Bug#831121: marked as done (shark: FTBFS with GCC 6: HDF5Tests.cpp:39:56: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator=' (operand types are 'std::vector' and 'boost::assign_detail::generic_list

Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:33:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#831121: fixed in shark 3.1.1+ds1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #831121, regarding shark: FTBFS with GCC 6: HDF5Tests.cpp:39:56: error: ambiguous overload for

Bug#820701: marked as done (shark: FTBFS on various architectures - testsuite failures)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:33:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#820701: fixed in shark 3.1.1+ds1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #820701, regarding shark: FTBFS on various architectures - testsuite failures to be marked as done.

Bug#802608: marked as done (knetwalk: missing depend qml-module-org-kde-games-core)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#802608: fixed in knetwalk 4:16.08.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #802608, regarding knetwalk: missing depend qml-module-org-kde-games-core to be marked as done. This

Bug#834674: pyevolve: FTBFS in testing (Format: "jpeg" not recognized)

Control: reassign -1 graphviz Control: merge -1 827806 Hi Santiago, On 2016-08-18 00:21, Santiago Vila wrote: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "pyevolve_ex19_gp.py", line 85, in > main_run() > File "pyevolve_ex19_gp.py", line 82, in main_run > graph.write_jpeg('tree.png',

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#834674: pyevolve: FTBFS in testing (Format: "jpeg" not recognized)

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 graphviz Bug #834674 [src:pyevolve] pyevolve: FTBFS in testing (Format: "jpeg" not recognized) Bug reassigned from package 'src:pyevolve' to 'graphviz'. No longer marked as found in versions pyevolve/0.6~rc1+svn398+dfsg-9. Ignoring request to alter

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 8:50:33 PM AEST Adrian Bunk wrote: > The i386 failure looks like upstream #2926 (fixed in the 1.11.0 release), > the failures on other architectures look like similar problems that > require similar fixes. 1.13.0 still FTBFS on i386 for another reason:

Bug#835302: marked as done (protobuf: FTBFS on s390x (undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_*'))

Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:48:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#835290: fixed in protobuf 3.0.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #835290, regarding protobuf: FTBFS on s390x (undefined reference to

Bug#835290: marked as done (protobuf: FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*, long)')

Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:48:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#835290: fixed in protobuf 3.0.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #835290, regarding protobuf: FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to

Bug#835358: marked as done (libprotobuf-java: artifactid should be protobuf-java not protobuf-parent)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:48:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#835358: fixed in protobuf 3.0.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #835358, regarding libprotobuf-java: artifactid should be protobuf-java not protobuf-parent to be marked

Bug#835290: tagged as pending

tag 835290 pending -- We believe that the bug #835290 you reported has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the commit message below and/or inspect the commit contents at: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-protobuf/pkg-protobuf.git/diff/?id=6df9f07 (This message was generated

Processed: Bug#835290 tagged as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 835290 pending Bug #835290 [src:protobuf] protobuf: FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*, long)' Bug #835302 [src:protobuf] protobuf: FTBFS on s390x (undefined reference

Processed: Re: Fixed in 4.6.7-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 834107 metview Bug #834107 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [libgrib-api-dev] magics++: FTBFS (No rule to make target '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libopenjp2.so', needed by 'lib/libMagPlus.so.3.0.0') Added indication that 834107

Processed: Re: Bug#831961: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 831961 + pending Bug #831961 [src:proftpd-dfsg] proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop. Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#831961: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.

tags 831961 + pending thanks Hello Santiago Vila, and everyone else, I have committed to proftpd-pkg git repository, I will upload to mentos once the other diff has completed. On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 06:49:06PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > tags 831961 + patch > thanks > > The following patch

Processed: Also mark it as fixed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 830471 4.6.7-1 Bug #830471 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [src:metview] metview: FTBFS: TeDefines.h:208:11: error: '::isnan' has not been declared Marked as fixed in versions metview/4.6.7-1. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: Move #834107 to the correct package and mark it properly as fixed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 834107 libgrib-api-dev Bug #834107 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [src:magics++] magics++: FTBFS (No rule to make target '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libopenjp2.so', needed by 'lib/libMagPlus.so.3.0.0') Bug reassigned

Processed: Re: Fixed in 4.6.7-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 830471 4.6.7-1 Bug #830471 [src:metview] metview: FTBFS: TeDefines.h:208:11: error: '::isnan' has not been declared No longer marked as found in versions metview/4.6.7-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#835373: blitz++: FTBFS due to testsuite failures on several architectures

