xpdf, too. I am cloning the bug report.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 687379 -1
Bug #687379 [evince] evince is not capable of displaying images
Bug 687379 cloned as bug 687429
reassign -1 xpdf
Bug #687429 [evince] evince is not capable of displaying images
Bug reassigned from package 'evince' to 'xpdf'.
No
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Just a note to say that I can still reproduce this.
Can you please provide a backtrace and/or a coredump? [I believe that
the build currently has them turned on, so it should just be a matter
of pulling them out of sbuild.] (Does this happen anywhere
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 684817 + moreinfo
Bug #684817 [src:lilypond] segfault in lilypond
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
684817: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684817
Debian
Processing control commands:
severity 682905 important
Bug #682905 [enigmail] can't import signatures
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
682905: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682905
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: severity 682905 important
According to upstream, this bug only occurs in certain configurations
[1], and as far as I know, those configurations are by no means default
settings. So I'm downgrading this bug's severity to important.
WM
[1]
Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:47:41 +
with message-id e1tbq6h-0005xd...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#687428: fixed in keystone 2012.1.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #687428,
regarding CVE-2012-4413: Revoking a role does not affect existing tokens
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:47:57 +0200
with message-id 20120912164757.ga29...@entuzijast.net
has caused the report #685360,
regarding AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard brokenness with Linux 3.2
(regression from 3.1)
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
Hi.
Il 12/09/2012 14:27, Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto:
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++
-DBIRNET_LOG_DOMAIN=\BIRNET\ -D_BIRNET_SOURCE_EXTENSIONS -I. -I.. -I..
I've finally observed something like this again, may or may not be related
On this second machine, there was an existing VG and existing NTFS
partitions (Windows and Lenovo recovery data) and an existing /boot
partition from a previous install
In partman, I did the following:
a) highlighted
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 642733 - sid wheezy
Bug #642733 {Done: Cristian Greco crist...@debian.org} [src:poco] poco:
FTBFS: Makefile:43: *** No ODBC library found. Please install unixODBC or iODBC
and try again. Stop.
Removed tag(s) sid and wheezy.
fixed 642733
On mer., 2012-09-12 at 23:30 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:34:29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
* do you have a reliable way to reproduce the issue?
* some comments seem to indicate that it might be related to issues in
session saving, which should be fixed with
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:11:14 +0200
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi Cristian,
I have seen that you cherry picked from the experimental branch patches
to close several bugs but I think due to bug #642733 the package can not
yet go to testing and thus there is the danger that its
Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:47:06 +
with message-id e1tbrxq-0007g6...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#687175: fixed in freeradius 2.1.10+dfsg-2+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687175,
regarding freeradius: CVE-2012-3547 stack-based buffer overflow in EAP-TLS
Control: reassign -1 python-numpy
Control: affects -1 python-scientific
Control: retitle -1 ABI change in 1.6.1 version
Hi,
Le 10/09/2012 04:32, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 16:59:13 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Le 27/08/2012 19:03, David Prévot a écrit :
Could you please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Wednesday 12 September 20:03:07 UTC 2012
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: a
href=http://packages.qa.debian.org/gentle;gentle/a
tags 685149 +
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.23-1
Severity: grave
On a very fresh wheezy install I was able to crash the kernel by
playing with btrfs. I am reporting it using a kvm image but I first
had the bug on real boxes.
To reproduce the bug, I am creating a raid1 btrfs filesystem,
creating some file
Grant H. sirgr...@member.fsf.org writes:
A couple things, intent and what actually happens are two different
things.
Of course I understand that. But what bothers me in this and other
cases is that you're asserting that it fails the DFSG without explaining
*how* you think it fails the DFSG.
Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:47:46 +
with message-id e1tbumg-ev...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#686567: fixed in owncloud 4.0.4debian2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #686567,
regarding owncloud: Missing security fixes in Wheezy
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: wims
Version: 4.04-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
From the
Processing control commands:
affects -1 + freefoam
Bug #687465 [libfreefoam1] libfreefoam1: fails to upgrade from 'testing' -
trying to overwrite /usr/lib/freefoam/libedgeMesh.so.0.1.0
Added indication that 687465 affects freefoam
--
687465:
Package: libfreefoam1
Version: 0.1.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + freefoam
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
Package: greylistd
Version: 0.8.8.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails.
From the attached log (scroll to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 685814 phpgacl/3.3.7-7.3
Bug #685814 [phpgacl] phpgacl: prompting due to modified conffiles which were
not modified by the user
The source phpgacl and version 3.3.7-7.3 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked as found in versions
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 04:26:28 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
The code in xfce4-panel was heavily changed in 4.10, and it seems it's
not easily possible to backport the fixes in 4.8
But this is regression from 4.8.5, if I'm remember correctly.
(At least I've been using panel for quite a while before
Ok, well I am sorry if I bothered you. I honestly didn't come here
tostart a fight and maybe should have been more clear. I also agree that
if he is willing to change the license that makes for an easy solution.
But to answer your question as to why I think it is not dfsg free it is
in the
Package: krazy2
Severity: serious
The information in debian/copyright is incomplete. Here are a few random
examples :
cppchecks/gui/symboltreemodel.cc
cppchecks/cplusplus/parser/SemanticCheck.h
cppchecks/cplusplus/cppmodel/cpppreprocessor.h
helpers/stripComments.pl
share/kxmlgui.xsd
On jeu., 2012-09-13 at 12:07 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 04:26:28 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
The code in xfce4-panel was heavily changed in 4.10, and it seems it's
not easily possible to backport the fixes in 4.8
But this is regression from 4.8.5, if I'm remember
79 matches
Mail list logo
