Bug#962763: renderdoc FTBFS: undefined references to spvtools symbols

2020-06-13 Thread Yuya Nishihara
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:48:23 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > -lSPIRV-Tools -lSPIRV-Tools-link -lSPIRV-Tools-opt -lrenderdoc_libentry > /usr/bin/ld: > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libSPIRV-Tools-opt.a(optimizer.cpp.o): > in function `spvtools::Optimizer::Run(unsigned int

Bug#953908: marked as done (sinntp: autopkgtest failure: regular output on stderr)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 05:04:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953908: fixed in sinntp 1.6-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #953908, regarding sinntp: autopkgtest failure: regular output on stderr to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#925782: marked as done (mp3check: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 04:33:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925782: fixed in mp3check 0.8.7-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #925782, regarding mp3check: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#949664: marked as done (libassuan: testsuite failure due to wrong flags being injected)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 02:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#949664: fixed in libassuan 2.5.3-7.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #949664, regarding libassuan: testsuite failure due to wrong flags being injected to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#949472: python-pex: diff for NMU version 1.1.14-3.1

2020-06-13 Thread Gleisson Jesuino Joaquim Cardoso
Control: tags 949472 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for python-pex (versioned as 1.1.14-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer or cancel NMU. Regards. Gleisson diff -Nru python-pex-1.1.14/debian/changelog python-pex-1.1.14/de

Processed: python-pex: diff for NMU version 1.1.14-3.1

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 949472 + patch Bug #949472 [src:python-pex] python-pex's autopkg tests are failing Added tag(s) patch. -- 949472: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949472 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#960041: marked as done (python-tornado4: Pending removal)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:02:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962711: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #960041, regarding python-tornado4: Pending removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#962703: marked as done (mailplate: Should we remove this package from Debian?)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:02:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962729: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #962703, regarding mailplate: Should we remove this package from Debian? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#802917: marked as done (do not migrate denyhosts to testing: who will do security support?)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:04:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962770: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #802917, regarding do not migrate denyhosts to testing: who will do security support? to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#938782: marked as done (virt-goodies: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:04:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962771: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #938782, regarding virt-goodies: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#945661: marked as done (mailplate: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:02:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962729: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #945661, regarding mailplate: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#868190: marked as done (gatling: -u is silently ignored if is a username rather than a numeric user id)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:03:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#868190: fixed in gatling 0.13-6.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #868190, regarding gatling: -u is silently ignored if is a username rather than a numeric user id to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#936385: marked as done (denyhosts: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:04:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962770: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #936385, regarding denyhosts: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#943009: marked as done (denyhosts: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:04:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962770: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #936385, regarding denyhosts: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#941866: marked as done (gtrayicon: Intent to remove from Debian)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:03:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962730: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #941866, regarding gtrayicon: Intent to remove from Debian to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#962784: facter aborts with free(): invalid pointer

2020-06-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: facter Version: 3.11.0-4.1 Severity: grave facter no longer works at all on amd64. When invoked, it dies with an invalid pointer error: % facter free(): invalid pointer Aborted (core dumped) gdb backtrace: #0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50 #1 0

Bug#948074: din FTBFS: cannot find X11/X.h

2020-06-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
I know that at the start of the year some reorganization within the X11 packages caused down FTBFS while files where being moving around. I recommend you just close this bug. FTR, it also builds in reproducible-builds testing. On Sun, 14 Jun 2020, 12:33 am Sudip Mukherjee, wrote: > Hi Helmut,

Bug#962781: containernetworking-plugins: may need Breaks+Replaces: rkt (<< ???)

2020-06-13 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: containernetworking-plugins Version: 0.8.6-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a Breaks+Replaces relation. Se

Bug#962755: exif: FTBFS on s390x: test failure

2020-06-13 Thread Nelson H. F. Beebe
Boyuan Yang reports on Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 09:40:19AM -0400: >> The new upload of exif/0.6.22-1 FTBFS on s390x architecture due to test >> failure: >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=exif&arch=s390x&ver=0.6.22-1&stamp=1591715266&raw=0 As an independent check of a new S/390 VM run

Bug#817954: Does this bug prevent firefox from entering backports also?

