Bug#830726: xtrlock: CVE-2016-10894: xtrlock does not block multitouch events

2019-08-16 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Patch attached that works for me on my Dell XPS 13 Antoine, does the patch attached to: https://bugs.debian.org/830726#43 … also work for you? If so, I will go ahead and upload. Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org

Bug#925687: fswatch: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-08-16 Thread Alf Gaida
hahaha - good joke: The severity of this report will be raised before the bullseye release, so nothing has to be done for the buster release.

Bug#934034: Bug#934775: stretch-pu: package monkeysphere/0.41-1+deb9u1

2019-08-16 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 934034 + pending thanks [Adding 934...@bugs.debian.org to CC, tagging original bug as pending; not this pu...] Hi Adam, > >   monkeysphere (0.41-1+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium > >    > > * Prevent a FTBFS by updating the tests to accommodate an updated GnuPG > > in > >   

Processed: Re: Bug#934775: stretch-pu: package monkeysphere/0.41-1+deb9u1

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 934034 + pending Bug #934034 [src:monkeysphere] monkeysphere: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests) Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 934034:

Bug#934901: marked as done (Please switch to Python 3 or remove your package from Sid/Bullseye)

2019-08-16 Thread Gerber van der Graaf
Hello, The PyGpiv package is not maintained anymore from upsream. So I think it's a good idea to remove python-gpiv from Sid. As I'm not a DD, I cannot do this by myself. Sincerely, Gerber van der Graaf On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 17:33 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Your message dated

Bug#932578: PATCH

2019-08-16 Thread sam penny
The release notes for PILlow 6.1 (https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/6.0.0.html#backwards-incompatible-changes) indicate that Image.VERSION has been dropped in favour of using Image.__version__. VERSION was fossilised at '1.1.7' 9 years ago to avoid confusing legacy users of

Bug#932404: marked as done (firefox-esr, FTBFS "possible zip bomb".)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 21:21:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#932404: fixed in unzip 6.0-21+deb9u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #932404, regarding firefox-esr, FTBFS "possible zip bomb". to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#934935: Should docbook2odf be removed?

2019-08-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: docbook2odf Severity: serious Should docbook2odf be removed? It's unmaintained (last maintainer upload in 2007), last upload in 2010 and has been dropped from testing for three years now. Cheers, Moritz

Processed: tagging 933185

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 933185 + pending Bug #933185 [fai-server] fai-server: /etc/fai/apt/sources.list should not contain trusted=yes to skip GPG verification Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#876566: printfilters-ppd: Depends of no longer available package (mpage)

2019-08-16 Thread Tari
Hi What should we do here with the from Debian removed package? We could at least move the mpage from depend to recommend to fix the issue with install and build. See diff below for that small change. But as Jeremy Bicha said on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876571, also

Bug#934931: planet-venus: depends on cruft package

2019-08-16 Thread peter green
Package: planet-venus Version: 0~git9de2109-4.2 Severity: serious Tags: bullseye, sid planet-venus depends on python-portalocker which is no longer built by the portalocker source package. If you want your package to stay around you probably need to migrate to python 3.

Bug#934932: presentty (build-)depends on cruft package.

2019-08-16 Thread peter green
Package: presentty Version: 0.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: bullseye, sid Presentty (build-)depends on the python-pbr binary package which is no longer built by the corresponding source package. There is a bug report questioning whether said dependency is really necessary (

Bug#839374: marked as done (kcov: FTBFS: ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 19:34:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#839374: fixed in kcov 36+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #839374, regarding kcov: FTBFS: ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#790912: marked as done (FTBFS: ld: CMakeFiles/kcov.dir/capabilities.cc.o .. recompile with -fPIC)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 19:34:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#790912: fixed in kcov 36+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #790912, regarding FTBFS: ld: CMakeFiles/kcov.dir/capabilities.cc.o .. recompile with -fPIC to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#922698: marked as done (kcov: FTBFS on sid : error: 'SIGUNUSED' was not declared in this scope)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 19:34:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#922698: fixed in kcov 36+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #922698, regarding kcov: FTBFS on sid : error: 'SIGUNUSED' was not declared in this scope to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#880344: marked as done (kcov: FTBFS: Test failures)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 19:34:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#880344: fixed in kcov 36+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #880344, regarding kcov: FTBFS: Test failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#934930: python-novnc: depends on cruft package.

2019-08-16 Thread peter green
Package: python-novnc Version: 1:1.0.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: bullseye, sid The python-novnc package depends on the python-oslo.config binary package which is no longer built by the corresponding source package. As far as I can tell if you want to keep novnc around you will need to migrate

Bug#925792: marked as done (odb: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:20:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925792: fixed in odb 2.4.0-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #925792, regarding odb: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Re: disper -S → Segmentation fault

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 844505 serious Bug #844505 [disper] disper -S → Segmentation fault Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > tags 844505 + patch Bug #844505 [disper] disper -S → Segmentation fault Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing

Processed: owner 925869

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 925869 tmanc...@debian.org Bug #925869 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: ftbfs with GCC-9 Owner recorded as tmanc...@debian.org. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 925869:

Bug#931003: marked as done (rust-simd: FTBFS (unrecognized platform-specific intrinsic function: `x86_mm_movemask_ps`unrecognized platform-specific intrinsic function: `x86_mm_movemask_ps`))

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:33:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934867: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #931003, regarding rust-simd: FTBFS (unrecognized platform-specific intrinsic function: `x86_mm_movemask_ps`unrecognized

Bug#934901: marked as done (Please switch to Python 3 or remove your package from Sid/Bullseye)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:31:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934832: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #934901, regarding Please switch to Python 3 or remove your package from Sid/Bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#931002: marked as done (rust-coresimd: FTBFS (unrecognized platform-specific intrinsic function: `x86_rdrand16_step`unrecognized platform-specific intrinsic function: `x86_rdrand16_step`))

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:32:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934866: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #931002, regarding rust-coresimd: FTBFS (unrecognized platform-specific intrinsic function: `x86_rdrand16_step`unrecognized

Bug#888579: marked as done (jscommunicator: FTBFS with debhelper/11.1 due to empty build target)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:27:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934732: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #888579, regarding jscommunicator: FTBFS with debhelper/11.1 due to empty build target to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#853512: marked as done (libv8-3.14: ftbfs with GCC-7)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:27:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934734: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #853512, regarding libv8-3.14: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#760385: marked as done (nodejs: CVE-2014-5256)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:27:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934734: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #760385, regarding nodejs: CVE-2014-5256 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#773671: marked as done (libv8-3.14: multiple security issues)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:27:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934734: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #773671, regarding libv8-3.14: multiple security issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#773623: marked as done (nodejs: CVE-2014-7192)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:27:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934734: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #773623, regarding nodejs: CVE-2014-7192 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#802350: marked as done (node-yawl: FTBFS: "yawl buffered messages" times out)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:26:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934730: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #802350, regarding node-yawl: FTBFS: "yawl buffered messages" times out to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#934912: printrun: depends on cruft package.

2019-08-16 Thread Rock Storm
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 02:36:27PM +0100, peter green wrote: > printrun depends on python-cairosvg which is no longer built by the cairosvg > source package. > > If you want your package to stay around you probably need to migrate to > python 3. Hi, thanks for reporting. The new version of

Processed: Re: Bug#934922: clevis: Reference to non-existant clevis-decrypt-http

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # "... without rendering it completely unusable to everyone" > severity 934922 important Bug #934922 [clevis] clevis: Reference to non-existant clevis-decrypt-http Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#934922: clevis: Reference to non-existant clevis-decrypt-http

2019-08-16 Thread David Heise
Package: clevis Version: 11-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable `src/luks/systemd/dracut/module-setup.sh.in` refers to a component that does not exist: `clevis-decrypt-http` https://sources.debian.org/src/clevis/11-2/src/luks/systemd/dracut/module-

Bug#925634: marked as done (apophenia: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:34:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925634: fixed in apophenia 1.0+ds-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #925634, regarding apophenia: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#830726: xtrlock: CVE-2016-10894: xtrlock does not block multitouch events

2019-08-16 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 830726 + patch thanks Chris Lamb wrote: > CVE-2016-10894[0]: > | xtrlock through 2.10 does not block multitouch events. Consequently, > | an attacker at a locked screen can send input to (and thus control) > | various programs such as Chromium via events such as pan scrolling, > | "pinch

Processed: Re: xtrlock: CVE-2016-10894: xtrlock does not block multitouch events

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 830726 + patch Bug #830726 [xtrlock] xtrlock: CVE-2016-10894: xtrlock does not block multitouch events Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 830726:

Processed: Re: xtrlock: CVE-2016-10894: xtrlock does not block multitouch events

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 830726 grave Bug #830726 [xtrlock] xtrlock: CVE-2016-10894: xtrlock does not block multitouch events Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > tags 830726 + security Bug #830726 [xtrlock] xtrlock: CVE-2016-10894: xtrlock does not block

Processed: Re: Bug#931483: konsole: Konsole will not launch from mate-panel or from KDE Application Launcher.

