Your message dated Sun, 08 Aug 2021 21:18:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#991081: fixed in diodon 1.11.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991081,
regarding gir1.2-diodon-1.0 lacks dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:12 am, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
[copying debian-ruby list]
On Sun, 08 Aug 2021 22:08:39 +0530 Akshay S Dinesh
wrote:
> Package: ruby-google-protobuf
> Version: 3.17.3-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I was
[copying debian-ruby list]
On Sun, 08 Aug 2021 22:08:39 +0530 Akshay S Dinesh
wrote:
> Package: ruby-google-protobuf
> Version: 3.17.3-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I was trying to install gitlab to reproduce #966653
>
> Installed
Dear Adrian,
thank you for taking care of this issue.
Several months ago I filed a RFS bug #981030 taking care of this and other
issues. Unfortunately the RFS is still open. If I update the package in
order to include this NMU changes, will you consider sponsoring the package?
Best regards,
Package: ruby-google-protobuf
Version: 3.17.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I was trying to install gitlab to reproduce #966653
Installed ruby-google-protobuf from experimental
The pg_query library was erroring at startup,
with failure to require
Le dimanche 8 août 2021, 10:04:30 UTC Benno Schulenberg a écrit :
> > $env -i nano
> > command fail because TERM is unset
>
> I can work around an unset TERM. But what if TERM=="" or TERM=="nonsense"?
> Checking whether TERM is a valid terminal name goes too far, in my opinion.
>
> Also, is the
Hi Salvatore,
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > bullseye-security is operational, so we can do both at the same time
> > > so that bullseye will be fixed from day one.
> >
> > That'd be great, thanks!
> >
> > Feel free to base the security upload upon 2.9.0dev.6-3 which I
> > uploaded just
Axel,
On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 12:14:16PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi Moritz,
>
> Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > > Security Team: Do you think the fix for CVE-2021-38165 should get a
> > > DSA? Or do you think it's not important enough and we should target a
> > > minor stable update for it?
>
> $env -i nano
> command fail because TERM is unset
I can work around an unset TERM. But what if TERM=="" or TERM=="nonsense"?
Checking whether TERM is a valid terminal name goes too far, in my opinion.
Also, is the 'vt100' terminal description guaranteed to exist? I ask,
because 'dumb' and
Hi Moritz,
Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Security Team: Do you think the fix for CVE-2021-38165 should get a
> > DSA? Or do you think it's not important enough and we should target a
> > minor stable update for it?
>
> This breaks a pretty fundamental security assumption for a browser,
Ack.
>
Your message dated Sun, 08 Aug 2021 10:03:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#991706: fixed in exiv2 0.27.3-3+deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991706,
regarding exiv2: CVE-2021-31292
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sun, 08 Aug 2021 10:03:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#991705: fixed in exiv2 0.27.3-3+deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991705,
regarding exiv2: CVE-2021-29457
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Am Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 01:54:56AM +0200 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > > tags 991971 fixed-upstream
> > > Bug #991971 [lynx] lynx: SSL certificate validation fails with URLs
> > > containing user name or user name and password, i.e.
> > >
13 matches
Mail list logo
