Bug#1020073: [Debian-pan-maintainers] Bug#1020073: pyfai: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsError: Command '['/usr/bin/python3.10', '-m', 'pip', '--disable-pip-version-check', 'wheel', '--no-deps', '-w

2022-10-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Jerome Kieffer wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > All my packages (and probably many more) are marked for removal because of > this bug. > > I believe this bugs comes from a specificity of Debian which does not > install python3-pip together with python3. If

Processed: severity of 1019974 is important

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1019974 important Bug #1019974 [src:uim] uim: FTBFS on armel/armhf: [Makefile:871: installed-modules.scm] Segmentation fault Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: Merge duplicates

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1020001 src:gdb Bug #1020001 [src:gdb-bpf] gdb-bpf: FTBFS: completer.c:2014:10: error: invalid conversion from ‘const char*’ to ‘char*’ [-fpermissive] Bug reassigned from package 'src:gdb-bpf' to 'src:gdb'. No longer marked as found in

Bug#1019610: ruby-ahoy-email: FTBFS with ruby3.1: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: cannot load such file -- net/smtp (LoadError)

2022-10-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 08:24:43PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Source: ruby-ahoy-email > Version: 1.1.1-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ruby3.1 > > Hi, > > We are about to start the ruby3.1 transition

Bug#1019609: ruby-activerecord-import: diff for NMU version 1.4.0-0.1

2022-10-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: tags 1019609 + patch Control: tags 1019609 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ruby-activerecord-import (versioned as 1.4.0-0.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian diff -Nru

Processed: ruby-activerecord-import: diff for NMU version 1.4.0-0.1

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1019609 + patch Bug #1019609 [src:ruby-activerecord-import] ruby-activerecord-import: FTBFS with ruby3.1: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed. Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1019609 + pending Bug #1019609 [src:ruby-activerecord-import] ruby-activerecord-import: FTBFS

Bug#1019340: Segfaults on startup

2022-10-06 Thread Daniele Forsi
Christoph Berg wrote: > Is it just broken for me and Bernhard, or for most people? the version from package 4.36-2 works for me, with "LC_ALL=C tucnak" and without LC_ALL set -- 73 de IU5HKX Daniele

Bug#1016939: marked as done (: flaky autopkgtest: padthv1_jack: no process found)

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2022 21:50:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1016939: fixed in padthv1 0.9.27-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1016939, regarding : flaky autopkgtest: padthv1_jack: no process found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1002264: marked as done (hcloud-cli: FTBFS: src/github.com/hetznercloud/hcloud-go/hcloud/internal/instrumentation/metrics.go:10:2: cannot find package "github.com/prometheus/client_golang/promethe

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2022 21:50:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1002264: fixed in hcloud-cli 1.30.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1002264, regarding hcloud-cli: FTBFS: src/github.com/hetznercloud/hcloud-go/hcloud/internal/instrumentation/metrics.go:10:2: cannot

Bug#1002264: marked as pending in hcloud-cli

2022-10-06 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1002264 in hcloud-cli reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1002264 marked as pending in hcloud-cli

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1002264 [src:hcloud-cli] hcloud-cli: FTBFS: src/github.com/hetznercloud/hcloud-go/hcloud/internal/instrumentation/metrics.go:10:2: cannot find package "github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus" in any of: Added tag(s) pending. --

Bug#1021320: isc-dhcp: diff for NMU version 4.4.3-2.1

2022-10-06 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tags 1021320 + patch Control: tags 1021320 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for isc-dhcp (versioned as 4.4.3-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. This follows for updates already done in bullseye, so we have not a

Processed: isc-dhcp: diff for NMU version 4.4.3-2.1

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1021320 + patch Bug #1021320 [src:isc-dhcp] isc-dhcp: CVE-2022-2928 CVE-2022-2929 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1021320 + pending Bug #1021320 [src:isc-dhcp] isc-dhcp: CVE-2022-2928 CVE-2022-2929 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1021320:

Processed: libzypp: diff for NMU version 17.25.7-2.2

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1016279 + patch Bug #1016279 [src:libzypp] libzypp: FTBFS: Random.cc:21:27: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1016279 + pending Bug #1016279 [src:libzypp] libzypp: FTBFS: Random.cc:21:27: error: ‘time’ was not declared in

Bug#1016279: libzypp: diff for NMU version 17.25.7-2.2

2022-10-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: tags 1016279 + patch Control: tags 1016279 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libzypp (versioned as 17.25.7-2.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian diff -Nru libzypp-17.25.7/debian/changelog

Bug#1008263: plans to upload memtest86+ 6 to unstable?