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #931483 [konsole] konsole: Konsole will not launch from mate-panel or from KDE Application Launcher. Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible Bug #931483 [konsole] konsole: Konsole will not launch from

Bug#931483: konsole: Konsole will not launch from mate-panel or from KDE Application Launcher.

2019-08-16 Thread Maximiliano Curia
Control: severity -1 important Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible ¡Hola David! El 2019-07-05 a las 21:19 -0400, David J. Ring escribió: Package: konsole Version: 4:18.04.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, konsole will not launch from

Bug#934915: node-es6-promise doesn't work anymore

2019-08-16 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: node-es6-promise Version: 4.2.8-4 Severity: grave The package is unusable as far as I can tell : it builds, but is giving the following error on loading (ie: require-ing it fails): /usr/lib/nodejs/es6-promise/dist/es6-promise.js:10 })(window, function() { ^ ReferenceError: window is

Bug#934914: m2crypto: non-buildd binaries

2019-08-16 Thread peter green
Package: m2crypto Version: 0.31.0-5 Severity: serious The release team have decreed that binaries not built on a buildd can no longer migrate to testing. Please make a source-only upload so your package can migrate.

Bug#934912: printrun: depends on cruft package.

2019-08-16 Thread peter green
Package: printrun Version: 1.6.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: bullseye, sid printrun depends on python-cairosvg which is no longer built by the cairosvg source package. If you want your package to stay around you probably need to migrate to python 3.

Bug#934519: marked as done (fence-agents: FTBFS in stretch/buster/sid (ImportError: No module named pywsman))

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:34:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934519: fixed in fence-agents 4.4.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #934519, regarding fence-agents: FTBFS in stretch/buster/sid (ImportError: No module named pywsman) to be marked as done. This means

Bug#934911: design-desktop-graphics: depends on cruft package.

2019-08-16 Thread peter green
Package: design-desktop-graphics Version: 3.0.13 Severity: serious design-desktop-graphics depends on python-cairosvg which is no longer built by the cairosvg source package. Looking at the stated intent of this package and the content of the packages built by the cairosvg source package I

Processed: block 921688 with 934908 934910

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 921688 with 934908 934910 Bug #921688 [electrum] Electrum vulnerable to malware Bug #923595 [electrum] electrum: Electrum branch containing critical vulnerability should be updated 921688 was not blocked by any bugs. 921688 was not

Bug#925770: marked as done (lldpad: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:05:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925770: fixed in lldpad 1.0.1+git20190520.5b9c9b3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #925770, regarding lldpad: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#934905: libaqbanking35: libaqbanking not ready for PSD2, will not work after 14 September 2019

2019-08-16 Thread Christian Gawron
Package: libaqbanking35 Version: 5.7.8-3 Severity: grave File: libaqbanking Tags: newcomer Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, according to the European Payment Service Directive (PSD2), only registered software may be used for online banking after 14 September 2019.

Bug#934885: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#934885: August 2019 security release

2019-08-16 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le ven. 16 août 2019 à 10:03, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit : > Package: nodejs > Severity: grave > Tags: security > > nodejs is affected by some of the recently announced HTTP2 issues: > > https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/aug-2019-security-releases/ > >

Bug#934903: Please switch to Python 3 or remove the package from Sid/Bullseye

2019-08-16 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: pycmail Version: 0.1.6 Severity: serious Hi, As we're removing Python 2 from Bullseye, we're working on removing all trace of Python 2 on all leaf packages (first). I've tried to port pycmail to Python 3, but it's non-trivial. Please do the work, or get the package removed from

