Bug#980609: missing i386-cpuinfo.h

2022-01-23 Thread Simon Ruderich
Hello, the attached patch works for me as workaround for Bullseye. It adds the missing file and updates the #include path to it. Apply it with cd / && patch -p1 < /path/to/patch With the patch I can successfully build kernels which use GCC plugins on Bullseye. Is it possible to apply a

Bug#1004067: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Mathieu Malaterre ) (Bug#1004067: fixed in imath 3.1.3-10)

2022-01-23 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi all, On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 10:45 PM Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > > Version: 3.1.3-10 > > On 2022-01-23 at 18:42 (+01), Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > > The build still ftbfs. > > Gosh, at the time of writing was still using -9 revision and it failed. > Now, I've tested -10 revision of imath and

Processed: python-lupa: FTBFS on mipsel during running the test

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 1001239 1.10+dfsg-1 Bug #1001239 {Done: Graham Inggs } [src:python-lupa] python-lupa: FTBFS on mipsel during running the test No longer marked as found in versions python-lupa/1.10+dfsg-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#1004223: closing 1004223

2022-01-23 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
close 1004223 5.4.1+repack-1 thanks

Processed: closing 1004223

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1004223 5.4.1+repack-1 Bug #1004223 [minetest-server] minetest-server: ItemStack meta injection vulnerability in Minetest 5.3 Marked as fixed in versions minetest/5.4.1+repack-1. Bug #1004223 [minetest-server] minetest-server: ItemStack

Processed: Re: Bug#1002657: FTBFS with OCaml 4.13.1

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #1002657 [src:sks] FTBFS with OCaml 4.13.1 Added tag(s) patch. -- 1002657: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002657 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1002657: FTBFS with OCaml 4.13.1

2022-01-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tags -1 + patch Le 26/12/2021 à 21:04, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > Your package FTBFS with OCaml 4.13.1 with the following error: >> File "mList.ml", line 203, characters 14-23: >> 203 | let slist = List.sort compare list in >> ^ >> Error (warning 6

Bug#1003579: marked as done (wsl: destroys files/directories named 'temp')

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jan 2022 02:36:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1003579: fixed in wsl 0.2.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1003579, regarding wsl: destroys files/directories named 'temp' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1002961: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1002961: Bug#1002961: src:castle-game-engine: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel

2022-01-23 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Hi Paul, On Sun, 2022-01-02 at 16:30 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > .. > > Moreover CGE upstream think we should abandon armel (and other non > > widely used architectures) as a target for CGE, but I think myself it is > > a good test for the compiler and tend to think we should  keep it. > > I

Bug#984144: fwbuilder: ftbfs with GCC-11

2022-01-23 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello Thanks for your patch it is building for you? It is failing now with: autoheader: warning: missing template: LIBFWBUILDER_TEMPLATE_DIR autoheader: warning: missing template: NET_SNMP autoheader: warning: missing template: UCD_SNMP autoheader: warning: missing template: WORDS_LITTLEENDIAN

Bug#1004271: os.c:84: fatal error: RUNTIME_CHECK((size_t)s == (size_t)64) failed

2022-01-23 Thread Ondřej Surý
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/3108 Yeah, there was wrong assumption on our side that the call would either not exist or always return valid value. There’s already MR for it which needs to be reviewed as I prepared it over the weekend. Ondrej -- Ondřej

Processed: Re: Bug#1004271: os.c:84: fatal error: RUNTIME_CHECK((size_t)s == (size_t)64) failed

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/3108 Bug #1004271 [bind9-dnsutils] os.c:84: fatal error: RUNTIME_CHECK((size_t)s == (size_t)64) failed Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#1004271 to the same value --

Processed: Re: Bug#1004271: os.c:84: fatal error: RUNTIME_CHECK((size_t)s == (size_t)64) failed

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/3108 Bug #1004271 [bind9-dnsutils] os.c:84: fatal error: RUNTIME_CHECK((size_t)s == (size_t)64) failed Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/3108'. --

Bug#1004271: os.c:84: fatal error: RUNTIME_CHECK((size_t)s == (size_t)64) failed

2022-01-23 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Control: affects -1 src:pdns * Chris Hofstaedtler [220123 23:18]: > It feels like, if this crashes on an arch, it would crash regardless of > the supplied parameters, etc. Indeed, on the ppc64el porterbox: ... Unpacking bind9-dnsutils (1:9.17.22-1) ... ... (sid_ppc64-dchroot)zeha@perotto:~$

Processed: Re: Bug#1004271: os.c:84: fatal error: RUNTIME_CHECK((size_t)s == (size_t)64) failed

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:pdns Bug #1004271 [bind9-dnsutils] os.c:84: fatal error: RUNTIME_CHECK((size_t)s == (size_t)64) failed Added indication that 1004271 affects src:pdns -- 1004271: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004271 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1004271: os.c:84: fatal error: RUNTIME_CHECK((size_t)s == (size_t)64) failed

2022-01-23 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Package: bind9-dnsutils Version: 1:9.17.22-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org Dear ISC BIND Maintainers, Hello Ondřej, src:pdns uses dig in its build to test pdns_server. On ppc64el this apparently now crashes: + dig -p 5301 @127.0.0.1 smoke.bind.example.org + tee

Bug#1004067: marked as done (imath: causes openexr to FTBFS)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:45:01 +0100 with message-id <87a6fm9leq.fsf@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#1004067: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Mathieu Malaterre ) (Bug#1004067: fixed in imath 3.1.3-10) has caused the Debian Bug report #1004067, regarding imath: causes

Bug#1002532: marked as done (pygments breaks ruby-pygments.rb autopkgtest: UTF-8 != ASCII-8BIT)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 21:34:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1002532: fixed in ruby-pygments.rb 2.3.0+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1002532, regarding pygments breaks ruby-pygments.rb autopkgtest: UTF-8 != ASCII-8BIT to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1002366: marked as done (python-django-celery-results: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" --system=custom "--test-args={interpreter} -m pytes

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 21:34:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1002366: fixed in python-django-celery-results 2.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1002366, regarding python-django-celery-results: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i

Processed: closing 997310

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 997310 2.3.0+ds-1 Bug #997310 [src:ruby-pygments.rb] ruby-pygments.rb: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed. The source 'ruby-pygments.rb' and version '2.3.0+ds-1' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed in versions

Bug#1002532: pygments breaks ruby-pygments.rb autopkgtest: UTF-8 != ASCII-8BIT

2022-01-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 03:51:02PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > I can't find how to create a MR in salsa, can you pull directly from here: > > https://salsa.debian.org/alexghiti/ruby-pygments.rb/-/tree/int/alex/2.3.0 > > It successfully built in my PPA, if you need any more modification, do >

Processed: tagging 1001760, found 1001760 in 6.9.5-3, tagging 1003345, tagging 1004143 ...

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1001760 + experimental Bug #1001760 {Done: Jose Luis Rivero } [dart] FTBFS: 'placeholders' is ambiguous Added tag(s) experimental. > found 1001760 6.9.5-3 Bug #1001760 {Done: Jose Luis Rivero } [dart] FTBFS: 'placeholders' is ambiguous

Bug#1002532: pygments breaks ruby-pygments.rb autopkgtest: UTF-8 != ASCII-8BIT

2022-01-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi Alex! Please take note that the Debian BTS doesn't subscribe automatically posters to a bug report, so you need to explicitly CC people that you want to message! (Grahm pointed me to your reply ^^) Also, I'm happy to have pointed out to tools and things you weren't aware of! :) On Fri, Jan

Bug#984063: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#984063: Closing bug (Was: Bug#984063: itk libtiff test issues (Was: Bug#984063))

2022-01-23 Thread Steven Robbins
On Saturday, January 22, 2022 12:15:25 P.M. CST Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > Andreas Tille, on 2022-01-16: > > I think the roadmap that ITK4 will be deleted as soon as possible > > is clear. However, if it might serve as an intermediate means > > to support some remaining