2022-10-06 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 06/10/2022 17:44, Antoine Beaupré ha scritto: Hello Fabio! Below is an excerpt of a discussion that happened in bug #1008263 about removing pcmemtest from Debian, to remove the duplication of work with memtest86+: On 2022-09-09 17:08:34, Felix Zielcke wrote: I wasn't sure if I should wait

Processed: block 1018225 with 1019206

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1018225 with 1019206 Bug #1018225 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:rust-rustls] src:rust-rustls: fails to migrate to testing for too long: blocked by build dependency 1018225 was not blocked by any bugs. 1018225 was not blocking any bugs. Added

Bug#1020120: taking ownership of BTS 1020120

2022-10-06 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Even better, I think that the upstream .flake8 file isn't copied by pybuild when running tests? A d/pybuild.testfiles file should do the trick and I'll try that when that pam build fix has propagated. The same should be done for the autopkgtests. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe

Bug#1020120: taking ownership of BTS 1020120

2022-10-06 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
I started looking at this bug, but bug #1021336 currently breaks my sbuild, so I might as well take ownership of it. flake8 tests clearly aren't important to us, so the "easy" way out is disabling those. I'll try upgrading the package to the latest upstream version before doing this though,

Bug#1016939: Adrian Bunk

2022-10-06 Thread Dennis Braun
Hi Adrian, sorry for the late reply. You can cancel it, because i prepared a new version with that fix already. Will upload it asap. Best regards, Dennis

Processed: taking ownership of BTS 1020120

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 1020120 po...@debian.org Bug #1020120 [src:jsonpickle] jsonpickle: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.10 returned exit code 13 Owner recorded as po...@debian.org. > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#1021367: pgcli: needs psycopg>=3.0.14

2022-10-06 Thread Yannick Roehlly
Package: pgcli Version: 3.5.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, Starting pgcli fails with pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'psycopg>=3.0.14' distribution was not found and is required by pgcli The current package depends on python3-psycopg2. The

Processed: block 1019509 with 1016452

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1019509 with 1016452 Bug #1019509 {Done: Jelmer Vernooij } [src:loggerhead] src:loggerhead: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression 1019509 was not blocked by any bugs. 1019509 was not blocking any bugs. Added

Processed: tagging 1019508

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1019508 + fixed Bug #1019508 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:uftrace] src:uftrace: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS Added tag(s) fixed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1019508:

Bug#1021336: marked as done (libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz')

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2022 19:19:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1021336: fixed in pam 1.5.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1021336, regarding libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1021358: marked as done (libpam-modules-bin: fails when upgrading from 1.5.2-2 revision)

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2022 19:19:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1021336: fixed in pam 1.5.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1021336, regarding libpam-modules-bin: fails when upgrading from 1.5.2-2 revision to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: severity of 1019477 is important

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1019477 important Bug #1019477 [src:diet-ng] diet-ng: FTBFS on riscv64 and s390x (unrecognized command line option ‘-main’) Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: bug 1019455 is forwarded to https://github.com/ohwgiles/laminar/issues/175

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1019455 https://github.com/ohwgiles/laminar/issues/175 Bug #1019455 [laminard] laminard: WebUI of laminar fails because newer incompatible version of Chart.js is included Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#1015103: marked as done (lomiri-ui-extras: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j8 test ARGS\+=--verbose ARGS\+=-j8 returned exit code 2)

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2022 19:09:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1015103: fixed in lomiri-ui-extras 0.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1015103, regarding lomiri-ui-extras: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j8 test ARGS\+=--verbose ARGS\+=-j8

Processed: padthv1: diff for NMU version 0.9.26-1.1

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1016939 + patch Bug #1016939 [src:padthv1] : flaky autopkgtest: padthv1_jack: no process found Added tag(s) patch. -- 1016939: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016939 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1016939: padthv1: diff for NMU version 0.9.26-1.1

2022-10-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: tags 1016939 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for padthv1 (versioned as 0.9.26-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian diff -Nru padthv1-0.9.26/debian/changelog padthv1-0.9.26/debian/changelog ---

Processed: tagging 1021336

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # um? > tags 1021336 - ftbfs Bug #1021336 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' Bug #1021358 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: fails when upgrading from 1.5.2-2 revision

Bug#1020840: arcanist fails with 'Toolset "arcanist" is unknown'

2022-10-06 Thread Christoph Biedl
Control: severity 1020840 important Control: tags 1020840 pending Taavi Väänänen wrote... > Hello. A recent update to the Arcanist packaging moved the binary from > /usr/bin/arc to /usr/bin/arcanist. The binary name change makes the CLI > fail to function properly: #919697 has the full story:

Processed: Re: Bug#1020840: arcanist fails with 'Toolset "arcanist" is unknown'

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity 1020840 important Bug #1020840 [arcanist] arcanist fails with 'Toolset "arcanist" is unknown' Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tags 1020840 pending Bug #1020840 [arcanist] arcanist fails with 'Toolset "arcanist" is unknown' Added tag(s) pending.

Bug#1021336: Acknowledgement (libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz')

2022-10-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Control: reopen 1021336 On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 07:49:24AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > On 06 oct. 2022 05:42, "Debian Bug Tracking System" > wrote: > I see more errors : > trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man8/pam_namespace_helper.8.gz', which > is also in package

Processed: Re: Bug#1021336: Acknowledgement (libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz')

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen 1021336 Bug #1021336 {Done: Steve Langasek } [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' Bug #1021358 {Done: Steve Langasek } [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: fails when upgrading from

Processed: Re: leave: please make the build reproducible

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 777403 + pending patch Bug #777403 [src:leave] leave: please make the build reproducible Added tag(s) pending. > tags 967002 + pending patch Bug #967002 [src:leave] leave successfully cross builds a package for the build architecture Added

Bug#999259: leave: please make the build reproducible

2022-10-06 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 777403 + pending patch tags 967002 + pending patch tags 999259 + pending patch thanks I've just uploaded leave 1.12-2.2 to DELAYED/10: leave (1.12-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Pass -n to gzip(1) to make the manual page and changelog reproducible,

Bug#1021358: marked as done (libpam-modules-bin: fails when upgrading from 1.5.2-2 revision)

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2022 17:55:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1021336: fixed in pam 1.5.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1021336, regarding libpam-modules-bin: fails when upgrading from 1.5.2-2 revision to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1021336: marked as done (libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz')

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2022 17:55:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1021336: fixed in pam 1.5.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1021336, regarding libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:golang-golang-x-net

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:golang-golang-x-net > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:geany-plugins

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:geany-plugins > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user

Processed: forcibly merging 1021336 1021358

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1021336 1021358 Bug #1021336 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' Bug #1021358 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: fails when upgrading from 1.5.2-2 revision

Bug#1021358: libpam-modules-bin: fails when upgrading from 1.5.2-2 revision

2022-10-06 Thread Eriberto Mota
To avoid a new breaking when upgrading my jail, I made a "local" NMU to remove the duplicate manpage from a package. I am not familiar with pam packaging, so I choosen libpam-modules-bin.manpages. When installing my "local NMU", I got: dpkg: error processing archive

Processed: Re: xcolmix: reproducible-builds: Embedded build path in /usr/bin/xcolmix

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1020748 + pending patch Bug #1020748 [src:xcolmix] xcolmix: reproducible-builds: Embedded build path in /usr/bin/xcolmix Added tag(s) pending. > tags 999219 + pending patch Bug #999219 [src:xcolmix] xcolmix: missing required debian/rules

Bug#999219: xcolmix: reproducible-builds: Embedded build path in /usr/bin/xcolmix

