Hi Stuart,
I saw you have fixed Python2 removal related issue (#943167) in madness
0.10.1~gite4aa500e-11 upload to experimental. However, unstable still
has 0.10.1~gite4aa500e-10.1 with the same issue now reported as #967172.
Is there a reason for not uploading your fix to unstable?
Best,
Your message dated Wed, 12 Aug 2020 03:03:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957049: fixed in bluez-tools 2.0~20170911.0.7cb788c-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #957049,
regarding bluez-tools: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi,
Thanks for your report.
2020年8月4日(火) 19:50 Gylstorff Quirin :
>
> Package: libubootenv-tool
> Version: 0.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I tried to build libubootenv-tool with dpkg-buildpackage and the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 967130 foxtrotgps/1.2.2-2
Bug #967130 {Done: Paul Wise } [src:foxtrotgps] foxtrotgps:
Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
No longer marked as found in versions foxtrotgps/1.2.2-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Wed, 12 Aug 2020 01:48:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#968248: fixed in orca 3.36.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #968248,
regarding orca: Do not install Orca 3.36.4; wait for Orca 3.36.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
> That change did not make it into the package, the B+R still contain the
> old version:
Uggh, ACKed ... sometimes one cannot see the forest between all the trees ...
# CharisSIL-*.ttf moved from texlive-fonts-extra to texlive-fonts-extra-links
Processing control commands:
> found -1 2020.20200804-2
Bug #968047 {Done: Norbert Preining }
[texlive-fonts-extra-links] texlive-fonts-extra-links: missing Breaks+Replaces:
texlive-fonts-extra (<< 2020.20200804)
Marked as found in versions texlive-extra/2020.20200804-2; no longer marked as
Control: found -1 2020.20200804-2
That change did not make it into the package, the B+R still contain the
old version:
Package: texlive-fonts-extra-links
Source: texlive-extra
Version: 2020.20200804-2
Replaces: texlive-fonts-extra (<< 2019.20191208)
Breaks: texlive-fonts-extra (<< 2019.20191208)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 956355 + pending
Bug #956355 [src:pam] pam: Please stop using deprecated and
headers
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
956355:
On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 1:38:52 PM EDT Peter Wienemann wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On 11.08.20 17:54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Unless you object, I'll probably do an NMU to do that since this will
> > block dnspython testing migration. I'll post a diff to the bug before I
> > do.
>
> that is
retitle 963760 new upstream release (1.4.11)
thanks
...and now there's 1.4.11.
Regards,
Daniel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 963760 new upstream release (1.4.11)
Bug #963760 [ceph] new upstream release (1.4.10)
Changed Bug title to 'new upstream release (1.4.11)' from 'new upstream release
(1.4.10)'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 22:03:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957327: fixed in hardinfo 0.5.1+git20180227-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #957327,
regarding hardinfo: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
>> # at t/methods.t line 86.
>> # got: '> class="header-section-number">1 x
>> # '
>> # expected: '1
>> x
>> # '
>> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 36.
my best guess is that this is caused by changes in pandoc or its
dependencies. (And the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 957029 - wontfix
Bug #957029 [src:ax25mail-utils] ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10
Removed tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
957029:
Hello,
> On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 1:38:52 PM EDT Peter Wienemann wrote:
> > @Security tools team: I requested a review/upload of a new version of
> > dnstwist last week [0]. Given Scott's planned NMU it might be good to
> > hold off the upload of the new version until the NMU is acknowledged.
Processing control commands:
> retitle 967022 mes: FTBFS: test failure on amd64:
> lib/tests/scaffold/63-struct-cell.c
Bug #967022 [src:mes] mes: FTBFS: checking for cc is Mes Cconfig.c:2:2:
error: #error no mesc
Changed Bug title to 'mes: FTBFS: test failure on amd64:
Control: retitle 967022 mes: FTBFS: test failure on amd64:
lib/tests/scaffold/63-struct-cell.c
Control: forwarded 967022
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-mes/2020-07/msg4.html
Thanks for the report!
On 2020-08-03, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> [0;31mFAIL[m:
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 20:26:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957353: fixed in ifhp 3.5.20-17
has caused the Debian Bug report #957353,
regarding ifhp: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Control: tags 957189 + patch
Control: tags 957189 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for f-irc (versioned as 1.36-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel it.
--
Regards
Sudip
diff -Nru f-irc-1.36/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 957189 + patch
Bug #957189 [src:f-irc] f-irc: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 957189 + pending
Bug #957189 [src:f-irc] f-irc: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) pending.
