Source: ruby-librarian
Version: 0.6.4-2
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always timeout
Dear maintainers,
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However it fails. Worse, since
0.6.4-2 it times out on the ci.d.n
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:08:04 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
>* Upgrade to debhelper-compat (=13)
With this reverted [1], it can be unblocked.
Paul
[1] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/FAQ.html section "I bumped the
debhelper compat level, why is it rejected?"
OpenPGP_signature
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2021 19:17:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950761: fixed in ipmitool 1.8.18-6+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #950761,
regarding ipmitool: CVE-2020-5208
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 986814 + unreproducible
Bug #986814 {Done: Lucas Nussbaum } [cloud.debian.org] Latest
vagrant Buster libvirt image not found
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Le 12/04/2021 à 13:14, Christopher Huhn a écrit :
> Package: cloud.debian.org
> Severity: serious
>
> The latest Buster libvirt image for vagrant gives me a 404, `vagrant box
> update` fails.
>
> λ > curl
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 987095 https://github.com/graphviz-perl/Graph/issues/20
Bug #987095 [libgraph-perl] transitive_closure corrupted results, after vertex
deleted
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/graphviz-perl/Graph/issues/20'.
> tags
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 10:16 pm, Utkarsh Gupta
wrote:
Makes sense. Probably the time to RM ruby-rexml from the archive is
*now*?
Requested removal from archive in #987101
Processing control commands:
> block 986806 by -1
Bug #986806 {Done: Pirate Praveen } [ruby-rexml]
CVE-2021-28965
986806 was not blocked by any bugs.
986806 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 986806: 987101
--
986806: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986806
Hi Praveen,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:24 PM Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I think the separate package was introduced by mistake without seeing
> the copy embedded in ruby. I think the right way is to fix this in ruby
> and remove this separate package. But I'd like someone from ruby team
> to confirm
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:27:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986701: fixed in mosquitto 2.0.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #986701,
regarding mosquitto: CVE-2021-28166
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:18:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986518: fixed in ant 1.10.9-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #986518,
regarding starjava-topcat: FTBFS: [javadoc] javadoc: error - invalid flag:
-Xdoclint:none
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:18:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986518: fixed in ant 1.10.9-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #986518,
regarding starjava-ttools: FTBFS: [javadoc] javadoc: error - invalid flag:
-Xdoclint:none
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 07:32:47PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tags -1 + help
>
> On Sunday, January 17 2021, Martina Ferrari wrote:
>
> > On 17/01/2021 01:06, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for the bug report, Martina.
> >> Yeah,
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #986518 [ant] starjava-topcat: FTBFS: [javadoc] javadoc: error - invalid
flag: -Xdoclint:none
Bug #986521 [ant] starjava-ttools: FTBFS: [javadoc] javadoc: error - invalid
flag: -Xdoclint:none
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #986518 in ant reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:22:24PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:05:29 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff
> wrote:
> > https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2021/04/05/xml-round-trip-vulnerability-in-rexml-cve-2021-28965/
> >
> > Why is there a separate package duplicating rexml from
I've created a bug upstream:
https://github.com/graphviz-perl/Graph/issues/20
All the best
Hi
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 12:59:40 +0100 Ian Jackson <> The correct output, as seen
on buster:
>
> input: A-NOTA,B-A,B-NOTA
> output: A-A,A-NOTA,B-A,B-B,B-NOTA,NOTA-NOTA
> output: A-NOTA,B-A,B-NOTA,NOTA-NOTA
I've bisected this regression to:
3ded9c7a25bf190fda5add1a13ed4f9b54082db7 is the
Package: libgraph-perl
Version: 1:0.9716-1
Severity: grave
The attached script, which tests the transitive closure function,
prints this output on testing:
input: A-NOTA,B-A,B-NOTA
Use of uninitialized value $_ in exists at /usr/share/perl5/Graph.pm line 362.
Use of uninitialized value $_ in
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 09:22:09PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> Yeah I realised there wasn't PHP 8 in Debian anywhere yet but referencing
> it is worthwhile otherwise months later someone might ask me about it and
> I'll go, hmm I think we fixed that.
Ack.
> Buster will have a debdiff to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 980428
Bug #980428 {Done: Ondřej Surý } [php-pear] Disallow
symlinks to out-of-path filenames (CVE-2020-36193)
Unarchived Bug 980428
> found 980428 1:1.10.6+submodules+notgz-1.1+deb10u1
Bug #980428 {Done: Ondřej Surý } [php-pear]
Yeah I realised there wasn't PHP 8 in Debian anywhere yet but referencing
it is worthwhile otherwise months later someone might ask me about it and
I'll go, hmm I think we fixed that.
Buster will have a debdiff to review very soon. Bullseye I have asked for
the version in Sid to be unblocked in
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2021 10:48:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986854: fixed in helm 3.7.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #986854,
regarding elpa-helm: does not ship helm-global-bindings.el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2021 10:48:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#985517: fixed in lxpanel 0.10.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #985517,
regarding lxpanel-dev: broken symlink:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxpanel/liblxpanel.so -> liblxpanel.so.0.0.0
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2021 09:03:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986726: fixed in boxer-data 10.8.22
has caused the Debian Bug report #986726,
regarding boxer-data: autopkgtest regressionin testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2021 08:10:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#983653: fixed in tasksel 3.66
has caused the Debian Bug report #983653,
regarding task-japanese-gnome-desktop: no Japanese input method available out
of the box
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2021 08:10:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941624: fixed in tasksel 3.66
has caused the Debian Bug report #941624,
regarding Recommending ibus breaks fcitx
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Hi Craig,
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 08:32:35AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> Should CVE-2021-29447 [1] be also listed against this bug? I'll be putting
> it in the changelog.
I choosed to explicitly cover only CVE-2021-29450 with this bug
because CVE-2021-29447 while fixed as well with 5.7.1, is
Hi,
I realised that on one hand there is a patch for this package but no
according upload and on the other hand there is the option that the
package can be removed without affecting other packages.
Any progress on this?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
29 matches
Mail list logo