2022-10-06 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 1020748 + pending patch tags 999219 + pending patch tags 988018 + pending patch thanks I've just uploaded xcolmix 1.07-10.1 to DELAYED/10: xcolmix (1.07-10.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Add missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or

Processed: Re: mailto: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 998978 + pending Bug #998978 [src:mailto] mailto: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 998978:

Bug#1021235: python-pymeasure: please switch to QtWidgets.QTreeWidgetItem

2022-10-06 Thread Michael R. Crusoe
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:52:21 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Source: python-pymeasure > Version: 0.9.0-1 > Severity: serious > > Hello, I noticed there is also a 0.10.0 version, but probably in order to fix autopkgtests/build against new python-pyqtgraph > some additional patches are

Bug#1021359: qtmir FTBFS on 32bit and riscv64: symbols differences

2022-10-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: qtmir Version: 0.7.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=qtmir

Bug#998978: mailto: please make the build reproducible

2022-10-06 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 777413 + pending patch thanks I've just uploaded mailto 1.3.2-3.1 to DELAYED/10: mailto (1.3.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Implement the required build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules. (Closes: #998978) * Make the build

Bug#1021358: libpam-modules-bin: fails when upgrading from 1.5.2-2 revision

2022-10-06 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: libpam-modules-bin Version: 1.5.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear maintainer, When upgrading my jail Sid, I got: Preparing to unpack .../libpam-modules-bin_1.5.2-3_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libpam-modules-bin (1.5.2-3) over (1.5.2-2) ... dpkg: error

Bug#1008263: plans to upload memtest86+ 6 to unstable?

2022-10-06 Thread Antoine Beaupré
Hello Fabio! Below is an excerpt of a discussion that happened in bug #1008263 about removing pcmemtest from Debian, to remove the duplication of work with memtest86+: On 2022-09-09 17:08:34, Felix Zielcke wrote: > I wasn't sure if I should wait until the new memtest86+ gets out of > beta and

Bug#1019988: marked as done (cadabra2: FTBFS: Storage.cc:28:10: fatal error: pcrecpp.h: No such file or directory)

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2022 14:34:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1019988: fixed in cadabra2 2.4.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1019988, regarding cadabra2: FTBFS: Storage.cc:28:10: fatal error: pcrecpp.h: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means

Processed: tagging 1021336

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1021336 + ftbfs Bug #1021336 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: affects 1021336

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1021336 src:postgresql-15 Bug #1021336 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' Added indication that 1021336 affects src:postgresql-15 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: Re: libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz'

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > notfound -1 1.5.2-2 Bug #1021336 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1021336 to the same values previously set > found -1 1.5.2-3 Bug #1021336

Processed: Re: libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz'

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > notfound -1 1.5.2-2 Bug #1021336 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' No longer marked as found in versions pam/1.5.2-2. > found -1 1.5.2-3 Bug #1021336 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin:

Bug#1021336: libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz'

2022-10-06 Thread Diederik de Haas
Control: notfound -1 1.5.2-2 Control: found -1 1.5.2-3 On 06 Oct 2022 07:39:06 +0200 Christian Marillat wrote: > Package: libpam-modules-bin > Version: 1.5.2-2 > > After an apt-get dist-upgrade > > > Unpacking libpam-modules-bin (1.5.2-3) over (1.5.2-2) ... > dpkg: error processing archive

Bug#1021336: libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz'

2022-10-06 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Thu, 06 Oct 2022 12:45:08 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Followup-For: Bug #1021336 > Control: severity -1 grave > > It happens on all architectures, and does not seem limited upgrades: > both libpam-modules and libpam-modules-bin in sid ship > usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz >

Bug#1021234: closing 1021234

2022-10-06 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
close 1021234 0.3.1-2 thanks

Bug#1021232: closing 1021232

2022-10-06 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
close 1021232 0.3.1-2 thanks

Bug#1021233: closing 1021233

2022-10-06 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
close 1021233 0.3.1-2 thanks

Processed: closing 1021234

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1021234 0.3.1-2 Bug #1021234 [librust-gtk4-sys-dev] librust-gtk4-sys-dev: uninstallable Marked as fixed in versions rust-gtk4-sys/0.3.1-2. Bug #1021234 [librust-gtk4-sys-dev] librust-gtk4-sys-dev: uninstallable Marked Bug as done > thanks