--
957189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957189
Debian Bug
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 19:49:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966943: fixed in tinygltf 2.2.0+dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #966943,
regarding tinygltf: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns
disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 19:18:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#964541: fixed in gnome-desktop3 3.37.90.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #964541,
regarding flatpak: Wrong argument order for clone syscall seccomp filter on
s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 1:38:52 PM EDT Peter Wienemann wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On 11.08.20 17:54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Unless you object, I'll probably do an NMU to do that since this will
> > block dnspython testing migration. I'll post a diff to the bug before I
> > do.
>
> that is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 966998 +patch
Bug #966998 [src:lxc] lxc: FTBFS: lsm/selinux.c:35:2: error:
‘security_context_t’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
Added tag(s) patch.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Attached you can find the diff.
commit 15d82dfe4f7900be54e06b6ca0a79321ee2a9b34
Author: Christian Brauner
Date: Sat Jul 25 11:36:46 2020 +0200
selinux: remove security_context_t usage as it's deprecated
Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1888705
This bug has been finally reproduced on a refresh VM.
It happens when the NSS flavour of libcurl4-dev is installed.
Otherwise with both GnuTLS / OpenSSL it works without problem.
I will write a patch to fix that.
Cheers
--
Aloïs Micard (creekorful)
GPG: DA4A A436 9BFA E299 67CD E85B F733
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 907496
Bug #907496 {Done: Aloïs Micard } [libcurlpp0] libcurlpp0:
Always fails with "No URL set!"
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #907496 to the same values
previously set
> forwarded 907496
Hi Scott,
On 11.08.20 17:54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Unless you object, I'll probably do an NMU to do that since this will block
> dnspython testing migration. I'll
> post a diff to the bug before I do.
that is fine with me.
@Security tools team: I requested a review/upload of a new version
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:51:17PM -0400, Todd Howe wrote:
> I got around to fixing my desktop today. In addition to the instructions I
> posted above and the procedure to mount system directories below, there was
> only one necessary change:
>
>
I got around to fixing my desktop today. In addition to the instructions I
posted above and the procedure to mount system directories below, there was
only one necessary change:
https://gist.github.com/samuelcolvin/43c5ed2807e7db004b1058d0c9bfb068
That guy suggested used grub-install /dev/sda
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 968248 3.37.90-1
Bug #968248 [orca] orca: Do not install Orca 3.36.4; wait for Orca 3.36.5
Marked as fixed in versions orca/3.37.90-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
968248:
Package: orca
Version: 3.36.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: breaks web navigation
Forwarded: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2020-August/msg00085.html
As reported by upstream
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2020-August/msg00085.html
we really need to
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:18:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963645: fixed in libcork 0.15.0+ds-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #963645,
regarding libcork: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: assert
symbol.siblingAbove.siblingBelow is None
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: dnstwist
Version: 0~20200424-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Note: Using FTBTS tag since it's the closest thing we have to this
(since autopkgtest failures block testing migration).
>From the autopkgtest log
Le 11/07/2020 à 19:54, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> Source: npm
> Version: 6.14.6+ds-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello, looks like one test is failing on ppc64el and s390x.
> Could you please have a look?
>
> this on s390x
>
Package: fpc
Version: 3.2.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
The autopkgtest for fpc 3.2.0 is failing
Compiling utests.pp
PPU Loading
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fpc/3.2.0/units/x86_64-linux/fcl-base/custapp.ppu
PPU Source: custapp.pp not available
Recompiling CustApp, checksum changed for
Hi,
The package needs some more work.
I plan work on it this week, I hope have some news
in the next few days.
Cheers,
Arias Emmanuel
@eamanu
http://eamanu.com
El mar., 11 de ago. de 2020 a la(s) 12:15, nb (n...@dagami.org) escribió:
>
> How much time does it take to come to sid?
>
>
How much time does it take to come to sid?
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:08:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966760: fixed in mklibs 0.1.44.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #966760,
regarding mklibs: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
FYI: We just bumped upstream to include the fix:
https://github.com/secure-systems-lab/securesystemslib/releases/tag/v0.16.0
Will prepare a downstream release later this week.
On 06.08.2020 2:21 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hey Lukas,
>
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 02:03:00PM +0200, Lukas
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:48:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966085: fixed in gitlab 13.2.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #966085,
regarding gitlab contains git bundles with non-free code, unlisted code
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:34:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#967162: fixed in libosmocore 0.12.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #967162,
regarding libosmocore: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:33:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963646: fixed in dynare 4.6.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #963646,
regarding dynare: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: ImportError: cannot import name 'l_'
from 'sphinx.locale'
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:34:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#968212: fixed in scheme48 1.9.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #968212,
regarding scheme48 misses source for S48_DETERMINE_BITS_PER_BYTE
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:33:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957433: fixed in libcec 6.0.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #957433,
regarding libcec: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On 11/08/2020 13:06, Graham Inggs wrote:
I've had a quick look at ddrescue [1], but I don't know how to fix
that. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Googling the error message took me to
https://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_Trunk
which has an entry "Property field access lists no longer
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #963646 [src:dynare] dynare: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: ImportError: cannot
import name 'l_' from 'sphinx.locale'
(/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/locale/__init__.py)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
963646:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #963646 in dynare reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On 11/08/2020 13:06, Graham Inggs wrote:
I've also looked at mricron [2][3], and changing '(**)' to '*)' in
both places fixes the compilation, but I have no idea what the '(**)'
means. Can anyone tell me?
(* and *) are comment delimeters
Borland style pascal traditionally handled comments
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #966653 [ruby-google-protobuf] gitlab: [BUG] Segmentation fault at
0x
Bug 966653 cloned as bug 968239
> retitle -2 "ruby-sidekiq 6 makes gitlab uninstallable"
Bug #968239 [ruby-google-protobuf] gitlab: [BUG] Segmentation fault at
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 "ruby-sidekiq 6 makes gitlab uninstallable"
Control: reassign -2 gitlab
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 16:08, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 13:35, dragos.ja...@dynamicpuzzle.ro wrote:
dpkg -i ruby-sidekiq_5.2.7+dfsg-1_all.deb dpkg: warning:
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 python3-sphinx 3.2.0-1
Bug #966983 [src:python-skbio] python-skbio: FTBFS: dh_sphinxdoc: error:
debian/python-skbio-doc/usr/share/doc/python-skbio-doc/html/search.html does
not load searchindex.js
Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-skbio' to
Control: reassign -1 python3-sphinx 3.2.0-1
Control: affects -1 + src:python-skbio
Hi Andreas!
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 02:26:40PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I need some help with a sphinx error for python-skbio:
>
> > > Extension error:
> > > Handler for event
> > >
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 13:19:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#967035: fixed in autodep8 0.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #967035,
regarding autodep8: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 13:19:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957014: fixed in asyncpg 0.21.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #957014,
regarding asyncpg: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 967181 mupdf/1.17.0+ds1-1
Bug #967181 [src:mupdf] mupdf: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
Marked as fixed in versions mupdf/1.17.0+ds1-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #967035 [src:autodep8] autodep8: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
967035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967035
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #967035 in autodep8 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:48:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#931566: fixed in apt 2.1.10
has caused the Debian Bug report #931566,
regarding Don't complain about suite changes
(Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:34:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#968035: fixed in mercurial 5.4.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #968035,
regarding Cannot migrate to testing due to Breaks: mercurial-crecord (<=
0.20151121-2)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
I need some help with a sphinx error for python-skbio:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:26:10AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 8/11/20 9:41 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 07:17:30AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >> A smiliar issue was reported for mapproxy
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:18:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#968207: fixed in libpod 2.0.4+dfsg2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #968207,
regarding podman: Breaks docker
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 968220 968233
Bug #968220 [apt] apt: 'apt source' fails: Data left in buffer
Bug #968233 [apt] apt regression: abort downloads on "long" package lists
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
Merged 968220 968233
> thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 966653 ruby-google-protobuf
Bug #966653 [gitlab] gitlab: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x
Bug reassigned from package 'gitlab' to 'ruby-google-protobuf'.
No longer marked as found in versions gitlab/13.1.4-2.
Ignoring
Package: apt
Version: 2.1.9
Severity: serious
Hi,
I think I've found a regression in the apt 2.1.9 upload.
When building system images, we do call 'apt install' with all the
packages in one single line, which is what we've been e.g. doing since
2006 for all the live images. Until 2.1.8 this
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #968035 [src:mercurial] Cannot migrate to testing due to Breaks:
mercurial-crecord (<= 0.20151121-2)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
968035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968035
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #968035 in mercurial reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:43:18 +
with message-id <2020084318.ga1...@scru.org>
and subject line gi-pango
has caused the Debian Bug report #955674,
regarding haskell-gi-pango: FTBFS: hlibrary.setup: An 'autogen-module' is
neither on 'exposed-modules' or 'other-modules'.
to be
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #968207 in libpod reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 13:43:24 +0200
with message-id
and subject line view3dscene: FTBFS with fpc 3.2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #968127,
regarding view3dscene: FTBFS with fpc 3.2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #968207 [podman] podman: Breaks docker
Added tag(s) pending.
--
968207: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968207
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:35:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966991: fixed in seaborn 0.10.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #966991,
regarding seaborn: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i
python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13
to be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 968124 + pending
Bug #968124 [src:diffoscope] diffoscope: FTBFS with fpc 3.2.0
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
968124:
tags 968124 + pending
thanks
Hi Graham,
> As can be seen on reproducible builds [1], this package FTBFS since
> the upload of fpc 3.2.0+dfsg-5 to unstable.
Thanks, very useful bug report. I've fixed this in:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 13:35, dragos.ja...@dynamicpuzzle.ro wrote:
dpkg -i ruby-sidekiq_5.2.7+dfsg-1_all.deb dpkg: warning: downgrading
ruby-sidekiq from 6.0.4+dfsg-2 to 5.2.7+dfsg-1 (Reading database ...
411139 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to
unpack
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957985: fixed in xjdic 24-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #957985,
regarding xjdic: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 968121 + upstream
Bug #968121 [src:ddrescueview] ddrescueview: FTBFS with fpc 3.2.0
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 968121 https://sourceforge.net/p/ddrescueview/tickets/13/
Bug #968121 [src:ddrescueview] ddrescueview: FTBFS with fpc
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 13:11, dragos.ja...@dynamicpuzzle.ro wrote:
Hi Praveen
I installed 13.2.3,but have problems on configure with sidekiq*
versions:
Bundler could not find compatible versions for gem "sidekiq": In
Gemfile: sidekiq gitlab-sidekiq-fetcher was resolved to 0.5.2, which
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 964880
Bug #964880 {Done: Xavier Guimard } [src:npm] npm: test
failures in ppc64el and s390x
Bug #964854 {Done: Xavier Guimard } [src:npm] npm:
autopkgtests failures on s390x
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with
Hello!
This bug has been fixed in Ubuntu's procenv 0.50-1ubuntu3:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procenv/0.50-1ubuntu3
A fix was proposed upstream as well:
https://github.com/jamesodhunt/procenv/pull/16
Best,
Lukas
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 10:05:29 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source:
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:06:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#964880: fixed in node-tap 12.0.1+ds-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #964880,
regarding npm: test failures in ppc64el and s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:06:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#964880: fixed in node-tap 12.0.1+ds-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #964880,
regarding npm: autopkgtests failures on s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:00:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957433: fixed in libcec 6.0.2-1~exp0
has caused the Debian Bug report #957433,
regarding libcec: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 964880 - pending
Bug #964880 [src:npm] npm: test failures in ppc64el and s390x
Bug #964854 [src:npm] npm: autopkgtests failures on s390x
Removed tag(s) pending.
Removed tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:00:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#956986: fixed in aflplusplus 2.66c-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #956986,
regarding aflplusplus: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 963437 12.0.1+ds-3
Bug #963437 [src:node-tap] node-tap: FTBFS: failed tests
The source 'node-tap' and version '12.0.1+ds-3' do not appear to match any
binary packages
Marked as fixed in versions node-tap/12.0.1+ds-3.
> thanks
Stopping
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #964880 in node-tap reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #964880 [src:npm] npm: test failures in ppc64el and s390x
Bug #964854 [src:npm] npm: autopkgtests failures on s390x
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
964854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964854
964880:
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:33:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957563: fixed in mpg321 0.3.2-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #957563,
regarding mpg321: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:09:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966857: fixed in libtpms 0.8.0~dev1-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #966857,
regarding libtpms: FTBFS: tpm2/NVDynamic.c:126:10: error: ‘nvHandle’ may be
used uninitialized in this function
Control: reassign -1 src:mysql-8.0
The BTS doesn't know about -dbgsym packages (see #868539), reassigning
to the source package.
On Du, 09 aug 20, 21:48:13, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: mysql-router-dbgsym,mysql-server-core-8.0-dbgsym
> Version: 8.0.20-1~exp1
> Severity: serious
> User:
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:mysql-8.0
Bug #968149 [mysql-router-dbgsym,mysql-server-core-8.0-dbgsym]
mysql-router-dbgsym,mysql-server-core-8.0-dbgsym: file conflict due to shared
build-id
Warning: Unknown package 'mysql-router-dbgsym'
Warning: Unknown package
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #966976 in msgpack-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:35:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966976: fixed in msgpack-java 0.8.20-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #966976,
regarding msgpack-java: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java -noverify -cp
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:36:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#967007: fixed in rails 2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #967007,
regarding rails: package new gem dependencies for autopkgtests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #966976 {Done: Andrius Merkys } [src:msgpack-java]
msgpack-java: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java
-noverify -cp /usr/share/maven/boot/plexus-classworlds-2.x.jar
-Dmaven.home=/usr/share/maven
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:33:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#968225: fixed in advi 1.10.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #968225,
regarding advi: FTBFS in sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On 8/11/20 9:41 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 07:17:30AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> A smiliar issue was reported for mapproxy in #966979, which was not an
>> issue in mapproxy but in sphinx, and fixed in sphinx (2.4.3-5).
>>
>> I have not tested the build of this
Le 21/06/2020 à 22:32, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: node-tap
> Version: 12.0.1+ds-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
>
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
