Bug#802671: Tentative patches for version 1.44

2015-10-23 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Thank you for the backport Raphael, I started working on the backport for 1.49 and I've interpreted similarly the changes required. The patch could be slightly simplified by moving the satisfiesCurveEquation() functions directly into the two ECPoint subclasses instead of introducing an intermediary

Bug#802704: calibre: FTBFS due to missing libraries to link to

2015-10-23 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: reassign -1 qtbase5-private-dev 5.5.1+dfsg-2 Control: affects -1 src:calibre Hi Lisandro, On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:44:55 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Hi! Musescore has started to FTBFS in the latest rebuild against Qt5 [ftbfs] > > [ftbfs] >

Processed: oslo.middleware fixed in 2.8.0-2

2015-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 798928 2.8.0-2 Bug #798928 {Done: Thomas Goirand } [src:python-oslo.middleware] python-oslo.middleware: FTBFS: AttributeError: assert_called_once Marked as fixed in versions python-oslo.middleware/2.8.0-2. > End of message, stopping proces

Bug#802757: djangorestframework-gis: FTBFS with djangorestframework 3.2.2-1

2015-10-23 Thread Brian May
Source: djangorestframework-gis Version: 0.8-2 Severity: serious Justification: Does not build from source I just uploaded djangorestframework 3.2.2-1 to unstable. Will see if I can look at this if I get a chance. If not tonight, possibly tomorrow. An example of the error - there are several sim

Processed: Re: calibre: FTBFS due to missing libraries to link to

2015-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 qtbase5-private-dev 5.5.1+dfsg-2 Bug #802704 [src:calibre] calibre: FTBFS due to missing libraries to link to Bug reassigned from package 'src:calibre' to 'qtbase5-private-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions calibre/2.38.0+dfsg-1. Ignoring request

Bug#802671: Tentative patches for version 1.44

2015-10-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, I have backported the relevant commits to version 1.44 and the result is in the attached patches. The package builds fine but I have not tested it and I'm not sure how to properly test it... if you have suggestions, I'm happy to hear them. I have asked an upstream developer (Peter Dettman)

<    1   2