Bug#992052: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#992052: cd-hit: autopkgtest fails on very powerful CI workers

2021-08-10 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Paul, Paul Gevers, on 2021-08-10: > I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. It's ironical > that cd-hit complains about not enough memory when the worker this test > runs on has the biggest amount of memory we have in the ci.d.n worker > park: 250GB. If I read the output

Processed: Bug#992052 marked as pending in cd-hit

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #992052 [src:cd-hit] cd-hit: autopkgtest fails on very powerful CI workers Added tag(s) pending. -- 992052: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992052 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#992052: marked as pending in cd-hit

2021-08-10 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #992052 in cd-hit reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#990340: glances: contains prebuilt javascript without source

2021-08-10 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Control: tag -1 + patch On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 01:44:06 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > It uses webpack to build. > > https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/blob/develop/glances/outputs/static/package.json#L28 > > cd glances/outputs/static && webpack > > in debian/rules with required build

Processed: Re: glances: contains prebuilt javascript without source

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #990340 [glances] glances: contains prebuilt javascript without source Added tag(s) patch. -- 990340: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990340 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: affects 928226

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 928226 = Bug #928226 {Done: Andreas Beckmann }

Processed: cloning 928226, user debian...@lists.debian.org, usertagging -1 ..., affects -1, closing -1 ...

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 928226 -1 Bug #928226 {Done: Andreas Beckmann }

Bug#991478: [shim-signed] RFE: do not brick users' systems in the stable distribution

2021-08-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 16:52:27 +0100 Steve McIntyre wrote: > When we found that problem, as an immediate workaround I released a > newer shim-signed package into the buster-updates repo which solves > it: version 1.36~1+deb10u2+15.4-5~deb10u1 (note the > deb10u1->deb10u2). I can see that your

Bug#992045: marked as done (CVE-2021-38185)

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:33:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#992045: fixed in cpio 2.13+dfsg-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #992045, regarding CVE-2021-38185 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#992065: marked as done (mpich: libhdf5-mpich-dev upgrade problems if libmpich1.0-dev is still installed)

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:33:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#992065: fixed in mpich 3.4.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #992065, regarding mpich: libhdf5-mpich-dev upgrade problems if libmpich1.0-dev is still installed to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#992068: libhdf5-mpich-dev: please bump libmpich-dev dependency to (>= 3.3-3~)

2021-08-10 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libhdf5-mpich-dev Version: 1.10.6+repack-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts During an piuparts upgrade test of libhdf5-mpich-dev on the upgrade path squeeze -> wheezy -> jessie -> stretch -> buster -> bullseye I observed this failure:

Bug#992065: mpich: libhdf5-mpich-dev upgrade problems if libmpich1.0-dev is still installed

2021-08-10 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: mpich Version: 3.4.1-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Control: affects -1 + libhdf5-mpich-dev During an piuparts upgrade test of libhdf5-mpich-dev on the upgrade path squeeze -> wheezy -> jessie -> stretch -> buster -> bullseye I observed this

Processed: mpich: libhdf5-mpich-dev upgrade problems if libmpich1.0-dev is still installed

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + libhdf5-mpich-dev Bug #992065 [mpich] mpich: libhdf5-mpich-dev upgrade problems if libmpich1.0-dev is still installed Added indication that 992065 affects libhdf5-mpich-dev -- 992065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992065 Debian

Processed: tagging 992040

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 992040 + bullseye sid Bug #992040 {Done: Pirate Praveen } [ruby-rqrcode-rails3] gitlab 2FA broken: NoMethodError (undefined method `module_count' for # Added tag(s) sid and bullseye. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#991982: nano does not work with TERM unset

2021-08-10 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Le mardi 10 août 2021, 08:05:00 UTC Benno Schulenberg a écrit : > Op 09-08-2021 om 15:08 schreef Bastien Roucariès: > > nano work with TERM=dumb (but is strange but it work), > > For me, 'TERM=dumb nano somefile' does not work, not on a console, not > on an xterm, not on Xfce Terminal -- it shows

Bug#992008: ruby-google-protobuf: Missing lib/google/protobuf directory and fails require

2021-08-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
2021, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 10 5:44:35 PM IST, Pirate Praveen ൽ എഴുതി > > >2021, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 10 12:44:39 PM IST, "László Böszörményi (GCS)" >ൽ എഴുതി >>Control: tags -1 +pending >> >>Hi Pirate, >> >>On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 8:51 PM Pirate Praveen >>wrote: >>> Can you upload this change? Or if you are okay

