Bug#966892: marked as done (megaglest: FTBFS: ld: ../shared_lib/liblibmegaglest.a(ftpAccount.c.o):./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/source/shared_lib/./source/shared_lib/include/feathery_ftp/ftpTypes.h:84: multi

Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2020 03:33:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966892: fixed in megaglest 3.13.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #966892, regarding megaglest: FTBFS: ld:

Processed: Bug#966892 marked as pending in megaglest

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #966892 [src:megaglest] megaglest: FTBFS: ld: ../shared_lib/liblibmegaglest.a(ftpAccount.c.o):./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/source/shared_lib/./source/shared_lib/include/feathery_ftp/ftpTypes.h:84: multiple definition of `ftpIsClientAllowedToGetFile';

Bug#966892: marked as pending in megaglest

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #966892 in megaglest reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#969123: webext-ublock-origin: FF80 broke ublock again

Hello ftp team, ublock origin is in the NEW queue again. [1] The binary packages have not changed since the last review. I had uploaded a newer version to unstable and when you finally approved the version I had uploaded to experimental it got automatically removed from Debian because the version

Bug#969123: webext-ublock-origin: FF80 broke ublock again

On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 01:32 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Thanks for reporting. I believe this is fixed in 1.29.0+dfsg. > Unfortunately the package has to go through NEW again which is > unfortunate. I hope I can convince the ftp-team to fast-track > reviewing > uBo (again). Interestingly it

Bug#969123: webext-ublock-origin: FF80 broke ublock again

Control: tags -1 pending On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:13:45 +0200 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: [...] > It seems stupid *zilla broke ublock origina again with the new Firefox. Thanks for reporting. I believe this is fixed in 1.29.0+dfsg. Unfortunately the package has to go through NEW again which

Processed: Re: webext-ublock-origin: FF80 broke ublock again

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #969123 [webext-ublock-origin] webext-ublock-origin: FF80 broke ublock again Added tag(s) pending. -- 969123: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969123 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#969112: flashplugin-nonfree: Re: RM: flashplugin-nonfree -- RoQA, unmainained, several RC bugs, techology deprecated

Package: flashplugin-nonfree Version: 1:3.7 Followup-For: Bug #969112 Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: severity -1 normal Reassigning bug after receiving heads-up to decide myself from the maintainer. -- tobi

Processed: flashplugin-nonfree: Re: RM: flashplugin-nonfree -- RoQA, unmainained, several RC bugs, techology deprecated

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #969112 [flashplugin-nonfree] RM: flashplugin-nonfree -- RoQA, unmainained, several RC bugs, techology deprecated Bug reassigned from package 'flashplugin-nonfree' to 'ftp.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions

Bug#968336: marked as done (afl++: Illegal instruction)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Aug 2020 21:03:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968336: fixed in aflplusplus 2.67c-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #968336, regarding afl++: Illegal instruction to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#487380: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Processed: severity of 487380 is serious

Control: severity -1 normal Am 28.08.20 um 21:33 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> # Modifying a config file is a policy violation >> severity 487380 serious > Bug #487380 [libnss-mdns] libnss-mdns: Unasked changes in nsswitch.conf >

Processed: Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Processed: severity of 487380 is serious

Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #487380 [libnss-mdns] libnss-mdns: Unasked changes in nsswitch.conf breaks the whole system Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' -- 487380: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487380 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: src:tiddit: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug

Processing control commands: > close -1 2.12.0+dfsg-2 Bug #969185 [src:tiddit] src:tiddit: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug Marked as fixed in versions tiddit/2.12.0+dfsg-2. Bug #969185 [src:tiddit] src:tiddit: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC

Bug#969185: src:tiddit: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug

Source: tiddit Version: 2.12.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.12.0+dfsg-2 Tags: sid bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 964101 Dear maintainer(s), As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that

Processed: severity of 487380 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Modifying a config file is a policy violation > severity 487380 serious Bug #487380 [libnss-mdns] libnss-mdns: Unasked changes in nsswitch.conf breaks the whole system Severity set to 'serious' from 'minor' > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#968709: marked as done (libcmark-gfm-dev: Missing header files)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:18:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968709: fixed in cmark-gfm 0.29.0.gfm.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #968709, regarding libcmark-gfm-dev: Missing header files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Bug#968336 marked as pending in aflplusplus

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #968336 [afl++] afl++: Illegal instruction Added tag(s) pending. -- 968336: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968336 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#968336: marked as pending in aflplusplus

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #968336 in aflplusplus reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#959828: marked as done (systemctl: `Provides: systemd`, but doesn't provide what systemd does)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Aug 2020 18:03:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#959828: fixed in docker-systemctl-replacement 1.4.4181-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #959828, regarding systemctl: `Provides: systemd`, but doesn't provide what systemd does to be marked as done. This

Bug#957803: sjeng: diff for NMU version 11.2-8.1

Control: tags 957803 + patch Control: tags 957803 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for sjeng (versioned as 11.2-8.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. -- Regards Sudip diff -u sjeng-11.2/debian/changelog sjeng-11.2/debian/changelog

Processed: sjeng: diff for NMU version 11.2-8.1

Processing control commands: > tags 957803 + patch Bug #957803 [src:sjeng] sjeng: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 957803 + pending Bug #957803 [src:sjeng] sjeng: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) pending. -- 957803: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957803 Debian Bug

Processed: owner 957506

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 957506 casca...@debian.org Bug #957506 [src:lprng] lprng: ftbfs with GCC-10 Owner recorded as casca...@debian.org. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 957506:

Bug#962651: Version 0.98 released

Upstream has now released version 0.98 of rst2pdf which removes the pdfrw dependency. * https://github.com/rst2pdf/rst2pdf/releases/tag/0.98 * https://pypi.org/project/rst2pdf/0.98/ Regards, Rob --

Bug#969177: debmake: cannot create deb for nodejs modeule

package: debmake version: 4.3.2-1 severity: grave Using pretty-ms node module as example. debmake 4.3.2-1 worked. (debian-sid)pravi@ilvala2:~/packaging/node-pretty-ms-7.0.0$ debmake I: set parameters I: sanity check of parameters I: pkg="node-pretty-ms", ver="7.0.0", rev="1" I: *** start

Bug#969171: akonadi-server expects akonadi-backend-mysql allthough any sql backend should work

Package: akonadi-server Version: 4:20.04.1-2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable akonadi server support any backend from package dependency point of view. However trying to start it via akonadictl start you get: org.kde.pim.akonadictl: Starting Akonadi Server...

Bug#964950: marked as done (nginx: CVE-2020-11724)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:48:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#964950: fixed in nginx 1.14.2-2+deb10u3 has caused the Debian Bug report #964950, regarding nginx: CVE-2020-11724 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#968934: marked as done (squid: CVE-2020-15810: SQUID-2020:10 HTTP(S) Request Smuggling)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:48:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968934: fixed in squid 4.6-1+deb10u4 has caused the Debian Bug report #968934, regarding squid: CVE-2020-15810: SQUID-2020:10 HTTP(S) Request Smuggling to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#968932: marked as done (squid: CVE-2020-15811: SQUID-2020:8 HTTP(S) Request Splitting)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:48:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968932: fixed in squid 4.6-1+deb10u4 has caused the Debian Bug report #968932, regarding squid: CVE-2020-15811: SQUID-2020:8 HTTP(S) Request Splitting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#968933: marked as done (squid: CVE-2020-24606: SQUID-2020:9 Denial of Service processing Cache Digest Response)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:48:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968933: fixed in squid 4.6-1+deb10u4 has caused the Debian Bug report #968933, regarding squid: CVE-2020-24606: SQUID-2020:9 Denial of Service processing Cache Digest Response to be marked as done. This

Bug#969156: rumur FTBFS on armel/armhf/mipsel/mips64el: test failures

Thanks for reporting this, Adrian. I noticed this some time after upload and fixed it upstream: https://github.com/Smattr/rumur/commit/68683c4742b380421936a703c4b9262dac1e68dc I hadn’t uploaded a fixed version to

Bug#966470: marked as done (ZlibInterface dlopens libz.so rather than libz.so.1)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:04:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966470: fixed in libmaus2 2.0.743+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #966470, regarding ZlibInterface dlopens libz.so rather than libz.so.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#957175: marked as done (endless-sky: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:48:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957175: fixed in endless-sky 0.9.8-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #957175, regarding endless-sky: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#969166: ruby-has-scope: FTBFS with rails 6 - ArgumentError: unknown keywords: :only_tall, :id

Package: ruby-has-scope Version: 0.7.2-2 Severity: serious User: pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: rails6-transition This package FTBFS with rails 6. 30) Error: HasScopeTest#test_scope_is_called_only_on_index: ArgumentError: unknown keywords: :only_tall, :id

Bug#966930: marked as done (kcalcore: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j1 test ARGS\+=-j1 returned exit code 2)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:03:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966930: fixed in kcalcore 5:5.70.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #966930, regarding kcalcore: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j1 test ARGS\+=-j1 returned exit code 2 to be

Processed: tagging 966930, tagging 962756

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 966930 + pending Bug #966930 [src:kcalcore] kcalcore: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j1 test ARGS\+=-j1 returned exit code 2 Added tag(s) pending. > tags 962756 + pending Bug #962756 [src:kcalcore] kcalcore

Bug#969157: ruby-diaspora-federation-rails: FTBFS with rails 6 - Could not find 'actionpack' (< 6, >= 4.2) - did find: [actionpack-6.0.3.1]

Package: ruby-diaspora-federation-rails Version: 0.2.6-1 Severity: serious User: pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: rails6-transition This package fails to build from source with rails 6. ┌──┐

Bug#969156: rumur FTBFS on armel/armhf/mipsel/mips64el: test failures

Source: rumur Version: 2020.05.27-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rumur=sid ... FAIL basic-sandbox.m Unexpected checker exit status -31: FAILX basic-sandbox.m Unexpected checker exit status -31: FAIL M basic-sandbox.m Unexpected

Bug#969152: teckit FTBFS on most architectures: symbol differences

Source: teckit Version: 2.5.10+ds1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=teckit=sid ... dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the

Bug#966888: marked as done (unicode-screensaver: FTBFS: ld: screenhack.o:/<>/hacks/screenhack.c:133: multiple definition of `progclass'; unicode.o:/<>/unicode.c:166: first de

Your message dated Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:22:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966888: fixed in unicode-screensaver 0.5.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #966888, regarding unicode-screensaver: FTBFS: ld: screenhack.o:/<>/hacks/screenhack.c:133: multiple definition of `progclass';

Processed: python-biom-format: FTBFS with pandas 1.0: test failures

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #950929 [src:python-biom-format] python-biom-format: FTBFS with pandas 1.0: test failures Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 950929: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950929 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact