Package: llvm-14-dev
Followup-For: Bug #1021857
Hi,
(sending properly again)
1:14.0.6-6 does some changes, however it does not fix all of it; this
is while trying to build qtcreator:
CMake Error at /usr/lib/llvm-14/lib/cmake/clang/ClangTargets.cmake:756
(message):
The imported target
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1022555 + upstream
Bug #1022555 [src:tiff] tiff: CVE-2022-3627 CVE-2022-3626 CVE-2022-3599
CVE-2022-3598 CVE-2022-3597 CVE-2022-3570
Added tag(s) upstream.
> tags 1022556 + upstream
Bug #1022556 [src:exim4] exim4: CVE-2022-3620
Added tag(s)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 22:31:13 -0700
with message-id <87sfjdg53y@keithp.com>
and subject line Re: libstdc++-arm-none-eabi-newlib: Fails to install because
of incorrect versioned depency on gcc-arm-none-eabi
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020619,
regarding
Message ---
Source: node-sinon
Version: 14.0.0+ds+~cs71.22.25-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
reopen 1021857
thanks
1:14.0.6-6 does some changes, however it does not fix all of it; this
is while trying to build qtcreator:
CMake Error at /usr/lib/llvm-14/lib/cmake/clang/ClangTargets.cmake:756
(message):
The imported target "diagtool" references the file
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1021857
Bug #1021857 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru } [llvm-14-dev]
llvm-14-dev: CMake Error in LLVMExports.cmake: The imported target "sancov"
references the file "/usr/lib/llvm-14/bin/sancov" but this file does not exist.
Bug #1022334 {Done:
: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh clean --with python3 --buildsystem=p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1022291 blueprint-compiler
Bug #1022291 [src:hydrapaper] hydrapaper: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module
named 'gi'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:hydrapaper' to 'blueprint-compiler'.
No longer marked as found in versions
a build-dependency for
hydrapaper.
I'm therefore reassigning to blueprint-compiler and tagging it as
'affects'-ing hydrapaper.
Cheers,
Francisco
On 10/23/22 09:38, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: hydrapaper
Version: 3.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1021735 3.4.3-4
Bug #1021735 [src:libffi] libffi breaks python3.10 autopkgtest on arm64 (and 5
other packages)
Marked as fixed in versions libffi/3.4.3-4.
Bug #1021735 [src:libffi] libffi breaks python3.10 autopkgtest on arm64 (and 5
Version: 2.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > >dh_usrlocal -O--buildsystem=pybuild -O--link-doc=qutebrowser
> > > dh_usrlocal: error: debian/qutebrowser/usr/local/bin/qutebrowser is not a
> > > directory
>
> This is clearly the one which makes the build stop at the end.
>
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + pending
Bug #1022364 [src:qutebrowser] qutebrowser: FTBFS: dh_usrlocal: error:
debian/qutebrowser/usr/local/bin/qutebrowser is not a directory
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022364: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022364
Debian Bug Tracking
System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sasview
Version: 5.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils-riscv64-unknown-elf
Version: 3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > make[3]: Entering directory '/<>
Processing control commands:
> tags 1021925 + patch
Bug #1021925 [src:prometheus-openstack-exporter] prometheus-openstack-exporter:
FTBFS dh_auto_clean: error: pybuild --clean -i python{version} -p 3.10 returned
exit code 13
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1021925 + pending
Bug #1021925
Control: tags 1021925 + patch
Control: tags 1021925 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for prometheus-openstack-exporter (versioned as
0.1.4-2.2). The diff
is attached to this message.
I require a sponsor to have it uploaded.
Best wishes,
--
Raúl Benencia
diff -Nru
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 991761 with 1022506 1022359 1022359 1022359 1022539 1022423 10225462
> 1022547 1022233 1013121
Bug #991761 [wnpp] ITP: swc -- A super-fast typescript / javascript compiler
written in rust
991761 was blocked by: 996644 996634
991761 was
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 22:34:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1018896: fixed in grcompiler 5.2.1-0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1018896,
regarding grcompiler: FTBFS on big endian
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
FTBFS confirmed with elpa-buttercup/1.26-{1,2,3}, tests work just fine
using elpa-buttercup/1.24-1.
Control: tags -1 confirmed pending
Hello,
I am preparing an upload with the newest upstream version, which
suppresses this bug.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed pending
Bug #1022360 [src:activemq] activemq: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary]
Error 25
Added tag(s) pending and confirmed.
--
1022360: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022360
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
: 21.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -Doclgrind_rt_EXPORTS -I/usr/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1022551 llvm-15-dev
Bug #1022551 [src:llvm-toolchain-15] llvm-15's cmake now requires
clang-tools-15, clang-tidy-15, clangd-15, even if unused
Bug reassigned from package 'src:llvm-toolchain-15' to 'llvm-15-dev'.
