Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2020 07:36:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#949334: fixed in plasma-desktop 4:5.17.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #949334,
regarding src:plasma-desktop: missing multiple Breaks+Replaces
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Source: r-cran-ranger
Version: 0.12.1-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Hi Maintainer
Since the upload of r-cran-ranger 0.12.1-1, its own autopkgtests have
been failing [1] on at least arm64, ppc64el and s390x.
Source: casacore-data-observatories
Version: 0+git2018.12.08-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid
libcasa-meas3 is no longer built by src:casacore.
It also looks wrong and unnecessary, and python3-casacore already
depends on libcasa-meas.
Source: simpleitk
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/simpleitk.html
...
99% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 944
Total Test time (real) = 167.65 sec
The following tests FAILED:
244 -
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 925720 + ftbfs
Bug #925720 [src:isc-dhcp] isc-dhcp: ftbfs with GCC-9
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
925720: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925720
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2020 05:48:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#949283: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #877507,
regarding ppx-core FTBFS: E: Cannot find external tool 'ocamlbuild'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2020 05:46:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948756: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938440,
regarding scgi: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2020 05:46:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948756: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #948756,
regarding RM: scgi -- RoQA; python2-only; leaf package; last release in 2014
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2020 05:45:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943683: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #907494,
regarding hgsvn: package is missing most of its files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2020 05:45:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943683: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936701,
regarding hgsvn: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Source: efl
Version: 1.21.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
efl fails to build from source, because pkg-config cannot find
x11-xcb.pc. Presumably, a dependency on libx11-xcb-dev is missing.
Also reproduced by reproducible builds:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 938795 + fixed-upstream
Bug #938795 [src:vmtk] vmtk: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
938795:
Source: camitk
Version: 4.1.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid
libgdcm2-dev and libvtkgdcm2-dev have been replaced with
libgdcm-dev and libvtkgdcm-dev.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 939594 + ftbfs
Bug #939594 [vmtk] vmtk build-depends on cruft package
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
939594: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939594
Source: plastimatch
Version: 1.8.0+dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
libgdcm2-dev has been replaced by libgdcm-dev.
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2020 03:19:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#934950: fixed in dafny 2.3.0+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #934950,
regarding dafny: unsatisfiable build-dependency in sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2020 03:19:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#852645: fixed in dafny 2.3.0+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #852645,
regarding dafny: FTBFS: The type or namespace name `IToken' could not be found.
Are you missing an assembly reference?
to be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 925841 + ftbfs
Bug #925841 {Done: Carsten Schoenert }
[src:thunderbird] thunderbird: ftbfs with GCC-9
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
925841:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 935527 + ftbfs
Bug #935527 [scantool] scantool: FTBFS due to undefined reference to symbol
'ceilf@@GLIBC_2.4'
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
935527:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 944211 + ftbfs
Bug #944211 [src:id-utils] id-utils: FTBFS on all 32-bit archs
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
944211:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 941989 2.1.1+dfsg-1
Bug #941989 [src:slic3r-prusa] slic3r-prusa: fails to build on arm*
Marked as fixed in versions slic3r-prusa/2.1.1+dfsg-1.
Bug #941989 [src:slic3r-prusa] slic3r-prusa: fails to build on arm*
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
close 941989 2.1.1+dfsg-1
thanks
slic3r-prusa 2.1.1+dfsg-1 has been built successfully on arm64, armel, and
armhf.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 947476 2.1.1+dfsg-1
Bug #947476 {Done: Chow Loong Jin } [src:slic3r-prusa]
slic3r-prusa: missing Build-Depends
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #947476 to the same values
previously set
Bug #947476 {Done: Chow Loong Jin }
close 947476 2.1.1+dfsg-1
slic3r-prusa 2.1.1+dfsg-1 builds fine on amd64
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 947476 2.1.1+dfsg-1
Bug #947476 [src:slic3r-prusa] slic3r-prusa: missing Build-Depends
Marked as fixed in versions slic3r-prusa/2.1.1+dfsg-1.
Bug #947476 [src:slic3r-prusa] slic3r-prusa: missing Build-Depends
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2020 01:05:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948936: fixed in gr-rds 3.8.0.0.f1c584a-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #948936,
regarding gr-rds FTBFS missing build-dependency on dh-python
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 23:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937163: fixed in ns3 3.30+dfsg-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #937163,
regarding ns3: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 23:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948660: fixed in ns3 3.30+dfsg-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #948660,
regarding python3-ns3 depends/suggests on Python2 modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: libshiboken2-py3-5.14
Version: 5.14.0-1~exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
Processing control commands:
> tags 937163 + patch
Bug #937163 [src:ns3] ns3: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #937163 to the same tags previously set
> tags 943978 + patch
Bug #943978 [python3-ns3] Obsolete Suggests: on python-kiwi
Ignoring request to alter
Processing control commands:
> tags 937163 + patch
Bug #937163 [src:ns3] ns3: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 943978 + patch
Bug #943978 [python3-ns3] Obsolete Suggests: on python-kiwi
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 948660 + patch
Bug #948660 [python3-ns3] python3-ns3
Processing control commands:
> tags 937163 + patch
Bug #937163 [src:ns3] ns3: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #937163 to the same tags previously set
> tags 943978 + patch
Bug #943978 [python3-ns3] Obsolete Suggests: on python-kiwi
Ignoring request to alter
Control: tags 937163 + patch
Control: tags 943978 + patch
Control: tags 948660 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ns3 (versioned as 3.30+dfsg-3.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Regards.
diff -Nru ns3-3.30+dfsg/debian/changelog ns3-3.30+dfsg/debian/changelog
---
Source: plasma-desktop
Version: 4:5.17.5-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stable'.
It installed fine in 'stable', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:52:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#867719: fixed in phpldapadmin 1.2.2-6.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #867719,
regarding phpldapadmin: CVE-2017-11107
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:36:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#938259: fixed in python-webob 1:1.8.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #938259,
regarding python-webob: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 949196 + sid bullseye
Bug #949196 [src:libzypp] libzypp: FTBFS: cmake can't locate LibSolv
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> tags 949213 + sid bullseye
Bug #949213 [src:naev] naev: FTBFS: undefined reference to
`bfd_get_section_flags'
Added
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:15:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#938131: fixed in python-repoze.lru 0.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #938131,
regarding python-repoze.lru: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:11:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948302: fixed in mmdebstrap 0.6.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #948302,
regarding mmdebstrap autopkgtest fails on arm64 while it should probably return
neutral
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #938259 [src:python-webob] python-webob: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
938259: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938259
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #938259 in python-webob reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #938131 [src:python-repoze.lru] python-repoze.lru: Python2 removal in
sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
938131: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938131
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #938131 in python-repoze.lru reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 21:35:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#940071: fixed in gr-radar 0.0.0.20180308-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #940071,
regarding gr-radar FTBFS in unstable.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2
> from bullseye
> # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
> # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html
> # See
Source: flatbuffers
Version: 1.11.0+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
The package needs a source-only upload to let it be rebuilt and only
then can it migrate to testing.
I've already added the fixes needed [1] for the rebuild to the
packaging repository on Salsa.
Cheers,
Balint
[1]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 945369 yard/0.9.20-1
Bug #945369 [src:yard] yard: CVE-2019-1020001
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #945369 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 945369 yard/0.9.20-1
Bug #945369 [src:yard] yard: CVE-2019-1020001
Marked as fixed in versions yard/0.9.20-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
945369:
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 21:20:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#938575: fixed in subliminal 2.0.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #938575,
regarding subliminal: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #938575 [src:subliminal] subliminal: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
938575: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938575
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #938575 in subliminal reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 21:06:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#949279: fixed in r-cran-devtools 2.2.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #949279,
regarding r-cran-devtools: autopkgtest regression
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 21:06:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925800: fixed in pads 1.2-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #925800,
regarding pads: ftbfs with GCC-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 881264 2.0.5-1
Bug #881264 [src:subliminal] subliminal: FTBFS and Debci failure with stevedore
1.25.0-2
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #881264 to the same values
previously set
Bug #881264 [src:subliminal] subliminal:
Here's a thread apply all backtrace on the core with debug symbols
installed, hope it helps:
Thread 5 (Thread 0x7fb9cf169700 (LWP 16506)):
#0 futex_wait_cancelable (private=0, expected=0, futex_word=0x55a9340e07d8) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futex-internal.h:88
#1 __pthread_cond_wait_common
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 20:55:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#949291: fixed in psi4 1:1.3.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #949291,
regarding psi4: Missing dependency to python3-qcelemental
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 20:54:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#945722: fixed in pinot 1.05-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #945722,
regarding pinot: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 3:19 PM Olly Betts wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 09:58:15PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards
> > Python2 packages, in details:
> >
> > (binary:pinot)Recommends->python-docutils
> >
> > Re-opening,
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #949291 in psi4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #949291 [psi4] psi4: Missing dependency to python3-qcelemental
Added tag(s) pending.
--
949291: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949291
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 949247 + confirmed
Bug #949247 [src:polymake] polymake: FTBFS: test failure
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
949247:
Hi,
I tried rebuilding the package, and it looks like the latest upload
fixed the issue (I could build the package without any problem).
If you believe I'm wrong, please reopen and let me know.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
On 1/17/20 6:35 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: reopen -1
>
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 10:17:23 +0100 Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> I'm closing this bug. Feel free to reopen if there's still a problem.
>>
>
> sorry for the late answer!
>
>
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 09:58:15PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards
> Python2 packages, in details:
>
> (binary:pinot)Recommends->python-docutils
>
> Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.
The dependency is actually:
Processing control commands:
> found -1 4.5.0-4
Bug #949322 [src:python-pysaml2] python-pysaml2: CVE-2020-5390
Marked as found in versions python-pysaml2/4.5.0-4.
--
949322: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949322
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Source: python-pysaml2
Version: 4.5.0-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
Control: found -1 4.5.0-4
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for python-pysaml2.
CVE-2020-5390[0]:
| PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML
|
Processing control commands:
> tags 945722 + patch
Bug #945722 [src:pinot] pinot: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) patch.
--
945722: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945722
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags 945722 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pinot (versioned as 1.05-4.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Regards.
diff -Nru pinot-1.05/debian/changelog pinot-1.05/debian/changelog
--- pinot-1.05/debian/changelog 2019-11-27 20:16:46.0 -0500
+++
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Yaroslav,
> can you please push your latest changes to nibabel? I'd volunteer
> to fix #948372 and when doing so move the repository to Debian Med
> if you do not mind.
actually as far as I see it Sando has pushed everything for
2.5.1-2
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:37:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#938407: fixed in routes 2.4.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #938407,
regarding routes: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi Tianon,
I found the cure for the problem: the ESP partition was listed as fs type
„msdos“ in fstab. Changing this to „vfat" made refind-install work for me.
Best regards,
Andreas.
> Am 17.01.2020 um 15:56 schrieb Tianon Gravi :
>
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 01:39, Andreas Feldner
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:11:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948801: fixed in refcard 10.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #948801,
regarding refcard: FTBFS: pdfjoin: Command not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Source: txsocksx
Severity: serious
Hello,
i think txsocksx should be removed from debian:
* python2-only
* upstream is not progressing on the py3k porting:
https://github.com/habnabit/txsocksx/issues/19
* leaf package
if i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to keep this package,
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #938407 [src:routes] routes: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
938407: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938407
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #938407 in routes reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2
> from bullseye
> # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
> # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html
> # See
Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> Hello Jamie Heilman,
> I just tried to retrieve some line information from the backtrace.
> Unfortunately I could not match the addresses with the
> binary from the debian repository.
> Was this backtrace by any chance built with a local
> rebuild of the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-cr...@lists.debian.org (was hel...@subdivi.de).
> # reassign ftbfs bug to source package
> reassign 933425 src:sooperlooper
Bug #933425 [sooperlooper] sooperlooper: Please rebuild against
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:35:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#949219: fixed in casacore-data-jplde 2007.07.05+ds.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #949219,
regarding casacore-data-jplde FTBFS due to missing file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 948756 ftp.debian.org
Bug #948756 [src:scgi] scgi: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package 'src:scgi' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions scgi/1.13-1.1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions
Control: tags -1 + confirmed pending
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 05:51:50PM +0100, Jernej Jakob wrote:
> + [ -f /etc/mailname ]
> + hostname --fqdn
> + MAILNAME=
> dpkg: error processing package opensmtpd (--configure):
>
> I think it's because I have no entry in /etc/hosts for the hostname
> in
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed pending
Bug #948824 [opensmtpd] opensmtpd: Installation fails with "post-installation
script subprocess returned error exit status 1"
Added tag(s) confirmed and pending.
--
948824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948824
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 14:53:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948770: fixed in subversion 1.13.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #948770,
regarding subversion: Fix for test failures with python2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 11:30 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Control: tags 946728 + patch
> Control: tags 946728 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for hugo (versioned as 0.59.1-1.1) and uploaded
> it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
>
> cu
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #948770 [subversion] subversion: Fix for test failures with python2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
948770: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #948770 in subversion reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed upstream
Control: Forwarded -1 https://0xacab.org/jvoisin/mat2/issues/136
Hi Paul,
On 20-01-18 22:09:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With a recent upload of libimage-exiftool-perl the autopkgtest of mat2
> fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed upstream
Bug #949252 [src:mat2] mat2: autopkgtest needs update for new version of
libimage-exiftool-perl
Added tag(s) confirmed and upstream.
> Forwarded -1 https://0xacab.org/jvoisin/mat2/issues/136
Bug #949252 [src:mat2] mat2: autopkgtest
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 08:49:12 -0500
with message-id <20200119134912.44vyevn42xufkgaw@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#937941: python-neovim: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
- reopen 937941
has caused the Debian Bug report #937941,
regarding python-neovim: Python2 removal in
Hello Jamie Heilman,
I just tried to retrieve some line information from the backtrace.
Unfortunately I could not match the addresses with the
binary from the debian repository.
Was this backtrace by any chance built with a local
rebuild of the xserver-xorg-core package?
Kind regards,
Bernhard
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 943334 important
Bug #943334 [src:dh-python] please run the tests for all supported python
versions
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
943334:
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:49:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943066: fixed in fonts-karmilla 016+git20181118-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #943066,
regarding fonts-karmilla: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 933425 + ftbfs
Bug #933425 [sooperlooper] sooperlooper: Please rebuild against wxWidgets GTK 3
package
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
933425:
Package: psi4
Version: 1:1.3.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
when importing psi4 from ipython after installing the package, I am
greated with the output
```
---
On 19.01.20 11:06, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> Hello, if it is like for my ufo-core package, this could be due to a script
> file with a shebang using python instead of python3
I just tested this and indeed, there were scripts with said python in
the shebang. Changing this to python3 fixed
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:04:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942976: fixed in crudini 0.9.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #942976,
regarding crudini: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:04:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942976: fixed in crudini 0.9.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #942976,
regarding crudini: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:04:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#936346: fixed in crudini 0.9.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #936346,
regarding crudini: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:04:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#936346: fixed in crudini 0.9.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #936346,
regarding crudini: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 10:23:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#938743: fixed in ufo-core 0.15.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #938743,
regarding ufo-core: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