Bug#919924: marked as done (mercurial: autopkgtest depends on monotone which is not in testing)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:20:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#919924: fixed in mercurial 5.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #919924, regarding mercurial: autopkgtest depends on monotone which is not in testing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#934901: Please switch to Python 3 or remove your package from Sid/Bullseye

2019-08-16 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: python-gpiv Version: 2.0.0-4.2 Severity: serious Hi, As we're removing Python 2 from Bullseye, we need your package to be either switched to Python 3, or removed from Sid/Bullseye. Please let everyone know your intention ASAP. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Bug#934035: marked as done (ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests))

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:51:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934035: fixed in ocrmypdf 9.0.1+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #934035, regarding ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#934089: closed by Jerome BENOIT (reply to calcu...@rezozer.net) (firehol fails to use iptables-restore)

2019-08-16 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Dear Jean Louis, On 16/08/2019 13:02, Jean Louis wrote: > Dear Jerome, > > Are you using firehol? Yes. On all my boxes. > > So just upgrade and watch if it is going to upgrade. I encountered no issue at upgrade time. > > If that is hard for you, you can install Debian VPS with previous >

Bug#934035: ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests)

2019-08-16 Thread Sean Whitton
control: fixed -1 8.0.1+dfsg-1 Hello, On Thu 15 Aug 2019 at 06:50PM +01, Sean Whitton wrote: > Thanks. My intention is to just update ocrmypdf to a newer release. Ah, wait, this FTBFS is reported against stretch. My apologies. I do not wish to support oldstable myself, but I would take a

Processed: Re: Bug#934035: ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 8.0.1+dfsg-1 Bug #934035 [src:ocrmypdf] ocrmypdf: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests) Marked as fixed in versions ocrmypdf/8.0.1+dfsg-1. -- 934035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934035 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#925682: marked as done (flang: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:35:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925682: fixed in flang 20190329-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #925682, regarding flang: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#925760: marked as done (libss7: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:36:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925760: fixed in libss7 2.0.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #925760, regarding libss7: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#925846: marked as done (usbrelay: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:19:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925846: fixed in usbrelay 0.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #925846, regarding usbrelay: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#934089: closed by Jerome BENOIT (reply to calcu...@rezozer.net) (firehol fails to use iptables-restore)

2019-08-16 Thread Jean Louis
Dear Jerome, Are you using firehol? So just upgrade and watch if it is going to upgrade. If that is hard for you, you can install Debian VPS with previous version, install firehol, and upgrade from inside, it costs maybe 0.00 cent for 1 hour VPS. That is exactly where I am using firehol since

Bug#925684: marked as done (flextra: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:04:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925684: fixed in flextra 5.0-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #925684, regarding flextra: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: bug 925830 is forwarded to https://github.com/SIPp/sipp/issues/390

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 925830 https://github.com/SIPp/sipp/issues/390 Bug #925830 [src:sip-tester] sip-tester: ftbfs with GCC-9 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/SIPp/sipp/issues/390'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#934892: r-cran-openssl: autopkgtest regression

2019-08-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: r-cran-openssl Version: 1.4.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer Since the upload of 1.4.1+dfsg-1, r-cran-openssl has been failings its own autopkgtests [1] with the following error: >

Bug#934894: r-cran-flexmix: autopkgtest regression

2019-08-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: r-cran-flexmix Version: 2.3-15-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer Since the upload of 2.3-15-1, r-cran-flexmix has been failings its own autopkgtests [1] with the following error: autopkgtest

Bug#925649: marked as done (cdo: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:42:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925649: fixed in cdo 1.9.7.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #925649, regarding cdo: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Processed: tagging 934886, bug 934886 is forwarded to https://github.com/h2o/h2o/issues/2090

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 934886 + upstream Bug #934886 [src:h2o] CVE-2019-9512 CVE-2019-9514 CVE-2019-9515 Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded 934886 https://github.com/h2o/h2o/issues/2090 Bug #934886 [src:h2o] CVE-2019-9512 CVE-2019-9514 CVE-2019-9515 Set Bug

Processed: found 934887 in 8.0.3+ds-4, tagging 934887

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 934887 8.0.3+ds-4 Bug #934887 [src:trafficserver] CVE-2019-9512 CVE-2019-9514 CVE-2019-9515 Marked as found in versions trafficserver/8.0.3+ds-4. > tags 934887 + upstream Bug #934887 [src:trafficserver] CVE-2019-9512 CVE-2019-9514

