On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 06:44:23PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:51:09PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > For security I would like to have the following:
> > - CVE-2013-6449: 0294b2be5f4c11e60620c0018674ff0e17b14238 +
> > ca989269a2876bae79393bd54c3e72d49975fc75
> > -
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 728452 3.10.10~dfsg-2.1
Bug #728452 {Done: Mark Purcell } [opal] opal: FTBFS if $HOME
does not exist
There is no source info for the package 'opal' at version '3.10.10~dfsg-2.1'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for vers
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 733396 2.12.8~dfsg-1
Bug #733396 [src:ptlib] ptlib: FTBFS: ptlib/common/getdate.y:112:18: error:
conflicting types for 'PTime_yyparse'
Marked as fixed in versions ptlib/2.12.8~dfsg-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 733396 2.12.8~dfsg-1
Bug #733396 [src:ptlib] ptlib: FTBFS: ptlib/common/getdate.y:112:18: error:
conflicting types for 'PTime_yyparse'
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #733396 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
St
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 16:35:17 +1100
with message-id <3463087.3NvzcMzcSO@acer>
has caused the report #733396,
regarding ptlib: FTBFS: ptlib/common/getdate.y:112:18: error: conflicting types
for 'PTime_yyparse'
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 733396 bison
Bug #733396 [src:ptlib] ptlib: FTBFS: ptlib/common/getdate.y:112:18: error:
conflicting types for 'PTime_yyparse'
Added indication that 733396 affects bison
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 06:25:34 +0100
with message-id <52bfb24e.3060...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Init script does not return success when mon is already
running.
has caused the Debian Bug report #538133,
regarding Init script does not return success when mon is already running
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 05:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#730924: fixed in ruby-serverspec 0.14.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #730924,
regarding ruby-serverspec: FTBFS:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require': cannot load
such file -- s
Hi,
For some specific MKV files, mplayer2 has problem to sync A/V, but mplayer
works fine. I've filed a bug.
( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731937 )
If possible, please keep the mplayer in Debian. Gentoo has new upstream
versions of Mplayer (1.1.1, and 1.2_pre20130729) that ca
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 05:03:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#725020: fixed in libcommoncpp2 1.8.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #725020,
regarding twinkle: indirectly depends on multiple gnutls, ucommon versions
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #libcommoncpp2 (1.8.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Hardcode Build-Depends: libgnutls28-dev
> #- Fixes "twinkle: indirectly depends on multiple gnutls, ucommon
> #versions" (Closes: #725020)
> # * Apply inaddr.patch from Tristan Mat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #libcommoncpp2 (1.8.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Hardcode Build-Depends: libgnutls28-dev
> #- Fixes "twinkle: indirectly depends on multiple gnutls, ucommon
> #versions" (Closes: #725020)
> # * Build --with autotools_dev to updat
Hi Ivan,
you were right on target. I've added the build path to the PYTHONPATH
and the tests are now running.
Andreas, I'll push my changes to the repo right away. Could you please
check if everything seems to be fine also on your side?
Cheers!
Tomás
On 28/12/13 00:32, Ivan Kalev wrote:
> Hi An
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 725020 with 731175
Bug #725020 [libcommoncpp2-dev] twinkle: indirectly depends on multiple gnutls,
ucommon versions
725020 was not blocked by any bugs.
725020 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 725020: 731175
> thanks
Stopp
Version: 3.12.8~dfsg-1
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:47:47 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Why does it call cd with no argument?
Thanks Andreas,
Upstream have been mucking around with the build environment.
All is good now:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=opal&suite=experimental
Thanks,
Mark
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 728452 3.10.10~dfsg-2.1
Bug #728452 [opal] opal: FTBFS if $HOME does not exist
There is no source info for the package 'opal' at version '3.10.10~dfsg-2.1'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '3.10.10~dfsg-2.
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:30:48 +1100
with message-id <4397642.cpHoQVnYno@acer>
and subject line Re: Bug#728452: opal: FTBFS if $HOME does not exist
has caused the Debian Bug report #728452,
regarding opal: FTBFS if $HOME does not exist
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 03:19:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#733379: fixed in libonemind-commons-java-java 1.5.5-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #733379,
regarding libonemind-commons-java-java: FTBFS: [javac]
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/java/org/onemind/commons/java/util/
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 03:19:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#733364: fixed in libjxp-java 1.6.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #733364,
regarding libjxp-java: FTBFS: [javac]
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/java/org/onemind/jxp/servlet/JxpServlet.java:29: error:
package java
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 03:19:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#732741: fixed in mailman 1:2.1.16-1exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #732741,
regarding mailman: Please backport upstream fix for TypeError in sync_members
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 03:19:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#730889: fixed in libpodofo 0.9.0-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #730889,
regarding libpodofo: FTBFS: configure errors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 713239 + patch
Bug #713239 [src:scalable-cyrfonts] scalable-cyrfonts: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat
'/usr/share/texlive/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf': No such file or directory
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
tags 713239 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for scalable-cyrfonts (versioned as 4.16+nmu1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
David
diff -Nru scalable-cyrfonts-4.16/debian/changelog scalable-cyrfonts-4.16+nmu1/deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #scalable-cyrfonts (4.16+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
> #
> # * fontinst/Makefile: updated location of texmf.cnf. Closes: #713239.
> #
> limit source scalable-cyrfonts
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of
'scalable-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> archive 699561
Bug #699561 {Done: Niels Thykier } [djmount] djmount:
multiple vulnerabilities in libupnp
Bug #699562 {Done: Niels Thykier } [djmount] djmount: embeds
libupnp
archived 699561 to archive/61 (from 699561)
archived 699562 to archive/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 699561 699562
Bug #699561 {Done: Niels Thykier } [djmount] djmount:
multiple vulnerabilities in libupnp
Bug #699562 [djmount] djmount: embeds libupnp
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
Marked Bug as done
Added tag(s) security.
Me
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 699561
Bug #699561 {Done: Niels Thykier } [djmount] djmount:
multiple vulnerabilities in libupnp
Unarchived Bug 699561
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
699561: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Hi there.
On 2013-12-27 04:05, tony mancill wrote:
> So, first, my apologies for not coordinating this change with you. It
> was an honest mistake. (Although it is embarrassing - I saw "Debian
> Scala Maintainers" and somehow thought "Debian Java Maintainers.") I
> was merely trying to chip away
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 01:33:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#733359: fixed in rdkit 201309-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #733359,
regarding rdkit: FTBFS: smiles.tab.cpp:1264:30: error: too few arguments to
function 'int yysmiles_lex(YYSTYPE*, void*)'
to be marked a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 733122 -1
Bug #733122 [gnome-shell-common] fatal error: Typelib file for namespace
'GnomeBluetoothApplet' (any version) not found
Bug 733122 cloned as bug 733461
> retitle -1 config.js is arch-specific, please move to cinnamon
Bug #733461 [
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 733122 patch
Bug #733122 [gnome-shell-common] fatal error: Typelib file for namespace
'GnomeBluetoothApplet' (any version) not found
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
733122
tags 733122 patch
thanks
Here's a patch.
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:32:22AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: gnome-shell-common
> Version: 3.8.4-5
> Severity: grave
>
> gnome-shell aborts on GNU/kFreeBSD because of Linux-specific settings
> in config.js:
>
> /usr/share/gnome-shell/js/misc
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 00:48:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#733427: fixed in doxia-maven-plugin 1.1.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #733427,
regarding doxia-maven-plugin: FTBFS: Reason: POM
'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin' not found in repository: Sys
Control: reassign -1 reconserver 0.9.1-1
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 11:31:18PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> reassign 733343 librecon-1.9-dev 1.9.0~beta8-1
> fixed 733343 1.9.0~beta8-2
> stop
>
> reconserver is not really at fault here, I believe librecon-1.9-dev
> should depend on the r
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 reconserver 0.9.1-1
Bug #733343 [librecon-1.9-dev] reconserver FTBFS on all architectures
Bug reassigned from package 'librecon-1.9-dev' to 'reconserver'.
No longer marked as found in versions resiprocate/1.9.0~beta8-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versio
Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2013 00:19:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#730330: fixed in xxxterm 1:1.11.3-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #730330,
regarding xxxterm: FTBFS: storage size of 'hints' isn't known
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Update: I've finally got around to porting the app, but there's some weird
segmentation fault happening that I need to figure out before I can upload
the changes.
--
Siegfried
On 28/12/2013 18:29, David Suárez wrote:
>> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/elf.h:22:3: error: #error This header is
>> unsupported on x86-64.
>> # error This header is unsupported on x86-64.
If is not supported on amd64, why is this header even present?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Package: sablotron
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: Critical
Sablotron uses unmapped memory to parse argument objects. If an attacker
can map this area of memory, they may be able to cause the application to
act in an unintended way. I did not research the possibility of code
execution.
In https://gi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 733168 https://code.google.com/p/psutil/issues/detail?id=434
Bug #733168 [glances] glances: FTBFS: OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or
directory: '/etc/mtab'
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://code.google.com/p/psutil/issues/detai
Package: contextfree
Version: 3.0.5+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
contextfree fails to build on mips/mipsel/sparc and m68k/sh4 with the
following error message:
| cc -Wl,-z,relro objs/cfdg.o objs/Rand
Hi Adrian,
units 2.02 uses YYPARSE_PARAM and YYLEX_PARAM, which are gone in Bison 3.0. I
had a quick look at parse.y but couldn't figure out off-hand how to fix this;
so before I dig further I thought I'd ask you if you had an idea...
Regards,
Stephen
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 28 De
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 733374 + upstream
Bug #733374 [src:units] units: FTBFS: parse.y:29:34: error: 'comm' undeclared
(first use in this function)
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 733374 adri...@gnu.org
Bug #733374 [src:units] units: FTBFS: parse.y:29:34: error
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 733343 librecon-1.9-dev 1.9.0~beta8-1
Bug #733343 [reconserver] reconserver FTBFS on all architectures
Bug reassigned from package 'reconserver' to 'librecon-1.9-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions reconserver/0.9.1-1.
Ignoring re
Source: clisp
Version: 1:2.49-9
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the clisp source package specifies a Build-Depends
libpq-dev [!hppa !ia64 !m68k !s390 s390x !mipsel !powerpc !powerpcspe],
libpcre3-dev, libdbus-1-dev [!hppa !ia64 !m68k !s390 !mipsel !po
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>From HTML:FormFu Changes:
- HTML::FormFu::MultiForm moved out to separate distribution.
HTML::FormFu::MultiForm, but we don't have it packaged in Debian.
There is also [1] relevant:
1.00 2013-12-16
- Updated for HTML-FormFu v1.00
- Only require
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #733429 [src:libcatalyst-modules-perl] libcatalyst-modules-perl: FTBFS:
Tests failed
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
733429: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733429
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2013 21:24:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#733388: fixed in paps 0.6.8-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #733388,
regarding paps: FTBFS: libpaps.c:28:30: fatal error: freetype/ftglyph.h: No
such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2013 21:21:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#730881: fixed in jabber.py 0.5.0-1.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #730881,
regarding jabber.py: FTBFS: uudecode: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/docs/img/logo-56-80.png:
No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2013 21:19:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#732143: fixed in fbi 2.07-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #732143,
regarding fbi: please link with libgif
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Source: cssmin
Version: 0.1.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enterin
Source: ruby-gon
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby1
Source: maven-plugin-testing
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: pydicom
Version: 0.9.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enteri
Source: rabbit
Version: 2.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby1.9
Source: commando
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debi
Source: tk-brief
Version: 5.9-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debi
Source: pyowncloud
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot de
Source: libcommons-lang3-java
Version: 3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> de
Source: jsonpipe
Version: 0.0.8-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debi
Source: python-chameleon
Version: 2.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: golang-gocheck
Version: 0.0~bzr20131118+85-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libcatalyst-modules-perl
Version: 46
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
On Sb, 28 dec 13, 18:45:48, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Package: reconserver
> Version: 0.9.1-1
Hmm, the BTS doesn't know about this package (yet?), CCing maintainers.
