Bug#990368: One more patch

2021-07-18 Thread tux supertuxkart
https://github.com/supertuxkart/stk-code/commit/339e07bb836d48c932b8516362a764480f57c8e8 one more patch to fix memory leak by the way

Bug#991151: corekeeper: postrm: invoke-rc.d: initscript procps, action "reload" failed.

2021-07-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2021-07-18 at 04:31 -0700, Craig Small wrote: > Which makes zero sense for procps which has no daemon. The restart action also makes zero sense for things that have no daemon. In the procps case, the Linux kernel is the software that is being restarted/reloaded, so reload actually makes

Processed: Re: Bug#932501 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Hideki Yamane ) (Bug#932501: fixed in squid-deb-proxy 0.8.15+nmu1)

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #932501 {Done: Hideki Yamane } [src:squid-deb-proxy] squid-deb-proxy: daemon does not start due to the conf file not being allowed by apparmor 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be

Bug#932501: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Hideki Yamane ) (Bug#932501: fixed in squid-deb-proxy 0.8.15+nmu1)

2021-07-18 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: reopen -1 The fix is incomplete. The version in unstable fails to start with the same error. Cheers On 2021-06-18 12:27:03 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the src:squid-deb-proxy package: >

Bug#968498: marked as done (fbless cant open files)

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2021 20:20:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968498: fixed in fbless 0.2.3-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #968498, regarding fbless cant open files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Processed: fix bug submission

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # as written, I intended this bug to be marked bullseye-ignore > tags 990818 bullseye-ignore Bug #990818 [src:rtags] rtags: flaky autopkgtest: regularly times out after 2:47 h Added tag(s) bullseye-ignore. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: Bug#933100 marked as pending in hg-git

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #933100 [src:hg-git] hg-git: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git Added tag(s) pending. -- 933100: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933100 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#933100: marked as pending in hg-git

2021-07-18 Thread Timo Röhling
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #933100 in hg-git reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#980472: cubicsdr: CubicSDR crashes after lauch! (same effect on 2 clean bullseye OS)

2021-07-18 Thread Benjamin Bänziger
I can also confirm that cubicsdr is now working. And I have not noticed any adverse effects on other packages. Thank you!

Bug#991188: marked as done (jetty9: CVE-2021-34429)

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2021 18:03:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#991188: fixed in jetty9 9.4.39-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #991188, regarding jetty9: CVE-2021-34429 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Processed: Bug#991188 marked as pending in jetty9

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #991188 [src:jetty9] jetty9: CVE-2021-34429 Added tag(s) pending. -- 991188: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991188 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#991188: marked as pending in jetty9

2021-07-18 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #991188 in jetty9 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#990119: marked as done (vip-manager: systemd service file uses incorrect parameter syntax)

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2021 17:04:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#990119: fixed in vip-manager 1.0.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #990119, regarding vip-manager: systemd service file uses incorrect parameter syntax to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#991245: diaspora fails to handle triggers in postinst

2021-07-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: diaspora Version: 0.7.15.0-7 severity: grave Processing triggers for diaspora (0.7.15.0-7~bpo11+1) ... Updating bundler configuration for migration from diaspora-installer... postinst called with unknown argument `triggered' dpkg: error processing package diaspora (--configure):

Bug#991241: marked as done (lrx-proc: command not found)

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2021 13:48:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#991241: fixed in apertium-swe-dan 0.8.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #991241, regarding lrx-proc: command not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Processed: found 990890 in 7.2.5.1+dfsg-3

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 990890 7.2.5.1+dfsg-3 Bug #990890 [virtuoso-opensource-7] virtuoso-opensource-7: source contains non-free image sw-vert-v.svg Marked as found in versions virtuoso-opensource/7.2.5.1+dfsg-3. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: tagging 988267

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 988267 + ftbfs Bug #988267 [src:micropython] micropython ftbfs on at least arm64 where it built before Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 988267:

Bug#991241: lrx-proc: command not found

2021-07-18 Thread Tino Didriksen
Fixed in https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/apertium-swe-dan - was missing a dependency on apertium-lex-tools -- Tino Didriksen

Bug#991241: lrx-proc: command not found

2021-07-18 Thread Pelle
Package: apertium-swe-dan Version: 0.8.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, When trying to use Apertium with the Swedish-Danish pair, I get the following error at startup, and no translation happens: $ apertium dan-swe /dev/fd/63: line 1: lrx-proc:

Processed: Bug#991151 marked as pending in procps

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #991151 [procps] procps: dropped the reload option from the init script, breaking corekeeper Added tag(s) pending. -- 991151: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991151 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#991151: marked as pending in procps

2021-07-18 Thread Craig Small
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #991151 in procps reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#991151: corekeeper: postrm: invoke-rc.d: initscript procps, action "reload" failed.

2021-07-18 Thread Craig Small
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2021-07-16 at 02:49, p...@debian.org wrote: > Can you elaborate on what you mean by "Using reload is very wrong"? The scripts should be deliberate and specific. When you use reload you are saying "don't stop the daemon but do what you do for

Processed: your mail

2021-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 983393 +bullseye-ignore Bug #983393 {Done: Matthias Klose } [gcc-10] gcc-10: Segmentation fault when building mkvtoolnix Added tag(s) bullseye-ignore. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#944697: (no subject)

2021-07-18 Thread Adrian Heine
Can this be closed? In any case, it's not relevant for next stable.

Bug#939147: (no subject)

2021-07-18 Thread Adrian Heine
I think this can be closed. In any case, it's not relevant for next stable.