Your message dated Fri, 03 Jun 2022 05:04:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002257: fixed in rust-os-info 3.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002257,
regarding rust-os-info: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo
build returned exit code 101
to be marked as
Your message dated Fri, 03 Jun 2022 03:24:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1012244: fixed in lime-forensics 1.9.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012244,
regarding autopkgtest fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: elan
Version: 1.3.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
A number of rust crates have been updated recently, as a result your
package no longer builds, I have updated the patches to relax the
dependencies and was able to succesfully build the package, I have not
tested it beyond that.
Control: tags -1 + pending
> Samuel Thibault wrote (Sun, 20 Mar 2022 01:01:07
> +0100):
> > Cyril Brulebois, le sam. 19 mars 2022 16:32:06 +0100, a ecrit:
> > > > Running suite(s): inet_mton
> > > > 95%: Checks: 24, Failures: 1, Errors: 0
> > > >
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #1007929 [src:netcfg] netcfg: FTBFS on s390x
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1007929: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007929
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1012275 - ftbfs
Bug #1012275 [firefox] firefox: new upstream version fixes possible RCE
security holes
Removed tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1012275:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - pending
Bug #1007929 [src:netcfg] netcfg: FTBFS on s390x
Removed tag(s) pending.
--
1007929: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007929
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1012275 with 1012197
Bug #1012275 [firefox] firefox: new upstream version fixes possible RCE
security holes
1012275 was not blocked by any bugs.
1012275 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1012275: 1012197
> thanks
Stopping
Source: php-horde-turba
Version: 4.2.25-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for php-horde-turba,
CVE-2022-30287[0].
If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
CVE
close 1004913 2.1.6-1
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1004913 2.1.6-1
Bug #1004913 [python-fysom] python-fysom: incompatible import from collections
in py3.10
There is no source info for the package 'python-fysom' at version '2.1.6-1'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1004913 = pending
Bug #1004913 [python-fysom] python-fysom: incompatible import from collections
in py3.10
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) bookworm and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2022 19:49:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1008361: fixed in rubygems 3.3.15-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008361,
regarding rubygems: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
The bug is currently fixed in trafficserver 9.1.2+ds-7 into unstable.
Due to the ongoing openssl transition, its migration to testing is
however blocked.
I'll continue to monitor package status to prevent it from being removed
from testing if possible.
Best,
Jean Baptiste
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1010764 serious
Bug #1010764 [openafs-modules-dkms] openafs-modules-dkms: module fails to build
for kernel 5.17.0-1-amd64
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:mumble
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
Source: hipspy
Version: 0.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Since the installation of astropy 5.1, hipspy fails its tests. The first
error is
ImportError while loading conftest '/usr/lib/python3/dist-
packages/hips/conftest.py'.
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/hips/conftest.py:6: in
Package: firefox
Version: 100.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Hi.
Would be good to see 101 packaged ASAP, as it fixes numerous issues,
including some which are
On 02/06/2022 14:31, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Yadd (2022-06-02 12:39:07)
can I switch this package from cdbs to debhelper+dh-sequence-nodejs ?
Please remove my name as maintainer, and maintain it however you like.
...or if you have no need for the package yourself either, then
>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2022 11:47:36 +0200 Christian Marillat
>> wrote:
>> BTW the debian/rules is completely outdated (Still use the deprecated
>> debhelper 9). You must not use configure/autotools build but cmake.
> That is a bit of a strong statement. As long as upstream keeps the autotools
>
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2022 15:18:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011884: fixed in coffeescript 1.12.8~dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011884,
regarding coffeescript: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: /usr/bin/licensecheck: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: aqsis
Version: 1.8.2+git20210815
Followup-For: Bug #1010140
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, we fixed this FTBFS with the following patch, it was
published successfully
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1010140 [src:aqsis] aqsis: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1010140: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010140
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2022 14:39:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1005650: fixed in squid 5.5-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005650,
regarding squid: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2022 14:34:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#995659: fixed in coturn 4.5.2-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #995659,
regarding coturn: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:10:27 +0300 Nicholas Guriev wrote:
Please consider to apply my patch fixing build against newest OpenSSL.
The patch refers to the OPENSSL_FIPS macro that used to be in ancient
OpenSSL source code. This fix does not change behaviour because
the FIPS_mode() function
On Wed, 01 Jun 2022 20:17:52 +0300 Nicholas Guriev wrote:
To fix FTBFS of the squid package, I offer to apply my changes with the
-Wno-error=deprecated-declarations flag and an original patch. This will
allow us to proceed with the OpenSSL transition.
