Source: gir-to-d
Version: 0.22.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin
Source: pykafka
Version: 2.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: opensaml
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: lombok-ast
Version: 0.2+ds-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ruby-certificate-authority
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: gtk-d
Version: 3.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: capsule-maven-nextflow
Version: 1.0.3.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libpdfbox-graphics2d-java
Version: 0.35-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: gl-image-display
Version: 0.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++
Source: pidgin-librvp
Version: 0.9.7cvs-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: deepin-album
Version: 5.9.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: switcheroo-control
Version: 2.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: libio-async-ssl-perl
Version: 0.22-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: posterazor
Version: 1.5.1-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++
Source: ignition-common3
Version: 3.14.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: casacore-data-sources
Version: 2-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: fis-gtm
Version: 6.3-014-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin
Source: libqapt
Version: 3.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: tclxml
Version: 1:3.2.7-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DPACKAGE_N
Source: pixz
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: libbluray
Version: 1:1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: netgen
Version: 6.2.2006+really6.2.1905+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: gitless
Version: 0.8.8-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: oscrypto
Version: 1.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: ruby-jwt
Version: 2.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> exp
Source: olm
Version: 3.2.11~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: freeimage
Version: 3.18.0+ds2-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-li
Source: colmap
Version: 3.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -g
Source: emscripten
Version: 3.1.5~dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: power-profiles-daemon
Version: 0.10.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ignition-physics
Version: 5.1.0+ds1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: veusz
Version: 3.3.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules cl
Source: qutemol
Version: 0.4.1~cvs2008-14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++
Source: barbican
Version: 1:14.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-bitcoinlib
Version: 0.11.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: photoqt
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -g
Source: gamehub
Version: 0.16.1-2-master+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: voms-api-java
Version: 3.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: pygmsh
Version: 7.1.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: wxpython4.0
Version: 4.0.7+dfsg-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: deepin-image-viewer
Version: 5.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: skycat
Version: 3.1.2+starlink1~b+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: nip2
Version: 8.7.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: ruby-image-science
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> :85
Source: opencascade
Version: 7.5.1+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<
Source: libspring-java
Version: 4.3.30-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: adql
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ruby-mechanize
Version: 2.7.7-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: synaptic
Version: 0.90.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFI
Source: imv
Version: 4.3.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -o imv-wayland
Source: ruby-openid-connect
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: t4kcommon
Version: 0.1.1-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: freewheeling
Version: 0.6.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ruby-json-jwt
Version: 1.13.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>Fail
Source: aptitude
Version: 0.8.13-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -DLOCALE
Source: apriltag
Version: 3.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/cc -g
Source: kicad
Version: 6.0.5+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<&g
Source: python-apt
Version: 2.3.0
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-gnu-
Source: ignition-common
Version: 4.5.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: ruby-ntlm
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Er
Source: gmsh
Version: 4.8.4+ds2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -g
Source: networking-mlnx
Version: 1:16.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ruby-rack-oauth2
Version: 1.19.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: oce
Version: 0.18.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
> /u
On Thu, 26 May 2022 09:31:00 +0300
=?UTF-8?Q?Martin=2D=C3=89ric_Racine?=
wrote:
> I'd really like to know how anyone could ever come to the conclusion
> that a package that has nothing to do with graphic drivers needs to be
> auto-removed.
>
> Martin-Éric
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:01 AM Debian
I'd really like to know why a package that that nothing to do with
NVIDIA drivers came to be marked for auto-removal.
Martin-Éric
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:04 AM Debian testing autoremoval watch
wrote:
>
> xserver-xorg-video-geode 2.11.20-9 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
> 2022-06-3
I'd really like to know how anyone could ever come to the conclusion
that a package that has nothing to do with graphic drivers needs to be
auto-removed.
Martin-Éric
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:01 AM Debian testing autoremoval watch
wrote:
>
> upgrade-system 1.9.1.0 is marked for autoremoval from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # I don't really intent to ignore this for bookworm, but as long as
> # 1011268 isn't fixed, lets try this
> tag 1011146 bookworm-ignore
Bug #1011146 {Done: Andreas Beckmann }
[src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470] nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-
Source: gazebo
Version: 11.10.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
I was testing rdeps for onetbb transition but found this issue.
Source: blender
Version: 2.83.5+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
I found it ftbfs during onetbb reverse dependency test,
although the reason irrelevant to onetbb.
Version 3.X is still not built for amd64.
Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2022 23:20:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011442: fixed in openvlbi 1.23.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011442,
regarding libopendsp-dev,libopenvlbi-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces:
libopenvlbi1-dev (<< 1.23)
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2022 23:20:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011441: fixed in openvlbi 1.23.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011441,
regarding openvlbi-data: missing Breaks+Replaces: libopenvlbi1 (<< 1.23)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2022 23:04:44 +0100
with message-id <81f1c7d5-7810-f631-a871-f94496ed9...@tina.pm>
and subject line Cannot reproduce
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010454,
regarding docker.io: FTBFS on s390x: === FAIL: daemon/logger
TestCopierWithSized (0.00s)
to be marked as do
Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2022 22:28:34 +0100
with message-id <813fb166-28b2-ac68-ddbd-279ad3977...@tina.pm>
and subject line Cannot reproduce
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010543,
regarding mtail: FTBFS on ppc64el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: netsend
Severity: serious
Justification: RoQA
Dear Maintainer,
netsend is de-facto unmaintained as simce 2009 only NMU happened. Upstream
disappeared, (as berlios disappeared) and I could not find a new place upstream
moved to. Appearantly, there was a newer upstream version than that in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 979748 + sid bookworm
Bug #979748 [src:rio] rio: FTBFS with glibc 2.32
Added tag(s) bookworm and sid.