Processed: closing 1021233

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1021233 0.3.1-2 Bug #1021233 [librust-gsk4-sys-dev] librust-gsk4-sys-dev: uninstallable Marked as fixed in versions rust-gsk4-sys/0.3.1-2. Bug #1021233 [librust-gsk4-sys-dev] librust-gsk4-sys-dev: uninstallable Marked Bug as done > thanks

Processed: closing 1021232

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1021232 0.3.1-2 Bug #1021232 [librust-gdk4-sys-dev] librust-gdk4-sys-dev: uninstallable Marked as fixed in versions rust-gdk4-sys/0.3.1-2. Bug #1021232 [librust-gdk4-sys-dev] librust-gdk4-sys-dev: uninstallable Marked Bug as done > thanks

Bug#1020702: prusa-slicer: SEGV on start

2022-10-06 Thread Matthias Cramer
Package: prusa-slicer Version: 2.5.0+dfsg-1 Followup-For: Bug #1020702 Dear Maintainer, I have the same issue with prusa-slicer although the backtrace looks a bot different is seams to be a similar problem: ╰─ gdb prusa-slicer ─╯ GNU gdb (Debian 12.1-3) 12.1 Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software

Processed: Re: libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz'

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #1021336 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' Added tag(s) patch. -- 1021336: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021336 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1021336: libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz'

2022-10-06 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1021336 Control: tag -1 patch Please revert f46cdd601d0270d8a3d7450a307aea30d7fc0e8d, it does not install "missing" manpages, but duplicates exiisting ones into another package. Andreas

Bug#1021336: libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz'

2022-10-06 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1021336 Control: severity -1 grave It happens on all architectures, and does not seem limited upgrades: both libpam-modules and libpam-modules-bin in sid ship usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz usr/share/man/man8/pam_namespace_helper.8.gz grave since it breaks sid chroot

Processed: Re: libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz'

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #1021336 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' Severity set to 'grave' from 'serious' -- 1021336: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021336 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1021032: vlc black screen while streaming TV

2022-10-06 Thread mh
Package: vlc Version: 3.0.17.4-5 Followup-For: Bug #1021032 Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? The current version solves the problem only in part: No problems viewing videos from HD. But when I

Processed: severity of 993452 is normal

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 993452 normal Bug #993452 [osslsigncode] osslsigncode: MSI tests fail on big-endian architectures Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 993452:

Bug#981088: marked as done (pacemaker: crm shell can't be executed due to a library error)

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2022 11:43:18 +0200 with message-id <87r0zlwamh@lant.ki.iif.hu> and subject line This has been worked around in buster via #987941 has caused the Debian Bug report #981088, regarding pacemaker: crm shell can't be executed due to a library error to be marked as

Bug#1019340: Segfaults on startup

2022-10-06 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: tony mancill > > tucnak doesn't start here: > > > > $ LC_ALL=C tucnak > > Hi Christoph, > > Hmm... it starts and runs here, so I don't think it is broken for > everyone. Is it just broken for me and Bernhard, or for most people? Christoph

Bug#1021032: VLC Black screen

2022-10-06 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2022-10-05 21:18:13 +0200, Markus Huber wrote: > > By the way, once updated to the new VLC version (3.0.17.4-5) in a fully > > updated Sid I noticed after seeing a few videos the player goes black again > > and nothing until a reboot is issued. > > > > Anyone else noticed this? > > Yes (also

Bug#1020779: marked as done (slic3r-prusa: FTBFS on 32-bit arches)

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2022 08:34:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1020779: fixed in libcereal 1.3.2+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1020779, regarding slic3r-prusa: FTBFS on 32-bit arches to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: tagging 1021265

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1021265 + ftbfs Bug #1021265 [golang-github-libgit2-git2go] golang-github-libgit2-git2go ftbfs with libgit2 1.5 Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1021265:

Processed: severity of 1021336 is serious

2022-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1021336 serious Bug #1021336 [libpam-modules-bin] libpam-modules-bin: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz' Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you