2020-06-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:22:40PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:10:45 +0200 Johannes Rohr wrote: > > It would be great to have firefox (or the next firefox-esr) in > > buster-backports, as it has important new functionality relevant for > > privacy and data protection, suc

Bug#948074: din FTBFS: cannot find X11/X.h

2020-06-13 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Hi Helmut, On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 06:48:06PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Source: din > Version: 5.2.1-6 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > din fails to build from source in unstable on amd64. A build log ends > with: I tried building it today and there was no build failure. +-

Bug#807648: your mail

2020-06-13 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 11:25:07PM -0400, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: > Hi, sorry for the long delay. > > I'm doing a (late) cleanup in my packages and will update Zyne to the new > upstream version, which now runs with python3 and python-wxgtk4.0. I'll have > to package a new dependency as well:

Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported ZFS (with acltype=off) (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2)

2020-06-13 Thread Elliott Mitchell
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 02:54:31PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > indicated this was specifically observed on ZFS on Linux only. Seth > Arnold's answer seem to be inline with that that the issue is more on > the ZFS on Linux side and the issue keeps biting people a bit > unexpectedly. Why doe

Processed: (Aucun sujet)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 959527 > https://salsa.debian.org/phpmyadmin-team/motranslator/-/issues/1 Bug #959527 [php-phpmyadmin-motranslator] php-phpmyadmin-motranslator: Parse error: unexpected 'const' (T_CONST) in Translator.php on line 58 Set Bug forwarded-t

Bug#961380: marked as done (guitarix: baseline violation on i386)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:03:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#961380: fixed in guitarix 0.39.0+dfsg1-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #961380, regarding guitarix: baseline violation on i386 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#961901: marked as pending in djangorestframework-gis

2020-06-13 Thread Nilesh Patra
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #961901 in djangorestframework-gis reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/djangorestframework-gi

Processed: Bug#961901 marked as pending in djangorestframework-gis

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #961901 [src:djangorestframework-gis] djangorestframework-gis: autopkgtest failure: No module named 'djangorestframework_gis' Added tag(s) pending. -- 961901: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961901 Debian Bug Tracking System Co

Bug#952143: marked as done (node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:49:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#952143: fixed in node-sntp 4.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #952143, regarding node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#952148: marked as done (node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:49:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#952143: fixed in node-sntp 4.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #952143, regarding node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#952148: marked as done (node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:49:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#952143: fixed in node-hoek 9.0.4+~cs10.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #952143, regarding node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#952143: marked as done (node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:49:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#952143: fixed in node-hoek 9.0.4+~cs10.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #952143, regarding node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#952143: marked as pending in node-hoek

2020-06-13 Thread Xavier Guimard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #952143 in node-hoek reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-hoek/-/commit/26b580043d6ec0b9b53906b76582d

Processed: Bug#952143 marked as pending in node-sntp

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #952143 [node-hoek] node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version Bug #952148 [node-hoek] node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #952143 to the same tags previously set Ignoring request to alter tags

Bug#937485: pymvpa2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-06-13 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
As the upstream and Debian maintainer for it, I am ok with it. It could be easily made to build for python 3 but tests would show that it is not entirely kosher. I better reupload it when it i an sure it is functioning correctly again On June 13, 2020 1:16:58 PM EDT, "Moritz Mühlenhoff" wrote:

Bug#952143: marked as pending in node-sntp

2020-06-13 Thread Xavier Guimard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #952143 in node-sntp reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-sntp/-/commit/e39ead5849926ddd70445ec0a0543

Processed: Bug#952143 marked as pending in node-hoek

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #952143 [node-hoek] node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version Bug #952148 [node-hoek] node-hoek: node-hapi-hoek provides lost version Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. -- 952143: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9

Bug#937485: pymvpa2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-06-13 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 08:36:43AM +1100, Stuart Prescott wrote: > Dear maintainers, > > In the last update on pymvpa2, it sounded like upstream would soon have > sorted > Python 3 compatibility and the FTBFS bugs for the package would soon be > fixed. > However, there has been no upstream act

Bug#937437: pyfeed: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-06-13 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:33:42AM +, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:pyfeed > Version: 0.7.4-2 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: py2removal > > Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove > Python2 from the dist

Bug#936239: fixed in brian 2.2.2.1-1

2020-06-13 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 10:00:17PM +, Andreas Tille wrote: > Source: brian > Source-Version: 2.2.2.1-1 > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of > brian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. > > A summary of the changes between this version

Bug#962645: qbittorrent-nox: Qbittorrent-nox is barely usable after the upgrade to 4.2.4-1+b1

2020-06-13 Thread jim_p
Package: qbittorrent-nox Version: 4.2.4-1+b1 Followup-For: Bug #962645 Yes and no. It now works as it should on my i386 system, but it still fails on the amd64 one. The output I get at the terminal is identical to the one I mention above. Also, the gui version of qbittorrent crashes on the amd64 s

Bug#953568: marked as done (alsa-lib: FTBFS in testing)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:18:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953568: fixed in alsa-lib 1.2.2-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #953568, regarding alsa-lib: FTBFS in testing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#962402: haskell-text-icu built

2020-06-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 09:49:21PM +0200, Frédéric Bonnard wrote: > Hi, > I wanted to check that FTBFS but it actually built, on different setup. > After a give back on ppc64el and s390x, everything went fine. Very few > changes between the failing and succeeding build. Same ghc, kernel. > For the

Bug#962755: exif: FTBFS on s390x: test failure

2020-06-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 09:40:19AM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Source: exif > Vresion: 0.6.22-1 > Severity: serious > X-Debbugs-CC: hugh.mcmas...@outlook.com > > Dear Debian exif package maintainers, > > The new upload of exif/0.6.22-1 FTBFS on s390x architecture due to test > failure: > > https

Bug#960791: marked as done (firmware-b43-installer: when language is not English, install fails. Script attempts to parse localized output)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 15:47:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#960791: fixed in b43-fwcutter 1:019-4+deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #960791, regarding firmware-b43-installer: when language is not English, install fails. Script attempts to parse localized output

Bug#961649: marked as done (php-horde-gollem: CVE-2020-8034)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 15:47:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#961649: fixed in php-horde-gollem 3.0.12-3+deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #961649, regarding php-horde-gollem: CVE-2020-8034 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#928813: marked as done (libapache2-mod-jk: Jk can not find any configured worker)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 15:47:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#928813: fixed in libapache-mod-jk 1:1.2.46-1+deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #928813, regarding libapache2-mod-jk: Jk can not find any configured worker to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#962763: renderdoc FTBFS: undefined references to spvtools symbols

2020-06-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: renderdoc Version: 1.7+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bullseye/amd64/renderdoc.html https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=renderdoc&suite=sid ... /usr/bin/c++ -fPIC -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong

Bug#945827: marked as done (ssvnc: fix libvncclient bundle security issues)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 15:47:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#945827: fixed in ssvnc 1.0.29-4+deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #945827, regarding ssvnc: fix libvncclient bundle security issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#961984: marked as done (pagekite: Embedded SSL certificate expired)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 15:47:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#961984: fixed in pagekite 0.5.9.3-2+deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #961984, regarding pagekite: Embedded SSL certificate expired to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#962762: Should monotone-viz be removed from unstable?

2020-06-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: monotone-viz Severity: serious Tags: bullseye sid Neither monotone-viz nor monotone are in the current stable, and monotone was already removed from unstable. Should monotone-viz also be removed from unstable?

Bug#962585: marked as done (schleuder: build fails on IPv6-only buildds)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 15:08:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962585: fixed in schleuder 3.5.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #962585, regarding schleuder: build fails on IPv6-only buildds to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#962645: qbittorrent-nox: Qbittorrent-nox is barely usable after the upgrade to 4.2.4-1+b1

2020-06-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 07:00:12PM +0300, jim_p wrote: > Package: qbittorrent-nox > Followup-For: Bug #962645 > > Downgrading to 4.2.4-1, the one from last week before the binary update, makes > qbittorrent work as it should, so I assume something went really wrong with > that boost 1.71 build. >.

Processed: Re: python-django: CVE-2020-13254 CVE-2020-13596

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 962323 2:3.0.6-1 Bug #962323 [python-django] python-django: CVE-2020-13254 CVE-2020-13596 There is no source info for the package 'python-django' at version '2:3.0.6-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '2:3.0

Processed: fixed 905415 in 12.7.0~dfsg-1

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 905415 12.7.0~dfsg-1 Bug #905415 [libnode-dev] libnode-dev: broken symlinks: /usr/include/nodejs/deps/uv/include/{uv,uv.h} -> ../../../../{uv,uv.h} Marked as fixed in versions nodejs/12.7.0~dfsg-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#962755: exif: FTBFS on s390x: test failure

2020-06-13 Thread Boyuan Yang
Source: exif Vresion: 0.6.22-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: hugh.mcmas...@outlook.com Dear Debian exif package maintainers, The new upload of exif/0.6.22-1 FTBFS on s390x architecture due to test failure: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=exif&arch=s390x&ver=0.6.22-1&stamp=159171

Bug#962254: Umask ignored when mounting NFSv4.2 share of an exported ZFS (with acltype=off) (was: Re: Bug#962254: NFS(v4) broken at 4.19.118-2)

2020-06-13 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Elliott, [I'm adding linux-nfs upstream hopefully J. Bruce Fields or others can help clarifying] On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:37:11PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > Bit more experimentation on this issue. > > I tried a very small C program meant to create files with fewer > permissions bits s

Bug#945415: closing 945415

2020-06-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
close 945415 thanks gitano now builds fine in unstable without any changes. This was probably an issue with some (build?) dependency. Closing. I will upload an source-only NMU myself to let it migrate back into testing since it was removed due to my original bug report.

Processed: closing 945415

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 945415 Bug #945415 [src:gitano] gitano: FTBFS on unstable Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 945415: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945415 Debian Bug Tracki

Bug#956710: marked as done (abiword: Please witch to enchant-2 instead of enchant(1))

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 11:18:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#956710: fixed in abiword 3.0.4~dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #956710, regarding abiword: Please witch to enchant-2 instead of enchant(1) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#956710: fixed in abiword 3.0.2-11

2020-06-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Laurent Bigonville (2020-06-13 12:45:51) > On Fri, 05 Jun 2020 22:03:34 + Debian FTP Masters > wrote: > > > > * add patch to use enchat2 instead of enchant; > > The fix is not complete, the libabiword-dev package still depends on > libenchant-dev > > Could you also fix that plea

Bug#956710: fixed in abiword 3.0.2-11

2020-06-13 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Hello, On Fri, 05 Jun 2020 22:03:34 + Debian FTP Masters wrote: > * add patch to use enchat2 instead of enchant; The fix is not complete, the libabiword-dev package still depends on libenchant-dev Could you also fix that please? Kind regards, Laurent Bigonville

Bug#962615: sylfilter: glib error prevent filter working

2020-06-13 Thread Xavier Brochard
Hello Le 11.06.2020 01:18, Hideki Yamane a écrit : On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:02:27 +0200 Xavier Brochard wrote: Sylfilter doesn't work anymore in Sylpheed. Sylpheed log contains these lines each time sylfilter is launched: GLib-DEBUG: posix_spawn avoided (fd close requested) ** Sylpheed-WARNING:

Bug#962737: marked as done (handlebars: Does not declare its dependencies)

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:04:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962737: fixed in node-handlebars 3:4.7.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #962737, regarding handlebars: Does not declare its dependencies to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#962320: facter crashes with "free(): invalid pointer"

2020-06-13 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Hi, Il 09/06/20 17:06, Adrian Bunk ha scritto: > For avoiding similar problems for people upgrading from buster, > it would be good if for both 1.71 and whatever version of Boost > will be released in Buster the library packages will add a Breaks: > on the corresponding libboost-*1.67.0 package.

Processed: openbox-menu: diff for NMU version 0.8.0+hg20161009-1.1

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 960717 + patch Bug #960717 [src:openbox-menu] openbox-menu: autopkgtest failure: openbox-menu: command not found Added tag(s) patch. > tags 960717 + pending Bug #960717 [src:openbox-menu] openbox-menu: autopkgtest failure: openbox-menu: command not found Added

Bug#960717: openbox-menu: diff for NMU version 0.8.0+hg20161009-1.1

2020-06-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: tags 960717 + patch Control: tags 960717 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for openbox-menu (versioned as 0.8.0+hg20161009-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian diff -Nru openbox-menu-0.8.0+hg20161009/debian/chang

Bug#962743: cnvkit FTBFS on mips64el/ppc64el: test failure

2020-06-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: cnvkit Version: 0.9.7-1 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=cnvkit ... alculating bin spreads Targets: 338 (5.0858%) bins failed filters (log2 < -5.0, log2 > 5.0, spread > 1.0) PLCH2 chr1:2433503-2433878 log2=-0.586 spread=0.505 "

Processed: fixed 960680 in 1.2.2-1

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 960680 1.2.2-1 Bug #960680 [src:ruby-actionpack-page-caching] ruby-actionpack-page-caching: CVE-2020-8159 Marked as fixed in versions ruby-actionpack-page-caching/1.2.2-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need as

Processed: tagging 959138

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 959138 + ftbfs Bug #959138 [src:nipy] numpy breaks nipy autopkgtest: No module named 'numpy.testing.decorators' Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 959138: https://bugs.debian

Bug#962742: tree-puzzle binary-all FTBFS: test failure

2020-06-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: tree-puzzle Version: 5.3~rc16+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Control: block 951984 by -1 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tree-puzzle&arch=all&ver=5.3%7Erc16%2Bdfsg-3&stamp=1591911818&raw=0 ... FAIL: ut-pure-prot == Testing: protein data, default mode

Processed: tree-puzzle binary-all FTBFS: test failure

2020-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 951984 by -1 Bug #951984 {Done: Pranav Ballaney } [src:tree-puzzle] tree-puzzle: FTBFS: mpi.h:322:57: error: static assertion failed: "MPI_Address was removed in MPI-3.0. Use MPI_Get_address instead." 951984 was not blocked by any bugs. 951984 was not blocki