See also my MR on Salsa.
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:05:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011867: fixed in node-cbor 8.1.0+dfsg+~cs5.2.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011867,
regarding node-cbor: FTBFS: Error: Can't resolve 'stream' in
'/<>/node_modules/nofilter/lib'
to be marked as done.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1011867 [src:node-cbor] node-cbor: FTBFS: Error: Can't resolve 'stream' in
'/<>/node_modules/nofilter/lib'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1011867: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011867
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1011867 in node-cbor reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
fixed 1012221
thanks
Le 01/06/2022 à 18:33, Peter Green a écrit :
Package: rust-stdweb-internal-macros
Version: 0.2.9-1
Severity: serious
4. Remove the stdweb features in instant and parking-lot and allow stdweb to be
removed from testing.
I think I implemented this solution.
I opened
Your message dated Thu, 2 Jun 2022 14:29:45 +0200
with message-id <0c531c04-c678-052c-9309-7e28447ef...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1012221:
rust-stdweb-internal-macros (build-)depends on old version of rust-sha1.
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012221,
On Thu, 02 Jun 2022 11:47:36 +0200 Christian Marillat
wrote:
BTW the debian/rules is completely outdated (Still use the deprecated
debhelper 9). You must not use configure/autotools build but cmake.
That is a bit of a strong statement. As long as upstream keeps the autotools
build
systems
Quoting Yadd (2022-06-02 12:39:07)
> can I switch this package from cdbs to debhelper+dh-sequence-nodejs ?
Please remove my name as maintainer, and maintain it however you like.
...or if you have no need for the package yourself either, then consider
dropping it: I suspect ot is obsolete
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1008992 important
Bug #1008992 [xwayland] xwayland: all X clients hang indefinitely waiting for
/tmp/.X11-unix/X0
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tags 1008992 + moreinfo
Bug #1008992 [xwayland] xwayland: all X clients hang
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2022 12:04:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1006343: fixed in erlang-p1-tls 1.1.15-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006343,
regarding erlang-p1-tls: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Followup-For: Bug #1012014
Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream
A new upstream release is available since yesterday which is supposed to
fix this.
Andreas
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 fixed-upstream
Bug #1012014 [src:r8125] r8125: fails to build module for Linux 5.17
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
--
1012014: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012014
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2022 10:50:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011849: fixed in node-change-case
0.0~git20210510.c24a0e1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011849,
regarding node-change-case: FTBFS: error TS2307: Cannot find module
'jest-matcher-utils' or its
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2022 10:50:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011796: fixed in node-node-rsa 1.1.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011796,
regarding node-node-rsa: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:19:
override_dh_auto_test] Error 10
to be marked as done.
This
Hi @jonas,
can I switch this package from cdbs to debhelper+dh-sequence-nodejs ?
Cheers,
Yadd
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2022 10:34:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011809: fixed in node-entities 4.3.0+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011809,
regarding node-entities: FTBFS: node_modules/@types/jest/index.d.ts(503,30):
error TS2307: Cannot find module
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2022 10:34:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011830: fixed in node-get-caller-file 2.0.5+~cs1.1.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011830,
regarding node-get-caller-file: FTBFS:
../node_modules/@types/jest/index.d.ts(503,30): error TS2307: Cannot
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1011849 [src:node-change-case] node-change-case: FTBFS: error TS2307:
Cannot find module 'jest-matcher-utils' or its corresponding type declarations.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1011849: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011849
Hi
On 02-06-2022 10:53, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 2022-06-01 21:14, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi, upstream Xwayland developer here.
Great. I always love it when upstream watches Debian bugs.
AFAICT this is about https://bugs.debian.org/1008992 . It's very unlikely that
this bug affects all users of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 995659 patch
Bug #995659 [src:coturn] coturn: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0
Added tag(s) patch.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
995659:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1011849 in node-change-case reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 785897
Bug #785897 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:exaile] exaile: Please update to GStreamer 1.x
Unarchived Bug 785897
> reopen 785897
Bug #785897 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:exaile] exaile: Please update to GStreamer 1.x
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1012024 0.9.27
Bug #1012024 {Done: Guido Günther } [git-buildpackage] Please
declare Breaks: dgit (<< 9.16~)
Marked as fixed in versions git-buildpackage/0.9.27.
Bug #1012024 {Done: Guido Günther } [git-buildpackage] Please
declare
Package: hatari
Version: 2.3.1+dfsg
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch upstream
Justification: fails to build from source
X-Debbugs-Cc: tienhock@starfivetech.com
Dear Maintainer,
hatari is FTBFS due to a header conflict with REG_A0 that is already
defined in RISC-V's header.
Patch to fix
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1011809 [src:node-entities] node-entities: FTBFS:
node_modules/@types/jest/index.d.ts(503,30): error TS2307: Cannot find module
'jest-matcher-utils' or its corresponding type declarations.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1011809:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1011809 in node-entities reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Package: libtesseract5
Version: 5.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
The build fail for armel :
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tesseract=armel=5.1.0-1=1654113171=0
The main reason is that armel do not have neon FPu and the build should
disbale neon.
BTW the debian/rules
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1011830 in node-get-caller-file reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hello!
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:12:20 +0200 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> src/client/ns_turn_msg.c: In function stun_produce_integrity_key_str:
> src/client/ns_turn_msg.c:260:7: warning: implicit declaration of function
> FIPS_mode [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 260 | if (FIPS_mode()) {
> |
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # to avoid people getting mad at me for not fixing the autoremovals
> # script
> merge 1012245 1012246
Bug #1012245 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470] fails on ppc64el due to
transitive GPL symbol usage
Bug #1012245
Package: debhelper
Version: 13.7.1
Severity: Serious
Justification: FTBFS
Control: block 1012022 by -1
fenics-basix 0.4.2-1exp1 is currently failing to build in a
binary-indep build, see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=fenics-basix=all
The problem occurs when building docs in an
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1011830 [src:node-get-caller-file] node-get-caller-file: FTBFS:
../node_modules/@types/jest/index.d.ts(503,30): error TS2307: Cannot find
module 'jest-matcher-utils' or its corresponding type declarations.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1011830:
Dear s390x porters,
As a Release Manager, I'm asking your help with the FTBFS of vkd3d on
s390x. The failure is blocking migration of the key package vkd3d.
Paul
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:54:51 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Processing control commands:
> block 1012022 by -1
Bug #1012022 [src:fenics-basix] fenics-basix: FTBFS during separate
binary-indep build
1012022 was not blocked by any bugs.
1012022 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1012022: 1012252
--
1012022:
Source: gscan2pdf
Version: 2.12.6-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on s390x
because it was showing up on our alert page [1]. I noticed that there
were several runs that took 27h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1012246
Bug #1012246 {Done: Andreas Beckmann }
[src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470] fails on ppc64el due to transitive GPL
symbol usage
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1012246 to the same values
reopen 1012246
found 1012246 470.129.06-3
forwarded 1012244
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/lime-forensics/-/merge_requests/2
reassign 1012244 src:lime-forensics
tag 1012244 patch
thanks
grr, I mixed up submit commands and in-line commands unintentionally and
got the source package
Source: limewire
Severity: serious
Version: 1.9.1-3
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470
Control: version -2 470.129.06-3
Control: tag -1 patch
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/lime-forensics/-/merge_requests/2
Control:
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1010883 {Done: Andreas Beckmann } [dkms] dkms:
autopkgtest mixes headers from sid and testing
Bug 1010883 cloned as bug 1012246
> reassign -2 src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470
Bug #1012246 {Done: Andreas Beckmann } [dkms] dkms:
autopkgtest
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1012244 [src:limewire] autopkgtest fails
Warning: Unknown package 'src:limewire'
Bug 1012244 cloned as bug 1012245
Warning: Unknown package 'src:limewire'
> reassign -2 src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470
Bug #1012245 [src:limewire] autopkgtest
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1011312 [src:llvm-toolchain-14] llvm-toolchain-14 autopkgtest segfaults on
armhf
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
1011312: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011312
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: severity -1 normal
On Thu, 19 May 2022 23:48:52 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
This issue is also present in llvm-toolchain-14, and currently blocking
testing migration there:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/l/llvm-toolchain-14/unstable/armhf/
The issue is now worked around by not running
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2022 06:19:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1012231: fixed in tinyows 1.2.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012231,
regarding tinyows: FTBFS: problems with boolean types and constants
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
69 matches
Mail list logo