Source: blitz++ Version: 1:0.10+ds-1 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=blitz++ Failure on i386, armel, armhf: ../../config/test-driver: line 107: 16150 Aborted "$@" > $log_file 2>&1 FAIL: matmult Failures on arm64, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x: FAIL:

Bug#831136: marked as done (calculix-cgx: FTBFS with GCC 6: stl_algobase.h:243:56: error: macro "min" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:19:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#831136: fixed in calculix-cgx 2.11+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #831136, regarding calculix-cgx: FTBFS with GCC 6: stl_algobase.h:243:56: error: macro "min"

Processed: bug 835290 is forwarded to https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/2002

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 835290 https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/2002 Bug #835290 [src:protobuf] protobuf: FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*, long)' Bug #835302 [src:protobuf]

Bug#834439: clementine: depend on gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad

2016-08-23 23:33 GMT+02:00 Thomas Pierson : After installing gstreamer1.0-alsa and manually selecting ALSA output (it just showed ALSA, I couldn't select the specific card). out.txt.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Bug#834439: clementine: depend on gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad

I tried with all 4 files, it doesn't play any of them without plugins-bad. 2016-08-23 23:33 GMT+02:00 Thomas Pierson : > On 23/08/2016 22:33, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: >> I tried playing 2 files >> Ogg data, Vorbis audio, stereo, 44100 Hz, ~0 bps, created by: >> Xiphophorus

Bug#778747: marked as done (openssl: RFC 7465 says RC4 is broken, never to be used)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 23:15:47 +0200 with message-id <20160824211546.6clvnxa72ozrg...@breakpoint.cc> and subject line Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#778747: openssl: RFC 7465 says RC4 is broken, never to be used has caused the Debian Bug report #778747, regarding openssl: RFC 7465 says

Bug#831591: ffmpeg: kodi crash

Hi! First, please understand that so far, no ABI breakage between FFmpeg 3.0 and FFmpeg 3.1 was found, only the usage of non-public api (that we decided to work-around for 3.1.1). Am I correct that no backtrace was provided for this issue? But even with a backtrace, I fear a bisect may be

Bug#835369: RM: dsyslog -- RoQA, unmaintained, RC-buggy, low popcon should dsyslog be removed from Debian (dead upstream, low popcon, RC buggy)

Source: dsyslog Severity: serious Dear maintainers, XTaran was in contact with upstream asking about the status and the response was that it is no longer developed [1]. Therefore the question if it should be removed from Debian, especially as it will need patches to fix #624025, which is open

Bug#835280: marked as done (libabw: FTBFS: libabw-0.1.so: undefined reference to `boost::system::system_category()')

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:50:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#835280: fixed in libabw 0.1.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #835280, regarding libabw: FTBFS: libabw-0.1.so: undefined reference to `boost::system::system_category()'

Bug#811972: marked as done (khtml: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:33:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#811972: fixed in khtml 5.25.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #811972, regarding khtml: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#831145: marked as done (kjsembed: FTBFS with GCC 6: dh_makeshlibs: failing due to earlier errors)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:33:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#831145: fixed in kjsembed 5.25.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #831145, regarding kjsembed: FTBFS with GCC 6: dh_makeshlibs: failing due to earlier errors to be

Bug#835213: [Help] Re: Bug#835213: python-cogent: FTBFS in testing (AssertionError)

Hi, On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:45:59PM +, Santiago Vila wrote: > The way it fails may be related to Bug #730515. I confirm that this was related and this very reason is fixed in SVN. There is also a new upstream version. Unfortunately there are 4 remaining failures. For a test I was just

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi Gianfranco, On 24-08-16 14:38, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Interesting findings: > fpcmkcfg-2.6.4 is *not* failing in neither Jessie, nor Sid. Good finding, but I miss the words "on powerpc" ;) . > for this, I copied the file from 2.6.4 over the one from 3.0.0, and I did a > rebuild. >

Bug#806383: marked as done (python-igraph: FTBFS on *i386: testMultilevel AssertionError)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:03:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#806383: fixed in python-igraph 0.7.1.post6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #806383, regarding python-igraph: FTBFS on *i386: testMultilevel AssertionError to be marked

Bug#833121: marked as done (darkradiant: seffaults when python scripting enabled)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#833121: fixed in darkradiant 2.0.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #833121, regarding darkradiant: seffaults when python scripting enabled to be marked as done. This

Bug#817880: The actual error message for the eclipse-cdt FTBFS

The actual error message for the eclipse-cdt FTBFS was snipped from the log in the bug report, it is: [javac] 67. ERROR in /tmp/eclipse-cdt-8.6.0/debian/.eclipse-build/org.eclipse.cdt.core/model/org/eclipse/cdt/core/settings/model/util/PatternNameMap.java (at line 90) [javac]

Bug#835285: webkit2gtk FTBFS

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:21:14PM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:40:59AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > I've been strugling to rebuild webkit2gtk backport. I tried with > > 2 environement, one using Jessie and sbuild, and one using a > > virtualbox machine without

Bug#835341: [Pkg-mutt-maintainers] Bug#835341: mutt 1.6.2-3 has wrong dependencies

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:53:56PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Version 1.6.2-2 depends on > > > > > > libgnutls30 (>=3.5.0) > > > libnotmuch4 (>=0.21~rc1) > > > > > > These should be correct. > > > > yes, this was my fault, I've already asked a binNMU for amd64, the other > > arch > >

Bug#835227: bookkeeper: FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-server:jar:4.2.4

Markus Koschany wrote: > whenever you see something with "protobuf" in the logs, it's most > certainly related to #835358. :) Really helpful; thank you for this :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#835341: [Pkg-mutt-maintainers] Bug#835341: mutt 1.6.2-3 has wrong dependencies

> > Version 1.6.2-2 depends on > > > > libgnutls30 (>=3.5.0) > > libnotmuch4 (>=0.21~rc1) > > > > These should be correct. > > yes, this was my fault, I've already asked a binNMU for amd64, the other arch > should be fine. > > See bugs.debian.org/835324 for more details. Hi. Just to point

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

Source: rkt Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious rkt FTBFS on several architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rkt The i386 failure looks like upstream #2926 (fixed in the 1.11.0 release), the failures on other architectures look like similar problems that require

Bug#830060: Could not find 'appraisal'

Package: ruby-appraisal Followup-For: Bug #830060 Dear Maintainer, I've built ruby-appraisal 0.5.1-2 directly from git. and the I cannot reproduce this issue. $ ruby -e 'gem "appraisal"' $ dpkg -l | grep ruby-appraisal ii ruby-appraisal 0.5.1-2 all Find out

Bug#835227: bookkeeper: FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-server:jar:4.2.4

On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:00:30 +0100 Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: bookkeeper > Version: 4.2.4-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs > X-Debbugs-Cc:

Bug#835358: libprotobuf-java: artifactid should be protobuf-java not protobuf-parent

Package: libprotobuf-java Version: 3.0.0-3 Severity: serious Hi, the recent upload of libprotobuf-java 3.0.0 breaks its reverse-dependencies [1]. This was caused by changing the artifactid in java/pom.xml from protobuf-java to protobuf-parent or in other words java/pom.xml represents the parent

Bug#749365: marked as done (lucene2: FTBFS too much often)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:21:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#749365: fixed in lucene2 2.9.4+ds1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #749365, regarding lucene2: FTBFS too much often to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#811977: marked as done (kjs: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:20:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#811977: fixed in kjs 5.25.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #811977, regarding kjs: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#835354: libitext-java: uninstallable, makes other packages FTBFS

Source: libitext-java Version: 2.1.7-11 Severity: serious libitext-java is uninstallable in sid at the moment. This is causing other build failures (e.g. for jasperreports). I'm not totally sure why the package won't migrate to testing because only libitext-java-gcj has been dropped with the

Bug#835341: [Pkg-mutt-maintainers] Bug#835341: mutt 1.6.2-3 has wrong dependencies

tag 835341 +pending thanks On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 02:48:00PM +, Viktor Jägersküpper wrote: > Package: mutt > Version: 1.6.2-3 > Severity: serious > > Dear Maintainer, > > the latest version of mutt has somehow got wrong dependencies (from an > older version I guess) and so is not

Bug#831096: Packages FTBFS with new eigen3

Hi Graham, it looks like the eigen-upstream has a patch already, but AFAIK it does not solve all problems. I discussed it with Philipp already and I will apply the patch as far as it will be ready. Yes, bug can be reassigned. Regards Anton 2016-08-24 18:01 GMT+02:00 Graham Inggs

Processed: Re: [Pkg-mutt-maintainers] Bug#835341: mutt 1.6.2-3 has wrong dependencies

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 835341 +pending Bug #835341 [mutt] mutt 1.6.2-3 has wrong dependencies Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 835341: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835341

Bug#835037: Packages FTBFS with new eigen3

Hi At least ceres-solver and opensurgsim FTBFS with eigen3 3.3~beta2-1. They both build fine with 3.3~beta1-2. Should these bugs be moved to eigen3? Regards Graham

Bug#832840: license-reconcile: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255

Thanks for looking into this, Petter. Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen (2016-08-24 11:05:16) > I had a look at the current failure, and discovered that there are two > issues blocking the build. One is the changed output format from > licensecheck, where a trailing period now show up in the

Bug#835349: gnupg needs proper Breaks/Conflicts for switch to gnupg2

Package: gnupg Version: 2.1.14-5 Severity: serious For at least #782904 and possibly other packages proper Breaks/Conflicts are required for all packages where old versions (especially the versions in stable) were broken to ensure that these packages get upgraded to fixed versions when the gnupg

Bug#835341: mutt 1.6.2-3 has wrong dependencies

Package: mutt Version: 1.6.2-3 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, the latest version of mutt has somehow got wrong dependencies (from an older version I guess) and so is not installable in unstable or testing. # apt-get install mutt Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading

Processed: forcibly merging 832438 833783

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 832438 833783 Bug #832438 {Done: gregor herrmann } [cdbs] cdbs: pass -I. through to Makefile.PL and Build.PL Bug #832438 {Done: gregor herrmann } [cdbs] cdbs: pass -I. through to Makefile.PL and

Bug#835285: webkit2gtk FTBFS

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:40:59AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I've been strugling to rebuild webkit2gtk backport. I tried with > 2 environement, one using Jessie and sbuild, and one using a > virtualbox machine without sbuild. Both times, I had the below > output: > > collect2: error: ld

Bug#835336: influxdb: FTBFS in testing (go generate returned exit code 1)

Package: src:influxdb Version: 0.13.0+dfsg1-4 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package on stretch with dpkg-buildpackage -A and sbuild and it failed with an error like this: -- go generate -v -ldflags=-X

Bug#831096: opensurgsim: FTBFS with GCC 6: cstdlib:75:25: fatal error: stdlib.h: No such file or directory

With the aforementioned patch in place, opensurgsim builds successfully with eigen3 3.3~beta1-2. Unfortunately, it fails to build with eigen3 3.3~beta2-1 currently in testing with the following message (hopefully the relevant bits): [ 99%] Building CXX object

Processed: Fix for the bristol FTBFS

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 834180 +patch Bug #834180 [src:bristol] bristol: FTBFS: audioEngineJack.c:42:26: fatal error: alsa/iatomic.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#834180: Fix for the bristol FTBFS

tags 834180 +patch thanks A fix for the bristol FTBFS is attached. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said.

Bug#835105: marked as done (erfa: FTBFS [i386]: Test failure)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:03:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#835105: fixed in erfa 1.2.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #835105, regarding erfa: FTBFS [i386]: Test failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #826300 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:fpc] fpc: fp-compiler not installable on powerpc since glibc 2.23 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to

Bug#835290: protobuf: FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*, long)'

On 08/24/16 14:35, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On 2016-08-24 14:20, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:28:23 +0200 Aurelien Jarno wrote: [I have added a Cc: to the debian-s390 list as it appears we have multiple copies of this code in the archive, so the patch might be useful in

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

control: reopen -1 ok, after digging into the issue I did: create a jessie-backport chroot for building create a sid chroot for testing fpcmkcfg- binaries (it crashes just by running the tool with no parameters). Interesting findings: fpcmkcfg-2.6.4 is *not* failing in neither Jessie, nor Sid.

Bug#835290: protobuf: FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*, long)'

On 2016-08-24 14:20, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:28:23 +0200 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > [I have added a Cc: to the debian-s390 list as it appears we have > > multiple copies of this code in the archive, so the patch might be > > useful in other packages.] > > protobuf has

Bug#835290: protobuf: FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*, long)'

On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:28:23 +0200 Aurelien Jarno wrote: [I have added a Cc: to the debian-s390 list as it appears we have multiple copies of this code in the archive, so the patch might be useful in other packages.] protobuf has taken the atomicops code from V8, we should fix the

Processed: Merge #835290 & #835302

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 835170 by 835290 Bug #835170 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf 835170 was blocked by: 835302 835266 835170 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 835170: 835290 > merge 835302 835290 Bug #835302 [src:protobuf] protobuf:

Bug#831874: marked as done (mediawiki: fails to install: mediawiki.postinst: php5enmod: not found)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:49:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#831874: fixed in mediawiki 1:1.27.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #831874, regarding mediawiki: fails to install: mediawiki.postinst: php5enmod: not found to be marked

Bug#831227: marked as done (mediawiki: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /var/lib/mediawiki/extensions/Cite)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:49:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#831227: fixed in mediawiki 1:1.27.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #831227, regarding mediawiki: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite

Processed: protobuf: FTBFS on s390x (undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_*')

Processing control commands: > block 835170 by -1 Bug #835170 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf 835170 was blocked by: 835266 835170 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 835170: 835302 -- 835170: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835170 835302:

Bug#835301: binutils-multiarch: breaks reverse dependencies on upgrades

Package: binutils-multiarch Version: 2.27-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable having binutils and binutils-multiarch installed and upgrading from testing (2.26.1-1) to unstable (2.27-6) makes at least `strings` and `ar` go away. This happened to me on my main system when I

Bug#835302: protobuf: FTBFS on s390x (undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_*')

Source: protobuf Version: 3.0.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch upstream Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so Control: block 835170 by -1 Dear Maintainer, protobuf 3.0.0 FTBFS on s390x because it lacks support for this architecture: /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX

Processed: Re: Bug#832840: license-reconcile: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #832840 [src:license-reconcile] license-reconcile: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255 Added tag(s) patch. -- 832840: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832840 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#832840: license-reconcile: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255

Control: tags -1 + patch [Petter Reinholdtsen] > My problem is that Debian::LicenseReconcile::App::suggest_stanzas isn't a > subroutine, > it is a boolean variable. I have no idea how to convince the coverage test > that > it isn't supposed to have any coverage. Or perhaps I completly

Bug#780429: snmp-mibs-downloader: postinst uses /usr/share/doc content (Policy 12.3): /usr/share/doc/mibrfcs/*

Hi! On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 20:23:13 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: snmp-mibs-downloader > Version: 1.1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > a test with piuparts revealed that your package uses files from > /usr/share/doc in its maintainer

Bug#835283: marked as done (snap: FTBFS: exonpairs.c:86:7: error: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation])

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:54:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#835283: fixed in snap 2013-11-29-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #835283, regarding snap: FTBFS: exonpairs.c:86:7: error: this 'if' clause does not guard...

Bug#782005: ovirt-guest-agent spu

"László Böszörményi (GCS)" writes: > Please use the following: dget -x > http://www.barcikacomp.hu/gcs/ovirt-guest-agent_1.0.10.2.dfsg-2+deb8u1.dsc Thank you. I checked it and: - It works for me with sysvinit. - With systemd, there is the same permission problem as in

Bug#806383: marked as pending

tag 806383 pending thanks Hello, Bug #806383 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: http://git.debian.org/?p=python-modules/packages/python-igraph.git;a=commitdiff;h=6265548 --- commit

Processed: Bug#806383 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 806383 pending Bug #806383 [src:python-igraph] python-igraph: FTBFS on *i386: testMultilevel AssertionError Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 806383:

Bug#835292: pcl 1.8 fails to build on armel and armhf (OpenGLES?)

Package: src:pcl Version: 1.8.0+dfsg1-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch pcl 1.8 fails to build on armel and armhf (OpenGLES?) cd /«BUILDDIR»/pcl-1.8.0+dfsg1/build/apps/in_hand_scanner && /usr/bin/c++ -DEIGEN_USE_NEW_STDVECTOR -DEIGEN_YES_I_KNOW_SPARSE_MODULE_IS_NOT_STABLE_YET

Bug#834188: marked as done (qsapecng: FTBFS: type_traits/detail/has_binary_operator.hp:50: Parse error at "BOOST_JOIN")

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:22:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#834188: fixed in qsapecng 2.1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #834188, regarding qsapecng: FTBFS: type_traits/detail/has_binary_operator.hp:50: Parse error at

Bug#834769: marked as done (python-oslo.config: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named setuptools)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:22:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#834769: fixed in python-oslo.config 1:3.15.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #834769, regarding python-oslo.config: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named setuptools to be

Bug#828658: marked as done (FTBFS under Django 1.10)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:19:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#828658: fixed in django-stronghold 0.2.7+debian-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #828658, regarding FTBFS under Django 1.10 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#822042: libforms: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets

On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 02:19:30 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila wrote: > > > I also recommend switching to dh, but in the meantime, the attached > > patch should work. > > Unfortunately that patch does not work. Strange. While it's true that I completely forgot

Bug#835290: protobuf: FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*, long)'

Source: protobuf Version: 3.0.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch upstream [I have added a Cc: to the debian-s390 list as it appears we have multiple copies of this code in the archive, so the patch might be useful in other packages.] Dear Maintainer, The new version of protobuf fails to build

Bug#832840: license-reconcile: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255

While I agree that it would be useful to have an active maintainer of the package, I hope it will not block this useful tool to stay in Debian as long as it is working. I had a look at the current failure, and discovered that there are two issues blocking the build. One is the changed output

Bug#832338: [PKG-Openstack-devel] Bug#832338: Also affects latest Sid - 3:9.0.1-2

On 08/23/2016 10:01 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > Please don't leave the package in this horrible, broken state! > > > You need to package an older version to replace this if you can't > get it to work. Granted, Sid is 'unstable', but that does NOT mean > that it's the same as 'completely

Processed: Bug#835094 in apt marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag 835094 pending Bug #835094 [src:apt] APT fails to install packages which conflict with an installed package when APT::Get::Purge=true is used Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #835094 to the same tags previously set -- 835094:

Bug#835094: in apt marked as pending

Control: tag 835094 pending Hello, Bug #835094 in apt reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/diff/?id=084562e (this message was generated automatically

Bug#835285: webkit2gtk FTBFS

Source: webkit2gtk Version: 2.12.3-1~bpo8+1 Severity: serious Hi, I've been strugling to rebuild webkit2gtk backport. I tried with 2 environement, one using Jessie and sbuild, and one using a virtualbox machine without sbuild. Both times, I had the below output: collect2: error: ld returned 1

Processed: Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package gajim Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'gajim' Limit currently set to 'package':'gajim' > severity 834399 normal Bug #834399 [gajim] Gajim GnuPG improvements Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' >

Bug#835283: snap: FTBFS: exonpairs.c:86:7: error: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]

Source: snap Version: 2013-11-29-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, snap fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

Bug#835284: urdfdom: FTBFS: Could not find a configuration file for package "urdfdom_headers" that is 367 compatible with requested version "0.4".

Source: urdfdom Version: 0.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, urdfdom fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

Bug#835281: projectl: FTBFS: libgphobos2.a(lt4-curl.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dlclose@@GLIBC_2.2.5'

Source: projectl Version: 1.001.dfsg1-8 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, projectl fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

Bug#835280: libabw: FTBFS: libabw-0.1.so: undefined reference to `boost::system::system_category()'

Source: libabw Version: 0.1.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, libabw fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

Bug#835279: tiledarray: FTBFS: ta_test.cpp:43:1: error: expected initializer at end of input BOOST_GLOBAL_FIXTURE( GlobalFixture )

Source: tiledarray Version: 0.4.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, tiledarray fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

Bug#835282: rocs: FTBFS: dh_install: Cannot find (any matches for) "usr/share/appdata/org.kde.rocs.appdata.xml" (tried in "." and "debian/tmp")

Source: rocs Version: 4:16.04.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, rocs fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

Bug#835226: marked as done (nurpawiki: FTBFS: sh: 1: camlp4: not found)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 08:36:23 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#835226: nurpawiki: FTBFS: sh: 1: camlp4: not found has caused the Debian Bug report #835226, regarding nurpawiki: FTBFS: sh: 1: camlp4: not found to be

Bug#831098: marked as done (libretro-desmume: FTBFS with GCC 6: src/MMU_timing.h:158:28: error: left operand of shift expression '(-1 << 11)' is negative [-fpermissive])

Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2016 06:18:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#831098: fixed in libretro-desmume 0.9.11+git20160819+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #831098, regarding libretro-desmume: FTBFS with GCC 6:

Bug#805947: libforms: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets

Control: tags -1 + patch On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 02:19:30 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila wrote: > I also recommend switching to dh, but in the meantime, the attached > patch should work. Unfortunately that patch does not work. I couldn't figure out how to fix it so I made a tested and working patch to

Processed: Re: libforms: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #822042 [src:libforms] libforms: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #822042 to the same tags previously set -- 822042: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822042

Processed: Re: libforms: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #805947 [src:libforms] libforms: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (no binary artifacts) Added tag(s) patch. -- 805947: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805947 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org