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> your package FTBFS on all architectures where it had been tried:
> | configure: WARNING: unrecognize
Source: doxia-maven-plugin
Version: 1.1.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: kalzium
Version: 4:4.11.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Ent
Source: blist
Version: 1.3.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: darktable
Version: 1.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ente
Source: ruby-fixture-builder
Version: 0.3.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /u
Source: rfdump
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: gdebi
Version: 0.9.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> msgfmt zh_TW.po -o
Source: ruby-zoom
Version: 0.4.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: python-cloudservers
Version: 1.1-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fa
Source: calabash
Version: 0.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debi
Source: hyde
Version: 0.8.5a1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enterin
please see http://bugs.debian.org/732282
Is there anybody who wants to maintain openjdk for these architectures? If not,
I'll go ahead and make gcj-jdk the default again on those architectures and
request removal of the kfreebsd and sparc binaries.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Hi,
On Sat Dec 28, 2013 at 20:27:05 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > severity 717023 serious
> Bug #717023 [solr-jetty] solr-jetty: Invalid symlink to solr webapp directory
> Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
This bug mak
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 717023 serious
Bug #717023 [solr-jetty] solr-jetty: Invalid symlink to solr webapp directory
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
717023: http://bugs.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013, David Suárez wrote:
> In the new 2.5 version the headers are located at
> '/usr/include/freetype2/ftglyph.h' instead of
> '/usr/include/freetype2/freetype/ftglyph.h' like in previous versions.
Thanks for the report. The correct thing to do is what is listed here:
http://bugs.
On 28.12.2013 20:56, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 08:51:58PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
While I don't really like it, I do not know of any alternative that
exists now, but, of course, you are invited to create one.
It exists, it's called systemd-shim and it's available in
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 08:51:58PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 28.12.2013 20:32, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:31:46PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >>After that gnome-shell and gdm3 should add a recommendation for
> >>systemd-sysv, since most people will want to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 724430 1.0.0~pre2-3
Bug #724430 [src:refdb] Please stop build depending on automake1.4, automake1.9
and automake1.10
Marked as fixed in versions refdb/1.0.0~pre2-3.
> found 74 1.0.0~pre2-3
Bug #74 [refdb] expected 'char ** __restric
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2013 19:52:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#724125: fixed in xylib 0.8-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #724125,
regarding xylib: FTBFS: configure: error: Boost::Spirit headers were not found.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi Steve,
On 28.12.2013 20:32, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:31:46PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
After that gnome-shell and gdm3 should add a recommendation for
systemd-sysv, since most people will want to use the functionality
like suspend from menus, that needs systemd
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 733384 4.5.1-3.11-3
Bug #733384 [src:gfxboot] gfxboot: FTBFS: gfxboot-font.c:16:30: fatal error:
freetype/ftsynth.h: No such file or directory
The source 'gfxboot' and version '4.5.1-3.11-3' do not appear to match any
binary packages
Marke
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:31:46PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> After that gnome-shell and gdm3 should add a recommendation for
> systemd-sysv, since most people will want to use the functionality
> like suspend from menus, that needs systemd as PID 1, but
> occasionally some people may prefe
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 14:20:54 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 04:07:39AM -0800, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> > >> gcc rabin2.o -L.. -o rabin2 -Wl,-z,relro
> > >> -L/«PKGBUILDDIR»/libr/lib -L/«PKGBUILDDIR»/libr/magic
> > >> -L/«PKGBUILDDIR»/libr/core -L/«PKGBUILDDIR»/
Am 28.12.2013 19:23, schrieb David Suárez:
> Source: python2.7
> Version: 2.7.6-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: jessie sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package fail
Source: ttf2ufm
Version: 3.4.4~r2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On the new 2.5 version the headers are lo
Source: lasi
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On the new 2.5 version the headers are located
Source: xmorph
Version: 1:20090926
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Due to the new libtiff transition.
Releva
Source: python-numpy
Version: 1:1.7.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-l
Source: maude
Version: 2.6-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: nted
Version: 1.10.18-6
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On the new 2.5 version the headers are locate
Source: ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.3.484-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
According to the header the symbol has
Source: mididings
Version: 0~20120419~ds0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> c++
Source: libbluray
Version: 1:0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On the new 2.5 version the headers are l
Source: psychtoolbox-3
Version: 3.0.11.20131017.dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
On the new 2.5 versio
Source: openvas-libnasl
Version: 2.0.2-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/
Source: ptlib
Version: 2.10.10~dfsg-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]:
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
