Bug#963673: droopy: Droopy fails to start due to a deprecated python3 module (macpath)

2020-06-24 Thread jim_p
Package: droopy Version: 0.20160830-1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Dear maintainer. I launched droopy earlier to transfer some files, and it failed like so $ droopy Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/droopy", line 81, in import

Bug#962959: Agda version in Debian bullseye

2020-06-24 Thread Marko Dimjašević
Dear Ilias Tsitsimpis, does your intention to remove haskell-edison-api mean that Agda 2.6.1 will be packaged for Debian bullseye? -- Regards, Marko Dimjašević https://dimjasevic.net/marko Mastodon: https://mamot.fr/@mdimjasevic PGP key ID: 056E61A6F3B6C9323049DBF9565EE9641503F0AA Learn

Bug#963631: marked as done (qtwebengine-opensource-src: FTBFS everywhere)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 19:41:11 -0300 with message-id and subject line Fixed in latest upload has caused the Debian Bug report #963631, regarding qtwebengine-opensource-src: FTBFS everywhere to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#963489: dgit mirror ssh wrapper breaks due to rsync update

2020-06-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Samuel Henrique writes ("Bug#963489: dgit mirror ssh wrapper breaks due to rsync update"): > Hello Ian, > > src:dgit contains a wrapper script which is intended for use in an ssh > > restricted command invoked by rsync, as part of a mirroring setup. > > Ahh, so that was the issue, I got confused

Bug#963489: dgit mirror ssh wrapper breaks due to rsync update

2020-06-24 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Ian, > src:dgit contains a wrapper script which is intended for use in an ssh > restricted command invoked by rsync, as part of a mirroring setup. Ahh, so that was the issue, I got confused and was about to ping you to help me figure it out. > This whole situation is not very good but it

Processed: reopening 963631

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # typoed the bug number > reopen 963631 Bug #963631 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher } [src:qtwebengine-opensource-src] qtwebengine-opensource-src: FTBFS everywhere 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed

Bug#963631: marked as done (qtwebengine-opensource-src: FTBFS everywhere)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:33:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963631: fixed in breathe 4.19.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #963631, regarding qtwebengine-opensource-src: FTBFS everywhere to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#963631: qtwebengine-opensource-src: FTBFS everywhere

2020-06-24 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: qtwebengine-opensource-src Version: 5.14.2+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Builds of qtwebengine-opensource-src failed to build everywhere: | /usr/bin/g++ -MMD -MF

Bug#953227: marked as done (garagemq: autopkgtest failure: github.com/valinurovam/garagemq/srvstorage [no test files])

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 20:34:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953227: fixed in garagemq 0.0~git20200204.15e6a9d+ds-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #953227, regarding garagemq: autopkgtest failure: github.com/valinurovam/garagemq/srvstorage [no test files] to be

Bug#954070: marked as done (fdroidserver: Incorrect Litecoin address validation)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 20:34:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954070: fixed in fdroidserver 1.1.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #954070, regarding fdroidserver: Incorrect Litecoin address validation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#953227: garagemq: autopkgtest failure: github.com/valinurovam/garagemq/srvstorage [no test files]

2020-06-24 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hi, On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 03:16:25AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > Control: notfixed -1 0.0~git20200204.15e6a9d+ds-2 > Control: tags -1 + ftbfs > > Hi Andreas, > > You just disabled the autopkgtest. But the test is not only running in > autopkgtest, but also during

Bug#953227: marked as pending in garagemq

2020-06-24 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #953227 in garagemq reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#953227 marked as pending in garagemq

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #953227 [src:garagemq] garagemq: autopkgtest failure: github.com/valinurovam/garagemq/srvstorage [no test files] Added tag(s) pending. -- 953227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#953800: marked as done (gpgme1.0: don't fail checky2106 on 32bit systems)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 19:48:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953800: fixed in gpgme1.0 1.13.1-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #953800, regarding gpgme1.0: don't fail checky2106 on 32bit systems to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#953800: gpgme1.0: don't fail checky2106 on 32bit systems

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found 953800 1.13.1-6 Bug #953800 [src:gpgme1.0] gpgme1.0: don't fail checky2106 on 32bit systems Marked as found in versions gpgme1.0/1.13.1-6. -- 953800: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953800 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#953800: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#953800: gpgme1.0: don't fail checky2106 on 32bit systems

2020-06-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Control: found 953800 1.13.1-6 If checky2106 will always fail on 32-bit systems, that's a clear indication that GnuPG will fail on those systems when it encounters objects that have a timestamp that lands about 86 years out from now. For example, an OpenPGP certificate with a 100-year expiration

Bug#963628: Node-jest fails with: Error: Cannot find module 'import-local'

2020-06-24 Thread Nilesh Patra
Package: node-jest Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, Node-jest fails with the following on all the node-modules I've tried yet. Sample examples on node-compression-webpack-plugin version 2.0.0-3 and node-proper-lockfile version 4.1.1-2 internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:800 throw err; ^

Processed: reopening 953227, unarchiving 953227, notfixed 953227 in 0.0~git20200204.15e6a9d+ds-2, tagging 953227

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 953227 Bug #953227 {Done: Andreas Henriksson } [src:garagemq] garagemq: autopkgtest failure: github.com/valinurovam/garagemq/srvstorage [no test files] Unarchived Bug 953227 > reopen 953227 Bug #953227 {Done: Andreas Henriksson }

Bug#961032: marked as done (autopkgtest flaky on arm64)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:47:24 -0300 with message-id and subject line autopkgtest flaky on arm64 has caused the Debian Bug report #961032, regarding autopkgtest flaky on arm64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#961216: marked as done (inkscape: symbol resolution problem)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:03:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#961216: fixed in glibmm2.4 2.64.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #961216, regarding inkscape: symbol resolution problem to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#961216: inkscape: symbol resolution problem

2020-06-24 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 19:05:51 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > _ZN3Gio11Application35set_option_context_parameter_stringERKN4Glib7ustringE > > So, that set_option_context_parameter_string thing comes from Glib 2.56 For future reference: glibmm, not GLib. The GLib family of libraries (GLib,

Processed: Bug#961216 marked as pending in glibmm2.4

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #961216 [libglibmm-2.4-dev] inkscape: symbol resolution problem Added tag(s) pending. -- 961216: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961216 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#961216: marked as pending in glibmm2.4

2020-06-24 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #961216 in glibmm2.4 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: tagging 961216

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 961216 = Bug #961216 [libglibmm-2.4-dev] inkscape: symbol resolution problem Removed tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 961216:

Bug#961216: inkscape: symbol resolution problem

2020-06-24 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: reassign -1 libglibmm-2.4-dev 2.56.0-1 So, talking with people over at the Gnome team, this came out: On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 10:30:20AM +1000, Peter Eckersley wrote: > However this somehow fixed the problem? > > $ sudo apt-get build-dep inkscape ... > The following packages will be

Processed: Re: Bug#961216: inkscape: symbol resolution problem

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libglibmm-2.4-dev 2.56.0-1 Bug #961216 [inkscape] inkscape: symbol resolution problem Bug reassigned from package 'inkscape' to 'libglibmm-2.4-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions inkscape/1.0-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug

Bug#963609: marked as done (golang-github-francoispqt-gojay FTBFS on 32bit)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963609: fixed in golang-github-francoispqt-gojay 1.2.13-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #963609, regarding golang-github-francoispqt-gojay FTBFS on 32bit to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#963493: Repeatable hard lockup running strace testsuite using 4.19.118+2+deb10u1, 4.19.98+1+deb10u1 works fine

2020-06-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hey Salvatore! On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 05:57:42PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >Control: found -1 4.19.118-1 >Control: tags -1 + upstream > >Hi Steve, > >On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:58:35PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> Source: linux >> Version: 4.19.118-2+deb10u1 >> Severity: serious >>

Processed: Re: Bug#963493: Repeatable hard lockup running strace testsuite using 4.19.118+2+deb10u1, 4.19.98+1+deb10u1 works fine

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 4.19.118-1 Bug #963493 [src:linux] Repeatable hard lockup running strace testsuite using 4.19.118+2+deb10u1, 4.19.98+1+deb10u1 works fine Marked as found in versions linux/4.19.118-1. > tags -1 + upstream Bug #963493 [src:linux] Repeatable hard lockup

Bug#963493: Repeatable hard lockup running strace testsuite using 4.19.118+2+deb10u1, 4.19.98+1+deb10u1 works fine

2020-06-24 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: found -1 4.19.118-1 Control: tags -1 + upstream Hi Steve, On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:58:35PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Source: linux > Version: 4.19.118-2+deb10u1 > Severity: serious > > Hi folks, > > Trying to reproduce #963462 on my Thinkpad T470, I'm repeatedly > getting a

Processed: tagging 961496

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 961496 + pending Bug #961496 [rinse] rinse: fails to extract rpms Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 961496: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961496 Debian

Bug#963609: golang-github-francoispqt-gojay FTBFS on 32bit

2020-06-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: golang-github-francoispqt-gojay Version: 1.2.13-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=golang-github-francoispqt-gojay=sid ... # github.com/francoispqt/gojay [github.com/francoispqt/gojay.test]

Bug#959157: fix for CVE-2020-1749 in linux-image-4.19.0-9 breaks wireguard

2020-06-24 Thread Timo Jyrinki
Timo Jyrinki kirjoitti 18.6.2020 klo 18.18: > I managed to fix it thanks to message #34, changing > /usr/src/wireguard-1.0.20200520/compat/compat.h slightly and running dpkg > --configure -a. It built fine both against 4.19.0-6-marvell and > 4.19.0-9-marvell. Likewise for

Bug#963454: marked as done (grml2usb: FTBFS: grml2usb:920:17: F523 '...'.format(...) has unused arguments at position(s): 0)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:48:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963454: fixed in grml2usb 0.18.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #963454, regarding grml2usb: FTBFS: grml2usb:920:17: F523 '...'.format(...) has unused arguments at position(s): 0 to be marked as done. This

Bug#963546: meson: autopkgtest failures

2020-06-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 02:08:23 +0300 Jussi Pakkanen wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 16:36, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: > > > Hello, as you can see, two tests can't be run on ppc64el and s390x, because > > of missing: > > g++-arm-linux-gnueabihf and ldc > >

Bug#962724: marked as done (iptables: autopkgtest regression: nft Unsupported command?)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962724: fixed in iptables 1.8.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #962724, regarding iptables: autopkgtest regression: nft Unsupported command? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2020-06-24 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Felix Lechner > There may be an alternative for some cases mentioned here. The wolfSSL > encryption library is a FIPS-certified, commercial product with a > fully usable, although incomplete, OpenSSL compatibility layer. Interesting pointer, thanks. For postgresql-12, it fails at the

Bug#963344: marked as done (python-urwid-utils: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 07:34:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963344: fixed in python-urwid-utils 0.1.2.dev2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #963344, regarding python-urwid-utils: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8

Bug#963400: marked as done (python-panwid: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 07:34:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963400: fixed in python-panwid 0.3.0.dev15-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #963400, regarding python-panwid: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit

Bug#962743: marked as done (cnvkit FTBFS on mips64el/ppc64el: test failure)

2020-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:56:05 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#962743: cnvkit FTBFS on mips64el/ppc64el: test failure has caused the Debian Bug report #962743, regarding cnvkit FTBFS on mips64el/ppc64el: test failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#962743: cnvkit FTBFS on mips64el/ppc64el: test failure

2020-06-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Michael, you did the last update of this package. The bug is blocking testing migration of python-biopython which creates regularly a lot of noise. Could you confirm that you are working on this or do you need help? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#963583: sysdig: sysdig segfaults on start

2020-06-24 Thread Dima Kogan
Package: sysdig Version: 0.26.7-2 Severity: grave Hi. sysdig used to work, but now it doesn't. I'm running Debian/sid, so probably something about my set of dependencies doesn't agree with sysdig, but we should figure out what that is. Earlier today I was seeing a segfault when running some