Source: octave-symbolic
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=octave-symbolicsuite=experimental
is looking bad because the octave-symbolic builds leave running octave-cli, e.g.
buildd 11783 0.2 1.1 122040 45864 ?SN Feb18 2:38
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 01:49:32PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko
deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
Yeah Stuart, thank you for the analysis... I even tried to figure out
shim for compatibility but gave up and decided to let it die off from
jessie encouraging people just to fetch recent one from
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 23:27 -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
All of the error messages shown in the logs you sent so far involve
the raw disks ( sdb, etc ) rather than the raid array. You certainly
should not be running fdisk or parted on the raw disk, and responding
to the error messages by saying
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Yeah Stuart, thank you for the analysis... I even tried to figure out
shim for compatibility but gave up and decided to let it die off from
jessie encouraging people just to fetch recent one from NeuroDebian
alongside with more recent statsmodels.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:38:14AM +0100, Florian Schlichting wrote:
Package: openssl
Version: 1.0.1e-2+deb7u14
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Newly released RFC 7465 [0] describes RC4 as being on the verge of
becoming practically exploitable and consequently mandates that both
servers
Package: openssl
Version: 1.0.1e-2+deb7u14
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Newly released RFC 7465 [0] describes RC4 as being on the verge of
becoming practically exploitable and consequently mandates that both
servers and clients MUST NOT offer or negotiate an RC4 cipher suite, and
indeed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 778747 1.0.1k-1
Bug #778747 [openssl] openssl: RFC 7465 says RC4 is broken, never to be used
Marked as found in versions openssl/1.0.1k-1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
778747:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 778668 + sid jessie
Bug #778668 {Done: Pierre Chifflier pol...@debian.org} [libhtp-dev,suricata]
suricata and libhtp-dev: error when trying to install together
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
tags 757413 + sid jessie
Bug #757413 {Done: Steve
Package: dtc-cyrus
Version: 0.35.5-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
since it still depends on the transitional cyrus-*-2.2 packages that
have been removed after wheezy.
Andreas
--
control: tags -1 - sid jessie
Hi,
Looking at git log -SUSBDEVICES quickly, this code path has been here
for 10+ years (in various forms). That's also confirmed by Gaudenz in
#761815's bug log. I don't think a jessie tag is appropriate.
then why don't you remove it while you're at it writing
Processing control commands:
tags -1 - sid jessie
Bug #757413 {Done: Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com} [partman-target]
debian-installer: Please do not add mount point on /media/usb0 because create
conflict with mount point create by kdm desktop session
Removed tag(s) sid and jessie.
--
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org (2015-02-19):
control: tags -1 - sid jessie
Ta.
Looking at git log -SUSBDEVICES quickly, this code path has been here
for 10+ years (in various forms). That's also confirmed by Gaudenz in
#761815's bug log. I don't think a jessie tag is appropriate.
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:19:16 +
with message-id e1yoq4a-0001nr...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#775627: fixed in node-tap 0.4.13-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #775627,
regarding node-tap: FTBFS in jessie: Tests failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:19:09 +
with message-id e1yoq4t-0001la...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#775843: fixed in node-serve-static 1.6.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #775843,
regarding node-serve-static: CVE-2015-1164
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:30:55 +
with message-id e1yorbv-00027w...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#776948: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #761179,
regarding pgtune: Update to a newer version
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 763900 grave
Bug #763900 [iceweasel] iceweasel/ppc: jemallocCompile-time page size does
not divide the runtime one.
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Hi,
considering the build log below I do not think vsearch does even compile
on i386. Will be clarified by upstream.
Kind regards
Andreas.
- Forwarded message from Debian buildds nore...@buildd.debian.org -
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:30:03 +
From: Debian buildds
I still see this bug in monkeysphere 0.37-2 on sid (fresh stable
install, upgrade through testing to unstable).
Aptitude installation:
Setting up monkeysphere (0.37-2) ...
adding monkeysphere user...
ms: setting up Monkeysphere authentication trust core...
Failed running transition script
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 14 Feb 2015, at 16:23, Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es wrote:
I wrote about this three weeks ago but got no answer. I'm going to
officially forward the Debian bug this time, with all the details.
The test case is just 840 bytes long. Please
Package: grub-efi-amd64-bin
Version: 2.02~beta2-20
Severity: critical
On a couple of occasions recently my system has been updated to remove
boot/bootx86.efi from the EFI boot partition, and on a new install on a
separate machine this file was not installed at all. Instead
debian/grubx86.efi was
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:50:40PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko y...@debian.org
wrote:
tags -1 pending
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Any news? Should we add a removal hint for seaborn?
Since you haven't removed yet -- gimme please few more days, I will fix
it up for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
limit source vsearch
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'vsearch'
Limit currently set to 'source':'vsearch'
tags 776813 + pending
Bug #776813 [src:vsearch] vsearch: FTBFS on i386: test times out (hangs?) while
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:18:48 +
with message-id e1youks-0003v0...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#765722: fixed in libxml2 2.9.1+dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #765722,
regarding CVE-2014-3660 libxml2 billion laugh variant
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:18:48 +
with message-id e1youks-0003v6...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#768089: fixed in libxml2 2.9.1+dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #768089,
regarding libxml2: CVE-2014-3660 patch makes installation-guide FTBFS
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:18:48 +
with message-id e1youks-0003v6...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#768089: fixed in libxml2 2.9.1+dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #768089,
regarding libxml2-utils: Upstream bug 738805 triggered by CVE-2014-3660 fix
to be marked as
Yes, I forgot to mention that, but it's the same with xdg-open. `xdg-open`
under
bash doesn't have this issue.
$ xdg-open exploit.jpg
exploit succeeded exploit.jpg
$ bash xdg-open exploit.jpg
(works as expected)
As _local_ is not in POSIX, it would be great if xdg-open was not using
_local_
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Because you might have had some good reasons, so I thought I'd wait for
some feedback before removing the tags.
ah!
feel free to directly adjust bugs I tag (or otherwise triage, really),
especially as long as I'll see them that I
Your message dated Fri, 20 Feb 2015 03:19:57 +
with message-id e1yoe8d-0001cv...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#775619: fixed in seaborn 0.4.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #775619,
regarding seaborn: FTBFS in jessie: Tests failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
tags -1 pending
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Any news? Should we add a removal hint for seaborn?
Since you haven't removed yet -- gimme please few more days, I will fix
it up for jessie
I have just uploaded -3 with fixes for mentioned FTBFS and few others
which could
Hello,
On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:04:20 -0800 Nick Seth-Smith n...@seth-smith.com wrote:
Hello
I read the chain with interest since I have been fighting the same
issue on my machine. What is interesting (at least to me) is that I
am running a much older release of Ubuntu Lucid with a
30 matches
Mail list logo
