Bug#1010429: gddrescue: autopkgtest regression

2022-05-01 Thread Michael Prokop
* Paul Gevers [Sun May 01, 2022 at 02:39:15PM +0200]: > With a recent upload of gddrescue the autopkgtest of gddrescue fails in > testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of gddrescue > from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In > tabular form:

Bug#1004511: luajit SEGFAULTS on ppc64el

2022-05-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 24-04-2022 12:00, Paul Gevers wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 19:32:53 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: With a recent upload of luajit the autopkgtest of knot-resolver fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of luajit from unstable. It passes when run with only

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: mdtraj: autopkgtest timeout on arm64 (downloading pdb file?)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1009079 [src:mdtraj] mdtraj: autopkgtest timeout on arm64 (downloading pdb file?) Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > user debian...@lists.debian.org Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > usertag -1 flaky

Bug#997742: marked as done (pyrlp: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean print(sys.path)? (conf.py, line 22))

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 May 2022 05:04:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#997742: fixed in pyrlp 0.5.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #997742, regarding pyrlp: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean

Bug#1010453: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Doug Torrance ) (Bug#1010453: fixed in macaulay2 1.19.1+ds-9)

2022-05-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 02-05-2022 02:39, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: macaulay2 (1.19.1+ds-9) unstable; urgency=medium . * debian/tests/control - Mark package-tests as flaky since it regularly times out on armhf (Closes: #1010453). Hmmm. May I recommend something else? Marking

Bug#1010453: marked as done (macaulay2: autopkgtest regularly times out on armhf)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 May 2022 00:34:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010453: fixed in macaulay2 1.19.1+ds-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010453, regarding macaulay2: autopkgtest regularly times out on armhf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#984083: marked as done (lasi: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 23:06:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984083: fixed in lasi 1.1.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #984083, regarding lasi: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#1000271: marked as done (jupyter-client breaks dask.distributed autopkgtest: ERROR - Workers don't have promised key: ['tcp://127.0.0.1:33937'])

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 21:33:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000271: fixed in jupyter-client 7.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000271, regarding jupyter-client breaks dask.distributed autopkgtest: ERROR - Workers don't have promised key:

Processed: affects 984865

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 984865 src:rust-kmon Bug #984865 [src:rust-tui] rust-tui: depends on multiple unavailable packages Ignoring request to set affects of bug 984865 to the same value previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: tagging 984865

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 984865 + ftbfs Bug #984865 [src:rust-tui] rust-tui: depends on multiple unavailable packages Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #984865 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: affects 984865

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 984865 src:rust-kmon Bug #984865 [src:rust-tui] rust-tui: depends on multiple unavailable packages Added indication that 984865 affects src:rust-kmon > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: tagging 984865

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 984865 + ftbfs Bug #984865 [src:rust-tui] rust-tui: depends on multiple unavailable packages Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 984865:

Processed: Bug#1000271 marked as pending in jupyter-client

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1000271 [src:jupyter-client, src:dask.distributed] jupyter-client breaks dask.distributed autopkgtest: ERROR - Workers don't have promised key: ['tcp://127.0.0.1:33937'] Added tag(s) pending. -- 1000271:

Bug#1000271: marked as pending in jupyter-client

2022-05-01 Thread Julien Puydt
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1000271 in jupyter-client reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1010454: docker.io: FTBFS on s390x: === FAIL: daemon/logger TestCopierWithSized (0.00s)

2022-05-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: docker.io Version: 20.10.14+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

Bug#1010453: macaulay2: autopkgtest regularly times out on armhf

2022-05-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: macaulay2 Version: 1.19.1+ds-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: flaky timeout Dear maintainer(s), I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package because it was showing up as a regression for the upload of gcc-12. I noticed that the test regularly

Processed: severity of 1005382 is serious

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1005382 serious Bug #1005382 [gitlab-ci-multi-runner] "couldn't load configuration template file: Near line 1 (last key parsed '-'): expected key separator '=', but got ',' instead" Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks

Processed: tagging 1005382

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1005382 + ftbfs Bug #1005382 [gitlab-ci-multi-runner] "couldn't load configuration template file: Near line 1 (last key parsed '-'): expected key separator '=', but got ',' instead" Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#1010452: gitlab-ci-multi-runner: FTBFS: test failure

2022-05-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: gitlab-ci-multi-runner Version: 13.3.1+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org gitlab-ci-multi-runner FTBFS: === RUN TestRmFile/pwsh integration_tests.go:15:

Bug#1010451: gdb-avr: Missing build dependency on libgmp-dev

2022-05-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: gdb-avr Version: 7.7-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gdb-avr=7.7-5%2Bb1 ... checking for libgmp... no configure: error: GMP is missing or unusable make[1]: *** [Makefile:9783: configure-gdb] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>/build'

Bug#1004847: marked as done (nvidia-graphics-drivers: CVE-2022-21813, CVE-2022-21814)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 19:57:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004847: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers 470.103.01-3~deb11u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004847, regarding nvidia-graphics-drivers: CVE-2022-21813, CVE-2022-21814 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1010276: parasail: compiles something extra (or less) depending on the CPU features available

2022-05-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sun, May 01, 2022 at 01:27:39PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > Thank you for the clarification. In any case, I believe the mv > makes a random static library disappear, so I'll replace by cp. > This is looking like a safe maneuver. Uh, that's actually true and should for sure have been

Bug#1008375: marked as done (apertium-crh-tur: FTBFS: configure: error: You don't have lrx-comp installed)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:40:57 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008375, regarding apertium-crh-tur: FTBFS: configure: error: You don't have lrx-comp installed to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1008364: marked as done (apertium-urd-hin: FTBFS: configure: error: You don't have lrx-comp installed.)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:40:57 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008364, regarding apertium-urd-hin: FTBFS: configure: error: You don't have lrx-comp installed. to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1008330: marked as done (apertium-spa: FTBFS: configure: error: You don't have lrx-comp installed)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:40:57 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008330, regarding apertium-spa: FTBFS: configure: error: You don't have lrx-comp installed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1010164: marked as done (fails autopkgtest against Octave 7)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 19:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010164: fixed in bart 0.7.00-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010164, regarding fails autopkgtest against Octave 7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1008378: marked as done (apertium-spa-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:31:31 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008378, regarding apertium-spa-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008331: marked as done (apertium-fra-frp: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:31:31 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008331, regarding apertium-fra-frp: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008390: marked as done (apertium-nno-nob: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008390, regarding apertium-nno-nob: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008389: marked as done (apertium-spa-ita: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008389, regarding apertium-spa-ita: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008388: marked as done (apertium-swe-nor: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008388, regarding apertium-swe-nor: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008373: marked as done (apertium-hbs-eng: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008373, regarding apertium-hbs-eng: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008363: marked as done (apertium-por-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.3) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008363, regarding apertium-por-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.3) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008371: marked as done (apertium-pol-szl: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008371, regarding apertium-pol-szl: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008370: marked as done (apertium-bel-rus: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.3) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008370, regarding apertium-bel-rus: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.3) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008367: marked as done (apertium-swe-dan: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008367, regarding apertium-swe-dan: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008365: marked as done (apertium-arg-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008365, regarding apertium-arg-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008362: marked as done (apertium-dan-nor: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008362, regarding apertium-dan-nor: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008359: marked as done (apertium-fra-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.3) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008359, regarding apertium-fra-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.3) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008353: marked as done (apertium-cat-ita: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008353, regarding apertium-cat-ita: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008347: marked as done (apertium-es-gl: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008347, regarding apertium-es-gl: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008335: marked as done (apertium-hbs-slv: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008335, regarding apertium-hbs-slv: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008339: marked as done (apertium-eng-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008339, regarding apertium-eng-cat: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008346: marked as done (apertium-rus-ukr: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008346, regarding apertium-rus-ukr: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008341: marked as done (apertium-srd-ita: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008341, regarding apertium-srd-ita: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008334: marked as done (apertium-oci-fra: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008334, regarding apertium-oci-fra: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008333: marked as done (apertium-afr-nld: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008333, regarding apertium-afr-nld: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008332: marked as done (apertium-cat-srd: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008332, regarding apertium-cat-srd: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1008329: marked as done (apertium-spa-arg: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2022 21:16:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing transient build errors has caused the Debian Bug report #1008329, regarding apertium-spa-arg: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met to be marked as done.