Bug#992053: c-ares: diff for NMU version 1.17.1-1.1

2021-08-10 Thread Gregor Jasny
Hello, Thank you for handling this issue so quickly. I'm travelling for the next week and won't be able to work on anything Debian related. If you feel comfortable, you could also upload the fixed package without any delay. Thanks, Gregor

Bug#992053: marked as done (c-ares: CVE-2021-3672: Missing input validation on hostnames returned by DNS servers)

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:03:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#992053: fixed in c-ares 1.17.1-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #992053, regarding c-ares: CVE-2021-3672: Missing input validation on hostnames returned by DNS servers to be marked as done. This means

Bug#992058: opensysusers: uses `eval` on data that is not supposed to be safe to eval

2021-08-10 Thread Ansgar
Package: opensysusers Version: 0.6-2 Severity: serious Tags: security upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team opensysusers uses the shell's `eval` on everything in sysusers.d like there is no tomorrow. These files can contain shell meta-characters that should not result in code execution,

Bug#992008: marked as done (ruby-google-protobuf: Missing lib/google/protobuf directory and fails require)

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:17:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#992008: fixed in protobuf 3.17.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #992008, regarding ruby-google-protobuf: Missing lib/google/protobuf directory and fails require to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#991982: nano does not work with TERM unset

2021-08-10 Thread Benno Schulenberg
Op 09-08-2021 om 15:08 schreef Bastien Roucariès: > nano work with TERM=dumb (but is strange but it work), For me, 'TERM=dumb nano somefile' does not work, not on a console, not on an xterm, not on Xfce Terminal -- it shows something, but is totally unusable: the user cannot see what he or she

Bug#992053: c-ares: diff for NMU version 1.17.1-1.1

2021-08-10 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Gregor, On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 09:38:07AM +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for handling this issue so quickly. I'm travelling for the next > week and won't be able to work on anything Debian related. > > If you feel comfortable, you could also upload the fixed package

Bug#992008: ruby-google-protobuf: Missing lib/google/protobuf directory and fails require

2021-08-10 Thread GCS
Control: tags -1 +pending Hi Pirate, On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 8:51 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > Can you upload this change? Or if you are okay with this change, I can > upload it as well. Once this is fixed, I can switch back to the > packaged version (currently using gem install google-protobuf as

Processed: Re: Bug#992008: ruby-google-protobuf: Missing lib/google/protobuf directory and fails require

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +pending Bug #992008 [ruby-google-protobuf] ruby-google-protobuf: Missing lib/google/protobuf directory and fails require Added tag(s) pending. -- 992008: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992008 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: c-ares: diff for NMU version 1.17.1-1.1

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 992053 + patch Bug #992053 [src:c-ares] c-ares: CVE-2021-3672: Missing input validation on hostnames returned by DNS servers Added tag(s) patch. > tags 992053 + pending Bug #992053 [src:c-ares] c-ares: CVE-2021-3672: Missing input validation on hostnames

Bug#992053: c-ares: diff for NMU version 1.17.1-1.1

2021-08-10 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tags 992053 + patch Control: tags 992053 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for c-ares (versioned as 1.17.1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards, Salvatore diff -Nru c-ares-1.17.1/debian/changelog

Processed: c-ares: CVE-2021-3672: Missing input validation on hostnames returned by DNS servers

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 1.14.0-1 Bug #992053 [src:c-ares] c-ares: CVE-2021-3672: Missing input validation on hostnames returned by DNS servers Marked as found in versions c-ares/1.14.0-1. > fixed -1 1.14.0-1+deb10u1 Bug #992053 [src:c-ares] c-ares: CVE-2021-3672: Missing input

Bug#992053: c-ares: CVE-2021-3672: Missing input validation on hostnames returned by DNS servers

2021-08-10 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: c-ares Version: 1.17.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Control: found -1 1.14.0-1 Control: fixed -1 1.14.0-1+deb10u1 Control: fixed -1 1.17.1-1+deb11u1 Hi, The following vulnerability was

Processed: cd-hit: autopkgtest fails on very powerful CI workers

2021-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:perl Bug #992052 [src:cd-hit] cd-hit: autopkgtest fails on very powerful CI workers Added indication that 992052 affects src:perl -- 992052: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992052 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#992052: cd-hit: autopkgtest fails on very powerful CI workers

2021-08-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: cd-hit Version: 4.8.1-3 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:perl Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of perl the autopkgtest of cd-hit fails in testing on armhf when that autopkgtest