> tags 1011494 + sid bookworm
Bug #1011494 [src:atitvout] FTBFS: compat level 6 unsupported
Added tag(s) bookworm and sid.
> tags 1002861 +
Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2022 19:39:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011147: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-510
510.73.08-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011147,
regarding nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-510: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183,
CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1001632 [src:rainloop] rainloop: FTBFS with webpack5: Invalid webpack
options
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1001632 [src:rainloop] rainloop: FTBFS with webpack5: Invalid webpack
options
Added tag(s) patch.
On Wed, 25 May 2022 11:40:24 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> There's one reverse dependency, but there libdbd-sqlite2-perl is only
> optional and will be removed: #1011476 / beancounter
beancounter is fixed / #1011476 is closed.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian D
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1002861 [src:node-node-forge] node-node-forge: FTBFS with webpack5: Error:
Configuration object don't match the API schema
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1002861: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002861
Deb
Package: php-guzzlehttp-guzzle
Version: 7.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Guzzle 7.5.0 (and 7.4.3) has just been released fixing a
cross-domain cookie leakage.
More information:
https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle/security/advisories/GHSA-cwmx-h
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 minor
Bug #1011626 [inkscape] Nearly no icons since several releases
Severity set to 'minor' from 'grave'
--
1011626: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: severity -1 minor
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 02:25:21PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Severity: grave
Hardly. Please don't over-inflate severities.
> Since several time, incscape has the same icon for most functions what
> makes it nearly impossible to find a function. (See screenshot)
>
Here is the screenshot.
Regards
Klaus
--
Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16Klaus Ethgen
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source: rust-fasteval
Version: 0.2.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=rust-fasteval&ver=0.2.4-2
...
test consts ... FAILED
failures:
consts stdout
thread 'consts' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
left: `"Slab{ exprs:{ 0:Ex
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1009468 pysolfc
Bug #1009468 [src:pysolfc] pysolfc: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'formatter'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:pysolfc' to 'pysolfc'.
No longer marked as found in versions pysolfc/2.6.4-3.
Ignoring request t
Package: inkscape
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: grave
Since several time, incscape has the same icon for most functions what
makes it nearly impossible to find a function. (See screenshot)
The error is the same than in gimp for several times.
With gimp I found that it is the missing png icons. There
Package: kdesu
Version: 5.93.0-1
Severity: serious
kdesu fails to authenticate with sudo from testing/unstable.
Examples: launching ksystemlog from the main menu, or trying to run
krusader root mode option via its 'Tools > Start Krusader Root Mode'
menu entry. Assuming that the current user is
Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2022 12:48:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011614: fixed in gpaste 42.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011614,
regarding gpaste: Fails to build except on arch:all
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Package: newsboat
Version: 2.21-1.2
Severity: serious
rust-gettext-sys and rust-gettext-rs have been updated to new upstream versions
breaking the build-dependencies of newsboat.
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 node-mermaid
Bug #1001549 [node-webpack] node-mermaid: FTBFS with webpack5: Error:
webpack-cli is missing
Bug reassigned from package 'node-webpack' to 'node-mermaid'.
No longer marked as found in versions 5.58.2+dfsg+~cs5.11.7.
Ignoring request to alter
Control: reassign -1 node-mermaid
Reassigned to node-mermaid to allow webpack migration and because we
didn't find which package is really responsible of this issue
Source: gpaste
Version: 42.1-2
Severity: serious
gpaste fails to build except on arch: all. This is because libgjs-dev
is in Build-Depends-Indep instead of Build-Depends
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gpaste
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2022 10:20:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011364: fixed in phcpack 2.4.85+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011364,
regarding phcpack: FTBFS with gnat-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Tue, 02 Nov 2021 21:49:55 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> libdbd-sqlite2-perl uses a vendored copy of SQLite 2.
>
> SQLite 3 was released in 2004, and the the regular
> SQLite 2 package is no longer shipped since bullseye (see #607969).
Ack.
There's one reverse dependency, but there libdbd-sqlit
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 18:07:34 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
> Forwarded: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=131226
>
> As noted on ci.d.n and in CPAN RT, libperl5i-perl is broken by the
> recent updagrade
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 21:18:10 +, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| intrigeri, 22.05.2020 08:47:25 +0200 |=-
> > Niko Tyni (2020-05-21):
> > > libcolor-calc-perl has just one reverse dependency AFAICS:
> > > libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl.
> > I took a quick look.
> Me too, a longer one
Source: bolt
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
bolt currently FTBFS during dh_auto_test and also fails its autopktest.
This is due to a change in systemd v251.
See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/23499 where this is being
discussed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/si
98 matches
Mail list logo