Processed: tagging 972749

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Currently testing my implementation locally > tags 972749 + pending Bug #972749 [xen-tools] xen-tools: bullseye: /updates -> -security Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#977694: 5.10.1 Debian kernel does not boot on raspi 4 with ext4 rootfs and usb-msd

2020-12-18 Thread Ryutaroh Matsumoto
Package: linux-image-5.10.0-trunk-arm64-unsigned Version: 5.10.1-1~exp1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Debian kernel maintainers, This is somewhat similar to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977645 but I assume this is a different issue as booting

Bug#977308: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library (Was: Bug#977308: shasta: hardcoded dependencies on boost 1.71)

2020-12-18 Thread Jeremy Sowden
On 2020-12-18, at 15:32:01 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I tried no override_dh_shlibdeps in shasta debian/rules, which has > lead to: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library > /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/shasta.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so > needed by debian/shasta/usr/bin/shasta (ELF

Processed: Re: Bug#977647: 5.10.1 Debian kernel does not boot on amd64 with btrfs rootfs

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #977647 [src:linux] 5.10.1 Debian kernel does not boot on amd64 with btrfs rootfs Added tag(s) moreinfo. > severity -1 important Bug #977647 [src:linux] 5.10.1 Debian kernel does not boot on amd64 with btrfs rootfs Severity set to 'important'

Bug#977647: 5.10.1 Debian kernel does not boot on amd64 with btrfs rootfs

2020-12-18 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: severity -1 important Justification: does not affect all users Hi, Ryutaroh Matsumoto writes: > Package: linux-image-5.10.0-trunk-amd64-unsigned > Version: 5.10.1-1~exp1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > I just confirmed that

Processed: forcibly merging 844141 976933

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 844141 976933 Bug #844141 [src:libsys-cpuaffinity-perl] libsys-cpuaffinity-perl: FTBFS: Failed test 'bind to all processors successful 18446744073709551615 == 18446744073709551616-1' Bug #844141 [src:libsys-cpuaffinity-perl]

Bug#977677: marked as done (node-babel7: versioning missing for virtual package node-babel-runtime)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 22:36:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#977677: fixed in node-babel7 7.12.11+~cs150.141.84-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #977677, regarding node-babel7: versioning missing for virtual package node-babel-runtime to be marked as done. This means

Bug#977265: diff NMU for dds_2.9.0-8.1

2020-12-18 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Christoph, Thanks for the feedback! I just generated a new symbols-file. Can you recommend a better fix for that? Regards Anton

Bug#977685: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977685: node-jest: build routines are too brittle: build failures go undetected

2020-12-18 Thread Xavier
Le 18/12/2020 à 23:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-18 22:59:06) >> Le 18/12/2020 à 22:28, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Source: node-jest >>> Version: 26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-3 >>> Severity: serious >>> >>> By accident I noticed that a release of node-jest with only

Bug#977685: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977685: node-jest: build routines are too brittle: build failures go undetected

2020-12-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Xavier (2020-12-18 22:59:06) > Le 18/12/2020 à 22:28, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Source: node-jest > > Version: 26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-3 > > Severity: serious > > > > By accident I noticed that a release of node-jest with only changes to > > package relations changed size from 8.5

Bug#977265: diff NMU for dds_2.9.0-8.1

2020-12-18 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Anton Gladky > Dear maintainer, > > I have prepared an NMU (versioned as dds_2.9.0-8.1) and > uploaded to DELAYED/5. > > Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer, cancel > or reschedule. Hi Anton, thanks for your help with fixing this. However I think your "update symbols

Bug#977685: marked as done (node-jest: build routines are too brittle: build failures go undetected)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 22:59:06 +0100 with message-id <4e827dba-2d2c-ba6a-df36-ff294183c...@debian.org> and subject line Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977685: node-jest: build routines are too brittle: build failures go undetected has caused the Debian Bug report #977685, regarding

Bug#972050: marked as done (CVE-2020-11939 CVE-2020-11940 CVE-2020-15471 CVE-2020-15472 CVE-2020-15473 CVE-2020-15474 CVE-2020-15475 CVE-2020-15476)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 22:00:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972050: fixed in ndpi 3.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #972050, regarding CVE-2020-11939 CVE-2020-11940 CVE-2020-15471 CVE-2020-15472 CVE-2020-15473 CVE-2020-15474 CVE-2020-15475 CVE-2020-15476 to be

Bug#977685: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977685: node-jest: build routines are too brittle: build failures go undetected

2020-12-18 Thread Xavier
Le 18/12/2020 à 22:28, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Source: node-jest > Version: 26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-3 > Severity: serious > > By accident I noticed that a release of node-jest with only changes to > package relations changed size from 8.5 megabytes to 500 kilobytes. > > A closer

Bug#977677: marked as done (node-babel7: versioning missing for virtual package node-babel-runtime)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:49:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#977677: fixed in pkg-js-tools 0.9.58 has caused the Debian Bug report #977677, regarding node-babel7: versioning missing for virtual package node-babel-runtime to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#977624: marked as done (libxstream-java: CVE-2020-26259: XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary File Deletion on the local host when unmarshalling )

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:49:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#977624: fixed in libxstream-java 1.4.15-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #977624, regarding libxstream-java: CVE-2020-26259: XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary File Deletion on the local host when

Bug#977677: marked as pending in pkg-js-tools

2020-12-18 Thread Xavier Guimard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #977677 in pkg-js-tools reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#977677 marked as pending in pkg-js-tools

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #977677 [pkg-js-tools] node-babel7: versioning missing for virtual package node-babel-runtime Added tag(s) pending. -- 977677: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977677 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#977685: node-jest: build routines are too brittle: build failures go undetected

2020-12-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Source: node-jest Version: 26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-3 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 By accident I noticed that a release of node-jest with only changes to package relations changed size from 8.5 megabytes to 500 kilobytes. A closer examination of build logs

Processed: reassign 977677 to pkg-js-tools

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 977677 pkg-js-tools Bug #977677 [node-babel7] node-babel7: versioning missing for virtual package node-babel-runtime Bug reassigned from package 'node-babel7' to 'pkg-js-tools'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #977677 to

Bug#957499: marked as done (logtools: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:04:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957499: fixed in logtools 0.13e+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #957499, regarding logtools: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#975588: marked as done (openms: FTBFS against boost_1.74)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:00:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#975588: fixed in openms 2.6.0+cleaned1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #975588, regarding openms: FTBFS against boost_1.74 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#957256: marked as done (gauche: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:00:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957256: fixed in gauche 0.9.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #957256, regarding gauche: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#977677: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: Bug#977677: Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

2020-12-18 Thread Xavier
Le 18/12/2020 à 21:37, Xavier a écrit : > Le 18/12/2020 à 20:09, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-18 18:45:30) >>> Please launch autopkgtest before uploading such changes to avoid >>> problems. >> >> Yes, I fully agree. >> >> I generally run autopkgtest at every build +

Bug#977677: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

2020-12-18 Thread Xavier
Le 18/12/2020 à 20:09, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-18 18:45:30) >> Please launch autopkgtest before uploading such changes to avoid >> problems. > > Yes, I fully agree. > > I generally run autopkgtest at every build + compare with debdiff > against previous package

Bug#977683: bouncycastle: CVE-2020-28052

2020-12-18 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: bouncycastle Version: 1.65-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for bouncycastle, it affects 1.65 and 1.66 and is fixed in 1.67. CVE-2020-28052[0]:

Bug#977502: podman,golang-github-containers-common: both ship /usr/share/man/man5/containers-mounts.conf.5.gz

2020-12-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Valentin, I just received the bug below. It seems that the manpage duplication is actually upstream: - https://github.com/containers/common/blob/master/docs/containers-mounts.conf.5.md - https://github.com/containers/podman/blob/master/docs/source/markdown/containers-mounts.conf.5.md They

Bug#977604: smarty3: broken internal parsetree code

2020-12-18 Thread Mike Gabriel
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/smarty-php/smarty/issues/621 Hi Wolfgang, (hi Uwe), On Do 17 Dez 2020 17:48:20 CET, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: Package: smarty3 Version: 3.1.36-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags:

Processed: diff NMU for kcollectd_0.11.99.0-1.1

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 977229 +pending +patch Bug #977229 [src:kcollectd] kcollectd FTBFS with Boost 1.74 Added tag(s) pending. Bug #977229 [src:kcollectd] kcollectd FTBFS with Boost 1.74 Added tag(s) patch. > user team+bo...@tracker.debian.org Setting user to

Processed: retitle 977677 to node-babel7: versioning missing for virtual package node-babel-runtime

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 977677 node-babel7: versioning missing for virtual package > node-babel-runtime Bug #977677 [node-babel7] FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools Changed Bug title to 'node-babel7: versioning missing

Bug#977229: diff NMU for kcollectd_0.11.99.0-1.1

2020-12-18 Thread Anton Gladky
tags 977229 +pending +patch user team+bo...@tracker.debian.org usertag 977229 +boost174 thanks Dear maintainer, I have prepared an NMU (versioned as 0.11.99.0-1.1) and uploaded to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer, cancel or reschedule. Diff is attached. MR is

Bug#977677: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

2020-12-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Xavier (2020-12-18 18:45:30) > Please launch autopkgtest before uploading such changes to avoid > problems. Yes, I fully agree. I generally run autopkgtest at every build + compare with debdiff against previous package release. I certainly intended to do here as well, but see now that

Processed: affects 977677

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 977677 node-i18next-xhr-backend node-i18next-browser-languagedetector > node-i18next node-matrix-js-sdk Bug #977677 [node-babel7] FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools Added indication that 977677

Bug#977265: Diff

2020-12-18 Thread Anton Gladky
Forgotten diff. Anton nmu.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#977265: diff NMU for dds_2.9.0-8.1

2020-12-18 Thread Anton Gladky
tags 977265 +pending +patch user team+bo...@tracker.debian.org usertag 977265 +boost174 thanks Dear maintainer, I have prepared an NMU (versioned as dds_2.9.0-8.1) and uploaded to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer, cancel or reschedule. Diff is attached. MR is

Processed: diff NMU for dds_2.9.0-8.1

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 977265 +pending +patch Bug #977265 [src:dds] dds ftbfs with boost1.74 Added tag(s) pending. Bug #977265 [src:dds] dds ftbfs with boost1.74 Added tag(s) patch. > user team+bo...@tracker.debian.org Setting user to team+bo...@tracker.debian.org

Bug#957996: marked as done (xppaut: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 18:49:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957996: fixed in xppaut 6.11b+1.dfsg-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #957996, regarding xppaut: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 node-babel7 Bug #977677 [node-regenerator-transform] FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools Bug reassigned from package 'node-regenerator-transform' to 'node-babel7'. No longer marked as found in versions 0.14.5-2.

Bug#977677: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

2020-12-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Control: reassign -1 node-babel7 Control: affects -1 node-regenerator-transform Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-12-18 19:13:01) > Quoting Xavier Guimard (2020-12-18 18:38:50) > > Since 0.14.5-2, dependency to node-babel7 was replaced by a dependency to > > node-babel-runtime (>= 7) which is

Bug#961283: libhttp-tiny-perl: Don't release with bullseye

2020-12-18 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 18-12-2020 16:47, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > pkg-perl standard practice is to keep dual-lived packages in unstable > for a release cycle to make it easier to bring back when they > become newer than the version in perl again, which happens from time > to time. Ack. gregoa explained the

Bug#977308: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library (Was: Bug#977308: shasta: hardcoded dependencies on boost 1.71)

2020-12-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:07:50PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 07:37:12PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:32:01PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I tried no override_dh_shlibdeps in shasta debian/rules, which has lead > > > to: > > > > >

Bug#977677: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

2020-12-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Xavier Guimard (2020-12-18 18:38:50) > Since 0.14.5-2, dependency to node-babel7 was replaced by a dependency to > node-babel-runtime (>= 7) which is provided by: > * node-babel-runtime (src node-babel 6) > * virtual node-babel-runtime provided by node-babel7 That's wrong: a _versioned_

Bug#966184: marked as done (xfractint: FTBFS with GCC 10: multiple definition of ... due to -fno-common)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:56:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966184: fixed in xfractint 20.4.10-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #966184, regarding xfractint: FTBFS with GCC 10: multiple definition of ... due to -fno-common to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#977677: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

2020-12-18 Thread Xavier
Le 18/12/2020 à 18:38, Xavier Guimard a écrit : > Package: node-regenerator-transform > Version: 0.14.5-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Since 0.14.5-2, dependency to node-babel7 was replaced by a dependency to > node-babel-runtime (>= 7) which is provided by: > * node-babel-runtime (src

Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

2020-12-18 Thread Xavier Guimard
Package: node-regenerator-transform Version: 0.14.5-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Since 0.14.5-2, dependency to node-babel7 was replaced by a dependency to node-babel-runtime (>= 7) which is provided by: * node-babel-runtime (src node-babel 6) * virtual node-babel-runtime provided by

Bug#950058: marked as done (python-flask-cors FTBFS with flask 1.1.1)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:19:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#950058: fixed in python-flask-cors 3.0.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #950058, regarding python-flask-cors FTBFS with flask 1.1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#969362: marked as done (python-flask-cors: CVE-2020-25032)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:19:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#969362: fixed in python-flask-cors 3.0.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #969362, regarding python-flask-cors: CVE-2020-25032 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#921952: marked as done (Don't include in buster without proper commitment to update in stable)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:10:22 +0100 with message-id <20201218161022.GA63644@pisco.westfalen.local> and subject line Re: Time to close this ? has caused the Debian Bug report #921952, regarding Don't include in buster without proper commitment to update in stable to be marked as

Bug#975791: marked as done (system-config-printer: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:06:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#975791: fixed in system-config-printer 1.5.13-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #975791, regarding system-config-printer: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 to be

Bug#964688: marked as done (sigviewer: FTBFS: src/file_handling_impl/biosig_reader.cpp:142:10: error: ‘QFile’ has not been declared)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:06:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#964688: fixed in sigviewer 0.6.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #964688, regarding sigviewer: FTBFS: src/file_handling_impl/biosig_reader.cpp:142:10: error: ‘QFile’ has not been declared to be marked as

Processed: notfixed 936805 in 19.0~alpha3+dfsg1-1

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 936805 19.0~alpha3+dfsg1-1 Bug #936805 {Done: Vasyl Gello } [src:kodi] kodi: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye The source 'kodi' and version '19.0~alpha3+dfsg1-1' do not appear to match any binary packages No longer marked as fixed in

Bug#976952: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/18/20 4:49 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Well, the test is obviously broken and upstream currently can't be bothered >> to fix >> it on non-x86 targets. He will certainly have to do it at some point given >> that ARM64 >> is replacing more and more x86_64 systems, but I wouldn't bother,

Bug#976952: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Ok, in that case, I think that a comment in the d/rules files is enough in order to keep in mind that we have this issue with ppc64el.

Bug#976927: marked as done (cimg: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): g++: error: unrecognized argument in option ‘-mtune=generic’)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:48:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976927: fixed in cimg 2.9.4+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #976927, regarding cimg: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): g++: error: unrecognized argument in option ‘-mtune=generic’ to be marked

Bug#976952: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:44:04PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > > so it does not fit with our policy: do not hide problems ;) Well, we do not need to *hide* the problem. We can exclude the test and *document* the problem - say in a README.Debian on the affected architecture.

Bug#976952: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> Well, the test is obviously broken and upstream currently can't be bothered > to fix > it on non-x86 targets. He will certainly have to do it at some point given > that ARM64 > is replacing more and more x86_64 systems, but I wouldn't bother, personally. so what is the best solution in order

Bug#961283: libhttp-tiny-perl: Don't release with bullseye

2020-12-18 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:17:24PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Dominic, > > On Fri, 22 May 2020 16:15:31 +0100 Dominic Hargreaves > wrote: > > Package: libhttp-tiny-perl > > Version: 0.076-1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: maintainer > > > > libhttp-tiny-perl at this version should

Bug#976952: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/18/20 4:42 PM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: >> Yes, good catch. The spec file for the openSUSE package has this [1]: > > so it does not fit with our policy: do not hide problems ;) > > The problem is that I do not have enougt time to investigate... on a porter > box Well, the test is

Bug#976952: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> Yes, good catch. The spec file for the openSUSE package has this [1]: so it does not fit with our policy: do not hide problems ;) The problem is that I do not have enougt time to investigate... on a porter box

Bug#976952: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Frederic! On 12/18/20 4:00 PM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > looking at the Opensuze log, I can find this > > [ 93s] + pytest-3.8 --ignore=_build.python2 --ignore=_build.python3 > --ignore=_build.pypy3 -v -k 'not speed and not (test_model_nan_policy or > test_shgo_scipy_vs_lmfit_2)' >

Processed: Re: Bug#977604: smarty3: broken internal parsetree code

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/smarty-php/smarty/issues/621 Bug #977604 [smarty3] smarty3: broken internal parsetree code Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/smarty-php/smarty/issues/621'. -- 977604:

Bug#977308: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library (Was: Bug#977308: shasta: hardcoded dependencies on boost 1.71)

2020-12-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 07:37:12PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:32:01PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I tried no override_dh_shlibdeps in shasta debian/rules, which has lead > > to: > > > > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library > >

Bug#976952: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello looking at the Opensuze log, I can find this [ 93s] + pytest-3.8 --ignore=_build.python2 --ignore=_build.python3 --ignore=_build.pypy3 -v -k 'not speed and not (test_model_nan_policy or test_shgo_scipy_vs_lmfit_2)' [ 97s] = test session starts

Bug#915050: Proposal: Repository for fast-paced package backports

2020-12-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 19:26:12 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > It stalled for a long time and we restarted work on it recently. We are in the process of getting server space to setup dak. Just adding this information here, Debian FastTrack is live for some time and instructions to install

Bug#976952: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:41:58PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/18/20 3:19 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I wonder whether we could get some help from PowerPC team to solve this > > issue. If we can not get that test working I see only two options: > > > >1. Skip this

Processed: Re: Bug#977590: freeradius: After upgrade to buster, freeradius doesn't talk over the network anymore

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #977590 [freeradius] freeradius: After upgrade to buster, freeradius doesn't talk over the network anymore Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #977590 [freeradius] freeradius: After upgrade to buster,

Bug#977590: freeradius: After upgrade to buster, freeradius doesn't talk over the network anymore

2020-12-18 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Harald, I'm going to downgrade this because - it does not break unrelated software ... The radius server not running might cause other software not to be able to authenticate anymore, but Radius can be easily made redundant. - this is

Bug#976952: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/18/20 3:19 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I wonder whether we could get some help from PowerPC team to solve this > issue. If we can not get that test working I see only two options: > >1. Skip this specific test >2. Exclude ppc64el from architecture list > > Any help would be really

Bug#977308: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library (Was: Bug#977308: shasta: hardcoded dependencies on boost 1.71)

2020-12-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:32:01PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I tried no override_dh_shlibdeps in shasta debian/rules, which has lead > to: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library > /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/shasta.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so needed > by

Bug#977308: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library (Was: Bug#977308: shasta: hardcoded dependencies on boost 1.71)

2020-12-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I tried no override_dh_shlibdeps in shasta debian/rules, which has lead to: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/shasta.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so needed by debian/shasta/usr/bin/shasta (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64' abi: '0201003e';

Bug#976952: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 -upstream Control: tags -1 help Hi, I wonder whether we could get some help from PowerPC team to solve this issue. If we can not get that test working I see only two options: 1. Skip this specific test 2. Exclude ppc64el from architecture list Any help would be really

Processed: [Help] Re: lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 -upstream Bug #976952 [src:lmfit-py] lmfit-py: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13 Removed tag(s) upstream. > tags -1 help Bug #976952 [src:lmfit-py]

Bug#977666: sbc ftbfs on almost all non-x86 archs

2020-12-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:sbc Version: 1.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye ftbfs /usr/bin/ld: /usr/bin/ld: sbc/.libs/libsbc-private.a(sbc_primitives.o): in function `sbc_init_primitives_x86': ./sbc/sbc_primitives.c:596: undefined reference to `__builtin_cpu_init'

Processed: severity of 969530 is grave

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 969530 grave Bug #969530 [src:rsync] rsync: CVE-2020-14387 Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 969530:

Bug#912880: gprename: Depends on libgtk2-perl, that won't be part of Bullseye

2020-12-18 Thread Witold Baryluk
Package: gprename Followup-For: Bug #912880 X-Debbugs-Cc: witold.bary...@gmail.com Hi all. Hi Christoph. Yes, that was me that ported it upstream, specifically because I was sad it gone from Debian! The upstream version 20201214 was specifically developed and tested on Debian, and fully

Processed: your mail

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 977657 + ftbfs upstream Bug #977657 [swi-prolog] swi-prolog: FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1i Added tag(s) ftbfs and upstream. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 977657:

Processed: your mail

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 977655 + ftbfs upstream Bug #977655 [m2crypto] m2crypto: FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1i Added tag(s) ftbfs and upstream. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 977655:

Processed: reassign 977645 to src:linux, reassign 977647 to src:linux

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 977645 src:linux 5.10.1-1~exp1 Bug #977645 [linux-image-5.10.0-trunk-arm64-unsigned] 5.10.1 Debian kernel does not boot on raspi 4 with ext4 rootfs and sdcard Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-5.10.0-trunk-arm64-unsigned' to

Bug#977308: shasta: hardcoded dependencies on boost 1.71

2020-12-18 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Andreas, On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 15:53, Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi, > > I tried to fix the issue by making dh_shlibdeps work. In > > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/shasta/-/commit/366edd672be428cc553b34b99bc614aa698175d6 > > I documented what I tried but all

Bug#908137: fixed in luajit 2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-5.2

2020-12-18 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Updated debdiff, due to some functions not yet implemented in ~beta3 G. On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:34:11 + Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Source: luajit > Source-Version: 2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-5.2 > Done: Gianfranco Costamagna > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version

Processed: your mail

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 977657 + confirmed Bug #977657 [swi-prolog] swi-prolog: FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1i Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 977657:

Bug#975533: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#975533: mat2's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.9

2020-12-18 Thread nicoo
Hi Georg, On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:03:46AM +, Georg Faerber wrote: > I'm well aware and will handle this accordingly once there is a new > upstream release, which should happen soon. Thanks for the info, I'll wait for that. I have a few unrelated packaging improvements that I wrote when

Processed: Re: Bug#977308: shasta: hardcoded dependencies on boost 1.71

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 help Bug #977308 [src:shasta] shasta: hardcoded dependencies on boost 1.71 Added tag(s) help. -- 977308: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977308 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#977308: shasta: hardcoded dependencies on boost 1.71

2020-12-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Hi, I tried to fix the issue by making dh_shlibdeps work. In https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/shasta/-/commit/366edd672be428cc553b34b99bc614aa698175d6 I documented what I tried but all failed and I think the key to this bug is just making it work. Any idea? Kind

Bug#960120: marked as done (node-yarnpkg: build with node-babel-loader 8.x (babel 7) fails)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:20:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#960120: fixed in node-yarnpkg 1.22.4-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #960120, regarding node-yarnpkg: build with node-babel-loader 8.x (babel 7) fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#977657: swi-prolog: FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1i

2020-12-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: swi-prolog Version: 8.2.3+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Forwarded: https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/packages-ssl/issues/159 Tag: patch Hi, Swi-prolog is failing to build using OpenSSL 1.1.1i. I've attached a patch that fixes it. Kurt --- packages/ssl/test_ssl.pl.orig 2020-12-18

Bug#977655: m2crypto: FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1i

2020-12-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: m2crypto Version: 0.36.0-1 Severity: serious Forwarded: https://gitlab.com/m2crypto/m2crypto/-/issues/289 Hi, m2crypto is failing to build since the 1.1.1i version of OpenSSL, see the upstream bug report for more details. Kurt

Bug#977621: marked as done (murasaki: autopkgtest armhf regression: 6660 Bus error mbfa $f --fasta > testfile)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:52:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#977621: fixed in murasaki 1.68.6-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #977621, regarding murasaki: autopkgtest armhf regression: 6660 Bus error mbfa $f --fasta > testfile to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #977156 [screenkey] Please switch to Ayatana AppIndicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 977156: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977156 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#977649: kde-spectacle: Spectacle no longer starts after an update to libkimageannotator0

2020-12-18 Thread Christopher Cormier
Package: kde-spectacle Version: 20.12.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: christophercorm...@protonmail.com Dear Maintainer, Spectacle is unable to start after the libkimageannotator0 package updated to 0.4.0-1 When attempting to start it, it crashes with

Bug#908137: marked as done (luajit: lightuserdata problem with > 47 bit address space on arm64)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:34:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#908137: fixed in luajit 2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-5.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #908137, regarding luajit: lightuserdata problem with > 47 bit address space on arm64 to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: found 977649 in kimageannotator/0.4.0-1

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 977649 kimageannotator/0.4.0-1 Bug #977649 [src:kimageannotator] bumped SONAME without name change Marked as found in versions kimageannotator/0.4.0-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: Re: luajit: lightuserdata problem with > 47 bit address space on arm64

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch pending Bug #908137 [src:luajit] luajit: lightuserdata problem with > 47 bit address space on arm64 Added tag(s) pending and patch. -- 908137: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908137 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#908137: luajit: lightuserdata problem with > 47 bit address space on arm64

2020-12-18 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: tags -1 patch pending NMU uploaded in sid G. On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 13:57:12 +0200 Santiago Ruano =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rinc=F3n?= wrote: > Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream > > On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:54:30 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Source: luajit > > Version: 2.0.4+dfsg-1 > > Severity:

Processed: tagging 919058

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 919058 - pending Bug #919058 [itstool] its-tools: crashes when freeing xmlDocs Bug #948781 [itstool] debmake-doc: FTBFS: Segmentation fault Removed tag(s) pending. Removed tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#971933: marked as done (src:rheolef: rheolef FTBFS: ...cut-bisector.eps: No such file or directory)

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:04:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#971933: fixed in rheolef 7.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #971933, regarding src:rheolef: rheolef FTBFS: ...cut-bisector.eps: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: tagging 665334

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 665334 + bullseye-ignore Bug #665334 [fontforge] non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge (currently August 2014 Added tag(s) bullseye-ignore. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665334:

Processed: tagging 694320

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 694320 + bullseye-ignore Bug #694320 [gsfonts] [gsfonts] Fonts include copyrighted adobe fragment all right reserved Bug #694321 [gsfonts] [gsfonts] Fonts include copyrighted adobe fragment all right reserved Added tag(s) bullseye-ignore.

Bug#973459: uim: FAIL: test-composer.scm

2020-12-18 Thread dai
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 01:53:22PM +0900, Takatsugu Nokubi wrote: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/uim/-/merge_requests/9 > > This is the fix request. > Could you review the patch? Thank you for your works. Reviewed and merged. -- Regards, dai GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765

Processed: Re: Bug#977649: kde-spectacle: Spectacle no longer starts after an update to libkimageannotator0

2020-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 977649 src:kimageannotator Bug #977649 [kde-spectacle] kde-spectacle: Spectacle no longer starts after an update to libkimageannotator0 Bug reassigned from package 'kde-spectacle' to 'src:kimageannotator'. No longer marked as found in

  1   2   >