Bug#999575: elan: error: failed to select a version for the requirement `itertools = "^0.9.0"`

2022-01-23 Thread Christopher Hoskin
Source: elan Version: 1.0.6-1 Followup-For: Bug #999575 Dear Peter, Thank you very much for the debdiff patch. I'm embarrassed to say, I'm not sure what to do with a debdiff patch. Can I import it into the salsa repo in some way? Thank you for your help, Christopher

Bug#1001239: marked as done (python-lupa: FTBFS on mipsel during running the test)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 21:53:20 +0200 with message-id and subject line python-lupa: FTBFS on mipsel during running the test has caused the Debian Bug report #1001239, regarding python-lupa: FTBFS on mipsel during running the test to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1004167: marked as done (debianutils: tries to overwrite /usr/share/man/fr/man1/readlink.1.gz, also in manpages-fr)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 18:48:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004167: fixed in debianutils 5.7-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004167, regarding debianutils: tries to overwrite /usr/share/man/fr/man1/readlink.1.gz, also in manpages-fr to be marked as done. This

Bug#1004260: marked as done (pybuild-plugin-pyproject: Uninstallable)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:47:58 -0500 with message-id <1719988.nozkWluFcG@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#1004260: pybuild-plugin-pyproject: Uninstallable has caused the Debian Bug report #1004260, regarding pybuild-plugin-pyproject: Uninstallable to be marked as done. This means

Processed: Re: Bug#1004067 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Mathieu Malaterre ) (Bug#1004067: fixed in imath 3.1.3-10)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #1004067 {Done: Mathieu Malaterre } [src:imath] imath: causes openexr to FTBFS 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marked

Bug#1004260: pybuild-plugin-pyproject: Uninstallable

2022-01-23 Thread David Steele
Package: pybuild-plugin-pyproject Version: 5.20220119 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: ste...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, The dh-python-pep517 meta package, required for poetry builds, and satisfied solely by this package, fails to install. $ sudo

Bug#1004067: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Mathieu Malaterre ) (Bug#1004067: fixed in imath 3.1.3-10)

2022-01-23 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Control: reopen -1 On 2022-01-23 at 16:51 (GMT), Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the src:imath package: > > #1004067: imath: causes openexr to FTBFS The build still ftbfs. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi

Bug#1003663: marked as done (golang-github-containers-image: FTBFS: tests fail with 'key has been revoked')

2022-01-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
> > > Hi Andreas, thank you for your report, > > I've tried rebuilding the package on my laptop in a clean sid chroot, > and for some reason, it works just fine. > > Can you please have a look at my build log and help me understand why > the build is failing for you but not for me? > > I looked a

Bug#1004067: marked as done (imath: causes openexr to FTBFS)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:49:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004067: fixed in imath 3.1.3-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004067, regarding imath: causes openexr to FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1004253: broken for BIND in stable

2022-01-23 Thread Marco d'Itri
Package: prometheus-bind-exporter Version: 0.4.0+ds-1+b5 Severity: grave It just does not work due to https://github.com/prometheus-community/bind_exporter/issues/96: Jan 23 16:31:43 dns2 prometheus-bind-exporter[14800]: level=error ts=2022-01-23T15:31:43.292Z caller=bind_exporter.go:427

Bug#964654:

2022-01-23 Thread Akbar Emamy
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 04:56:47 +1200 Kaily Salmon <74pacervail...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Bug#1002773: marked as done (nbdkit: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: guestfs-tools)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:59:36 +0100 with message-id <87v8yatpcn@msgid.hilluzination.de> and subject line PAckage is available has caused the Debian Bug report #1002773, regarding nbdkit: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: guestfs-tools to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1002609: marked as done (Build-Conflicts with ocaml)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 15:06:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1002609: fixed in llvm-toolchain-13 1:13.0.1~+rc3-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1002609, regarding Build-Conflicts with ocaml to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#995360: marked as done (pytorch: autopkgtest regression: fft: ATen not compiled with MKL support)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:37:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#995360: fixed in pytorch 1.8.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #995360, regarding pytorch: autopkgtest regression: fft: ATen not compiled with MKL support to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#994423: marked as done (pytorch: Baseline violation on armhf)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:37:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994423: fixed in pytorch 1.8.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #994423, regarding pytorch: Baseline violation on armhf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#995356: python-parameterized: autopkgtest regression: AssertionError in tearDownModule

2022-01-23 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: python-parameterized Followup-For: Bug #995356 Hi, As announced yesterday, I have uploaded an NMU to DELAYED/5 dropping the autopkgtest. Please let me know if I should cancel that, but then I expect a solution reasonably soon. Paul diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index

Bug#1000637: generating debian/control is *NOT* policy compliant

2022-01-23 Thread Ondřej Surý
That’s exactly how it’s done in the PHP packages. If you see a different content in the debian/control, it means the packages were not generated in the clean build environment. Ondřej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) > On 23. 1. 2022, at 15:09, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Hi, > > Looks like the

Bug#1000637: generating debian/control is *NOT* policy compliant

2022-01-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Looks like the php-* PECL packages are getting their debian/control generated at build time from a debian/control.in. If you didn't know, this is *NOT* policy compliant. The policy clearly says source packages must have a not-generated debian/control in good shape (though I haven't

Bug#1002212: marked as done (python-pyorick: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 13:48:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1002212: fixed in python-pyorick 1.4-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1002212, regarding python-pyorick: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13 to

Bug#967010:

2022-01-23 Thread Mubariz Qaribov

Processed: Re: elan: error: failed to select a version for the requirement `itertools = "^0.9.0"`

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 999575 +patch Bug #999575 [src:elan] elan: error: failed to select a version for the requirement `itertools = "^0.9.0"` Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 999575:

Bug#999575: elan: error: failed to select a version for the requirement `itertools = "^0.9.0"`

2022-01-23 Thread Peter Green
tags 999575 +patch thanks The attatched patch fixes up the dependencies so that elan will build successfully both in current sid and in sid after the upcoming rand transition enters sid. diff -Nru elan-1.0.6/debian/changelog elan-1.0.6/debian/changelog --- elan-1.0.6/debian/changelog

Bug#1002634: marked as done (FTBFS with OCaml 4.13.1)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 13:15:52 +0100 with message-id <87czkive9z@msgid.hilluzination.de> and subject line This has been closed in libguestfs 1.46.x has caused the Debian Bug report #1002634, regarding FTBFS with OCaml 4.13.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1002357: marked as done (flask-login: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:43:40 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1002357: flask-login: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13 has caused the Debian Bug report #1002357, regarding flask-login:

Bug#993620: marked as done (vip-manager: test failure with some network configurations)

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:03:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#993620: fixed in vip-manager 1.0.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #993620, regarding vip-manager: test failure with some network configurations to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#993620: marked as pending in vip-manager

2022-01-23 Thread Michael Banck
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #993620 in vip-manager reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#993620 marked as pending in vip-manager

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #993620 [vip-manager] vip-manager: test failure with some network configurations Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #993620 to the same tags previously set -- 993620: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993620 Debian Bug

Processed: #1002336: forwarded upstream

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1002336 https://github.com/spulec/freezegun/issues/396 Bug #1002336 [src:freezegun] freezegun: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13 Set Bug forwarded-to-address

Processed: tagging 993620

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 993620 + pending Bug #993620 [vip-manager] vip-manager: test failure with some network configurations Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 993620:

Bug#999334: marked as done (android-platform-tools: FTBFS: error: no member named 'unique_lock' in namespace 'std')

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:03:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999334: fixed in android-platform-tools 29.0.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #999334, regarding android-platform-tools: FTBFS: error: no member named 'unique_lock' in namespace 'std' to be marked as

Processed: bug 993620 is forwarded to https://github.com/cybertec-postgresql/vip-manager/pull/76

2022-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 993620 https://github.com/cybertec-postgresql/vip-manager/pull/76 Bug #993620 [vip-manager] vip-manager: test failure with some network configurations Set Bug forwarded-to-address to