The patch works for upgrading the system. Thanks a lot. I applied the
changes to the installed files on my system and was able to upgrade the
kernel.
Cheers,
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 7:27 AM Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Package dbab/1.5.7-1 has broken maintscript and cannot be properly upgraded
> from dbab/1.5.01-1 to dbab/1.5.7-1:
Thanks for reporting. I'll try to fix it ASAP.
In the meantime, for anyone who doesn't want to wait for the fix to be
published
Your message dated Thu, 07 Oct 2021 23:18:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#990223: fixed in pcp 5.3.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #990223,
regarding pcp-zeroconf: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3):
/etc/default/pmlogger
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 07 Oct 2021 22:34:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#995839: fixed in supertuxkart 1.3+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #995839,
regarding supertuxkart FTBFS on mips*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #995839 in supertuxkart reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #995839 [src:supertuxkart] supertuxkart FTBFS on mips*
Added tag(s) pending.
--
995839: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995839
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: libmediainfo
Followup-For: Bug #995863
X-Debbugs-Cc: igel...@pussport.com
Problem solving
https://github.com/MediaArea/MediaInfoLib/pull/1434
Source: nvidia-cuda-toolkit
Version: 11.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
bunk@coccia:~$ cat
/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/queue/reject/nvidia-cuda-toolkit_11.4.1-1_amd64-buildd.changes.reason
Version check failed:
Your upload included the binary package nsight-compute-target, version
11.4.1-1,
Your message dated Thu, 07 Oct 2021 17:48:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#995880: fixed in fcitx5-qt 5.0.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #995880,
regarding fcitx5-qt FTBFS in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 994795 + sid bookworm
Bug #994795 [w3-dtd-mathml] w3-dtd-mathml: invalid redeclaration of predefined
entities amp and lt yields failures with libxml2 2.9.12
Added tag(s) bookworm and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Hi Lee
On 10/7/21 18:18, Lee Garrett wrote:
ansible has already been uploaded there to make it easier
for the ftp team to review it. I'm hoping to upload it some time this
weekend.
great to hear, and thanks a lot for looking after ansible in Debian,
much appreciated.
Regards,
Daniel
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ruby-httpclient
Bug #995875 [apt-listbugs] SSL error when trying to retrieve bug reports
Bug reassigned from package 'apt-listbugs' to 'ruby-httpclient'.
No longer marked as found in versions apt-listbugs/0.1.28.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions
On 07/10/2021 16:56, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: ansible
> Version: 4.6.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
>
> Hi,
>
> ansible in experimental is currently uninstallable because of the
> dependency on ansible-core which is unavailable/not yet uploaded in
> Debian as it seems.
>
>
Package: fcitx5-qt
Version: 5.0.7-1
Severity: serious
I recently noticed that fcitx5-qt failed to build in raspbian bookworm-staging.
dh_install -a
dh_install: warning: Cannot find (any matches for)
"usr/lib/*/fcitx5-qt5-gui-wrapper" (tried in ., debian/tmp)
dh_install: warning:
Package: ansible
Version: 4.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
ansible in experimental is currently uninstallable because of the
dependency on ansible-core which is unavailable/not yet uploaded in
Debian as it seems.
Regards,
Daniel
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #979096 [omake] Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
979096: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979096
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags 960822 + pending
Control: tags 974802 + patch
Control: tags 974802 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for autofdo (versioned as 0.19-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru
Processing control commands:
> tags 960822 + pending
Bug #960822 [src:autofdo] autofdo should use the system libprotobuf
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 974802 + patch
Bug #974802 [autofdo] autofdo: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-11
Bug #974806 [autofdo] autofdo: Please upgrade to
Processing control commands:
> tags 960822 + pending
Bug #960822 [src:autofdo] autofdo should use the system libprotobuf
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #960822 to the same tags previously set
> tags 974802 + patch
Bug #974802 [autofdo] autofdo: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-11
Bug
Quoting Yadd (2021-10-07 07:06:42)
> Le 06/10/2021 à 23:32, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>> On 10/6/21 6:53 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>> On ബു, ഒക്ടോ 6 2021 at 12:16:07 വൈകു +0200 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard
>>> wrote:
Quoting Yadd (2021-10-06 11:43:40)
> On Lu, 04 oct 21, 16:40:48, Bastien
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 990079
Bug #990079 [chromium] chromium: Several upstream versions released with
important security fixes
Bug #992625 [chromium] chromium: security CVE-2021-30604To30598
Marked Bug as done
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing
* Bastian Germann [2021-10-07 11:59:24 CEST]:
> Can you please take a look at #995843 which I think is a Policy violation by
> abook not including all distribution licenses in the copyright file. The
> package maintainer does not think so and claims that only including the main
> license (GPL-2+)
Hi,
Can you please take a look at #995843 which I think is a Policy violation by abook not
including all distribution licenses in the copyright file. The package maintainer does not
think so and claims that only including the main license (GPL-2+) is good enough.
There are at least two BSD
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 992899 with 981229
Bug #992899 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:dub] src:dub: fails to
migrate to testing for too long
992899 was not blocked by any bugs.
992899 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 992899: 981229
> thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 992894 with 993517
Bug #992894 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:mit-scheme]
src:mit-scheme: fails to migrate to testing for too long
992894 was not blocked by any bugs.
992894 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 992894: 993517
>
On 7 October 2021 3:02:55 am IST, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 10/6/21 6:53 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> [adding -devel]
>>
>> On ബു, ഒക്ടോ 6 2021 at 12:16:07 വൈകു +0200 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard
>> wrote:
>>> Quoting Yadd (2021-10-06 11:43:40)
On Lu, 04 oct 21, 16:40:48, Bastien Roucari�s
* Bastian Germann [2021-10-07 11:00:28 CEST]:
> Am 07.10.21 um 10:55 schrieb Rhonda D'Vine:
> > I think you misunderstand how the GPL works. The GPL is known to be
> > viral, and licenses compatible with the GPL are indeed compatible with
> > it because they allow to be covered under the GPL.
Package: libmediainfo-dev
Version: 21.09+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
When I try to link an application (cine encoder (not in Debian)) to
libmediainfo I see :
/usr/bin/ld :
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libmediainfo.so :
référence indéfinie vers «
Am 07.10.21 um 10:55 schrieb Rhonda D'Vine:
I think you misunderstand how the GPL works. The GPL is known to be
viral, and licenses compatible with the GPL are indeed compatible with
it because they allow to be covered under the GPL. The whole work in
the end is covered by the GPL, and thus
Severity: -1 minor
* Bastian Germann [2021-10-07 00:31:00 CEST]:
> abook contains distribution licenses that are not copied to
> debian/copyright. At least BSD-2-clause (xmalloc.c, misc.c), old-style
> MIT (ldif.c), FSFULLR (configure, Makefile.in), X11 (install-sh), and
> probably others.
I
Your message dated Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#974791: fixed in astra-toolbox 1.8.3-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #974791,
regarding astra-toolbox: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#974791: fixed in astra-toolbox 1.8.3-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #974791,
regarding astra-toolbox: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
@l0f4r0 Can you still reproduce this issue? Is it still present in
latest upstream tagged version (ie. v1.9.3 [1])? Is it still present in
latest version from git master branch [2]?
[1]: https://github.com/ranger/ranger/releases/tag/v1.9.3
[2]: https://github.com/ranger/ranger
--
Arnaud
33 matches
Mail list logo
