Source: libiscsi
Version: 1.19.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC
Source: libtpms
Version: 0.8.0~dev1-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../libtool
Source: gmap
Version: 2020-06-30+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -pthread
Source: vilistextum
Version: 2.6.9-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -Wall -O2 -ansi -g -O2
Source: gramophone2
Version: 0.8.13a-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -Wdate-time
Source: hexcurse
Version: 1.58-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -g -O2
Source: libu2f-host
Version: 1.1.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 966838 2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-4
Bug #966838 [rails] rails: newapp autopkgtest failed and it also broke
autopkgtest for many rails assets packages
Marked as found in versions rails/2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2020 07:18:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966735: fixed in fvwm-crystal 3.4.1+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #966735,
regarding fvwm-crystal: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2020 07:20:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966670: fixed in pixelmed 20200416-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #966670,
regarding pixelmed FTBFS: iconv: illegal input sequence at position 19
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2020 07:18:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966735: fixed in fvwm-crystal 3.4.1+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #966735,
regarding fvwm-crystal: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
I don't know if it's relevant, but I'm getting this a warning at boot with
this service:
systemd[1]: /lib/systemd/system/blk-availability.service:10: Neither a
valid executable name nor an absolute path: ${exec_prefix}/bin/true
lvm2/2.03.09-2
debian/patches/0001-Be-careful-with-that-bundler.patch
We can reproduce this by just running
rails new foo
$ rails new foo
create
create README.md
create Rakefile
create .ruby-version
create config.ru
create .gitignore
create Gemfile
run git init from "."
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/foo/.git/
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #966670 in pixelmed reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #966670 [src:pixelmed] pixelmed FTBFS: iconv: illegal input sequence at
position 19
Added tag(s) pending.
--
966670: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966670
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 964143 serious
Bug #964143 [schleuder] schleuder: ftbfs with Rails 6 in experimental - Could
not find 'activerecord' (~> 5.2) - did find: [activerecord-6.0.3.1]
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 964952 serious
Bug
Source: openmm
Severity: grave
Owner: Andrius Merkys
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/openmm/openmm/issues/2784
Hello,
The upstream expressed their concern that packaging development version of
OpenMM may cause trouble with its users [1]. Therefore it has been agreed to
withhold the
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/openmm/openmm/issues/2784
Bug #966839 [src:openmm] openmm: withhold the package until a stable release
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/openmm/openmm/issues/2784'.
--
966839:
Please find attached patch to fix this issue.
--
Antoni Villalonga
https://friki.cat/
Description: fixes gcc-10 build issues
Author: Antoni Villalonga
Last-Update: 2020-08-02
--- a/common/includes/debug.h
+++ b/common/includes/debug.h
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
#include
#include
-int debug;
Package: rails
Version: 6.0.3.2+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/r/ruby-rails-assets-autosize/6520761/log.gz
(same error in rails as well other autopkgtest failures)
run bundle install --local
Étienne Mollier, on 2020-08-02 20:25:07 +0200:
> I will push that change to salsa if I see the build succeed,
Arf, no dice, there might be more changes needed, including
maybe:
* reviewing cmake build dependencies metainformations, as in
the upstream commit documented in a previous entry,
301 - 322 of 322 matches
Mail list logo