Bug#1010287: marked as done (perl-openssl-defaults: generated substvar should not end in a newline)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 19:04:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010287: fixed in perl-openssl-defaults 6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010287, regarding perl-openssl-defaults: generated substvar should not end in a newline to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: nodejs 14.19 hangs on mipsel/mips64el when building qtwebengine frontend with rollup and terser plugin

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 nodejs/16.14.2+dfsg-1 Bug #1010446 [nodejs] nodejs 14.19 hangs on mipsel/mips64el when building qtwebengine frontend with rollup and terser plugin Marked as fixed in versions nodejs/16.14.2+dfsg-1. -- 1010446:

Bug#1010446: nodejs 14.19 hangs on mipsel/mips64el when building qtwebengine frontend with rollup and terser plugin

2022-05-01 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Package: nodejs Version: 16.13.2+really14.19.1~dfsg-6 Severity: serious Control: fixed -1 nodejs/16.14.2+dfsg-1 Affects: src:qtwebengine-opensource-src Dear nodejs maintainers, Currently qtwebengine-opensource-src FTBFS on mipsel and mips64el:

Bug#1009041: marked as done (guile-git: FTBFS with libgit2 1.3.0)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 18:18:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009041: fixed in guile-git 0.5.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009041, regarding guile-git: FTBFS with libgit2 1.3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: Re: python3.10 breaks yade autopkgtest on i386: Segmentation fault

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:yade Bug #1009739 [src:python3.10, src:yade] python3.10 breaks yade autopkgtest on i386: Segmentation fault Bug reassigned from package 'src:python3.10, src:yade' to 'src:yade'. No longer marked as found in versions yade/2022.01a-7 and

Bug#1009739: python3.10 breaks yade autopkgtest on i386: Segmentation fault

2022-05-01 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: reassign -1 src:yade yade was removed from testing, and also is not installable on i386. Reassigning until we can investigate if that's a Python issue.

Bug#984203: marked as done (libpgf: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 18:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984203: fixed in libpgf 7.21.7+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984203, regarding libpgf: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Processed: Re: Bug#1009041: guile-git: FTBFS with libgit2 1.3.0

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded 1009041 https://gitlab.com/guile-git/guile-git/-/issues/23 Bug #1009041 [guile-git] guile-git: FTBFS with libgit2 1.3.0 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gitlab.com/guile-git/guile-git/-/issues/23'. -- 1009041:

Bug#1009041: guile-git: FTBFS with libgit2 1.3.0

2022-05-01 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: forwarded 1009041 https://gitlab.com/guile-git/guile-git/-/issues/23 On 2022-04-06, Mohammed Bilal wrote: > guile-git was found to fail to build during a test rebuild with > libgit2 1.3.0 in unstable. Attaching the build logs as well. > > Relevant part(hopefully) : > > FAIL: tests/proxy

Bug#1009888: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1009888: rust-h2, existing version is badly broken, new upstream needs new package

2022-05-01 Thread Peter Michael Green
On 01/05/2022 14:00, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: currently progress is blocked on - itoa/serde_json transition (anybody working actively on that?) I just uploaded the new itoa to experimental and took a quick look through the reverse dependencies. rust-cssparser - already broken and not in

Bug#1010432: debian-edu-config: autopkgtest regression: update-mime: not found

2022-05-01 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
[ Paul Gevers, 2022-05-01 ] > It seems that with the fix for bug #1010102 you either picked the > wrong Depends of two, or you forgot to update the postinst for the > change as update-mime lives in mailcap. AFAICT calling update-mime in d-e-c.postinst is unneeded since the obsolete

Processed: close FTBFS bug

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 999066 0.1.2.0-5 Bug #999066 [src:tmexpand] tmexpand: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep The source 'tmexpand' and version '0.1.2.0-5' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed in versions

Bug#1010164: fails autopkgtest against Octave 7

2022-05-01 Thread Uecker, Martin
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:23:25 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?= wrote: > Package: octave-bart > Version: 0.7.00-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Control: block 1009865 by -1 > > Dear Maintainer, > > The autopkgtest for octave-bart fails against octave 7.1.0-2 recently uploaded > to

Bug#1010428: marked as done (twine: autopkgtest needs update for new version of python-readme-renderer: error message changed)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 15:20:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010428: fixed in twine 4.0.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010428, regarding twine: autopkgtest needs update for new version of python-readme-renderer: error message changed to be marked as done.

Processed: Bug#1010428 marked as pending in twine

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1010428 [src:twine] twine: autopkgtest needs update for new version of python-readme-renderer: error message changed Added tag(s) pending. -- 1010428: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010428 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1010428: marked as pending in twine

2022-05-01 Thread Stefano Rivera
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1010428 in twine reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1003463: Functionally broken with current PHP

2022-05-01 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 01/05/2022 à 15:29, Christoph Biedl a écrit : Control: tag 1003463 confirmed Roman Lebedev wrote... Package: arcanist Version: 0~git20200925-2 Severity: grave @Sylvestre, as previously mentioned in IRC (possibly got lost), I am considering rebasing the src:phabricator package to the

Processed: Increase severity - FTBFS with libgit 1.3

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1009041 serious Bug #1009041 [guile-git] guile-git: FTBFS with libgit2 1.3.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 1009029 serious Bug #1009029 [julia] julia: FTBFS with libgit2 1.3.0 Severity set to 'serious' from

Processed: Increase severity 1009017

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1009017 serious Bug #1009017 [src:criterion] criterion: FTBFS with libgit2 1.3.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1009017:

Bug#999050: marked as done (cldump: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 13:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999050: fixed in cldump 0.11~dfsg-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #999050, regarding cldump: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1003463: Functionally broken with current PHP

2022-05-01 Thread Christoph Biedl
Control: tag 1003463 confirmed Roman Lebedev wrote... > Package: arcanist > Version: 0~git20200925-2 > Severity: grave @Sylvestre, as previously mentioned in IRC (possibly got lost), I am considering rebasing the src:phabricator package to the latest git commit in the respective upstream

Processed: Re: Bug#1003463: Functionally broken with current PHP

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag 1003463 confirmed Bug #1003463 [arcanist] Functionally broken with current PHP Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1003463: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003463 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1010276: parasail: compiles something extra (or less) depending on the CPU features available

2022-05-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sun, May 01, 2022 at 02:09:21PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > > Note that `sort` is locale dependant, so if that's really the proper way > > to do it (tbh doing find|head feels *very* brittle to me… it's probably > > better if you can think of a better way to achieve whatever that piece > >

Bug#1009888: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1009888: rust-h2, existing version is badly broken, new upstream needs new package

2022-05-01 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On April 20, 2022 11:39 am, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > On April 20, 2022 12:33 am, Peter Michael Green wrote: >> Package: rust-h2 >> Version: 0.1.26-1 >> X-debbugs-cc: d...@jones.dk >> >> I noticed that Jonas had set a number of bugs about broken rust packages as >> blockers of 900928, so I

Bug#1010432: debian-edu-config: autopkgtest regression: update-mime: not found

2022-05-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: debian-edu-config Version: 2.12.21 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of debian-edu-config the autopkgtest of debian-edu-config fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of

Bug#1010431: ensmallen: autopkgtest regression on i386: 2.101206341 == Approx( 2.0 )

2022-05-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: ensmallen Version: 2.19.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of ensmallen the autopkgtest of ensmallen fails in testing on i386 when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of ensmallen from

Processed: tifffile breaks skimage autopkgtest: asarray() got an unexpected keyword argument 'multifile'

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 tifffile/20220426-1 Bug #1010430 [src:tifffile, src:skimage] tifffile breaks skimage autopkgtest: asarray() got an unexpected keyword argument 'multifile' Marked as found in versions tifffile/20220426-1. > found -1 skimage/0.18.3-2 Bug #1010430

Bug#1010430: tifffile breaks skimage autopkgtest: asarray() got an unexpected keyword argument 'multifile'

2022-05-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: tifffile, skimage Control: found -1 tifffile/20220426-1 Control: found -1 skimage/0.18.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of tifffile the autopkgtest of skimage fails in

Bug#1009261: Evolution bwrap problem - may fail to print or hang in startup

2022-05-01 Thread Domenico Cufalo
Dear developers, I have the same issue in my machine (Debian Bullseye Stable with Gnome 3.38): Evolution doesn't start at all. But I could add that this issue affects also Gnome Online Accounts. To have it working we have to launch WEBKIT_FORCE_SANDBOX=0 gnome-control-center

Bug#1010429: gddrescue: autopkgtest regression

2022-05-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: gddrescue Version: 1.26-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of gddrescue the autopkgtest of gddrescue fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of gddrescue from unstable. It

Bug#1010428: twine: autopkgtest needs update for new version of python-readme-renderer: error message changed

2022-05-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: twine Version: 4.0.0-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: python-readme-rende...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:python-readme-renderer Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of python-readme-renderer

Processed: twine: autopkgtest needs update for new version of python-readme-renderer: error message changed

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:python-readme-renderer Bug #1010428 [src:twine] twine: autopkgtest needs update for new version of python-readme-renderer: error message changed Added indication that 1010428 affects src:python-readme-renderer -- 1010428:

Bug#1010276: marked as done (parasail: compiles something extra (or less) depending on the CPU features available)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 12:34:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010276: fixed in parasail 2.5+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010276, regarding parasail: compiles something extra (or less) depending on the CPU features available to be marked as done. This

Processed: Re: Bug#1010287: libnet-ssleay-perl: FTBFS: bad line in substvars file debian/libnet-ssleay-perl.substvars at line 2

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 perl-openssl-defaults 5 Bug #1010287 [src:libnet-ssleay-perl] libnet-ssleay-perl: FTBFS: bad line in substvars file debian/libnet-ssleay-perl.substvars at line 2 Bug reassigned from package 'src:libnet-ssleay-perl' to 'perl-openssl-defaults'. No longer

Bug#1010287: libnet-ssleay-perl: FTBFS: bad line in substvars file debian/libnet-ssleay-perl.substvars at line 2

2022-05-01 Thread Niko Tyni
Control: reassign -1 perl-openssl-defaults 5 Control: tag -1 sid bookworm Control: retitle -1 perl-openssl-defaults: generated substvar should not end in a newline Control: affects -1 src:libnet-ssleay-perl On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 03:28:06PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Source:

Bug#1010276: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1010276: parasail: compiles something extra (or less) depending on the CPU features available

2022-05-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 10:50:16AM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Upstream implements run time > CPU detection to avoid baseline violation on older CPU. Great! Thank you for confirming this bit. I figured it might be the case, but I didn't verify it myself (as I noted in my first email). > So

Bug#1009460: marked as done (python-marathon: FTBFS: FAILED tests/test_model_event.py::MarathonEventTest::test_marathon_event - At...)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 10:51:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009460: fixed in python-marathon 0.13.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009460, regarding python-marathon: FTBFS: FAILED tests/test_model_event.py::MarathonEventTest::test_marathon_event - At... to be

Processed: Bug#1009460 marked as pending in python-marathon

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009460 [src:python-marathon] python-marathon: FTBFS: FAILED tests/test_model_event.py::MarathonEventTest::test_marathon_event - At... Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009460: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009460 Debian Bug

Bug#1009460: marked as pending in python-marathon

2022-05-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009460 in python-marathon reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1010421: gir-to-d: FTBFS with ldc 1.29

2022-05-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: gir-to-d Version: 0.22.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org gir-to-d FTBFS with ldc 1.29: FAILED: girtod ldc2 -of=girtod girtod.p/source_girtod.d.o

Processed: mark as fixed in experimental too.

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 984913 0.3.51-1 Bug #984913 {Done: Peter Michael Green } [src:rust-backtrace] librust-backtrace+rustc-dep-of-std-dev: depends on unavailable librust-cfg-if-0.1+rustc-dep-of-std-dev Marked as fixed in versions rust-backtrace/0.3.51-1. Bug

Bug#1010276: Bug#1010276: parasail: compiles something extra (or less) depending on the CPU features available

2022-05-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, Am Sun, May 01, 2022 at 10:50:16AM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > I'm still looking up this issue, but I wrap up a status to clear > my mind. > > To me, the main topic of the bug is the reproducibility issue[1] > observed on i386, but other architectures may be affected. The >

Bug#1005978: marked as done (Please migrate away from dpatch)

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 07:18:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1005978: fixed in vdk2 2.4.0-5.6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005978, regarding Please migrate away from dpatch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1008464: marked as done (sia: FTBFS: dh_auto_build: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go install -trimpath -v -p 1 github.com/NebulousLabs/Sia/api [..] github.com/NebulousLabs/Sia/sync github.com/

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2022 06:48:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1008464: fixed in sia 1.3.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1008464, regarding sia: FTBFS: dh_auto_build: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go install -trimpath -v -p 1 github.com/NebulousLabs/Sia/api

Bug#1008464: marked as pending in sia

2022-05-01 Thread Nilesh Patra
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1008464 in sia reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1008464 marked as pending in sia

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1008464 [src:sia] sia: FTBFS: dh_auto_build: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go install -trimpath -v -p 1 github.com/NebulousLabs/Sia/api [..] github.com/NebulousLabs/Sia/sync github.com/NebulousLabs/Sia/types returned exit code 2 Added

Processed: Re: Bug#1009308: libopenexr-dev: Missing Breaks/Replaces libilmbase-dev

2022-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1009308 [libopenexr-dev] libopenexr-dev: Missing Breaks/Replaces libilmbase-dev Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 1009308: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009308 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact