Your message dated Sat, 26 Sep 2020 23:48:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969768: fixed in libio-socket-ip-perl 0.41-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #969768,
regarding libio-socket-ip-perl: do not release with bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Sat, 2020-09-26 at 10:12 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> The bug was fixed by a patch in 302-5.3+deb9u1. The reintroduction of
> the package, even if it no longer contains the patch, did not
> reintroduce the bug, because upstream fixed it in another way: the
> dynamic check against the
Your message dated Sun, 27 Sep 2020 01:28:54 +0200
with message-id <20200926232854.ga18...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#969967: libtest-tcp-perl: bogus dependency
libio-socket-ip-perl (>= 0.39-3~)
has caused the Debian Bug report #969967,
regarding libtest-tcp-perl: bogus
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 23:52:42 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > I guess we should update libio-socket-ip-perl to 0.41 and close this
> > bug with the upload (and close #969967 in libtest-tcp-perl as well).
> >
> > I've pushed libio-socket-ip-perl_0.41-1 to git but wanted to give
> > others a
Your message dated Sat, 26 Sep 2020 23:04:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970258: fixed in openafs 1.8.6-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #970258,
regarding openafs-modules-dkms: Does not build on bullseye with kernel 5.8.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 26 Sep 2020 23:04:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#954503: fixed in ruby-mustache 1.1.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #954503,
regarding ruby-mustache: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 05:07:13PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + pending
>
> On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 23:50:03 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > IO-Socket-IP is bundled with perl 5.30, so there is no need to ship
> > this separately.
>
> IO-Socket-IP 0.41 has been released,
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #954503 [src:ruby-mustache] ruby-mustache: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7"
failed.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
954503: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954503
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #954503 in ruby-mustache reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 954503 https://github.com/mustache/mustache/pull/258
Bug #954503 [src:ruby-mustache] ruby-mustache: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7"
failed.
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/mustache/mustache/pull/258'.
> thanks
Stopping
On 14.06.20 17:20, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 11.05.20 11:53, Winfried Münch wrote:
>> package: s390-tools
>>
>> Version: current Installer from 04.05.2020 21:14
>> http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/debian/dists/buster/main/installer-s390x/current/images/generic/
>>
>>
>> When I install debian I run
Your message dated Sat, 26 Sep 2020 19:18:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970102: fixed in barman 2.11-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #970102,
regarding src:barman: fails to migrate to testing for too long: maintainer
built arch:all binaries
to be marked as done.
This means
Source: samba
Version: 2:4.12.5+dfsg-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream
Justification: user security hole
Forwarded: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: found -1 2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1
Control: found
Processing control commands:
> found -1 2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1
Bug #971048 [src:samba] samba: CVE-2020-1472
Marked as found in versions samba/2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1.
> found -1 2:4.9.5+dfsg-5
Bug #971048 [src:samba] samba: CVE-2020-1472
Marked as found in versions samba/2:4.9.5+dfsg-5.
> found -1
Processing control commands:
> block 969321 by -1
Bug #969321 [release.debian.org] transition: GNOME 3.38, libmutter-7-0
969321 was blocked by: 971038 971040
969321 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 969321: 971041
--
969321:
Package: gnome-shell-extension-hard-disk-led
Version: 19-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream bullseye sid
Justification: renders package unusable in unstable (as of today)
Control: block 969321 by -1
This extension doesn't seem to be compatible with Shell 3.38 (coming soon
to an unstable mirror near
Your message dated Sat, 26 Sep 2020 17:04:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970245: fixed in gdm3 3.38.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #970245,
regarding gnome-core: gnome-core/s390x has unsatisfiable dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: gnome-shell-extension-easyscreencast
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Control: block 969321 by -1
GNOME Shell 3.38 is on its way into unstable, which makes
gnome-shell-extension-easyscreencast uninstallable. Please test with GNOME
Shell 3.38, and
Processing control commands:
> block 969321 by -1
Bug #969321 [release.debian.org] transition: GNOME 3.38, libmutter-7-0
969321 was blocked by: 971038
969321 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 969321: 971040
--
969321: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969321
Your message dated Sat, 26 Sep 2020 15:18:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969565: fixed in azure-cli 2.11.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #969565,
regarding python3-azure-cli: dependency unsatisfiable in sid and questionable
in testing.
to be marked as done.
This means that
Control: tag -1 + pending
On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 23:50:03 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> IO-Socket-IP is bundled with perl 5.30, so there is no need to ship
> this separately.
IO-Socket-IP 0.41 has been released, without the patch for #964902
but with some other changes:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + pending
Bug #969768 [libio-socket-ip-perl] libio-socket-ip-perl: do not release with
bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
969768: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969768
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 969768 0.39-2
Bug #969768 [libio-socket-ip-perl] libio-socket-ip-perl: do not release with
bullseye
Marked as found in versions libio-socket-ip-perl/0.39-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 969967 with 969768
Bug #969967 [libtest-tcp-perl] libtest-tcp-perl: bogus dependency
libio-socket-ip-perl (>= 0.39-3~)
969967 was not blocked by any bugs.
969967 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 969967: 969768
> thanks
Your message dated Sat, 26 Sep 2020 13:33:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957191: fixed in fact++ 1.6.5~dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #957191,
regarding fact++: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Am 26.09.20 um 10:27 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> On 25/09/2020 13:50, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> Why did you upgrade hibernate-validator to version 5.x when
>> no other package in Debian requires it? Wouldn't it have been
>> simpler to revert the upgrade instead of creating a separate
>>
Le sam. 26 sept. 2020 à 14:18, Gianfranco Costamagna <
locutusofb...@debian.org> a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:39:03 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbXkgTGFs?= <
> kapo...@melix.org> wrote:
> > Le mer. 19 août 2020 à 21:12, Gianfranco Costamagna <
> > locutusofb...@debian.org> a écrit :
>
Hello,
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:39:03 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbXkgTGFs?=
wrote:
> Le mer. 19 août 2020 à 21:12, Gianfranco Costamagna <
> locutusofb...@debian.org> a écrit :
>
> > Source: nodejs
> > Version: 12.18.2~dfsg-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hello, looks like node-create-hask,
tags 970901 + patch
thanks
Hi,
> black: cannot run, "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named '_black_version'"
The following patch works for me, but there is likely a cleaner
solution; seems like the Black package maintainers are doing special
things with the version handling and I am missing some
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 970901 + patch
Bug #970901 [black] black: cannot run, "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'_black_version'"
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
970901:
Your message dated Sat, 26 Sep 2020 11:34:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970900: fixed in nextcloud-desktop 3.0.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #970900,
regarding depends on non-existing qml-module-qtqml-modules2 (typo?)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #970900 in nextcloud-desktop reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #970900 [nextcloud-desktop] depends on non-existing
qml-module-qtqml-modules2 (typo?)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
970900: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970900
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 3:30 AM Scott Talbert wrote:
> If you don't mind, please do a new package upload to mentors.
Sure! Done here:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mrpt/mrpt_2.1.0-2.dsc
Best,
JL
Processing control commands:
> block 970550 by -1
Bug #970550 [libjs-autoprefixer] diaspora installation fails with
ExecJS::ProgramError: TypeError: Cannot read property 'list' of undefined
970550 was not blocked by any bugs.
970550 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 970550:
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.249
Severity: critical
I have a problem with the debian installer, at the finish-install stage
in the udeb clock-setup.
The following code path produces a strange protocol interaction:
if db_fget clock-setup/utc seen && [ "$RET" = true ]; then
# keep preseeded
Source: libgnatcoll-db
Version: 20.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from scratch on previously built architectures
Hello.
libgnatcoll-db/20.0-1 in experimental fails to build on
mipsel and mips64el with the following messages [1].
/tmp/ccl8IVnY.s: Assembler messages:
Hello,
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 08:41:38 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >debian/tests/autopkgtest-pkg-nodejs.conf contains
> >
> > "extra_depends=mocha, node-tape, node-rollup-plugin-json (>= 4.1.0)"
> >
> >which should be enough for autodep8 ≥ 0.23. If you use autodep8 ≥
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 744113 934191
Bug #744113 [ftp.debian.org] don't include uploaded binary packages (build on
developer machines) in the archive
Bug #934191 [ftp.debian.org] ftp.debian.org: Should reject/ignore/auto-binNMU
binary uploads
Severity set
Your message dated Sat, 26 Sep 2020 11:24:24 +0200
with message-id <87y2kw99h3@43-1.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#953426: python-apt: Hasjes problem
has caused the Debian Bug report #953426,
regarding python-apt: Hasjes problem
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hello,
>debian/tests/autopkgtest-pkg-nodejs.conf contains
>
> "extra_depends=mocha, node-tape, node-rollup-plugin-json (>= 4.1.0)"
>
>which should be enough for autodep8 ≥ 0.23. If you use autodep8 ≥ 0.23,
>this bug should be reassigned to autodep8.
interesting, I don't see autodep8 installed
Processing control commands:
> block 938777 by -1
Bug #938777 [src:vim-ultisnips] vim-ultisnips: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
938777 was not blocked by any bugs.
938777 was blocking: 937695
Added blocking bug(s) of 938777: 971015
--
938777:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 970265
Bug #970265 [src:python3.8] python3.8: FTBFS on arch:all, causing python3.8-doc
to be unavailable and python3-doc uninstallable
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
On 25/09/2020 13:50, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Why did you upgrade hibernate-validator to version 5.x when
> no other package in Debian requires it? Wouldn't it have been
> simpler to revert the upgrade instead of creating a separate
> hibernate-validator4 package?
The version 5.x is a
Control: notfound -1 305~alpha02-1
Control: close -1
Hi Paul,
There was no need to reopen this bug. The metadata was correct.
The bug was fixed by a patch in 302-5.3+deb9u1. The reintroduction of
the package, even if it no longer contains the patch, did not
reintroduce the bug, because upstream
Processing control commands:
> notfound -1 305~alpha02-1
Bug #917485 [ckermit] ckermit: relax openssl version check or tighten
libssl1.x.y dependencies
No longer marked as found in versions ckermit/305~alpha02-1.
> close -1
Bug #917485 [ckermit] ckermit: relax openssl version check or tighten
46 matches
Mail list logo