Bug#934887: CVE-2019-9512 CVE-2019-9514 CVE-2019-9515

2019-08-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Source: trafficserver Severity: grave Tags: security ATS is affected by three of the recently announced HTTP2 issues: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/trafficserver/8.0.x/CHANGELOG-8.0.4 Cheers, Moritz

Bug#934886: CVE-2019-9512 CVE-2019-9514 CVE-2019-9515

2019-08-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Source: h2o Severity: grave Tags: security h2o is affected by three of the recently announced HTTP2 issues: https://github.com/h2o/h2o/issues/2090 Cheers, Moritz

Bug#934885: August 2019 security release

2019-08-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: nodejs Severity: grave Tags: security nodejs is affected by some of the recently announced HTTP2 issues: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/aug-2019-security-releases/ https://github.com/Netflix/security-bulletins/blob/master/advisories/third-party/2019-002.md Cheers,

Bug#925683: marked as done (flexpart: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:34:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925683: fixed in flexpart 9.02-22 has caused the Debian Bug report #925683, regarding flexpart: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Processed: Block GCC 9 build failures in dependent packages by JUCE failure

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 925716 by 925723 Bug #925716 [src:iem-plugin-suite] iem-plugin-suite: ftbfs with GCC-9 925716 was not blocked by any bugs. 925716 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 925716: 925723 > block 925754 by 925723 Bug #925754

Bug#934089: closed by Jerome BENOIT (reply to calcu...@rezozer.net) (firehol fails to use iptables-restore)

2019-08-16 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 16/08/2019 10:24, Jean Louis wrote: > I do not understand your reasoning. At the very upgrade stage, in general, some transitions do not go smoothly. On my side, everything was fine. I cannot reproduce the issue. > > Package is unusable on Buster 10.0 > > Of course it is "upgrade" issue,

Bug#931902: marked as done (cflow-doc,cflow-l10n: missing Breaks+Replaces: cflow (<< 1:1.6-2))

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:19:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#931902: fixed in cflow 1:1.6-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #931902, regarding cflow-doc,cflow-l10n: missing Breaks+Replaces: cflow (<< 1:1.6-2) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#851774: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.151

2019-08-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:25:53PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Moritz Muehlenhoff (2019-07-17): > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 09:07:45AM +, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > apt-setup (1:0.151) unstable; urgency=medium > > > . > > >[ Moritz Mühlenhoff ] > > >* When preseeding

Processed: Re: giada: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 925723 Bug #925695 [src:giada] giada: ftbfs with GCC-9 925695 was not blocked by any bugs. 925695 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 925695: 925723 -- 925695: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925695 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#934860: mate-media-pulse: Can't install on Buster because depends on wrong version of mate-media-common

2019-08-16 Thread Mike Gabriel
Control: close -1 Control: tags -1 wontfix On Fr 16 Aug 2019 01:16:27 CEST, Carl Fink wrote: Package: mate-media-pulse Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable root@debian-NUCi5:~# apt install mate-media-pulse Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading

Processed: Re: Bug#934860: mate-media-pulse: Can't install on Buster because depends on wrong version of mate-media-common

2019-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 Bug #934860 [mate-media-pulse] mate-media-pulse: Can't install on Buster because depends on wrong version of mate-media-common Marked Bug as done > tags -1 wontfix Bug #934860 {Done: Mike Gabriel } [mate-media-pulse] mate-media-pulse: Can't install on

Bug#934089: closed by Jerome BENOIT (reply to calcu...@rezozer.net) (firehol fails to use iptables-restore)

2019-08-16 Thread Jean Louis
I do not understand your reasoning. Package is unusable on Buster 10.0 Of course it is "upgrade" issue, as from upgrade from previous Debian to 10.0 it does not work. So if you close the bug for that reason, you leave that open, there is no improvement for users. I had to remove firewall,

Bug#925771: lmms: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-08-16 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:46:58 + Matthias Klose wrote: > /<>/plugins/LadspaEffect/calf/src/calf/giface.h:458:15: error: > 'memset' used with length equal to number of elements without multiplication > by element size [-Werror=memset-elt-size] >   458 | memset(ins, 0, sizeof(ins)); >