No longer marked as
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 20:49:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022004: fixed in pyasn1 0.4.8-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022004,
regarding pyasn1 please drop pypy-pyasn1 to support python2.7 removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build --with javahelper
>dh_update_autotoo
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for libgcrypt-config... /usr/bin/libgcrypt-config
> checking f
Le dim. 23 oct. 2022, 19:21, Lev Lamberov a écrit :
> Hi Paul,
>
> Вс 23 окт 2022 @ 10:10 Paul Gevers :
>
> > Hi Lev,
> >
> > On 23-10-2022 09:40, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> >> I'm not sure it is the solution, it needs testing. The change in
> >> swi-prolog concerns pre-compiled prolog source code,
Source: tiff
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for tiff.
CVE-2022-3627[0]:
| LibTIFF 4.4.0 has an out-of-bounds write in _TIFFmemcpy in
| libtiff/tif_unix.c:346 when called from extractImageSection,
|
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 21:43:46 +0200
with message-id <2132104.Icojqenx9y@treadstone-71>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022548,
regarding lokalize: text window does not repaint
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 22:24:39 +0300
with message-id
and subject line Fixed since 1:15.0.2-2~exp4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021117,
regarding llvm-15-dev: cmake fails on missing /usr/lib/llvm-15/bin/mlir-tblgen
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1022388 [src:jacoco] jacoco: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: build]
Error 25
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022388: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022388 in jacoco reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Version: 6.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> node bui
: node-global-modules
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 1022388 !
Bug #1022388 [src:jacoco] jacoco: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: build]
Error 25
Owner recorded as tony mancill .
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1022388:
gi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022422
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: spirv-llvm-translator-14
Version: 14.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookwo
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: intel-vc-intrinsics
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
gi?bug=1022380
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: opencl-clang-14
Version: 14.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 19:06:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1021817: fixed in firebird3.0 3.0.11.33637.ds4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021817,
regarding firebird3.0: undistributable source files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1022300 pending
Bug #1022300 [src:kleopatra] kleopatra: FTBFS:
refreshcertificatecommand.cpp:22:10: fatal error: QGpgME/RefreshOpenPGPKeysJob:
No such file or directory
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Hi Clément,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 06:27:08PM +0200, Clément Hermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 22/10/2022 à 15:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit :
>
> > Thanks for the quick reply! (much appreciated). I think it would be
> > good to get a confirmation from upstream and if possible to have
> > those
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_au
h problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: qt6-tools
Version: 6.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (
-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_au
-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_au
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 18:37:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022414: fixed in llvm-toolchain-14 1:14.0.6-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022414,
regarding llvm-14-dev: CMake Error in LLVMExports.cmake: The imported target
"sancov" references the file
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_au
h problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: qt6-tools
Version: 6.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 18:37:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1021857: fixed in llvm-toolchain-14 1:14.0.6-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021857,
regarding llvm-14-dev: CMake Error in LLVMExports.cmake: The imported target
"sancov" references the file
: 0.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> test -x debian/rules
&
Package: lokalize
Version: 4:22.08.2-1~np1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: l...@castermans.org
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
lokalize open correctly, the window with translation memory shows
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022417 in node-js-tokens reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1022417 [src:node-js-tokens] node-js-tokens: FTBFS: ln: failed to create
symbolic link 'build/.': File exists
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022417
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022401 in node-global-modules reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1022401 [src:node-global-modules] node-global-modules: FTBFS:
dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022401: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022401
Debian Bug
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 19:44:44 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: vim-ultisnips: autopkgtest failure on arm64, i386 and
ppc64el
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016744,
regarding vim-ultisnips: autopkgtest failure on arm64, i386 and ppc64el
to be marked as done.
This
-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/cc -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 17:33:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1020046: fixed in slimit 0.8.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020046,
regarding slimit: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'minifier'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
-plugin-html
Version: 6.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
-loader
Version: 4.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
: node-graphlibrary
Version: 2.2.0+really2.1.8+repack-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
: 4.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
---
Source: node-webpack-sources
Version: 3.2.3+~3.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
-deep-for-each
Version: 3.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh binary
>dh_update_autotoo
Weird, tests pass for me locally. Will look into it.
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Hi Lucas,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Thanks for the bug report. Can reproduce it here.
> Relevant part (hopefully):
[…]
> > I: dh_python3 pydist:302: Cannot find package that provides
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #1022364 [src:qutebrowser] qutebrowser: FTBFS: dh_usrlocal: error:
debian/qutebrowser/usr/local/bin/qutebrowser is not a directory
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1022364: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022364
Debian Bug
On zondag 23 oktober 2022 19:01:06 CEST Andreas Wirooks wrote:
> Am 23.10.22 um 14:27 schrieb Diederik de Haas:
> > On zondag 23 oktober 2022 14:10:11 CEST Andreas Wirooks wrote:
> >>> You both have kernel parameters like these. Can you explain why?
> >>> I have an AMD GPU on a machine and I have
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> *** You need libgpg-error to build this program.
> ** This library is for e
Hi Paul,
Вс 23 окт 2022 @ 10:10 Paul Gevers :
> Hi Lev,
>
> On 23-10-2022 09:40, Lev Lamberov wrote:
>> I'm not sure it is the solution, it needs testing. The change in
>> swi-prolog concerns pre-compiled prolog source code, when there is no
>> pre-complied prolog code rebuilt is not needed.
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 blueprint-compiler 0.4.0-3
Bug #1022286 [src:gnome-shell-extension-manager] gnome-shell-extension-manager:
FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'gi'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gnome-shell-extension-manager' to
'blueprint-compiler'.
No
Control: reassign -1 blueprint-compiler 0.4.0-3
Control: affects -1 + src:gnome-shell-extension-manager
On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 14:38:05 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Program blueprint-compiler found: YES (/usr/bin/blueprint-compiler)
...
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File
Am 23.10.22 um 14:27 schrieb Diederik de Haas:
On zondag 23 oktober 2022 14:10:11 CEST Andreas Wirooks wrote:
You both have kernel parameters like these. Can you explain why?
I have an AMD GPU on a machine and I have never set parameters like these.
These are parameters for Southern Islands
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022396 in node-webpack-sources reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1022396 [src:node-webpack-sources] node-webpack-sources: FTBFS:
dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022396: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022396
Debian
On 2022-10-23 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libassuan
> Version: 2.5.5-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
> Hi,
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, y
Control: tag -1 + fixed-upstream
On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 17:17:22 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 18:48:31 +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
>
> > Taking the approach of refreshing the test suite to match the
> > output produced by the new libgit2 seems to do the job to
> > address
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + fixed-upstream
Bug #1009031 [libgit-raw-perl] libgit-raw-perl: FTBFS with libgit2 1.3.0
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
--
1009031: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009031
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022410 in node-eslint-plugin-html reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1022410 [src:node-eslint-plugin-html] node-eslint-plugin-html: FTBFS:
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:26: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022410: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022410
Debian Bug Tracking
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1022367 [src:node-deep-for-each] node-deep-for-each: FTBFS: dh_auto_test:
error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022367: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022367
Debian Bug
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1020046 [src:slimit] slimit: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'minifier'
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1020046 to the same tags previously set
--
1020046: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020046
Debian Bug
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022367 in node-deep-for-each reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1020046 in slimit reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi,
Le 22/10/2022 à 15:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit :
Thanks for the quick reply! (much appreciated). I think it would be
good to get a confirmation from upstream and if possible to have
those advisories updates. E.g.
with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rr
Version: 5.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Diederik de Haas writes:
> Then I'm inclined to think this *is* a separate issue, which is
> due to the upgrade to -19, but that you happen to have an AMD
> GPU is 'not' relevant.
>
> I realize it's not what you want, but may result in an useful
> extra data point if you (for this test) switch
Diederik de Haas writes:
> Then I'm inclined to think this *is* a separate issue, which is
> due to the upgrade to -19, but that you happen to have an AMD
> GPU is 'not' relevant.
> I realize it's not what you want, but may result in an useful
> extra data point if you (for this test) switch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1022519 0.0.3-4
Bug #1022519 [src:readucks] readucks: FTBFS:
distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class
must subclass Command
The source 'readucks' and version '0.0.3-4' do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked as
On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 18:48:31 +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Taking the approach of refreshing the test suite to match the
> output produced by the new libgit2 seems to do the job to
> address the test suite failure. I also checked this has no
> adverse effects on reverse dependencies.
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
> dh clean --with p
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-pcl
Version: 0.3.0~rc1+dfsg-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 15:07:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013888: fixed in libvmod-re2 2.0.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013888,
regarding libvmod-re2: Fails to build in Ubuntu (incompatible with Varnish
7.x.y), unsatisfiable dependency
to be marked as
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022309 in spades reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1022309 [src:spades] spades: FTBFS: CheckIncludeFile.c:1:10: fatal error:
cxxabi.h: No such file or directory
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022309: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022309
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
---
Source: ruby-puppet-syntax
Version: 3.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
1 - 100 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
